ML17277A430

From kanterella
Revision as of 06:59, 7 July 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Thirteenth Progress Rept Re Review of Completed safety-related Work for Oct - Dec 1982
ML17277A430
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 01/27/1983
From: MATLOCK R G
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To: ENGELKEN R H
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
References
GO2-83-073, GO2-83-73, NUDOCS 8302040376
Download: ML17277A430 (24)


Text

Washington Public Power Supply System P.O.Box 968 3000 George Washington Way Richland, Washington 99352 (509)372-5000 IZ KQ PlgE copy.Docket Number 50-397 January 27, 1983 G02-83-073 Responds to: N/A Response required by: N/A Mr.R.H.Engelken, Regional Administrator Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region V 1450 Maria Lane Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596

Subject:

Reference:

SUPPLY SYSTEM NUCLEAR PROJECT NO.2 THIRTEENTH PROGRESS REPORT-10CFR50.54(f) a)G02-80-153, N.O.Strand to USNRC,"WPPSS Nuclear Project No.2 Docket No.50-397, EA-80-20, Notice of Violation and Additional Information-10CFR50.54(f)," dated July 17, 1980 This is the thirteenth Progress Report on the actions we have taken in regard to our commitments in Reference a).This quarterly report covers the period of October through December 1982.Verification reinspections of mechanical and electrical work have been completed.

All of the contractors except Bechtel have completed their programs and have submitted final reports.The status of individual tasks is detailed in the attachments.

"@hi"!Qfg~g Ol Zl J tC tlIt'N I G~VJ Qi+2Q J'>~/(8302040376 830i27 PDR ADOCK 05000397 R PDR

'I I h I I li n r~Ih R.H.Engelken Page 2 Should you have any questions regarding the nature or content of the review program or this report, please feel free to contact me at your convenience.

.Matlock-901A Program Director, WNP-2 RLK/lkh Attachments:

l.WNP-2 Project Review of Completed Safety-Related Work-Progress Report 1A.Prepurchase and Inactive Contracts-Status Report 1B.Deficiency Document Review-Status Report CC: WS Chin, BPA-Richland RA Feil, NRC, Resident WNP-2 3A Forrest, BAR-Richland PE Grady, BPA-WNP-2 3B Knotts, Jr., Debevoise 8 Liberman, Shoreham Bldg.1200 17th St.NW, Washington, DC 20036 ND Lewis, EFSEC, M/S PYll, Olympia, WA 98504 TA Mangelsdorf, Bechtel-WNP-2 J3 Verderber, BM, 185 Crossway Park Dr., Woodbury, NY 11797 1~l lg'l C k I', f-A 1 h ATTACHMENT 1 Page 1 of 5 THIRTEENTH PROGRESS REPORT WNP-2 PROJECT REVIEW OF COMPLETED SAFETY-RELATED WORK A.INTRODUCTION This report covers activities of the Supply System's Quality Verification Program (QVP)during the months of October, November, and December, 1982.Reinspection of hardware in the plant is complete.Results of the rein-spections are being evaluated.

Several contract reports covering the contractors'ctivities have been completed, others are in progress.B.GENERAL INFORMATION l.Instruction QVI-06 for Prepurchase and Inactive Contract reviews was revised during this period to take into account past experience of the reviewers in their respective areas of expertise.

This revision is being used by Project Quality Assurance (PQA)for the remaining QVP document reviews.2.A surveillance was conducted in October by PQA to confirm follow-up actions by QVP in response to management-assessment recommendations made by Technical Audit Associates.

A report was prepared by PQA on the findings of this surveillance.

Technical Audit Associates (TAA)performed an audit of this Program in November as a part of their review of the Plant Verification Pro-gram.Lead QVP personnel (Supply System and Bechtel)responded to inquiries concerning significant issues in the Program.The NRC Resident Inspectors were present during the audit sessions.4.At the Program Director's request, a presentation was made to mem-bers of the Project Management staff in December for a round table discussion of the methods by which the QVP has met its 50.54(f)-Response commitments.

