ML20076L382

Interim Deficiency Rept Re Discrepancies in Wj Woolley Co QA Documentation.Initially Reported on 830504.Records Reviewed for Compliance W/Irwin Steel Co QA Manual.Final Rept Expected by 830915

ML20076L382
Person / Time
Site:	Nine Mile Point
Issue date:	06/03/1983
From:	Manno S NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP.
To:	Starostecki R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
10CFR-050.55E, 10CFR-50.55E, 6778, NUDOCS 8307190151
Download: ML20076L382 (2)

Text

s. 6d Y NIAGARA NUMOHAWK NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION /300 ERIE BOULEVARD WEST, SYRACUSE. N.Y.13202/ TELEPHONE (315) 474-1511 SAMUEL F. MANNO VICE PHESIDENT NUCLE AR CONSTRUCTION June 3, 1983 (6778)

Mr. R. W. Starostecki, Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I Division of Project and Resident Programs 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 Re: Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Docket No. 50-410

Dear Mr. Starostecki:

Enclosed is a 30-day interim report in accordance with 10CFR50.55(e) concerning W. J. Woolley Company's Quality Assurance documentation. This condition was reported via telecon to Mr. H. Kister of your staff on May 4, 1983, as a potentially reportable deficiency.

Very truly yours, S. F. Manno Vice President Nuclear Construction SFM/TL:Ja Enclosure xc: Director of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Mr. R. D. Schulz, Resident Inspector 0

8307190151PDRADOCK0000 S

pDR I

}lt &#

s. oo -

NIAGARA M0 HAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT - UNIT 2 DOCKET N0. 50-410 Interim Report Concerning W. J. Woolley Company's Quality Assurance Documentation Description of the Problem A review of the welding and in-process records, available at W. J. Woolley Company's Canton, Ohio, facility, was performed during the week of April 4, 1983. The review indicated discrepancies in the Quality Assurance documentation records for the fabrication of certain equipment manufactured by Irwin Steel Company. The Irwin Steel Company was subsequently acquired by W.

J. Woolley Company.

The available records were reviewed for compliance to Irwin Steel Company's Quality Assurance Manual, Revision 8, dated May 5, 1978, which was the manual in effect during fabrication. The following types of discrepancies were indicated:

1. Contrary to the requirement in Irwin Steel Company's quality assurance manual, weld cards were not available for certain components.

2. Welder qualification maintenance records were not available to show that the welders maintained their qualification by performing the welding process within a 6-month period prior to the use of the welding process in certain applications. The welders' original qualifications were on file except for one welder.

3. Inconsistencies were observed between weld maps, developed to coordinate the various parameters (e.g., weld number, welder number, weld procedure used, Non-destructive test (NDT) report number), and the cross-referencing documents.

4. From various magnetic particle test reports it appears as if the testing was performed on a date prior to the date of the weld cards.

The matter is still under investigation, and a final report will be submitted by September 15, 1983.

..