ML20245K262

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 890712-14.Violation Noted: as of 890421,corrective Actions Not Taken to Evaluate & Correct Design Deficiencies in Hydrogen Gas Supply Sys as Documented on Operational Review Form,
ML20245K262
Person / Time
Site: Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png
Issue date: 08/03/1989
From: Scarano R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML20245K259 List:
References
50-344-89-18, IEIN-87-020, IEIN-87-20, NUDOCS 8908180375
Download: ML20245K262 (1)


Text

r u

APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Portland General Electric Company Docket No. 50-344 121 S. W. Salmon Street License No. NPF-1 Portland, Oregon During an NRC inspection conducted on July 12-14, 1989, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.

In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1988), as modified by 5_3 Fed. Reg. 40019 (Oct. 13, 1988), the violation is listed below:

10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, " Corrective Action", provides'in part that:

" Measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective material, and equipment and nonconformances are promptly identified and corrected...."

Contrary to the above, as of. April 21, 1989, corrective' actions had not been taken to evaluate and correct design deficiencies in the hydrogen gas supply system which were identified and documented on an Operational Assessment Review Form (0AR-87-29) dated May 3, 1987, in response to NRC Information Notice No. 87-20 " Hydrogen Leak in Auxiliary Building."

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Portland General Electric Company is hereby required to submit a written statement of explanation to the U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region V, and a' copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting

'this Notice. This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:

(1) the reason for the violation if admitted, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the-results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be

+

,itaken. Consideration may be given to extending the response for good cause s

shown.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Dated a Walnut Creek, California h).

hor

  • c__

this?

day of August 1989 Scckano, Director RossA.(naf>RadiationSafetyand Divisio Safeguards 8908180375 890803 FDR ADOCK 05000344 O

FDC