This consisted of a"process"-oriented review of the reports being published by QVP, interpretation of results, and data-gathering methods used.A follow-up critique of this pre-sentation was requested by the Program Director to provide recom-mendations for successfully concluding QVP activities and reports, currently scheduled for the second quarter of 1983.5.During this reporting period, attrition reduced the staff levels of the QVP office by two and the Bechtel Reverification Group (BRG)by three (one engineer being reassigned).

Project Management reasses-sed the manpower requirements necessary for the timely completion of the program and has begun to restaff.BRG has added one engineer, reassigned another, while the QVP office has added one engineer.

V ATTACHMENT 1 Page 2 of 5 6.During the course of our work in 1982, the program has been scrutinized by the following audits and surveillances:

Overall Pro ram T e of Surveillance Audit Management Assessment Audit Audit Surveillance Audit (will commence presently)

Date January 1982 April 1982 June 1982 (On-going)

July 1982 October 1982 January 1983 Performed B Project QA Corporate QA TAA Project QA Project QA Corporate QA Bechtel Reverification Grou T e of Surveillance Date Performed B Audit Audit June thru July 1982 September 1982 Site Contractors Bechtel QA Project QA T e of Surveillance 5 Audits 69 Surveillances Date Performed B January thru October 1982 Bechtel QA December 1981 to October 1982 Bechtel QC The overall results of these surveillances has given us high con-fidence in the Program's performance and administration.

C.SYSTEMS COMPLETION 1.The following is a brief report for each of the active site contrac-tors'everification activities.

o Contract 210A Peter Kiewit Sons Complete, reported earlier.o Contract 21'ittsbur-DesMoines Steel Complete, reported earlier.o Contract 215/250 WBG/Bechtel Reinspection of contract 215 hardware items required for reveri-fication has been completed.

The following is a summary of the work during this report period:

('

ATTACHMENT 1 Page 3 of 5 Containment Drywell Structural Steel.All reinspections of the pipe whip supports and structural steel in the dry-well have been completed.

Deficiencies identified are currently being evaluated by the Architect-Engineer (A/E).Results will determine whether additional hardware inspec-tion will be necessary.

RPV Hydro, RPV Hydro Support, and Wetwell Hydro Boun-daries.All hardware items requiring inspection for the RPV and Wetwell Hydro boundaries and support systems have been inspected by the Bechtel Quality Control organiza-tion.Deficiencies were identified on Quality Control Inspection Reports (QCIRs)and are being reviewed by the A/E.Balance of Systems.Hardware reinspections have been com-pleted.Sixteen system reports have been written by BRG and approved by Bechtel QA.Reinspection results for the remaining twenty one systems will be evaluated and the reports completed as outstanding QCIRs and NCRs are dis-positioned.

Some QCIRs are being reevaluated by the A/E to ensure that the dispositions made are complete and technically adequate.o Contract 216 The Naldin er Cor oration Complete, reported earlier.The NRC Resident Inspector review-ed this report in depth and performed his own field investiga-tion of a sample of the hardware reinspected in this contract.In our participation in this review, we discovered that some copies of drawings were not legible.This information was given to the Project and is being acted upon by Project Management.

o Contract 217 Sentr Complete, reported earlier.The NRC Resident Inspector review-ed this report also, and has found some deficiencies.

An ad-dendum to the final report for this contract is being prepared for clarification and to respond to questions raised by the Inspector.

o Contract 218 Fischbach/Lord (F/L)The contractor has completed review of FAM Technical Services'his subcontractor engaged to perform reverification) hardware reinspection.

All but one of Fischbach/Lord's reverification system letter-reports have been submitted to BRG for review.To date, no deficiencies of such a nature or number as would increase the original lOX reverification sample have been iden-tified.F/L has completed the draft of their final contract report, which is now under review by BRG and the QVP office.

ATTACHMENT 1 Page 4 of 5 o Contract 219/234 O.B.Cannon Complete, reported earlier.o Contract 220 johnson Controls The final reverification report for this contract has been re-viewed and approved by BRG.The report is currently under re-view by the Supply System for concurrence.

D.PREPURCHASE AND INACTIVE CONTRACTS l.In the Twelfth Progress Report, we reported that we had searched the records of all WNP-2 contracts to be certain that all QC-I and SC-I work had been addressed.

