ML20151S979
| ML20151S979 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png |
| Issue date: | 07/29/1988 |
| From: | Kirsch D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20151S925 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-344-88-26, NUDOCS 8808160202 | |
| Download: ML20151S979 (2) | |
Text
_ _ _ _.
i
+
l APPENDIX A f
l
)
'u Portland General Electric Company Docket No. 50-344 i
121 S.W. Salmon Street License No. NPF-1 1
Portland, Oregon 97204 j
During an NRC inspection conducted on June 6-10 and June 14-17, 1988, violations of NRC requirements were identified.
In accordance with the 2
1 "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enfor ement Actions,"
r 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1987), the violations are listed below:
10 CFR 50 Appendix B, Criterion V, states in part, "Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures; or i
drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances."
l Nuclear Quality Assurance Program (PGE-8010), Section 5.2, states in part, i
"Activities affecting quality shall be accomplished in accordance with approved, documented instructions, procedures, or drawings."
j Contrary to the above:
1.
During May 25 through June 4,1988 visual (VT"3) inspections were l
performed on ASME Section XI pipe supports utilizing the unapproved
[
J
]
guidelines in PGE memorandum JM-004-88M for acceptance criteria, j
1 I
2.
As of June 10, 1988, written instructions or procedures were not l
1 established to prescribe the engineering evaluation process being t
performed on QC identified discrepancies of ASME Section XI pipe supports.
l
]
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I).
I i
f a
i i
4 i
4 l
J 8808160202 000729 ADOCK OSO g 4 j
PDR O
l
2-Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, the Portland General Elsctric Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region V, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice.
This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should 'n-?ude for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation if admittet. 6; t.ha riorrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (T tr:5 wrec*ive steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and ("A
-e e " when~ full complianet will be achieved.
If an adequate reply ie
- t. ' ras thin the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issuec te C-cavyt why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked 7.
, suci. ither action as may be proper should not be taken.
Consideration may be j u n to 2xtending the response time for good cause shown.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMISSION TV
'Ifennis
/ Kirsch, Of rector Division of Reactor Safety and Projects Dated at Walnut Creek, California this y V )ay of g
, 1988
,