IR 05000514/2007001: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[IR 05000344/1985016]]
{{Adams
| number = ML20133E932
| issue date = 07/19/1985
| title = Notice of Violation from Insp on 850514-0701
| author name = Dodds R
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation =
| docket = 05000344
| license number =
| contact person =
| document report number = 50-344-85-16, NUDOCS 8508080067
| package number = ML20133E920
| document type = NOTICE OF VIOLATION OF A REGULATION, TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS
| page count = 2
}}
 
{{IR-Nav| site = 05000514 | year = 2007 | report number = 001 }}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:p
.
.
S-APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Portland General Electric Company  Docket No. 50-344 121 S. W. Salmon Street  License No. NPF-1 Portland, OR 97204  ,
As a result of the inspection conducted during the period of May 14 - July 1, 1985, and in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the following violations were identifie CFR 50 Appendix B, criterion V and the Trojan Nuclear Plant Nuclear Quality Assurance Program, section 5.0, require in part that activities affecting quality be prescribed by and accomplished in accordance with documented procedure The work plan for the accomplishment of Request for Design Change (RDC)
83-030, Design Change Package (DCP) 3, " Spent Fuel Pool Rerack", required that the proper installation of the second set of rack feet of each rack be verified in the work plan by the signature of the diver who performed the wor Contrary to the above, on May 30, 1985, with the construction work for RDC 83-030, DCP 3, complete, four of twelve SFP racks were not verified by signature as having the second set of rack feet properly installe This is a Severity Level V violatio CFR 50 Appendix B, criterion V and the Trojan Nuclear Plant Nuclear Quality Assurance Program, section 5.0, require in part that a:tivities affecting quality be prescribed by and accomplished in accordance with documented procedure Plant safety procedure PS-3-30, " Trojan Holdout and Tagging Procedure",
section VIII requires that when a clearance is released, the person assigned to remove the danger tag shall ensure that the system is returned to service ar.d the tag removed and returned to the control operato . Contrary to the above, on June 28, 1985, danger tag number 4 of clearance 85-1066 was on a drain valve off the 'B' train containment spray header downstream of the containment penetration. The tag was shown as cleared on the clearance sheet that had been filed in the released clearance fil This is a Severity Level IV violatio PDR ADOCK 05000344 O  PDR
 
, _ _
      -
.
.
v'      '
    ~
    -2-
 
In that.our inspection indicates corrective action has been; adequately taken and completed for violation A, a written ~. response is not required with regard to violation With regard to violation B, pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Portland General Electric' Company is hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the~date of this notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including: (1) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (2)_ corrective steps which will be taken to
  : avoid further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be 'H achieved. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good
      '
cause show .
  'JUL 191985  jf/gW Date  R.~ T. Dbdds, Chief Reactor Projects Section 1
.
Y
}}

Latest revision as of 21:53, 25 September 2020

Notice of Violation from Insp on 850514-0701
ML20133E932
Person / Time
Site: 05000514, Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png
Issue date: 07/19/1985
From: Dodds R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML20133E920 List:
References
50-344-85-16, NUDOCS 8508080067
Download: ML20133E932 (2)


Text

p

.

.

S-APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Portland General Electric Company Docket No. 50-344 121 S. W. Salmon Street License No. NPF-1 Portland, OR 97204 ,

As a result of the inspection conducted during the period of May 14 - July 1, 1985, and in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the following violations were identifie CFR 50 Appendix B, criterion V and the Trojan Nuclear Plant Nuclear Quality Assurance Program, section 5.0, require in part that activities affecting quality be prescribed by and accomplished in accordance with documented procedure The work plan for the accomplishment of Request for Design Change (RDC)83-030, Design Change Package (DCP) 3, " Spent Fuel Pool Rerack", required that the proper installation of the second set of rack feet of each rack be verified in the work plan by the signature of the diver who performed the wor Contrary to the above, on May 30, 1985, with the construction work for RDC 83-030, DCP 3, complete, four of twelve SFP racks were not verified by signature as having the second set of rack feet properly installe This is a Severity Level V violatio CFR 50 Appendix B, criterion V and the Trojan Nuclear Plant Nuclear Quality Assurance Program, section 5.0, require in part that a:tivities affecting quality be prescribed by and accomplished in accordance with documented procedure Plant safety procedure PS-3-30, " Trojan Holdout and Tagging Procedure",

section VIII requires that when a clearance is released, the person assigned to remove the danger tag shall ensure that the system is returned to service ar.d the tag removed and returned to the control operato . Contrary to the above, on June 28, 1985, danger tag number 4 of clearance 85-1066 was on a drain valve off the 'B' train containment spray header downstream of the containment penetration. The tag was shown as cleared on the clearance sheet that had been filed in the released clearance fil This is a Severity Level IV violatio PDR ADOCK 05000344 O PDR

, _ _

-

.

.

v' '

~

-2-

In that.our inspection indicates corrective action has been; adequately taken and completed for violation A, a written ~. response is not required with regard to violation With regard to violation B, pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Portland General Electric' Company is hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the~date of this notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including: (1) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (2)_ corrective steps which will be taken to

avoid further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be 'H achieved. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good

'

cause show .

'JUL 191985 jf/gW Date R.~ T. Dbdds, Chief Reactor Projects Section 1

.

Y