ML17059B905

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NMP Unit 1 Boat Samples Analyses Part Iii:Tension Tests, RDD:98:55863-004-000:01
ML17059B905
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 02/28/1998
From: Ferrell L, Hour K
External (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To:
Shared Package
ML17059B904 List:
References
RDD:98:55863, RDD:98:55863-00, RDD:98:55863-004-000, RDD:98:55863-4, NUDOCS 9803090237
Download: ML17059B905 (118)


Text

ATTACHMENT2 TENSILE SPECIMEN TESTING RESULTS 9'8030902$ 7 980227 PDR ADOCK 05000220 P

PDR..

Qr

NIAGARAMOHAWK'SI'GbtE MILEPOINT VNIT1 BOATSAMPLES ANALYSES PART III:TENSION TESTS PREPARED FOR B&WSERVICES, INC. FOR FRAMATOMETECHNOLOGIES INC.

NIAGARAMOHAWK'SNINEMILEPOINT UNIT 1 BOAT SAMPLES ANALYSES PART III:TENSION TESTS PREPARED BY MCDERMOTTTECHNOLOGYINC RESEARCH &DEVELOPMENTDIVISION POST OFFICE BOX 11165 LYNCHBURG,VIRGINIA24506 (804) 522-6000 Prepared by:

K. Y. Hour, Project Leader Nuclear &Environmental Operations Reviewed by:

L..Fe 1,

ana er Nuclear &Environmental Operations RDD:98:55863-004-000:01 FEBRUARY 1998

Saaiha

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 SPECIMEN PREPARATION 3.0 TEST RESULTS ANDDISCUSSION

~ae

~

~

~

1 4.0

SUMMARY

11

5.0 REFERENCES

12

Table 2.1 Detailed Section Plan for V-9 Sample Table 2.2 Detailed Section Plan for V-10 Sample Table 2.3 Summary ofTension Specimen Dimensions Table 3.1 Summary ofTension Test Results

.I

Figure 1.1 Location ofboat samples taken &om core shroud at NMP-1.

Figure 2.1 V-9 tension specimen geometry.

Figure 2.2 (a) V-10 tension specimen geometry (with 0.030 inch specimen thickness)

(b) V-10 tension specimen geometry (with 0.025 inch specimen thickness)

Figure 2.3 Section diagram and specimen orientation for V-9 tension specimens.

Figure 2.4 Figure 2.5 Figure 3.1 Section diagram and specimen orientation for V-10 tension specimens.

Section diagram for unirradiated (control) specimens.

Plot ofspecimen width to specimen thickness ratio versus yield strength to fullsize specimen yield strength.

I I

I I

I I

I

MTI RDDi98:55863-004-000:01

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Two boat samples removed from the Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation's (NMPC) Nine Mile Point Unit 1 (NMP-1) Core Shroud were sent to McDermott Technology Inc. (MTI)Lynchburg Research Center (LRC) for analysis in 1997. Metallography examination and dosimetry analysis were performed at LRC and the test results were documented in Part I [1] and II [2] of this report, respectively.

The goals ofthe metallography examination included:

~

document microstructural features ofboth samples,

~

evaluate the cracking morphologies and patterns that may be present,

~

measure the microhardness for selected locations on the metallurgical sample cross-sections,

~

examine oxides that may be present in the cracks, and

~

examine the microstructural evidence for degree ofsensitization indicated for each sample.

Dosimetry analysis provided information for the neutron fluence calculation through the core shroud thickness direction.

The shroud is a right cylindrical shell that functions to direct the flowofcoolant through the reactor core while operating and maintains core alignment during hypothetical accident conditions.

The central-mid-cylinder (shell course) ofthe shroud is 176 inches inner diameter and 90.12 inches high.

It is fabricated &omtwo 1.5 inch thick Type 304 stainless steel plates.

The plates are roll-formed into halfcylinders and welded together to form a cylinder. Extensive cracking was discovered along the two long vertical welds.

These welds are designated V-9 and V-10. The central-mid-cylinder shell course surrounds the reactor core, and therefore, the materials in this vicinityare exposed to the high energy neutron flux.

The potential for irradiation assisted stress corrosion cracking (IASCC) was considered, because the reactor has been operating since 1969 and because the welds are in close proximityto the reactor core.

Both samples were examined specifically for evidence of IASCC in both the cracking morphologies and in the microstructures.

Both welds were cracked extensively on the outer surface,

RDD:98:55863-004-000:01 but only two short cracks were discovered on the inner surface.

The outer surface cracking was confined to one plate; however it was noted that both plates from this shell course were cracked at the horizontal welds. Boat sample V-10 contains a crack. Itwas removed from the outer surface and was located to the right of weld V-10 approximately 57.5 inches below the upper horizontal weld, H-4. Boat sample V-9 is not cracked and was removed from the inner surface and was located to the right ofweld V-9 at an elevation approximately 25 inches below the upper horizontal weld, H-4.

This latter sample represents a high fluence location and is used to determine ifmeasurable material degradation has occurred due to fluence.

This sample provides material with which to measure fracture toughness'.

Figure 1.1 shows the boat sample locations in the central-mid-cylinder shell course.

After reviewing the test results from metallography examination, NMPC decided to pursue the possibility to machine tension specimens from both V-9 and V-10 samples'.

After carefully reviewing NMPC's request, MTIproposed the following.

1.

Due to very limited material that was available for machining, miniature tension specimen should be considered.

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) design [3] could be useful for this work.

2.

To study the geometry effects, control specimens should be machined from archive materials'.

Scaling factor can then be determined from the test results to convert the test results generated &om irradiated miniature specimens to full size equivalent results.

Therefore, full size, V-9 size, and V-10 size tension specimens should be machined and tested under the same

'This possibility is currently being studied by MTI.

'V-10 tension specimen machining and testing was requested by NMPC after the V-9 tension specimens were machined and tested.

'NMPC does not have core shroud archive materials. By agreement withNMPC, control specimens were machined from a 304 stainless steel plate that was supplied by Dr. Mike Manaham ofMPM Research & Consultant.

I

MTI RDD:98:55863-004-000:01 conditions.

2.0 SPECIMEN DESIGN PREPARATION 2.1 Specimen Design MTIstudied various miniature specimen designs and concluded that the ORNL design (pin-loaded tension test specimen) was probably the best one to use in this project since (1) through careful machining, a comparable specimen geometry to ORNL's may be obtained from V-9-I and (2) although the material was different (reactor vessel steel was used in ORNL's program), material properties should be comparable since the fluences that V-9 and V-10 boat samples received were much higher compared to a PWR vessel and could result in higher embrittlement.

Therefore, the V-9 tension specimen was designed using ORNL's design as guidance with minor alteration to address the limits resulting &om a very complicated machining process due to highly irradiated material. The V-9 tension specimen geometry was shown in Figure 2.1.

Atthe request ofNMPC, MTIalso studied the possibility to machine tension specimens from V-10 remaining pieces. Withvery limited material available for machining purpose, it was concluded that the V-10 tension specimen would be smaller than the V-9 tension specimen.

Since V-9 tension specimens were machined and tested successfully, itwas decided to have a scale-down version ofV-9 tension specimen design for a V-10 tension specimen.

Figure 2.2 shows V-10 tension specimen geometry. Note that specimen thickness was 0.030 inch [shown in Figure 2.2 (a), specimens BLV10 Pl &2] in the planning stage but was changed to 0.025 inch [shown in Figure 2.2 (b), BLV1083 &

V10irr81] due to limited material obtained from the V-10-L sample.

