ML20135B416: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Adams | |||
| number = ML20135B416 | |||
| issue date = 08/30/1985 | |||
| title = Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-213/85-08.Method of Data Transmission Between Meteorological Tower & Control Room Will Be Reviewed During Subsequent Insp | |||
| author name = Martin T | |||
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) | |||
| addressee name = Opeka J | |||
| addressee affiliation = CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER CO. | |||
| docket = 05000213 | |||
| license number = | |||
| contact person = | |||
| document report number = NUDOCS 8509110048 | |||
| title reference date = 06-20-1985 | |||
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE | |||
| page count = 2 | |||
}} | |||
See also: [[see also::IR 05000213/1985008]] | |||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:, | |||
y 7 | |||
: ; ... ., | |||
' | |||
l | |||
AUG 3 01985 | |||
Docket No. 50-213 | |||
Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company | |||
ATTN: Mr. J. F. Opeka < | |||
Senior Vice President - Nuclear | |||
Engineering and Operations Group | |||
P. O. Box 270 | |||
Hartford, Connecticut 06101 | |||
Gentlemen: | |||
Subject:50-213/85-08 | |||
Your letter of June 20, 1985, in response to our letter dated May 20, 1985, | |||
informed us of your corrective and preventive actions regarding performance of | |||
Environmental audits. These actions will be examined during a future inspection | |||
of your licensed program. | |||
Additionally, we have received your letter dated August 14, 1985, detailing | |||
your commitments in developing a supplemental method of data transmission | |||
between the meteorological tower and the control room. This method will be | |||
reviewed during a subsequent inspection in this area. | |||
Your cooperation with us is appreciated. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
Ori6 1nal Signed BYI . | |||
() P | |||
Thomas T. Martin, Direcuor | |||
Division of Radiation Safety | |||
and Safeguards | |||
cc: | |||
R. Grayes, Plant Superintendent | |||
D. 0.' Nordquist, Manager of Quality Assurance | |||
'R. T. Laudenat, Manager, Generation Facilities Licensing | |||
E. J. Mroczka, Vice President, Nuclear Operations | |||
Gerald Garfield, Esquire | |||
Public Document Room (PDR) | |||
l | |||
' | |||
Local Public Document Room (LPDR) | |||
Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC) | |||
-NRC Re~sident Inspector | |||
i | |||
State of Connecticut | |||
! | |||
l | |||
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY RL HN 85-08 - 0001.0.0 | |||
08/22/85 g\ | |||
850911004e e50830 | |||
PDR ADOCK 05000213 | |||
G PM | |||
_ _ . . . _ . . . . . _ . --_ ,_ | |||
. . - _ .. - | |||
* | |||
4 | |||
Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company 2 | |||
; | |||
bcc: | |||
Region I Docket Room (with concurrences) | |||
Section Chief, DRP | |||
3 | |||
: | |||
; | |||
i | |||
: | |||
: | |||
! | |||
4 | |||
L | |||
: | |||
! | |||
! | |||
' | |||
II I l | |||
RI:DRSSM | |||
-Weadock/djh/mjd | |||
RI:DRSS//8 | |||
Struckmeyer- | |||
.RI:DRS | |||
Shanbaky | |||
h . SS | |||
BI'11amy | |||
' h0 R rt n - | |||
S | |||
8f)$ /85 8/38/85 8/f /85 8)]85 -8/ /85 | |||
0FFICIAL RECORD COPY RL HN 85-08 - 0001.1.0- | |||
08/22/85 | |||
. | |||
I | |||
f | |||
. . - , - - . - e _m.ryr -- - ,.~,., .- w .. | |||
. | |||
. | |||
- | |||
CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY | |||
BERLIN. CONNECTICUT | |||
P.o box 270 HARTFORD. CONNECTICUT 06141-0270 j | |||
l | |||
To e. cut | |||
2 ness-s000 ) | |||
June 20,1985 | |||
Docket No. 50-213 | |||
A04919 | |||
Mr. Thomas T. Martin, Director | |||
Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards | |||
Region I , | |||
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | |||
631 Park Avenue | |||
King of Prussia, PA 19406 | |||
References: (1) T. T. Martin letter to 3. F. Opeka, dated May 20,1985. | |||
Gentlemen: | |||
Haddam Neck Plant | |||
Response to I&E Inspection No. 50-213/85-08 | |||
In Reference (1), a violation was cited concerning required reviews and audits | |||
performed by the Environmental Review Board (ERB) in accordance with the | |||
Haddam Neck Plant Environmental Technical Specifications, Section 5.3. | |||
Accordingly, pursuant to 10CFR2.201, CYAPCO is providing its response to the | |||
subject Notice of Violation. A restatement of the violation followed by our | |||
response is provided as Attachment 1. | |||
Very truly yours, | |||
CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY | |||
% F OtA | |||
J. F. OpWa V | |||
Senior Vice President | |||
[(c5,'dffb EN | |||
n | |||
