DD-86-17, Responds to 10CFR2.206 Petition Seeking Issuance of Order to Show Cause Why OL Should Not Be Suspended or Terminated for Alleged Emergency Planning Deficiencies.Encl Director'S Decision DD-86-17 Indicates Why Petition Denied

Responds to 10CFR2.206 Petition Seeking Issuance of Order to Show Cause Why OL Should Not Be Suspended or Terminated for Alleged Emergency Planning Deficiencies.Encl Director'S Decision DD-86-17 Indicates Why Petition Denied

ML20214H532
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	11/19/1986
From:	Taylor J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To:	Northrop D, Sigler S AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
Shared Package
ML20214H517	List: ML20214H536
References
2.206, DD-86-17, NUDOCS 8611260444
Download: ML20214H532 (2)

Text

.-

t Novemb;r 19, ~ 1986 D:cket N2. 50-346 David E. Northrep, Esq. -

Sharon Sigler, Esq.

Assistant Attorney General 30 E. Broad St.

Columbus, OH 43266-0410

Dear Mr. .Northrop and Ms. Sigler:

This is in response to a Petition pursuant to 10 CFR 62.206 dated October 24, 1986 wherein the Attorney General on behalf of the State of Ohio sought that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission institute proceedings to suspend the oper-ating license of the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station of the Toledo Edison Company in light of alleged deficiencies in the area of offsite emergency planning. The Petition further sought that the Commission keep the Davis-Besse facility shut down pending resolution of the alleged deficiencies.

The Petition noted that the Governor of the State of Ohio had withdrawn his support for the evacuation plans for the Davis-Besse facility and had further created tbn Ohio Emergency Evacuation Review Team (EERT) to conduct an evalu-ation of the evacuation plans currently in place. The Petition alleges that the EERT has found serious deficiencies in the plan. The Petition further alleges that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has not issued any formal statement concerning the adequacy of eraergency planning for the Davis-Besse facility and that, consequently, the NRC has not and cannot make required findings as to adequacy of offsite emergency preparedness for that facility.

For the reasons set forth in the enclosed " Director's Decision Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.205,", DD-86-17, the Petition has been denied. A copy of the enclosed Director's Decision will be referred to the Secretary for the Commission's review in accordance with 10 CFR 2.206(c).

Sincerely, -

Original signed Bf5 James M.Ta#

James M. Taylor, Director Office of Inspection and Infercement

Enclosures:

1. Director's Decision

2. Federal Register Notice cc: w/enclos. Toledo Edison Company DISTRIBUTION: See next page ebe MMb 11//9/86 EPB/IE IE /IE EEd/IE(

7 d ER/IE DDVIE RAMeck:sc . R an Niel B atthews Schwartz LJordan RWStarosteck' a lor 11//9 /86 11/U1/86 11//g /86 11/f1/86 11/L /86 11/n/86 11/p/86

/

91 8611260444 DR 861119 ADOCK 05000346 PDR

DISTRIBUTION:

MMalsch, DGC CRVan Niel, IE CENorelius, RIII FKantor, IE HRDenton, NRR RAMeck, IE EChristenbury, OGC EDO - 2264 JKeppler, RIII CDeliso, IE 86-621 BBerson, RIII MLReardon, IE WShafer, RIII L OCS_.s - -

ADeAgazio, NRR DEPER R/F JMTaylor, IE EPB R/F RWStarostecki, IE JGDavis, NMSS JGPar,tiow, IE JResner, PPM 6 BKGrimes, IE PDR ELJordan, IE LPDR SASchwartz, IE DBMatthews, IE KEPerkins, IE -

JAAxelrad, IE RKHoefling, 0GC 4

I t

4

- - , , . , - - - - - - - - , - - - , -. - -- - ------.-- , m--.-----, - -. ----,..- - - - -