Mock-up specimens were machined and tested to verify the adequacy ofspecimen design, equipment, and procedures.

MTI RDD:98:55863-004-000:01 2.2 Specimen Preparation In order to reduce employee radiation exposure, specimen preparation was separated into two stages.

The first stage was to machine a specimen blank using a combination of(1) low-speed sectioning in the hot cell facility to obtain a workable specimen blank and (2) this specimen blank was transferred out ofthe hot cell facilityto the MTIHot Machine Shop (HMS) where this specimen blank was machined into a rectangular parallelepiped shape using an electrical discharge milling (EDM) machine.

The second phase ofmachining included:

(1)

Specimen blank was sliced into several rectangular parallelepipeds with the exact specimen thickness using EDM.

(2)

Specimen blank with the exact specimen thickness was placed on a pre-fabricated fixture where the tension specimen was machined using EDM (except the pin holes).

(3)

The whole fixture was then removed &om the EDM and placed on a millingmachine where the pin holes were machined.

(4)

Specimen dimension was then verified.

Prior to machining the irradiated samples, several unirradiated mock-up samples were machined to verify the adequacy ofthe equipment and procedures and also to provide operators opportunity to practice to minimize exposure during actual work.

2.2.1 Sample Section Plan Both samples V-9 and V-10 were sectioned in the hot cell for the metallography work [1]. Figure 2.3 shows the specimen orientation and sectioning diagram for specimen V-9. The followingtable summarizes the sectioning plan for specimen V-9.

I I

I I

I I

I

MI'I RDD:98:55863-004-000:01 Table 2.1 Detailed Section Plan for Specimen V-9 Specimen ID V-9-A V-9-B V-9-C V-9-D V-9-E V-9-F V-9-G V-9-H V-9-I V-9-K V-9-L V-9-M V-9-N V-9-0 V-9-P Purpose Fracture toughness specimen Dosimetry sample (did not use due to oxides)

Dosimetry sample (did not use due to oxides)

Sectioned to create a flat surface for further section ofsamples Dosimetry sample (tip)

Sectioned to create a flat surface for further section ofsamples None. Excessive material was removed to reduce radiation levels for specimens transferred out ofcell None. Excessive material was removed to reduce radiation levels for specimens transferred out ofcell Blank for machining oftension specimens None. Excessive material was removed to reduce radiation levels for specimens transferred out ofcell None. Excessive material was removed to reduce radiation levels for specimens transferred out ofcell Optical metallographic evaluation Dosimetry sample (near flat surface)

None. Excessive material was removed to reduce radiation levels for specimens transferred out ofcell Dosimetry sample (midway)

V-9-Iwas used to obtain tension specimens.

MTI RDD:98:55863-004-000:01 Figure 2.4 illustrates the sectioning diagram forV-10. The followingtable summarizes the specimen orientation and sectioning plan for specimen V-10.

Table 2.2 Detailed Section Plan for Specimen V-10 Specimen ID V-10-A V-10-B V-10-C V-10-Met 1 V-10-Met 2 V-10-Met-3 V-10-Met 4 V-10-SEM V-10-ORNL V-10-LA V-10-RQ V-10-RK Purpose Dosimetry sample (midway)

Dosimetry sample (near flat surface)

Dosimetry sample (tip)

Optical metallographic evaluation Optical metallographic evaluation Optical metallographic evaluation Did not use due to insufficient material Scanning electron microscopy Reserved for further analysis None None None V-10-L Reserved for further analysis V-10-Lwas originally reserved for advanced analytical analysis but was selected for obtaining the tension specimens due to the fact that it had an adequate amount ofmaterial for machining purpose.

The section diagram forthe control specimens is depicted in Figure 2.5. Atotal oftwo fullsize, two V-9 size, and three V-10 size specimens were machined.

Specimen dimension in ASTME-8 Figure 7 for a fullsize pin-loaded tension test specimen was used.

RDD:98:55863-004-000:01 2.2.2 Actual Specimen Machining Two tension specimens were obtained from the V-9 sample successfully and only one specimen was obtained &om the V-10-Lsample despite the fact that two tension specimens were originally planned.

MTIhad to cut one side ofthe tension specimen very close to the crack so that a maximum size V-10 miniature tension specimen could be obtained. Itwas apparent to the operator that the primary crack was avoided. However, the EDM machine wire broke several times during the cutting process. It was concluded that the wire broke because it encountered secondary cracks which were non-conductive and were not apparent to the operator.

Table 2.3 summarizes the dimension ofvarious tension specimens for the purpose ofcomparison purpose.

Table 2.3 Summary ofTension Specimen Dimensions Specimen Type Full Size V-9 Gage Length (in) 0.3 Width (in) 0.5 0.06 Thickness (in) 0.625 0.030 Width/thickness Ratio

'.8 V-10 (first design)

V-10 (second design)

ORNL 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.030 0.025 0.030 1.3 1.6 0.2 0.04 0.010 3.0 TEST RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Tension testing was performed in accordance with MTITechnical Procedure TP-78 which is in compliance with ASTM E8-94a and ASTM E21-92.

The tests were performed using an MTS

I I

I I

I I

MTI RDD:98:55863-004-000:01 servohydraulic testing machine.

The test machine is interfaced with the MTS TestStar digital system.

An MTIcertified program TNSLTEST was used to control the machine and acquire the data during the test. Alltension tests were run using stroke control with actuator travel rates of 0.0030 to 0.0075 inch per minute depending on specimen size.

Force and strain were monitored and recorded continuously throughout the duration of each test.

Force was measured with a 5 kip MTS load cell at 300 to 600 pound range depending on specimen size.

Strain was measured using an MTS extensometer with 0.5 inch of available travel at 0.25 inch range.

This extensometer was attached to the bottom of an ATS Linear Voltage Displacement Transducer (LVDT)that has a pair of knife edges and was placed 0.2 to 0.3 inch away to match the specimen gage length.

Tests were performed in an ATS split type furnace and test temperature was controlled to within J 4 'F of the test temperature.

A soak time of at least 20 minutes after reaching test temperature was used to assure uniform temperature distrubution in the specimen.

The final specimen width and thickness of each broken specimen was measured using a dial caliper to determine material fracture properties.

The tension test data were analyzed using the MTIcertified computer program MTADS. This program uses the load and strain data in conjunction with various specimen and testing parameters to perform a standard ASTM E8-94a analysis.

Reported values for each test include yield and ultimate tensile strength, uniform and total elongation, reduction in area, fracture load, fracture

stress, fracture strength, and the Ramberg-Osgood'strain hardening parameters.

A summary of tension test results is reported in Table 3.1. Appendix A contains test reports, realtime data plots, and data analysis reports for each specimen.

The test results from unirradiated specimens clearly suggest that, except for the ultimate strength, the mechanical properties determined from miniature specimens are dependent on the specimen geometry.

For example, the yield strength increases with increasing specimen width to specimen thickness ratio.

This is shown in Figure 3.1.

The original plan to use unirradiated data to establish scaling factors was not appropriate.

This can be seen by applying the scaling factor to irradiated V-9 tension test results; the yield strength decreases to 33 ksi which is well below V-

MTI RDD:98:55863-004-000:01 10's results.

One possible explanation for this observation is that the yield strength for unirradiated 304 stainless steel is only 22 ksi at 550 F compared to 48 ksi for irradiated 304 stainless steel at the same temperature and the scaling factor is a function of specimen geometry as well as material yield strength.

Material with higher yield strength may generate test results consistent with those of full size specimens although a smaller size is used.