. - -. ... . .- - -.. - - -_ .- - . . . . . _ - - ~ - - .. ~ --_-- . | |||
-,, . . | |||
, | |||
'e-?.- | |||
Attachment 1 | |||
Notice of Violation ! | |||
As a result of the inspection conducted on March 25-29,1985, and in accordance | |||
with the NRC Enforcement Policy (10 CFR 2, Appendix C), the following | |||
violation was identified: | |||
Environmental Technical Specifications, Section 5.3, " Review and Audit," states, | |||
in part, that, "The Environmental Review Board shall make or cause to be made | |||
. at least semiannual reviews _or audits of the following... surveillance records, | |||
written procedures, and reports required for compliance with these | |||
Environmental Technical Specifications." | |||
Contrary to the above, the scope of the 1983 Semiannual Environ' mental Audit | |||
#A20021 failed to include a review of the Annual Environmental Operating | |||
Report, Part B or the Radioactive Effluents Release Report. Additionally, the | |||
scope of the 1983 Semiannual Environmental Audit #A20022 failed to include a | |||
review of ' the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program surveillance | |||
records or the Annual Environmental Operating Report and the Radioactive | |||
Effluents Release Report. | |||
This is a Severity Level V violation. (Supplement 1) | |||
Response ; | |||
As a result of the finding, a review was conducted to ensure ERB audits ~ ! | |||
subsequent to 1983 were complete. Results of our review indicate that all | |||
required audits were conducted. In order to correct the deficiencies cited and | |||
provide - measures to help prevent reoccurrence, the following measures and | |||
corresponding schedules are proposed: | |||
i | |||
o The ERB audit conducted during the summer of 1985 for the Haddam Neck l | |||
Plant will ensure that the 1983 Annual Environmental Operating Report, | |||
Part B and the two 1983 Radioactive Effluent Release Reports have been | |||
reviewed. This action will be completed by September 1,1985. | |||
o ERB audit procedure MPERB-1, " Environmental Review Board Procedure . | |||
Environmental Audits", will be revised to include a requirement that the | |||
ERB Chairman and Audit Chairman review the audit package to ensure | |||
that all required items have been audited. This action will completed by | |||
August 1,1985. | |||
: | |||
; | |||
. | |||
& | |||
---%A -- , . . -----+ - ++- , , , , - | |||
-4- m-, .,-,--,..,-o,= - -, ,--wo y,,,-,,v. - - ,-m vy w-+,y -,,,-cw-,vn y , .-w- | |||
r . | |||
1 | |||
o | |||
* | |||
Qv* . | |||
. | |||
j | |||
. | |||
. | |||
ATOMIC POWER COMPANY | |||
C CONNECTICUT YANKEE | |||
TELEPHONE | |||
po sox 270 | |||
B E R L I N, CONNECTICUT | |||
HARTFORD. CONNECTICUT 06141-0270 | |||
203-665-5000 | |||
August 14, 1985 | |||
Docket No. 50-213 | |||
Bil652 | |||
. Mr. Thomas T. Martin, Director | |||
Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards | |||
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | |||
631 Park Avenue | |||
King of Prussia, PA 19406 | |||
b | |||
Reference: (1) T. T. Martin letter to 3. F. Opeka, dated May 20,1935 | |||
Gentlemen: | |||
? | |||
Haddam Neck Plant | |||
inspection Report No. 50-213/85-03 | |||
Informational Letter in Regard to Unresolved item No. 213/85-08-04 | |||
During IE Inspection No. 50-213/85-08, your Mr. A. A. Weadock identified an | |||
unresolved item (No. 213/85-03-04) in regard to our inability to bring | |||
metteorological monitoring equipment within tolerance ranges specified in | |||
, | |||
calibration procedures. As pointed out in the inspection report, CYAPCO | |||
t attributes this problem to inadequacies in some meteorological signal cable | |||
! | |||
between the Meteorological Building and Control Room. Because of this | |||
problem, we committed to provide a short term solution and evaluate potential | |||
long term solutions considering the reoccurring nature associated with the | |||
underground meteorological signal cable. Again, as noted within your inspection | |||
report on March 31,1935, during a phone conversation we confirmed that a short | |||
term solution had been accomplished. This was done by utilizing spare cable | |||
within the cable run for meteorological signal transmission. Once this | |||
switchover was completed, successfulinstrument calibration was attained. | |||
- In response to your second request to evaluate a long term solution, we have | |||
done so and are enmmitted to the fo!!owing action plan: | |||
a | |||
O A supplemental means of data transmission will be available via use of | |||
y an on-demand, dial-up data terminal which will be installed in the | |||
control room to obtain meteorological data from the mini-computer at | |||