The list of contracts obtained from that effort was added to Attachment lA.However, two identified con-tracts were inadvertently omitted from the list.They are both Pur-chase Order contracts and have been entered in Attachment lA of this report.Document reviews and contract evaluations continue and the fourteen contracts remaining are expected to be completed soon.2.The audit by Bechtel of test documentation for cranes and hoists installed by WBG which began during the previous reporting period has been completed.

The results revealed that not all testing con-formed to the appropriate code requirements.

Pursuant to this find-ing, a program has been initiated whereby all cranes and hoists not already turned over and tested by Supply System's Test and Start-up organization (TSU)are now being retested by Bechtel and TSU.Reinspection of the Diesel-Generators by TSU is continuing.

It is expected that this task and a completion report will be available soon.E.SPECIAL TASKS l.Deficienc Document Review Progress continues on task reports documenting the veri.fication activities accomplished.

The examination of procedures governing the processing and use of the various site and contractor documents is continuing to determine:

o Which documents disseminated technical information to the field?o What was the extent of engineering latitude?o What reviews for technical adequacy occured as part of the nor-mal processing?

ATTACHMENT 1 Page 5 of 5 o What special reviews for technical adequacy were performed'?

o If audits for procedural compliance were conducted and what the results were?Documents disseminating technical information which were not sub,ject to examination for technical adequacy may be selected for indepen-dent review.The status of document reviews and contractor document evaluation is summarized in Attachment 1B to this report.2.Personnel Qualifications An examination began during this period of personnel qualification reviews conducted'nder the Restart Program.The results of this examination, combined with similar information from the Project Quality Assurance review, the Deficiency Document review, and the Systems Completion task will be assessed to determine if further investigation is warranted.

Receivin Ins ection Bechtel's report on the repeat inspections for material to be in-stalled in System 58 has been reviewed by the QVP offices and re-turned with comments.The final report is expected to be issued soon.The examination of receiving inspection reviews performed during Restart Program is continuing.

As in the Personnel Qualifications Task, the results of this examination will be combined with similar information from the Systems Completion task and the Project Quality Assurance review for assessment to determine if further investiga-tion is required.4.Grout Evaluation Pro ram A report documenting the history, sampling, and results of field testing of in-place grout at WNP-2 has been completed and is being reviewed prior to its transmittal to the NRC.This report estab-lishes that, based on the results of the investigation and evalua-tion by the Architect-Engineer, the quality of grout is satisfactory for its intended use or has been identified for replacement.

This activity is also reported as lOCFR50.55(e)

Item 73.

n THIRTEENTH PROWESS REPCAT SUPPLY SYSTEM REVIEW OF FREPlHCHASE AQ)INACTIVE CONTRACTS STATUS REPORT ATTACWENT 1A Page 1 of 5 I I I CONTRACT(R I DESCRIPTION OF I CONTRACTOR'S WCRK I STATUS OF OW%R FINAL I OOQMENTATION REVIEW (X GNPLETE)I I STATUS OF OW~EVALUATION I RESULTS OF OOQNENTATION REVIEW I ON NEED FOR REINSPECTION I (X COMPLETE)1 2808-2 General Electric l NSSS I 7 Science Systems I Seepage Control From&Technology I Ponds I 17 Pathway Bellows I Refueling Bellows I 18 Farr Comply I Standby Gas Treatment I&HEPA Filters I 22A Joy Marufactur-I HVAC Fans ing 23 Bryon Jackson I Standby Service Water I Pumps I I No Deficiencies I No Deficiencies I INo Significant Deficiencies I No Deficiencies I Ihb Significant Deficiencies I I INo Deficiencies 24 WICO Inc I Shop Fabricated Tanks I I No Deficiencies I 28 Buffalo Forge I HVAC Fans I I No Significant Deficiencies I 31A Whiting 32CD Clayton 35A Cree Co.I Turbine Generator and I Reactor Building Crmesl JIB Overhead Cranes I Pumps&Motors I IPotential Deficiencies, Rein-I spection Reconaended I INo Significant D ficiencies I INo Deficiencies I 36 Acme Concrete I Productim&Delivery I of Concrete I I I INo Significant Deficiencies I I THIRTEENTH PROGRESS RERRT SUPPLY SYSTEM REVIEW OF PRERHCHASE ARK INACTIVE CONTRACTS STATUS,REPlRT'TTAORENT 1AT Page 2:of,5 I I I CONTRACT(8 I DESCRIPTION OF I CONTRACTOR'S WORK I STATUS OF OWER FINAL I STATUS OF'WNER EV(lLUATTON)