This can be further observed in the ORNL's paper [3] where the lowest yield strength that was validated was 67 ksi (no data points below 67 ksi). For a low yield strength unirradiated 304 stainless steel, ORNL's design (similar to MTIV-9 tension specimen design) is not valid and a larger specimen design (or a lower specimen width to specimen thickness ratio) is needed.

The unirradiated test data provided the following information.

1.

The test data were compared to the "certified material test report" provided by the material supplier (see Attachment B). The yield and ultimate strength are 37.4 ksi and 89.2 ksi, respectively, at room temperature.

At550 'F, the yield strength and ultimate strength are lower due to temperature effects.

This is consistent with MTI's data, 2.

More importantly, scatter is expected when testing miniature specimens.

MTI's data suggest that scatter is minimized due to precision machining, good specimen alignment, and an accurate measuring device.

Several observations were made on the irradiated tension test data and are summarized as follows.

1.

The irradiated specimens were machined from regions close to the surface areas (maximized material for machining), it was determined that the fluence for the V-9 and V-10 tension specimens was approximately 3.1x10" and 1.1xlP n/crri, respectively, per Framatome Technologies Inc.'s calculation [4].

2.

The data were first compared to data published by A. J. Jacobs et al [5] where solution heat treated 304 stainless steel samples were irradiated to 8 x 10" and 2.5x10" n/cm

. The yield

I I

I I

I I

MTI RDD:98:55863-004-000:01 strength for the unirradiated condition and these two fluences at 550 'F were 24.9, 80.2, and 94.2 ksi, respectively.

Based on Jacobs'ata, the yield strength for a 304 stainless steel sample irradiated to 1 to 3 x 10 n/cm'would range from 40 ksi to 60 ksi. MTI's data were reasonable compared to Jacobs'ata.

Later, test data were forwarded to GE Nuclear Energy for review. Per discussion between GE Nuclear Energy and NMPC, the yield strength at 550

'F for 304 stainless steel irradiated to a fluence of 1 to 3 x 10~'/cm~ would be in the range of50 ksi according to GE's design curves.

This is consistent with MTI's data.

3.

Margaret L. Hamilton et al [6] at Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) performed a research project where solution annealed 304 stainless steel was machined into miniature specimens using various machining methods (specimen gage = 0.2 inch, specimen width = 0.04 inch, and specimen thickness = 0.01 inch).

PNL's design is similar to the V-10 tension specimen (specimen gage = 0.2 inch, specimen width = 0.04 inch, and specimen thickness = 0.025 inch).

PNL specimens were tested at room temperature; the yield strength was 38 ksi and was consistent with the bulk yield strength and therefore validated their miniature specimen design. PNL test results seem to suggest that material yield strength has a strong influence on miniature specimen validity. Although PNL's'specimen has a larger specimen width to specimen thickness ratio (=4) compared to MTI's design, the test results were valid because ofa higher yield strength at room temperature (38 ksi at room temperature and 22 ksi at 550

'F). In summary, PNL data are conclusive for MTIto determine that no corrections are needed for V-9 and V-10 tension specimens because of(1) a higher yield strength for the irradiated material (50 ksi compared to 38 ksi) and (2) a lower specimen width to specimen thickness ratio compared to that ofPNL gower ratio yields results close to full size specimen as shown in Figure 3.1).

Atflrstglance, itis questionable why the yield strength for specimen V-9 (average = 48 ksi) is lower than that ofspecimen V-10 (51 ksi) since specimen V-9 (core shroud inner surface) received higher neutron fluence than specimen V-10 (core shroud outer surface).

Such observation is based on the fact that specimen material, orientation, dimension, and test conditions are all identical. Discussion ofthose factors is summarized as follow.

10

I.

t L

0)

RDD:98r55863-004-000:01 1.

Although V-9 and V-10 boat samples were removed &om diFerent half cylinders, NMPC has concluded that difFerences in the ma~) for those halfcylinders may be small and should not impact the test results.

2.

The grggiaQgg ofV-9 tension specimens is in parallel to the fusion line and the center line ofthe tension specimen is approximately 1.10 inch from the fusion line. The specimen V-10 tension specimen is normal to the fusion line and the distance between the fusion line and specimen center line is 0.56 inch (see Figures 2.3 and 2.4). Since the V-10 tension specimen is closer to the fusion line, it is expected that the material that MTIsampled should contain HAZmetal which has higher yield strength.

3.

Specimen digznsigg should not have significant impact per aforementioned discussion.

h Itis concluded that material di6erences (V-10 tension specimen was a combination ofHAZ and base metal and V-9 tension specimen was base metal) result in the higher yield strength for the V-10 tension specimen.

The impact ofspecimen geometry on the ultimate strength is small. For unirradiated material, the ultimate strength ranges from 66 ksi to 70 ksi for all geometries; while slightly higher values are observed for the irradiated material (68 ksi to 75 ksi). A slight increase in ultimate strength due to irradiation is observed.

4.0 SUMKQhY t

Li L

The following conclusions can be drawn from this investigation:

1.

Miniature tension specimens were successfully machined from boat samples V-9 and V-10

t i

0)

MTI RDDi98:55863-004-000:01 and tested at 550 'F.

2.

The yield strength forthe core shroud material (base metal) ranges from 45 ksi to 51 ksi and the ultimate strength from 68 ksi to 75 ksi at 550 'F.

The neutron irradiation has larger impact on the yield strength and much less impact on the ultimate strength.

3.

The idea ofestablishing scaling factors by testing unirradiated material was not applicable due to low yield strength at 550 'F. Although miniature tension specimens were tested, it is concluded that no correction needs to be applied to irradiated yield and ultimate strength data because ofthe material's higher yield strength.

5.0 REFERENCES

1.

K. Y. Hour, "Niagara Mohawk's Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Boat Sample Analysis, Part I:

Metallography," Report Number: RDD:98:55863-001-000:01, McDermott Technology Inc.,

September, 1997.

2.

K. Y. Hour, "Niagara Mohawk's Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Boat Sample Analysis, Part II:

Dosimetry," Report Number: RDD:98:55863-003-000:01, McDermott Technology Inc.,

December, 1997.

F. M Haggag, R. K. Nanstad, and S. T. Byrne, "Use ofMiniature and Standard Specimens to Evaluate Effects of Irradiated Temperature on Pressure Vessel Steels," Proceeding - Fifth International Symposium on Environmental Degradation ofMaterials in Nuclear Power Systems - Wafer Reactors, American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, IL, pp. 704-710.

4.

S. Q. King 'Fluence Analysis Report forBoat Samples Nine MilePt. 1," Report Number: 86-1266298-00, Framatome Technologies Inc., January, 1998.

12

I

MTI RDD:98:55863-004-000:01 A. J. Jacobs, G. P. Wozadlo, K. Nakata, T. Yoshida, and I. Masaoka, "Radiation Effects on the Stress Corrosion and Other Selected Properties ofType-304 and Type 316 Stainless Steels," Proceeding - Third International Symposium on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems - Water Reactors, American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, IL,pp. 673-681.

6.

Margaret L. Hamilton, Martin A. Blotter, and Danny J. Edwards, "Evaluation ofMiniature Tension Specimen Fabrication Techniques and Performance,"

Small Specimen Test Technique Applied to Nuclear Reactor Vessel Thermal Annealing and Plant LifeExtension, ASTMSTP 1204, W. R. Corwin, F. M. Haggag, and W. L. Server, Eds.. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1993, pp. 368-385.