j the base of the tower, via a telephone line completely separate from | |||
j the signal cable. This terminal is scheduled to be operational by | |||
' | |||
October 1,1985. The strip chart recorders will remain operative, | |||
e , c ,/ c, e , $AD ' | |||
c vi */" P ' | |||
,. | |||
'4N- , | |||
. | |||
- | |||
. | |||
-2- , | |||
O | |||
The planned final solution to provide meteorological data access in the | |||
control room entails replacing the existing analog recorders with | |||
digital data displays and installing a dedicated, real time data | |||
terminal. This will continually display data from the mini-computer at | |||
the base of the tower which will be transmitted via a telephone line. | |||
Because of the time required to procure and install the new devices, | |||
and consider appropriate backup schemes, an in-service date of | |||
October 11,1986 is targeted. | |||
If you should have any additional concerns, feel free to contact us. | |||
Very truly yours, | |||
CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY | |||
S.%.D | |||
J. F. Opeka ' | |||
Senior Vice President | |||
i | |||
By: C. F. Sears | |||
Vice President | |||
cc: A. A. Weadock | |||
, | |||
e | |||
a | |||
! | |||
! | |||
._. . . .-. _ | |||
}} |
Latest revision as of 15:05, 9 August 2022
ML20135B416 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png |
Issue date: | 08/30/1985 |
From: | Martin T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
To: | Opeka J CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER CO. |
References | |
NUDOCS 8509110048 | |
Download: ML20135B416 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000213/1985008
Text
,
y 7
- ; ... .,
'
l
AUG 3 01985
Docket No. 50-213
Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company
ATTN: Mr. J. F. Opeka <
Senior Vice President - Nuclear
Engineering and Operations Group
P. O. Box 270
Hartford, Connecticut 06101
Gentlemen:
Subject:50-213/85-08
Your letter of June 20, 1985, in response to our letter dated May 20, 1985,
informed us of your corrective and preventive actions regarding performance of
Environmental audits. These actions will be examined during a future inspection
of your licensed program.
Additionally, we have received your letter dated August 14, 1985, detailing
your commitments in developing a supplemental method of data transmission
between the meteorological tower and the control room. This method will be
reviewed during a subsequent inspection in this area.
Your cooperation with us is appreciated.
Sincerely,
Ori6 1nal Signed BYI .
() P
Thomas T. Martin, Direcuor
Division of Radiation Safety
and Safeguards
cc:
R. Grayes, Plant Superintendent
D. 0.' Nordquist, Manager of Quality Assurance
'R. T. Laudenat, Manager, Generation Facilities Licensing
E. J. Mroczka, Vice President, Nuclear Operations
Gerald Garfield, Esquire
Public Document Room (PDR)
l
'
Local Public Document Room (LPDR)
Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
-NRC Re~sident Inspector
i
State of Connecticut
!
l
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY RL HN 85-08 - 0001.0.0
08/22/85 g\
850911004e e50830
PDR ADOCK 05000213
G PM
_ _ . . . _ . . . . . _ . --_ ,_
. . - _ .. -
4
Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company 2
bcc:
Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)
Section Chief, DRP
3
i
!
4
L
!
!
'
II I l
RI:DRSSM
-Weadock/djh/mjd
RI:DRSS//8
Struckmeyer-
.RI:DRS
Shanbaky
h . SS
BI'11amy
' h0 R rt n -
S
8f)$ /85 8/38/85 8/f /85 8)]85 -8/ /85
0FFICIAL RECORD COPY RL HN 85-08 - 0001.1.0-
08/22/85
.
I
f
. . - , - - . - e _m.ryr -- - ,.~,., .- w ..
.
.
-
CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY
BERLIN. CONNECTICUT
P.o box 270 HARTFORD. CONNECTICUT 06141-0270 j
l
To e. cut
2 ness-s000 )
June 20,1985
Docket No. 50-213
A04919
Mr. Thomas T. Martin, Director
Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards
Region I ,
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
631 Park Avenue
King of Prussia, PA 19406
References: (1) T. T. Martin letter to 3. F. Opeka, dated May 20,1985.
Gentlemen:
Haddam Neck Plant
Response to I&E Inspection No. 50-213/85-08
In Reference (1), a violation was cited concerning required reviews and audits
performed by the Environmental Review Board (ERB) in accordance with the
Haddam Neck Plant Environmental Technical Specifications, Section 5.3.
Accordingly, pursuant to 10CFR2.201, CYAPCO is providing its response to the
subject Notice of Violation. A restatement of the violation followed by our
response is provided as Attachment 1.
Very truly yours,
CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY
% F OtA
J. F. OpWa V
Senior Vice President
[(c5,'dffb EN
n
. - -. ... . .- - -.. - - -_ .- - . . . . . _ - - ~ - - .. ~ --_-- .