I OOONENTATION REVIEW I RESULTS OF DOCLNENTATION REVIEW, I ON NEED FOR REINSPECTION I (X COMPLETE)I (X COMPLETE)~I" I>I 41A Velan'alve.r!I I 41B Anchor/Darling:s I I 42A Fisher Controls I I hbclear Valves Nuclear>Valves Control Valves 42B Fisher Controls I Control Valves E 47A Westinghouse I" Switchgear 48 Westinghouse I 480 Volt Substation I 100 INo Significant Deficiencies I INo Deficiencies I'No D ficiencies I'No Significant Deficiencies I INo D.f'iciencies

  • I I No Deficiencies I I I'.I'.100-.-"---*--.I'-II I-zoo---"----"I I-Ia 100 a 100 49 I-T-E Imperial I I Motor Control Centers t INo, Significant Ceficiencies I'li 100~I: Ij 51A ESB Inc.Batteries 51B Power Conversi~l Battery Chargers'iv 52 Solid State I Uninterruptible Power Controls I, Supply I'3 Stewart I Diesel Generators Stevenson a'100 100"100 I No Deficiencies INo Significant Deficiencies I INo Deficiencies IOpen Documentation Deficiencies 100 100 100 95 55 Westinghouse I, Containment Electrical

'I II Penetrations INo Significant Deficiencies It I'57 Kinemetrics I I Ac'cele rotte ters INo Deficiencies I 100 THIRTEENTH PRO(BESS REPORT SUFPLY SYSTEM REVIEW OF PRERNCHASE QG INACTIVE CONTRACTS STATUS REHRI ATTAONENT 1A Page 3 of 5 I I I mNTRACTCR I I DESCRIPTION OF I CONTRACTOR'S WCRK I STATUS OF OWNER FINAL I DOQNENTAT ION REVIEW I (X COMPLETE)I I STATUS OF OWNER EVALUATION I RESULTS OF DOCWENTATION REVIEW I ON NEED FCR REINSPECTION I (X COMPLETE)58 lelco 59 GE 60A Sentry Equip-ment Corp.I I 62A Okonite 628 Raychem I 62C Rockbestos 67 H K Porter Instrunent Racks I Instrunent

&Control I Boards I I Sampling and Analysis I Systems I I Cable I I Cable I I Cable I Air Hmdling Units INo Significant Deficiencies I INo Deficiencies I I INo Significant Deficiencies I No Deficiencies I INo Significant Deficiencies I IOpen Document Deficiencies I INo Defxciencxes I 100 68 BIF 69 Velan 71 Air Products&Chemicals Isolation Valves Check Valves Hydrogen Recombiner INo Significant Deficiencies I INo Significant Deficiencies I I No Deficiencies 73 Elgar 90 Leckenby 92A Ingersoll Rmd 15KVA Inverters Pipe Whip Restraints I Sampling Probes I I I This is an Active Pre-I purchase Contract I INo Deficiencies I IDeficiencies Identified And Being I I Corrected thru Management System I INo D ficiencies I I p~