13

lD Boat Sample 25" below H-4 H-4 h(

F OD Boat Sample 57.5" below H-4 V-10 H-5 Figure 1-1

- Location of boat samples taken from core shroud at NMP-1.

Elevation for center of active fuel is approximately the same as the location of the boat sample taken from vertical weld, V-9.

~9375

~ 1187 8.3187

~3883

. 1581

.8861

~ 1958

.8975

.8686

.8388

.8625 R.1563

. 1983

~7888 Thfckness of Specimen to be

.838 NOTES:

1.

THICKNESS OF SPECII'1EN TO BE.838 2.

TOLERANCES TO BE SPECIFIED BY PROJECT ENGINEER Figure 2.1 V-9 tension specimen geometry.

CUSTOMER SUPPLIEO MATERIAL ITEM QTY DRAWING NO.

DESCRIPTION/VENDOR/MATERIAL BILL OF MATERIAL GATE 18/18/97 TOLERANCES ESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIEO DECIHAL~

D(X

+/-

XXX +/-

ANGLE

+/-

(SEE NOTE)

McDERMOTT TECHNOLOGY Incorporated LYNCHBURG RESEARCH CENTER LYNCHBNG, VA 2'ISB6 REVISION DESCRIPTION THIS CRAMING IS THE PRVERTT OF TIF BABCOCX 4 WILCOX CO. IA HCOERHOTT COH'ANI)

AIO IS LOANEO UPN CCIQTION THAT IT IS NOT REPROOVCEO IN WHOLE OR IN PART. OR VSEO FOR FINNISHING IIFORHATION TO OTHERS. OR FOR ANT OTIER PURPOSE OETRIHENTAL TO INTEREST OF BABCOCX 4 WILCOX. A% MILL BE RETURNEO UPON REOVEST.

FIL6 B788%1B FCO CONTRACT NO~

SSSB3 TENSILE SPECIMEN 41 ASSEHBLTs 00 NOT SCALE SCALE VSE OIHENSIONS ONLT NONE A 67-889 16 QEET I/I

~213

.127

~625

~288 R.180

~ 138

~865

+.828 8.817 2 PLACES

~371 I

I

~867~

NOTES:

1.

THICKNESS OF SPECIMEN TO BE.838 2.

TOLERANCES TO BE SPECIFIED BY PROJECT ENGINEER 3.

AI L DIMENSIONS ANNOTATED WITH I ARE TO BE CONSIDERED MINIMUM VALUES.

ACTUAL DIMENSIONS MAY BE LARGER ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES SUPPLIED MATERIAL Figure 2.2 (a) V-10 tension specimen geometry (with 0.030 inch specimen thickness).

OATE I/18/ 8 TOLERANCES ESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIEO 0@1AL~

XX

+/-

XXX +/-

AAGL6

+/-

(SEE NOTE)

HcDERHOTT TECHNOLOGY Incorporated LTNCHBURG RESEARCH CENTER LTNCHBURG, YA 21586 ITEN QTY DRAWING NO.

OESCRIPTION/VENDOR/HATERIAL BILL OF MATERIAL REVISION DESCRIPTION TtDS WAMDC IS THE PRCPERTT IF T% BABCOX 4 WILCOX CO. (A tCOERN)TT CQf'AND HO 1S LOANEO UPQI CONOTION THAT IT tS NOT REPRORCEO tN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED FOR AÃSISHtlC DRXtQTION TO OTHERS, OR RR ANT OTHDt PURPOSE OETRIHEHTAL TO THE tNTEREST tF BABCOX S MD.COL ANO MILL BE RETNNEO UPON REOVEST.

OATE FILB 678t823WCD A@TRACT NQs 558N TENSILE SPECIMEN A2 ASSESS.Ts OO NOT SCALE SCALE UsE oDNDeroe m.v A.67-88923 8

.213

~625

.127 R.189

.138

+.828 8

.8'17 2 PLACES 371 NOTES:

1.

THICKNESS OF SPECIMEN TO BE.825 2,

TOLERANCES TO BE SPECIFIED BY PROJECT ENGINEER 3.

ALL DIMENSIONS ANNOTATED WITH >

ARE TO BE CONSIDERED MINIMUM VALUES.

ACTUAL DIMENSIONS MAY BE LARGER ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES CUSTOMER SUPPLIED MATERIAL Figure 2.2 (b) V-10 tension specimen geometry (with 0.025 inch specimen thickness).

APP cv OAT 2/2/98 TOLERANCES UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED DECIMAL:

AX

+/-

D(XX +/-

ANGLE:

+/-

(SEE NOTEI McDERHOTT TECHNOLOGY Incorporated LYNCHBURG RESEARCH CENTER LYNCHBURG, VA 2%586 ITEM OTY DRAWING NO.

DESCRIPTION/VENDOR/MATERIAL BILL OF MATERIAL REVISION DESCRIPTION THIS CRAMINO IS THE PROPERTT CF THE BABCOCK 4 MILCOX TXL IA HCOERHOTT CRT'ANT)

AIQ IS LOANEO UPON CONOTION THAT IT IS NO'I REPRKUCEO IN MHOLE OR IN PART. OR USEO FOR FtlINISHINO IIFORHATION TO OTHERS, OR FCR ANT OTIER PURPOSE OETRIHENTAL TO THE INTEREST OF BABCOX 4 MILCOX. ANO MILL BE RETKNEO UPON REOIEST.

DATE FILB678H3I~

CONTRACT Cb 55863 TENSILE SPECIMEN A3 ASSEHBLTs OO NOT SCALE SCALE USE OIHENSIONS ONLT 9: I A.67-88't 31 QUET I/ I

SPECIMEN V-9 I I I

V-9-C~l I I I I

I I

I I

I I I V-9-L V-9-l Tensile Specimen V-9-A V-9-I V-9-F l

V-9-H >

V-9-K V-9-M V-9-P V-9-0 SIDE VIEW SECTION V-9-M Figure 2.3 Section diagram and specimen orientation forV-9 tension specimens.

SPECIMEN V-10 V-1OZEM I

I

(

I I

I V-10-MET 3 V-10-B V-10-L V-10-L Tensile Sample I I I

V-10-LA V-10-ORNL I

I I

I I

(

I I

(

(

V-10-MET4 II

~

(

I II I

I I

I I

I I I

I

(

)

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I I I

I I I

)

)

I I

I I I I I

I I

I I

I I (

)I

( I I

I I

I

)

I I

I I

I I

I V-10-RK V-10-MET 2 V-10-MET 1 V-10-A IL SIDE VIEW V-10-LA Figure 2.4 Section diagram and specimen orientation forV-10 tension specimens.

5T

..Compact-Tension-r r

S r

pare r

ModrTi<<

..'Compact-Tensiorr'.

.:.Teosih Blan'ks..

Spare Material Full size tensile sample Full size tensile sample II I

I Spare Material pigure 2.5 Section diagram for unirradiated (control) specimens.

Table 3.1 Summary of Tension Test Results.

Test Stren th Fracture Elan ation Reduction Ramberg-Os ood Specimen Temp.

