ML20135B363

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 850612-15 & 17-21
ML20135B363
Person / Time
Site: Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png
Issue date: 08/27/1985
From: Thomas Young
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML20135B360 List:
References
50-344-85-20, NUDOCS 8509110008
Download: ML20135B363 (1)


Text

.

l APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Portland General Electric Company Docket No. 50-344 121 S. W. Salmon Street License No. NPF-1 Portland, Oregon 97204 As a result of the inspection conducted during the period of June 12-15 and 17-21, 1985, and in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy (10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C), the following violation was identified:

A. Paragraph 4.0.5 of Trojan Nuclear Plant Technical Specifications states, in part:

"... inservice inspection of ASME Code Class 1, 2 and 3 components and inservice testing of ASME Code Class 1, 2 and 3 pumps and valves will be performed in accordance with a periodically updated version of Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code and Addenda...."

ASME Section XI, subsection IWV-3513 Additional Tests states, in part:

"When any valve in a system fails to function properly during a regular test, additional valves in the system shall be tested...."

Contrary to the above requirement, (1) the Component Cooling Water (CCW) Safety Valve PSV-3323B failed a test in 1985, but the companien valve PSV-3323A was not tested.

(2) the Residual Heat Removal (RHR) system has four relief valves.

During 1982 two valves were tested and both failed to meet the acceptance criteria. In 1983 one valve was tested and it failed.

Also, during 1984 two valves were tested and both failed the test.

None of the remaining relief valves were tested during the regular tests.

This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Portland General Electric Company is hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including: (1) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be ta*aen to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause a own.

bbb5 Date WYoungJr.,Chpf Engineering Section 8509110000 850027 4 PDR ADOCK 05 0