THIRTEENTH FROKESS RERRT SUFPLY SYSTEN REVIEW OF PRERBCHASE AM)INACTIVE CONTRACTS STATUS REPCAT ATTAQ%ENT 1A Page 4 of 5 I I I CONTRACTCR I DESCRIPTION OF I CONTRACTOR S WCRX I STATUS OF OWKR FINAL I STATUS OF OWtKR EVALUATION f DOCNENTATION REVIEW I RESULTS OF DOCLMENTATION REVIEW I ON NEED FOR REINSPECTION I (%COMPLETE)I (%GNPLETE)92B Kaman Sciences Vacuun Brewer Valves I This is an Active Pre-)No Deficiencies I purchase Contract 93 GPE Controls 94 B F Shaw Vacmn Breaker Valves I MSRV Discharge I I Na Deficiencies I INo Deficiencies I I 12409 Buehler thclear I BNtR High Density Spent I Products I Fuel Racks I I No Significant Deficiencies 6426 Wright-I Schuchar t-Harbor I I Interim Construction IResults not yet available 6809 Bethlehem 6904 Welk Brothers 6905 Welk Brothers 6912 Pybus 6917 Texas Pipe I Reinforcing Steel I Annular Sleeves I Skiaaer Surge Tank I I Skimer Surge Tank I I Fuel Pool Liner h I Accessories I 99 INo Significant Deficiencies I INo Significant Deficiencies I I&Significant Deficiencies I)No Significant Deficiencies I INo Significant Deficiencies 75 90 75 75 I Reactor Building I Substructure I 205 Stewart Erikson 7012 Brwd Industrial I Separation System I INo Significant Deficiencies I (No Significant Deficiencies 206 Bovee Crail General Construction lOpen Documentation Deficiencies I 95 THIRTEENTH PROGRESS REPORT SUPPLY SYSTEM REVIEW OF PREPURCHASE ANO INACTIVE CONTRACTS STATUS REHHT ATTACHMENT 1A Page 5 of 5 I A I CONtRACTOR I DESCRIPTION OF I CONTRACTOR S WmK I STATUS OF OWNER FINAL I.I STATUS OF OWNER EVALUATION DOCUMENTATION REVIEW I RESULTS OF DOONENTAT ION REVIEW I ON NEED FOR REINSPECTION (X COMPLETE)(X COMPLETE)206A Peter Kiewit I Architectural Const Structural Steel 209 Rigging Int.I Rigging of Reactor I Pressure Vessel I 210 Peter Kiewit I Architectural Const.I 99 99 I INo Significant Deficiencies I!No Significant Deficiencies I (No Deficiencies 10pen Oocqnentation Deficiencies I 90 160 100 90 213 PDH I Primary Containment I Vessel I INo Significant Deficiencies I I 226 Sime I I I Reactor Building I Excavation I I Testing Laboratory I 225 HcHillin Bros.I Hake Up Water Punphousel I 25 lOpen deficiencies I INo Significant Deficiencies I INo Deficiencies 100 233 B F Shaw I Spray Pond Alteration I I Reactor Internals l Instrunent Hodificationsl INo Deficiencies I I lNo Significant Deficiencies

25.

THIRTEENTH FROGRESS REPNIT OEF ICIENCY DOQNENT REVIEW SU+lARY QC-I CONTRACTS Attachment 1B Page 1 of 4 QIALIT<CLASS-I SEISMIC-I I SITE WCRK PERFCRMED SITE OO~ENTATION SISJECT TO QVP REVIEW 7, Yes 7 I Yes I 7 I Yes I 7.I Yes I 7 I Yes I 7 I Yes 7 I Yes I 7 I Yes 7.I Yes I 7 I I 7 I F'7 I I 7.I F I 7 I F I 7 I F I 7 I 7 I Yes I 7 I Yes 7 I Yes 7 I Yes 7 I Yes 7 I Yes I 7 I Yes Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I F I F F I F I F I F I F I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I I I I I I I I I I I.I I I I I I I I I I E 7 I E I 7 Yes I'I Yes I 3 0 I 7 Yes I I B I 7 I E I 7 I Yes I 3 I Yes.I 3 I Yes,l 3 I Yes I 3 I Yes I,.3 I Yes I 3 I Yes I 3 Yes I 3 I E-I 7 0 I 7 0 I 3 I E I I Yes I I Yes I 3 I 0'7 IStewart-Erickson IBovee-Crail I IPeter Kiewit Sons>-.-I IPit tsburgh-Des Moines I ILampson Inc,~;.I IPeter Kiewit Sons'-I IPeter Kiewit Sons',.I I Wright Schuchart+rbor I IPi ttsburgh-Des Moines I IPittsburgh-Des Moines,, I I WSH/Boecon/GER I~.-, I Wal dinger ISentry I IFischbach/Lord