~(kst)

Load Stress Strength

(%)

in area

[

Parameters ID

('F)

Yield Ultimate (Ib)

(ksi)

(ksi)

Uniform Total

(%)

Alpha n

V9irr¹1 V9irr¹2 V10irr¹1 BLfull¹1*

BLfull¹2*

BLV9¹1 BLV9¹2 8LV10¹1 BLV10¹2 BLV10¹3**

550 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 50.3 71.5 107 81.1 58.6 20.9 45.9 68.0 79 61.1 43.3 19.6 51.0 74.9 37 43.3 36.4 19.2 24.1 67.8 NA NA NA NA 21 0 674 NA NA NA NA 33.6 66.0 30 23.8 17.0 32.8 33.0 69.8 80 60.4 45.7 30.7 24.2 67.2 46 51.0 39.0 31.1 25.9 69.0 55 61.9 46.4 29.5 26 5 70 3 NA NA NA NA 24.5 24.9 26.7 54.0 54.0 39.9 36.1 38.9 36.6 NA 27.7 5.43 5.42 29.0 5.93 4.99 16.0 8.19 4.14 NA NA NA NA NA NA 28.4 11.7 2.93 24.4 9.7 2.99 23.4 11.4 2.45 24.9 13.0 2.38 20.7 NA NA

  • tested by Westmoreland.
    • extensometer slipped between yield and ultimate stress.

W W W W N

tD CD C

CO U

Q)

CD C

6)

S CO 0) 0-1.50 1.40 1.30 1.20 1.10 1.00

+ V-10b

+ V-9 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 Specimen VVidth/Specimen Thickness 2.50 Figure 3.1 Plot ofspecimen width to specimen thickness ratio versus yield strength to fullsize specimen yield strength. Note specimen thickness for V-10a is 0.03 inch and V-10b is 0.025 inch.

I

ATTACHMENTA Tension Test Results

I I

I I

I I

t i

)

i

L'ADS

<890928.1259>

TENSILE DATA ANALYSIS 20 Oct.,

1997 File: NMPCTl SPECIMEN ID P2QVQEETERS Date of test Operator Project number Spec>men Test temperature Material Modulus o

e

~

Cross Section type Fluence Technical Specification 10/20/97 BJV 55865 NMPCTl =

V't vv'0 t

550 F

SS 23019. ksi RECT 0.0000E+00 TP-78-13 288.

C 158716.

MPa SET UP PARAMETERS Initial disp rate Second.

disp rate Gauge length (Ext)

.0075 in/min

.0075 in/min

.300 in

.190 mm/min

.19 mm/min 7.62 mm DIMENSIONAL r

Cross-section

~

~

Axial Fidical X-Initial Y-Initial X-Final Y-Final INITIAL FINAL

.0300 in

.0610 in

.0245 in

.0540 in

.3000 in

.0000 in

.76 mm 1.55 mm

.62 mm 1'7 mm 7.62 mm

.00 mm TEST RESULTS Yield Strength Tensile Strength Fracture Load Fracture Stress Fracture Strength Young's Modulus Elongation (fiducial).

Uniform Elongation (Ext)

Total Elongation (Ext)

Reduction in Area 50282.

71507-107.

81109.

58638.

5.11E+07

-1.0000

.2091

.2449 27 '

+S3.

Psi lb Psi Psi psi 346.7 MPa 493.0 MPa 477.

N 559.2 MPa 404.3 MPa 3.52E+05 MPa CURVE FIT Ramberg-Osgood Equation Alpha N

~

~

~

~

5.430

5. 415 Fit Std Dev

.024

.064

I I

I I

I

20 Gc t.,

1997 File:

NNPCT1 o

(U Specimen:

NNPCT1 St~ength Yield:

50282.

UTS:

71507.

Test Temp.:

550 F (

287 C) o CO oo C3 C

(A~

co M

MS (A

~o CD (0 C

~ W 88 C

~A C

CD o QJ O

3K CL o <

lA M

MS R

CD C

~ A o

S C

~W CD C

~

LLI O

CU o

(U o

o

0. 00
0. OQ
0. 08 0.12 0.16 0.20 Engineer 'ng Str ain
0. 2Q
0. 28
0. 32

C)

C3 Specimen:

NMPCT1 Ramberg-Gsgood Coef.

Yield:

50282.

UTS:

71507.

Alpha:

5.4304 N:

5. 4145 20 Qc t.,

1997 File:

NMPCT1 Tes t Temp.:

550 F

(

287 C)

C)

CO C)

C3 CO 00~ o(0 (A

C)

C3 (O

C) lA 0

0)

Q)

(A o

I C)

AJ C)

CU C)

0. 00
0. 04
0. 08
0. 12
0. 16 Tr ue Strain
0. 20
0. 2V
0. 28
0. 32

TADS

<890928.1259>

TENSILE DATA ANALYSIS 20 Oct.,

1997 File:

NMPCT2 SPECIMEN ID P2Q&METERS Date of test Operator Project number Specimen Test temperature Material Modulus

~

~

e

~

Cross Section type Fluence Technical Specificat son 10/20/97 BJV 5586$

NMPCT2 = g$ i<<~ >

550 F

SS 23018. ksi RECT 0.0000E+00 TP-78-13 288.

C 158709.

MPa SET UP PARAMETERS Initial disp rate Second.

disp rate Gauge length (Ext)

.0075 in/min

.0075 in/min

.300 in

.190 mm/min

.19 mm/min 7.62 mm DIMENSIONAL Cross-section Axial Fidical

~

~

~

X-Initial Y-Initial X-Final Y-Final INITIAL FINAL

.0300 in

.0610 in

.0245 in

.0530 in

.3000 in

.0000 in

.76 mm 1.55 mm

.62 mm 1.35 mm 7.62 mm

.00 mm TEST RESULTS Yield Strength Tensile Strength Fracture Load Fracture Stress Fracture Strength Young's Modulus Elongation (fiducial).

Uniform Elongation (Ext)

Total Elongation (Ext)

Reduction in Area 45867..psi 68027. psi

79. lb 61079. psi 43340. psi 1.50E+07 psi

-1.0000

.1956

.2488 29.0 316.2 MPa 469.0 MPa 353.

N 421.1 MPa 298.8 MPa 1.03E+05 MPa CURVE FIT Ramberg-Osgood Equation Alpha N

~ ~

~

~

5.932 4.993 Fit Std Dev

.021

.054

I t

r

~li i

20 l3c t.,

1997 File:

NNPCT2 C3 (U

C)

C3 Specimen:

NHPCT2 Str ength Yield:

45867.

UTS:

68027.

Test Temp.:

550 F (

287 C)

C)

C3 CO C)

(U (A~

CO I

(D S

R

~O CD (0 C

~ P4 Q)8 C

~&

C0) ~

QJ Q3 cd

~

(D 0

(D CO

~

CA Oo c

~~

~

Q)

O CD AJ C

(n e~

CD C

o ~

CU C3 (U

C)

CO

0. 00
0. 04
0. 08
0. 12
0. 16
0. 20 Enginee~'ng Strain
0. 2Q
0. 28
0. 32

C3 CU Specimen:

NHPCT2 Ramber g-Qsgood Coef.

Yield:

45867.

UTS:

68027.

Alpha:

5.9321 N:

4.9926 20 Qc t.,

1997 File:

NHPCT2 Test Temp.:

550 F (

287 C)

C3 00 00~ o(0 (F)

C)

(O C) lA CL U)

M (A

C)

C)

CU

0. 00
0. 04
0. 08
0. 12 0.16 Tr ue Str ain
0. 20
0. 24
0. 28 C)
0. 32

I I

I I

I I

I I

I

(890928.1259>

TENSILE DATA ANALYSIS I

SPECIMEN ZD PARAMETERS 29 Jan.,

1998 Pile:

V10 1

Date of test Operator Project number Specimen Test temperature Material Modulus Cross Section type Fluence Technical Specification 1/29/98 BJV 5586 5 V10 1

=

Qlo ~~

550 F

SS IRR 23019. ksi RECT 0.0000E+00 TP-78-13 288.

