ML20151C471

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 880208-12 & 0229-0304. Violation Noted:In Work Area,W/General Background Radiation Level of 15 Mrem/Hr,Four Hot Spots Exhibiting Contact Radiation Levels of 800 Mrem/Hr to 1,200 Mrem/Hr Not Posted
ML20151C471
Person / Time
Site: Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png
Issue date: 03/28/1988
From: Wenslawski F
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML20151C470 List:
References
50-344-88-04, 50-344-88-4, NUDOCS 8804130014
Download: ML20151C471 (1)


Text

~

9 APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Portland General Electric Company Docket No. 50-344 121 S. W. Salmon Street License No. NPF-1 Portland, Oregon 97204 During an NRC inspection conducted on February 8-12 and February 29-March 4, 1988, one violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement Actions,"

10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1987), the violation is listed below:

A. Technical Specification 6.11 requires that procedures for personnel radiation protection shall be prepared consistent with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 20 and shall be approved, maintained, and adhered to for all operations involving personnel radiation exposure.

The licensee's Radiation Protection Manual, established pursuant to the above Technical Specification,Section II.D.2.e states, in part, that hot spots will be posted when the contact radiation level is equal to or greater than five times the general area radiation level and the contact radiation level exceeds 100 mrem /hr.

Contrary to the above, on February 9,1988, in a work area, with a general background radiation level of 15 mrem /hr, four hot spots that exhibited contact radiation levels from 800 mrem /hr to 1200 mrem /hr were not posted.

This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement IV).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Portlared General Electric Company i is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control F ;k, Washington, DC l 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region V, and a copy to the

, NRC Resident Inspector, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice. This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation if admitted, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved; (3) the corrective steps that have been taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.

F0 THE NUC EAR REGULA ORY COMMISSION l

./ /i F. A. Wenslawski, Chief Emergency Preparedness and Radiological Protection Branch Dated at Walnut Creek, California this 28th day of tbrch 1988 i

i 8804130014 880329 PDR ADOCK 05000344 O DCD