+,, I IO.B.Cannon, te,~,, I I Johnson Controlsi,-I IPacific Testing<Labs z I IPacific Testing,.Labs;I I IMcMillan Brothers I ISime Contruction Co.I IBF Shaw IO.B.Cannon~p I IGE ISLE Yes I Yes Yes I Yes I Yes Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes 6 I 6 I~6 I 6 I 6 I 6 I,6 I~6 I 6 I 6 I 6 I 6 I 6, I 6 I 6 I 6 I6 I 6 I 6 I 6 I 6 I 6 I 6 Yes 205>>206>>206A>>207" 209" 210>>21OA 7 Yes 7 I Yes 7 I Yes 7 I Yes 7 I 0 7 I Yes 7 I B 7, I Yes 7'Yes 7 I Yes 7 I Yes 7'Yes 7 I Yes 7 I Yes 7 I Yes 7 I Yes 7 I Yes 7 I 0 7 I Yes 7 I Yes 7 I Yes 7 I Yes 7 I 0 Yes I Yes 11 I 11.I..AO I 11 I 7 I ll I 7 I 11 I 11 I ll I ll I 11 I 11 I 11 I 11 I 11 I ll I 7 I 10 I 3 I 11 I 11 I I 3 I 3 I 3 I 3 I 3 I 3 I 3 I 3 7 I 7 I 7 I 7 I 7 I 7 I 7 I 3 I I I 3 I 3 I 3 I 3 Yes I Yes Yes I Yes I Yes Yes I Yes Yes I Yes Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes Yes).".'Yea.I..6 3l l 3l 3 3 3-3 t 7.7.7, 7.7, 7 7)3.3 3 3;3 3.3 Yes I Yes 0 I Yes I B Yes I Yes I Yes I Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6426" Yes 213>>213A" 215 216 217 218 219 Yes~Yes, I Yes...I Yes I Yes Yes I Yes Yes Yes Yes I Yes I A Yes 220 221>>221A Yes Yes I 0 I I Yes I Yes 225" 226 I Yes I Yes Yes Yes 233'Yes I 0 Yes I 234 I 235 Yes>>e 4,~~I 1 PCN PEO CWR--ECN RCC CO NCR RFI I I 5 NOTES: A-Review not conmenced-No QC-I Work performed.prior to 7/80-Special Review~-No QC-I or QC-II/SC-1 Documentation closed prior to 7/80-Docunent not used'orathis contract-Docunent reviewed under CAR 1475:-Denotes Inactive Contract-Numbers indicate action in Flow Chart, Page 4 LEGEND: PCN-Project Change Notice PEO-Project Engineering Directive,'CR