C 158716.

MPa t

SET UP PARAMETERS Initial disp rate Second.

disp rate t

Gauge length (Ext)

DIMENSIONAL

.0050 xn/man

.0050 in/min

.200 in

.127 mm/min

.13 mm/min 5.08 mm I

Axial Fidical TEST RESULTS X-Znitial Y-Initial X-Final Y-Final INITIAL FINAL

.0250 in

.0405 in

.0230 in

.0370 in

.2000 in

.0000 in

.63 mm 1.03 mm

.58 mm

.94 mm 5.08 mm

.00 mm Yield Strength Tensile Strength Fracture Load Fracture Stress Fracture Strength Young s Modulus Elongation (fiducial).

Uniform Elongation (Ext)

Total Elongation (Ext)

Reduction in Area 50951. psi 74873. psi

37. lb 43307. psi 36399. psi 4.04E+06 psi

-1.0000

. 1916

.2670 16.0 351.3 MPa 516.2 MPa 164.

N 298.6 MPa 251.0 MPa 2.78E+04 MPa I

CURVE FZT Ramberg-Osgood Equation Alpha N

8.191 4.138 Fit Std Dev

.009

.024

29 1998 File:

V10 1

Cg CU Specimen:

V10 1

Str ength Yield:

50951.

UTS:

74873.

Test Temp.:

550 F (

287 Cj C)

GO C)

Cg R~

co V) 0)

gtg (A

~

Cg U) (0 C

~&

88 C

~&

C CD ~

QJ Cg CU lg(l gl gl g

l l

l I

l l

I l

l l

l l

l t

g l

l l

gtll gll O

(Q CLZ LA gD go go g N CD C

~A Cg C

~ W U)

C

~

LLt CU C)

0. 00
0. 04
0. 08 0.12 0.16 0.20 Engineering Strain
0. 24
0. 28
0. 32

I

W W W W W W W W

)

Specimen:

V10 1

Ramber g-l3sgood Coef.

Yield:

50951.

UTS:

74873.

Alpha:

8. 1911 N:
4. 1382 m

29 1998 File:

V10 1

Test Temp.:

550 F (

287 C)

C) 00 C3 K)

C) 3K M

M"o (O

GD C)

(0 (A

0)3 I

C3 (U

C)

CU

0. 00
0. 04
0. 08
0. 12
0. 16 Tr ue Str ain
0. 20
0. 24
0. 28
0. 32

(890928.1259)

TENSILE DATA ANALYSIS I

SPECZMEN ID PARAMETERS 22 Jan.,

1998 File:

NMPCTSS2 Date of test Operator Project number Specimen Test temperature Material Modulus Cross Section type Fluence Technical Specification 158716.

MPa 1/22/98 BJV S5865 NMPCTSS2 gLV f 4 I

550 F

288.

C SS 23019. ksi RECT 0.0000E+00 TP-78-13 SET UP PARAMETERS Initial disp rate Second.

disp rate Gauge length (Ext)

. 0075 in/min

. 0075 in/min

.300 in

.190 mm/man

.19 mm/min 7.62 mm I

I DIMENSIONAL Cross-section X-Initial Y-Initial X-Final Y-Final Axial Fidical INITIAL FINAL

.0290 in

.0605 in

.0253 in

.0498 in

.3000 in

.0000 in

.74 mm 1.54 mm

.64 mm 1.26 mm 7.62 mm

.00 mm I

TEST RESULTS Yield Strength Tensile Strength Fracture Load Fracture Stress Fracture Strength Young s Modulus Elongation (fiducial).

Uniform Elongation (Ext)

Total Elongation (Ext)

Reduction in Area 33642. psi 65960. psi

30. lb 23792. psi 17035. psi 5.81E+06 psi

-1.0000

.3277

.3989 28.4 232.0 MPa 454.8 MPa 133.

N 164.0 MPa 117.5 MPa 4.01E+04 MPa CURVE FZT Ramberg-Osgood Equation Alpha....

11.685 N

2.933 Fit Std Dev

.010

. 014

22 1998 File:

NHPCTSS2 C3 CU Specimen:

NHPCTSS2 Strength Yield:

33642.

UTS:

65960.

Tes t Temp.:

550 F (

287 C)

C3 C)

CO C3 C)

C)

(D II S

C.

O

0) (Q C

~ W 88 C

~W~o C

QJ C)

CO C)

C)

C3 CU C)

I V) 0)

(A 0)

C

~ W SS C

~ W 0)

C LU C)

(0 C) 00 C3

0. 00
0. 05
0. 10 0.15 0.20 0.25 Engineer ing Str ain
0. 30
0. 35
0. 40

C)

C)

W W W W W Specimen:

NNPCTSS2 Ramber g-Qsgood Coef.

Yield:

33642.

UTS:

65960.

Alpha:

xxxxxx N:

2.9332 W

W W 22 1998 File:

NHPCTSS2 Test Temp.:

550 F (

287 C)

C)

CG C)

CO 0)S"o (Q

(A (0

Q)

(A

0. 00
0. OQ
0. 08
0. 12
0. 16 True Strain
0. 20
0. 2V
0. 28
0. 32

(890928.1259)

TENSILE DATA ANALYSZS I

SPECIMEN ID PARAMETERS 22 Jan.

1998 File:

Date of test Operator Project number Specimen Test temperature Material Modulus Cross Section type Fluence Technical Specification 288.

C 158716.

MPa 1/22/98 BJV 55865 NMPCTSS3 = QLV)Cl, 550 F

SS 23019. ksi RECT 0.0000E+00 TP-78-13 t

SET UP PARAMETERS Initial disp rate Second.

disp rate t

Gauge length (Ext)

. 0075 in/min

.0075 in/min

.300 in

.190 mm/min

.19 mm/min 7.62 mm I

Axial Fidical t

DIMENSIONAL Cross-section X-Initial Y-1'nitial X-Final Y-Final INITIAL FINAL

.0290 in

.0605 in

.0258 in

.0515 in

.3000 in

.0000 in

.74 mm 1 ~ 54 mm

.65 mm 1.31 mm 7.62 mm

.00 mm t

TEST RESULTS Yield Strength Tensile Strength Fracture Load Fracture Stress Fracture Strength Young s Modulus Elongation (fiducial).

Uniform Elongation (Ext)

Total Elongation (Ext)

Reduction in Area 33041. psi 69766. psi

80. lb 60424. psi 45671. psi 6.96E+06 psi

-1.0000

.3072

.3607 24.4 227.8 MPa 481.0 MPa 356.

N 416.6 MPa 314.9 MPa 4.80E+04 MPa I

I CURVE FIT Ramberg-Osgood Equation Alpha N

9. 725 2.987 Fit Std Dev

.017

.023

C)

CU Specimen:

NHPCTSS3 Str ength Yield:

33041.

UTS:

69766.

22 Jan.,

1998 File:

Tes t Temp.:

550 F (

287 Cj C)

C) 0 (Q

~

co Co M

CDL (A

~

C)

0) (0 C

~

~

8S C

~W C0) ~

QJ Cd Q

o <

LA Co Co 0)

QN 0)

C

~ W 5

cn C

~ W 0)

C

~

LLl C)

(U C)

CU C3

0. 00
0. 05
0. 10
0. 15
0. 20
0. 25 Engineering Strain
0. 30
0. 35
0. 40

C)

CV Specimen:

NHPCTSS3 Ramber g-Osgood Coel.