-,, . .
,
'e-?.-
Attachment 1
Notice of Violation !
As a result of the inspection conducted on March 25-29,1985, and in accordance
with the NRC Enforcement Policy (10 CFR 2, Appendix C), the following
violation was identified:
Environmental Technical Specifications, Section 5.3, " Review and Audit," states,
in part, that, "The Environmental Review Board shall make or cause to be made
. at least semiannual reviews _or audits of the following... surveillance records,
written procedures, and reports required for compliance with these
Environmental Technical Specifications."
Contrary to the above, the scope of the 1983 Semiannual Environ' mental Audit
- A20021 failed to include a review of the Annual Environmental Operating
Report, Part B or the Radioactive Effluents Release Report. Additionally, the
scope of the 1983 Semiannual Environmental Audit #A20022 failed to include a
review of ' the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program surveillance
records or the Annual Environmental Operating Report and the Radioactive
Effluents Release Report.
This is a Severity Level V violation. (Supplement 1)
Response ;
As a result of the finding, a review was conducted to ensure ERB audits ~ !
subsequent to 1983 were complete. Results of our review indicate that all
required audits were conducted. In order to correct the deficiencies cited and
provide - measures to help prevent reoccurrence, the following measures and
corresponding schedules are proposed:
i
o The ERB audit conducted during the summer of 1985 for the Haddam Neck l
Plant will ensure that the 1983 Annual Environmental Operating Report,
Part B and the two 1983 Radioactive Effluent Release Reports have been
reviewed. This action will be completed by September 1,1985.
o ERB audit procedure MPERB-1, " Environmental Review Board Procedure .
Environmental Audits", will be revised to include a requirement that the
ERB Chairman and Audit Chairman review the audit package to ensure
that all required items have been audited. This action will completed by
August 1,1985.
.
&
---%A -- , . . -----+ - ++- , , , , -
-4- m-, .,-,--,..,-o,= - -, ,--wo y,,,-,,v. - - ,-m vy w-+,y -,,,-cw-,vn y , .-w-
r .
1
o
Qv* .
.
j
.
.
ATOMIC POWER COMPANY
C CONNECTICUT YANKEE
TELEPHONE
po sox 270
B E R L I N, CONNECTICUT
HARTFORD. CONNECTICUT 06141-0270
203-665-5000
August 14, 1985
Docket No. 50-213
Bil652
. Mr. Thomas T. Martin, Director
Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
631 Park Avenue
King of Prussia, PA 19406
b
Reference: (1) T. T. Martin letter to 3. F. Opeka, dated May 20,1935
Gentlemen:
?
Haddam Neck Plant
inspection Report No. 50-213/85-03
Informational Letter in Regard to Unresolved item No. 213/85-08-04
During IE Inspection No. 50-213/85-08, your Mr. A. A. Weadock identified an
unresolved item (No. 213/85-03-04) in regard to our inability to bring
metteorological monitoring equipment within tolerance ranges specified in
,
calibration procedures. As pointed out in the inspection report, CYAPCO
t attributes this problem to inadequacies in some meteorological signal cable
!
between the Meteorological Building and Control Room. Because of this
problem, we committed to provide a short term solution and evaluate potential
long term solutions considering the reoccurring nature associated with the
underground meteorological signal cable. Again, as noted within your inspection
report on March 31,1935, during a phone conversation we confirmed that a short
term solution had been accomplished. This was done by utilizing spare cable
within the cable run for meteorological signal transmission. Once this
switchover was completed, successfulinstrument calibration was attained.
- In response to your second request to evaluate a long term solution, we have
done so and are enmmitted to the fo!!owing action plan:
a
O A supplemental means of data transmission will be available via use of
y an on-demand, dial-up data terminal which will be installed in the
control room to obtain meteorological data from the mini-computer at
j the base of the tower, via a telephone line completely separate from
j the signal cable. This terminal is scheduled to be operational by
'
October 1,1985. The strip chart recorders will remain operative,
e , c ,/ c, e , $AD '
c vi */" P '
,.
'4N- ,
.
-
.
-2- ,
O
The planned final solution to provide meteorological data access in the
control room entails replacing the existing analog recorders with
digital data displays and installing a dedicated, real time data
terminal. This will continually display data from the mini-computer at
the base of the tower which will be transmitted via a telephone line.
Because of the time required to procure and install the new devices,
and consider appropriate backup schemes, an in-service date of
October 11,1986 is targeted.
If you should have any additional concerns, feel free to contact us.
Very truly yours,
CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY
S.%.D
J. F. Opeka '
Senior Vice President
i
By: C. F. Sears
Vice President
cc: A. A. Weadock
,
e
a
!
!
._. . . .-. _