ML20151S979

Notice of Violation from Insp on 880606-10 & 14-17.Violation Noted:Unapproved Guidelines Used During 880525-0604 Insps on ASME Section XI Pipe Supports & Written Instructions or Procedures Not Established

ML20151S979
Person / Time
Site:	Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png
Issue date:	07/29/1988
From:	Kirsch D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML20151S925	List: IR 05000344/1988026 ML20151S921 ML20151S979
References
50-344-88-26, NUDOCS 8808160202
Download: ML20151S979 (2)

Text

_ _ _ _ . _

+

i l

l APPENDIX A f l

) NOTICE OF VIOLATION

'u Portland General Electric Company Docket No. 50-344 i

, 121 S.W. Salmon Street License No. NPF-1 1 Portland, Oregon 97204 j During an NRC inspection conducted on June 6-10 and June 14-17, 1988, l 2

violations of NRC requirements were identified. In accordance with the  :

1 "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enfor ement Actions," r 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1987), the violations are listed below:

10 CFR 50 Appendix B, Criterion V, states in part, "Activities affecting  !

quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures; or i drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances."

l Nuclear Quality Assurance Program (PGE-8010), Section 5.2, states in part, i "Activities affecting quality shall be accomplished in accordance with '

approved, documented instructions, procedures, or drawings."  !

j Contrary to the above:  !

1. During May 25 through June 4,1988 visual (VT"3) inspections were l J

performed on ASME Section XI pipe supports utilizing the unapproved [

] guidelines in PGE memorandum JM-004-88M for acceptance criteria, j 1 I

2. As of June 10, 1988, written instructions or procedures were not l 1 established to prescribe the engineering evaluation process being t performed on QC identified discrepancies of ASME Section XI pipe  !

supports. l

] This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I).  !

I i

f a i

i 4

4 i

l J

$ 8808160202 000729 j PDR ADOCK OSO g 4 O

l

2-Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, the Portland General Elsctric Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region V, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice. This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should 'n-?ude for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation if admittet. 6; t.ha riorrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (T tr:5 wrec*ive steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and ("A -e e " when~ full complianet will be achieved. If an adequate reply ie t. ' ras .- thin the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issuec te C- cavyt why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked 7. , suci. ither action as may be proper should not be taken. Consideration may be j u n to 2xtending the response time for good cause shown.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMISSION TV

'Ifennis / Kirsch, Of rector Division of Reactor Safety and Projects Dated at Walnut Creek, California this y V )ay of g , 1988

,