Yi e 1 d:

33041.

UTS:

69766.

Alpha:

9.7250 N:

2.9874 22 Jan.,

1998 File:

Test Temp.:

550 F[

287 C)

C)

CO I

(0~ o CO (A

C)

C3 CU C)

0. 00
0. 04
0. 08
0. 12
0. 16 True Strain
0. 20
0. 2L1
0. 28 C)
0. 32

(890928.1259)

TENSILE DATA ANALYSZS I

SPECIMEN ZD PARAMETERS 22 Jan.,

1998 File:

NMPCTSS4 Date of test Operator Project number Specimen Test temperature Material Modulus Cross Section type Fluence Technical Specif ication 158716.

MPa 1/22/98 BJV 5586JJ NMPCTSS4 - $( g (@g

(

550 F

288.

C SS 23019. ksi RECT 0.0000E+00 TP-78-13 SET UP PARAMETERS i

Initial disp rate Second.

disp rate t

Gauge length (Bxt)

.0075 in/min

.0075 in/min

.200 in

.190 mm/min

.19 mm/min 5.08 mm I

DIMENSlONAL Cross-section Axial Fidical i

i ica X-Initial Y-Initial X-Final Y-Final INITIAL FINAL

.0295 in

.0400 in

.0260 in

.0347 in

.2000 in

.0000 in

.75 mm 1.02 mm

.66 mm

.88 mm 5.08 mm

.00 mm TEST RESULTS Yield Strength Tensile Strength Fracture Load Fracture Stress Fracture Strength Young s Modulus Elongation (fiducial).

Uniform Elongation (Ext)

Total Elongation (Ext)

Reduction in Area 24196. psi 67215. psi

46. lb 50997. psi 39047. psi 5.99E+06 psi

-1.0000

.3111

.3887 23.4 166.8 MPa 463.4 MPa 205.

N 351.6 MPa 269.2 MPa 4.13E+04 MPa I

I CURVE FIT Ramberg-Osgood Equation Alpha....

11.436 N

2.451 Fit Std Dev

.018

.018

22 1998 File:

NNPCTSS4 C3 CU C)

C)

Specimen:

NMPCTSS4 Str ength Yield:

24196.

UTS:

67215.

Test Temp.:

550 F (

287 C)

C)

C)

CO C3 CU C)

(O lA II Q)

R

~

C)

CD (0 C

~ W 88 C

~W C0) ~

QJ C)

CO C)

C)

C)

CU C) 00 0)

(A 0)

C

~&

C 0)8 C

~ W CO C

UJ C)

CO

0. 00
0. 05
0. 10
0. 15
0. 20
0. 25 Engineer ing Strain
0. 30
0. 35 C3
0. 40

M 22 1998 File:

NNPCTSSV Specimen:

NNPCTSSV Ramberg-Qsgood Coef.

Yield:

24196.

UTS:

67215.

Alpha:

xxxxxx N:

2. 4512 Test Temp.:

550 F (

287 Cj C)

CO C)

Co S

V)5 (D

(f)

(0I Q)

(A C3 AJ

0. 00
0. 08
0. 12
0. 16 Tr ue Sir ain
0. 20
0. 2Q
0. 28
0. 32

(890928.1259)

TENSILE DATA ANALYSIS 22 Jan.,

1998 File:

NMPCTSSS SPECIMEN ZD PARAMETERS 1/22/98 BJV 55865 NMPCTSS5 g) (/to 4 2-550 F

288.

C 158716.

MPa Date of test Operator Project number Specimen Test temperature Material SS Modulus 23019. ksi Cross Section type RECT Fluence 0.0000E+00 Technical Specification

. TP-78-13 SET UP PARAMETERS Initial disp rate Second.

disp rate Gauge length (Ext)

.0075 in/min

~ 190 mm/min

.0075 in/min

.19 mm/min

.200 in 5.08 mm e

DIMENSIONAL Cross-section 5

I TEST RESULTS X-Znitial Y-Initial X-Final Y-Final INITIAL FINAL

.0295 in

.0400 in

.0255 in

.0347 in

.2000 in

.0000 in

.75 mm 1.02 mm

.65 mm

.88 mm 5.08 mm

.00 mm Yield Strength Tensile Strength Fracture Load Fracture Stress Fracture Strength Young s Modulus Elongation (fiducial).

Uniform Elongation (Ext)

Total Elongation (Ext)

Reduction in Area 25941. psi 69028. psi

55. lb 61809. psi 46416. psi 3.55E+06 psi

-1.0000

.2945

.3659 24.9 178

~ 9 MPa 476.0 MPa 244.

N 426.2 MPa 320.0 MPa 2.45E+04 MPa CURVE FIT Ramberg-Osgood Equation Alpha....

12.954 N

2 377 Fit Std Dev

.015

. 017

I

22 1998 File:

NMPCTSS5 C)

(U Specimen:

NMPCTSS5 Str ength Yield:

25941.

UTS:

69028.

Tes t Temp.:

550 F (

287 C)

C)

C)

CO C)o R~ I (00S (A

~

C)

0) (0 C

~&

SS C

~ P4 C0) ~

w ~

C)

(O lA O

CO C3 C)

C)

(U Y)

C3 CU V)

V)

(A U)

C

~ W 8S C

~ W CO C

UJ I

I I

I I

I I

I

0. 00
0. 05
0. 10
0. 15
0. 20
0. 25 Engineer ing Str ain
0. 30
0. 35
0. L10

I

C3 C)

Specimen:

NHPCTSS5 Ramberg-Gsgood Coe+.

Yield:

25941.

UTS:

69028.

Alpha:

xxvxxx N:

2.3772 22 1998 File:

NNPCTSS5 Test Temp.:

550 F(

287 C)

C)

CO C)

CO V)

(0~ o (D

(f)

(0 Q)

(A C3 o

0. 00
0. 04
0. 08
0. 12
0. 16 Tr ue Strain
0. 20
0. 2L1
0. 28 C)
0. 32

<<890928.1259)

TENSILE DATA ANALYSIS I

SPECIMEN ID PARAMETERS 30 Jan.,

1998 File: V10 UNI1 Date of test Operator Project number Specimen Test temperature Material Modulus Cross Section type Fluence Technical Specification 158716.

MPa 1/30/97 BJV 55863 V10 UNI1 /LE(0+)

~

550 F

288.

C SS 23019. ksi RECT 0.0000E+00 TP-78-13 i

SET UP PARAMETERS Initial disp rate Second.

disp rate I

Gauge length (Ext)

.0030 in/min

.0050 in/min

.200 in

.076 mm/min

.13 mm/min 5.08 mm DZMENSZONAL I

I TEST RESULTS X-Initial Y-Initial X-Final Y-Final INITIAL FINAL

.0250 in

.0405 in

.0220 in

.0365 in

.2000 in

.0000 in

.63 mm 1.03 mm

.56 mm

.93 mm 5.08 mm

.00 mm I

Tensile Strength 26540. psi 70282. psi 183.0 MPa 484.6 Mpa i

Young s Modulus 7.57E+06 psi 5.22E+04 MPa Elongation (fiducial).

-1.0000 Reduction in Area 20.7 I

I CURVE FIT Ramberg-Osgood Equation Fit Std Dev

I

30 Jan.,

1998 File:

V10 UNI1 C)

CU Specimen:

V10 UNI1 Strength Yi e I d:

26540.

UTS:

70282.

