ML20138C212

Insp Repts 50-321/86-07 & 50-366/86-07 on 860225-28. Violation Noted:Failure to Implement Emergency Implementing Procedure 63-EP-EIP-078-OS, Maint of Emergency Organization

ML20138C212
Person / Time
Site:	Hatch
Issue date:	03/19/1986
From:	Decker T, Sartor W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20138C181	List: ML20138C176 ML20138C207 ML20138C212
References
50-321-86-07, 50-321-86-7, 50-366-86-07, 50-366-86-7, IEIN-85-080, IEIN-85-80, NUDOCS 8604020400
Download: ML20138C212 (4)

See also: IR 05000321/1986007

Text

-

4 , ..

..

e

A troo4D UNITED STATES

./ o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

y" ~

, REGION 11

3 j 101 MARIETTA STREET, N.W.,

• g ATLANTA. GEORGf A 30323

\,

/ MAR 2 51986-

Report Nos.: 50-321/86-07 and 50-366/86-07

Licensee: Georgia Power Company

P. O. Box 4545

Atlanta, GA 30302~

Docket Nos.: 50-321 and 50-366 License Nos.: DPR-57 and NPF-5

Facility Name: Hatch 1 and 2

Inspection Conducted: Eebruary 25-28, 1986

Inspector: A.

W. Sart r '- -

i f b I[/f

'Date' Signed

.;//

Approved by: Y #E" 3M 9/84

T. Decker, Section Chief Date Signed

-Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards

SUMMARY

l

Scope: This special, unannounced inspection entailed 29 inspector-hours onsite

in the' area of emergency preparedness traini.ng.-

Results: One violation was . identified for failure to implement an Emergency

Implementing Procedure.

.

er

G

-

e,

'~

-

,

2

REPORT DETAILS

1. Persons Contacted

Licensee Employees

• R. K. Moxley, Associate Quality Assurance Field Representative

' *J. E. Collins, Emergency Plan Coordinator

• H. C. Nix, General Manager, Plant Hatch

S. C. Ewald, Manager, Nuclear Chemistry and Health Physics

L. Summer, Deputy Plant Manager

• T. Beckham, Vice President and General Manager of Nuclear Operations

• P. E. Hayes, Senior Regulatory Specialist

R. W. Ott, Acting Supervisor HP/ Chemistry Training

P. E. Fornel, Quality Assurance Site Manager

Other licer.see employees. contacted included engineers, technicians,

operators, security force members, and office personnel.

NRC Resident Inspector

• P. Holmes-Ray

• Atterded onsite exit interview conducted February 28, 1986.

2. Exit Interview

The inspection scope and findings were summarized on' February 28, 1986, with

those persons indicated in Paragraph I above. The inspector described the

areas inspected and discussed the inspection findings. No dissenting

comments were received from the licensee.

The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided

to or reviewed b~y the inspector during this inspection.

3. Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters

(Closed) Violation 50-321, 366/85-23-03. Failure to maintain Emergency

Implementing Procedures as required by Technical Specifications.

Georgia Power's letter of response dated September 24, 1985, for this

violation had been reviewed and was determined to be acceptable by

Region II. The inspector verified the licensee's corrective action and

noted no discrepancies ~ .

.4. Knewledge and Performance of Duties (Training) 82206

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.47(b)(15) and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F,

this area was inspected to determine her emergency response personnel

~

.

3

understood their emergency response roles and could perform their assigned

functions.

The inspector reviewed the description of the training program (in the

Emergency Plan), training procedures, selected lesson plans and training

records, and interviewed members of the instructional staff. Based on these

reviews and interviews, the inspector determined that the licensee has

established an aggressive formal emergency training program. The review

and interviews disclosed that the impetus of this training program was the

highest category audit weakness that had been identified by the licensee's

quality assurance audit of emergency planning. A review of the November 14,

1985, audit records documented the finding that the licensee had failed to

maintain a qualified emergency response staff per the Emergency Plan. A

comparisem of the licensee's emergency position matrix against the emergency

response training status report indicated that some personnel listed on the

matrix had not received the necessary training for the functional position

-to which they were assigned. Annex-0, Radiological Emergency Response

Training, of the Plant Hatch Emergency Plan, describes the specialized

training that the various categories of emergency personnel are to receive.

This licensee identified failure to have trained the emergency response

staff in accordance with the Emergency Plan is identified as an inspector

follow-up item (321,366/86-07-01).

The inspector's review of the implementing procedures identified a violation

by the licensee for failure to fully implement Emergency Plan Implementing

Procedure 63-EP-EIP-078-05 dated August 7, 1985. Specifically, the licensee

had failed to: (1) provide management summary reports to plant management.as

described, and (2) publisn the initial and uodated reports listed in the

procedure in accordance with the schedule described. This is identified as

a violation in that the licensee failed to implement emergency implementing

procedures as required _by Technical Specification 6.8.1.e

(321,366/86-07-02).

During - the course of the inspection, the inspector observed a licensee

conducted emergency drill which tested the emergency staff's response and

included the establishment of communication links in the emergency response

facilities. The drill appeared to have been well pianned and accomplished

the desired objectives. The drill provided * the inspector with the

opportunity to evaluate how the notifications pursuant to 10 CFR 50.72 would

be simulated during this drill. The inspector was informed that the

on-shif t Operations Supervisor would be the communicator who would make the

notifications to the NRC Headquarters Operations Officer. This notification

-was in accordance with the Plant Hatch Emergency Procedures. The Shift

Clerk indicated that since he was not sufficiently knowledgeable of

operational events he would not make the notification to the NRC. The

inspector's discussions with the licensee did not identify any changes made

to the notification procedures in response to IE Information Notice

No. 85-80, Timely Declaration of an Emergency Class, Implementation of an

Emergency Plan, and Emergency Notifications.'

One violation was identified.

-

..

.

4

5. Inspection Followup (92701)~

(Closed) IFI 50-321,366/85-23-01. Verify trainirg of emergency response ~

personnel against new training roster. Correct--ve action taken by the

,

licensee to address this issue identified that some of the emergency

organization personnel had not received required training. This licensee

identified issue is being tracked as 50-321, 366/86-07-01.

-

,