-Nonconformance Report RFI-Request For Information ECN-Engineering Change Notice CWR-Contractor Waiver Request RCC-Request for Contract Change C.O.-Change Order.act's>>=lose THIRTEENTH FROGRESS REPORT DEFICIENCY DOClNENT REVIEW TASK Attachment 18 Page 2 of 4 N3NQ)NFORMANCE REHHT REVIEW SENARY NCR CONTRACT 205" 206A%209%210%21OA 6426" 213" 213A" 215 216 217 218 219 220 221" 221 A 225" 233" 234 235 CONTRACT(8 Stew-Erikson I Bovee-Crail I Peter Kiewit Sons'Pittsburgh-Des I Moines Steel Co.I Lampson Inc.I I Peter Kiewit Sons'Peter Kiewit Sons'Wright Schuchart I Harbor I Pittsburgh-Des I Moines Steel Co.I Pittsburgh-Des I Hoines Steel Co.I WSH/Boecon/GERI I Waldinger I Sentry I Fischbach/Lord I 0.8.Cannon I Johnson Controls I Pacific Testing Labl I Pacific Testing Labl I McHillan Brothers I I BF Shaw I I 0.8.Cannon I I GE IS&E I I I I I CONTRACT ACTIVITY Rx Bldg.Substructure General Construction Arch.Construction Structural Steel Rigging of Reactor Pressure Vessel Arch.Construction Arch.Construction Interim General Construction Primary Cont Vessel Primary Cont Vessel Retrofit Mechanical Construction HVAC, Plunbing Fire Protection Electrical Construction Special Coatings Instr linen tat ion Testing Testing Makeup Water Pump House Spray Pond Alterations Wetwell Coating IhC Board Hodification NO.OF NCR'S I CLOSED PRIOR I TO 7/80 31 417 387 2 41 8 113 75 1016 420 3 375 13 27 6 8 24 4 3094 I I I SAMPLE 4 I 42 I 39 I I 3 I I 0 I 5 I 8 I 11 I I 10 I I 10 I 126 49 I 1 I 37 I 2 I I 1 I 8 I 2 I I I 1 I 8 I I 347 14 0 0 A 1 1 1 11 14 6 A A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 ISCRE PANG IES I IOENTIFIEO I CLARIFICATION I I REQUIRING I FROVIOH)-I" CLARIFICATION I NCR CLEARED"Inactive Site Contract A: Review in progress, final data not available at this time.8: No QC-I NCR's closed prior to 7/80 THIRTEENTH FROGRESS REPORT DEFICIENCY DOCENT REVIEW SINMARY QC-1 CONTRACTS Attachment 18 Page 3 of 4 4'vr~~Ig r r I Contract QUALITY CLASS-I SEISMIC-I SITE WMK PERFUMED Contractor 205"'tewart-Erickson 206<>I Peter Kiewit Sons'07" I Pittsburgh-Des Moines I Lampson Inc 210" I Peter Kiewit Sons'10A I Peter Kiewit Sons'6426" I Wright Schuchart Harbor 2D>>I Pittsburgh-Des Moines 2DA" (Pittsburgh-Des Moines 215 I WSH/Boecon/GER I 216 I, Waldinger 217 I Sentry 218 I Fischbach/Lord 219"'0.8.Cannon 220 I Johnson Controls 221>>I Pacific Testing Labs 221A I-Pacific Testing Labs 225" I McMillan Brothers 226=I Sime Construction Company 233>>I BF Shaw 234 I 0.8.Cannon 235 I GE ISLE NCR I IR I I IR I I I I I I IR I N/A I I I CAR I I CAR I I IR I OR I IR I.I IR I I IR I I ISR I I I I I I ICL I I I I I I iR I I N I Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes GD Rev ew CONTRACTCR DOCUMENTATION,:,'

r)r SIHJECT TO VP REVIEW INTERNAL DOCUMENTS I Status+OCO Review Status+I Complete None-Complete I r I=3 I NCR I Yes-.I 3--I I 3 INone I-I-I I 3 I I Yes I=-3 I I Complete I I 0"-I Complete I I Complete I None I-I Complete I I Complete I N/A I 8 IComplete I I 5 I I Yes I 15 I I 3 I ECAR I Yes I 3"I*I Complete I ECAR I Yes I Complete I I Complete I FCR I C I Complete I I 9 I OR I Yes I, 9 I I Gmplete I IR I 0 I Complete I I Complete I IR I Yes Pllylete I I Complete I None I-I Complete I I Complete I KRN I Yes, I pxnplete I I Complete I I Yes I Complete I I Complete I I 0 I Complete I=.-I 5 I CAR I Yes r I'.5 I I 3 I I Yes I-3 I I-I I A I-I I Complete I one I-I Complete I I 6 I NoneI-I-I N)TES: A-Revi'ew not conaenced 8-No QC-I Work performed prior to 7/80 C-Special Review 0-No QC-I or QC-II/SC-1 Docrmrentation closed prior to 7/80 CD-Deficiency Document DCO-Design Change Document-Denotes Inactive Contract+-Numbers indicate action in Flow Chart, Page 4 LE GEM): IR-Inspection Report CAR-Corrective Action Report CR-Deficiency Report ISR-Inspection Surveillance Report QR-Quality Report ECAR-Engineering Corrective Action Report FCR-Field Change Request WRN-Johnson Controls Field Request Notice

.-'HIRTEENTH PROGRESS REPORT FLOW CHART FOR REVIEW OF CONTRACTOR INTERNAL DOCUMENTATION ATTACHMENT 1B-..Page 4 of 4 7 Write Report No 1 Coordinator Interface 2 Checkl i s t Intervi ew 3 Procedural Review 4 Logbook Review, 5 Sampl e Review 6 Decision To Sample 11 Write Report YES No 8 Document Selection 9 Revi ew 10 Decision To Increase Sample Yes