Tes t Temp.:

550 F (

287 C)

C)

C)

CO C)

CU CD o

~ co Co M

Co (A

~

C)

CD CD C

~W 8S C

~~

C0)

QJ C3 CD lA C)

CO C)

C)

C3 CU C)

CU M

C0 II)

C.

CA 0)

C

~ W Q)8 C

~W 0)

C UJ C)

CU C)

I I

I I

I I

I I

I III C)

CD C)

CO

0. 00
0. OQ
0. 08 0.12 0.16 0.20 Engineering Str ain
0. 2LI
0. 28
0. 32

C3 C)

Specimen:

V10 UNI1 Ramber g-Gsgood Coel.

Yield:

26540.

UTS:

70282.

Alpha:

9.5896 N:

2. 71LI6 30

. Jan.,

1998 File:

V10 UNI1 Test Temp.:

550 F (

287 C)

C)

OO C) 00 00~ o (O

(A C)

C)

(0 C) 3K C)

LA CL S

Q)

(A o

~

rI C)

CU C)

(U C)

0. 00
0. 02
0. 04
0. 06
0. 08 Tr ue Str ain
0. 10
0. 12
0. 14
0. 16

I I

I I

I I

I

'l l~eSL7nureland ilteduraiCal 'EeSting eSearCll. lnC.

siesiioS SpeciolisLs jurr'Ierosprsce, iloiomolioe, onsfQisckor JielsCs CERTIFICATION THIS CERTIFICATE OR REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN PULLs HITHOUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF NMT&R, INC.

~ a

~

PERFORMANCE FACT ON THIS FORM OR MAKING FALSE FICTITIOUS OR FRAUDULENT STATEMENTS OR REPRESENTATIONS HEREIN COULD LABORATORT WMTBIR REPORT No.: 8 01302 DATE: 01128198

()ill+c)life 30e l'I'esfrlroreliznrf'rizzle I'.0. So1 388, gorrngstozurr, I'Fz. 1SN6-0388 Q.S.il.

Veleplione: 724-537-3131 Jny 724-537-3151 BABCOCK 8I WILCOX CO P.O. No.: LYN07838BWS NUCLEAR ENVIRONMENTALSERVICES Charge No.: 475.0174-10.01 LYNCHBURGTECHNOLOGY CENTER MT ATHOS RD BOX 11165 LYNCHBURG, VA 24506.1165 Attn: Mr. Kevin Hour FENSILE RESULTS ASTM E21

'MATERIAL304 Stainless Steel SPECIFICATION: ASTM E21-92 SOAK TIME:30 MINUTES SAMPLE TEMP UTS NUMBER F

PSI 1

550 67832 2

550 67445

.2% YS PSI 24067 20985 ELONG 54.0 54.0 ULT LOAD

.2% YLD LBS LBS 21220 7529 21170 6587 ORIG GAGE IN 2.00 2.00 FINALGAGE IN WIDTH IN 3.08 0.5025 3.08 0.5030 THICKNESS IN ORIG AREA SQ IN MACH TEST NO LOG 0.62255 0.312831375 M5 139467 0.62403 0.313887090 M5 139468 COMMENTS: Alltesting done at WMTBIR, Inc.

WMT&Rutilized the pinholes for testing.

Yb4.0 Michele L. Rhody, Metallurgical ngineer Page1of 1

January 28, 1998 kmc

I I

I I

I I

I

ATTACHMENTB Vendor Certification Statement for Unirradiated Material

!+%

RESEARCH 8 CONSULTING November 25, 1997 Kevin Y. Hour Babcock &Wilcox PO Box 11165-MC69 Lynchburg, VA24506-1165

Dear Dr. Hour:

Subject:

Shipment of304 SS Material for Use in NMPC Shroud Boat Sample Project As we discussed during our recent telephone conversation, NMPC has authorized MPM to provide a 304 SS block ofmaterial for use in mechanical property testing related to the boat sample work. I have also enclosed the Allegheny Ludlum Certified Material Test Report (CMTR). The material enclosed is Heat Number 766529 and this heat is shown on the CMTR.

'fyou have any questions or concerns, please call me. I look forward to hearing from you concerning progress on preparing a mold ofthe boat sample for our fracture toughness specimen design.

Sincerely,

~p ~~,g Dr. Michael P. Manahan, Sr.

cc: George Inch i eke Strccc> pO Box 840 Offirr (8 I 4) 234-8860 I.cmont, PA I685 l.0840 I'xx (8 l 4 ) 234-0 24 8

i

&OP PI4lO Pt04ucls Dlvl40ll 5OO Page 1

Green Street CERTIFIED MATERIAL,TEST REPORT Washington'ennsylvania 15301

/ A-L AD 19320 Shiptot PLATE PROD DIV / A"L 1201 VALLEY ROAD COATESVILLE PA 19320 HELEN Mi O'ONNOR Quality Assurance Representative 8839-OO 04 STAINLESS HRAP

-91a ASME SA-240-A93 AMS 5513F Our Order noi PP4279950 Your Order Hoti891 Date!

04/07/95 Slip 12908 I.:

MH P

S ii68

>028 F0008 SI HI

.32 8.27 Size ii7500 x 82i0000 x 208ioooo CR 18>46 MO.

~ 23 Pcs Weight 1

8726 CO CU H

>07 i35

>094 L

Gauge 1>7500 Yield Strength 37o4 KSI Tensile Strength Elong 89 ~ 2 KSI 68

~ 0 Red'f Area 80<0 Grain Hardness Rend Corrosion Size BHN170 OK I-

)ERWISE NOTED, THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN MANUFACTURED AHD TESTED IH ACCORDANCE ISTED SPECIFICATIOHS AHD RESULTS CONFORM TO TI3E'PECIFICATIOH AHD ORDER REQUIREMENTS

)E INFORMATION HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM THE ORIGINAL CERTIFIED MATERIAL TEST REPORTS COPY

~l t

I

Shipto t NPN RESEARCH tt CONSULTIHG 915 PIKE'T LEMOHT PA JossOp Platt Ptoducts Division 1201 Valley Road CERTIFICATE OF COHFORNANCE

'Coatesville~

Pennsylvania 19320 tE tt CONSULTIHG Page Our Order not GV-066852 Your Order Hot1402079526 Nemo Not 4025645 Datet 07/26/95 16851 16851 Quality hs Representative t

0-94a~

ASNE SA-240-A93p ade Heat Ho Slip 766529 12908 T-304'RAP Size io7500 12a0000'MID 77.0000 LEN li7500 12i0000 77o0000 ITEN TOTALt Meight Hill Cert 1

PCS Ordered 1

473 068839-00 Shipped 1

473 TOTAL ORDERt 1

473 1 CNTR (NAHUFACTURER)

  • SONIC REPORT R

L LISTED ABOVE IS SUPPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ABOVE LISTED SPECIFICATIOHS BASED ON EM OF THE HATERIAL NANUFACTURER'S CERTIFIED, NATERIAL TEST REPORT

TROHICALLY EXCERPTED COPY ATTACHED)

AHD THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PURCHASE ORDER COPY

KEYWORDS:

Core Shroud, Stress Corrosion Cracking, 304 Stainless Steel, tension test, miniature specimen, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Nine MilePoint Unit 1 DISTRIBUTION(COMPANYLIMITED):This information is &eely available to allMTIpersonnel.

Written approval by MTIREcDD Nuclear A Environmental Operations Manager is required only if release outside the Company is required.

ZXLQE hLTI-~LR hlTI ~AR George Inch (6)

Brian Hall (3)

Larry Ferrell Kevin Hour (2)

Project File (2)

CIC (2)