ML17277A430

Forwards Thirteenth Progress Rept Re Review of Completed safety-related Work for Oct - Dec 1982

ML17277A430
Person / Time
Site:	Columbia
Issue date:	01/27/1983
From:	Matlock R WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To:	Engelken R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
References
GO2-83-073, GO2-83-73, NUDOCS 8302040376
Download: ML17277A430 (24)

Text

Washington Public Power Supply System P.O. Box 968 3000 George Washington Way Richland, Washington 99352 (509) 372-5000 IZKQ PlgE copy

. Docket Number 50-397 January 27, 1983 Responds to: N/A G02-83-073 Response required by: N/A Mr. R. H. Engelken, Regional Administrator Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region V 1450 Maria Lane Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596

Subject:

SUPPLY SYSTEM NUCLEAR PROJECT NO. 2 THIRTEENTH PROGRESS REPORT 10CFR50.54(f)

Reference:

a) G02-80-153, N.O. Strand to USNRC, "WPPSS Nuclear Project No. 2 Docket No. 50-397, EA-80-20, Notice of Violation and Additional Information-10CFR50.54(f)," dated July 17, 1980 This is the thirteenth Progress Report on the actions we have taken in regard to our commitments in Reference a). This quarterly report covers the period of October through December 1982.

Verification reinspections of mechanical and electrical work have been completed. All of the contractors except Bechtel have completed their programs and have submitted final reports. The status of individual tasks is detailed in the attachments.

@hi"!Qfg~g Ol Zl J tC tlIt'N I G~VJ Qi+2Q J'>~/

( 8302040376 830i27 PDR ADOCK 05000397 R PDR

'I I

h I

I li n

~ Ih r

R.H. Engelken Page 2 Should you have any questions regarding the nature or content of the review program or this report, please feel free to contact me at your convenience.

. Matlock 901A Program Director, WNP-2 RLK/lkh Attachments: l. WNP-2 Project Review of Completed Safety-Related Work Progress Report 1A. Prepurchase and Inactive Contracts Status Report 1B. Deficiency Document Review Status Report CC: WS Chin, BPA Richland RA Feil, NRC, Resident WNP-2 3A Forrest, BAR Richland PE Grady, BPA WNP-2 3B Knotts, Jr., Debevoise 8 Liberman, Shoreham Bldg.

1200 17th St. NW, Washington, DC 20036 ND Lewis, EFSEC, M/S PYll, Olympia, WA 98504 TA Mangelsdorf, Bechtel WNP-2 J3 Verderber, BM, 185 Crossway Park Dr., Woodbury, NY 11797

1

~ l lg 'l C

k I',

f- A 1 h

ATTACHMENT 1 Page 1 of 5 THIRTEENTH PROGRESS REPORT WNP-2 PROJECT REVIEW OF COMPLETED SAFETY-RELATED WORK A. INTRODUCTION This report covers activities of the Supply System's Quality Verification Program (QVP) during the months of October, November, and December, 1982.

Reinspection of hardware in the plant is complete. Results of the rein-spections are being evaluated. Several contract reports covering the contractors'ctivities have been completed, others are in progress.

B. GENERAL INFORMATION

l. Instruction QVI-06 for Prepurchase and Inactive Contract reviews was revised during this period to take into account past experience of the reviewers in their respective areas of expertise. This revision is being used by Project Quality Assurance (PQA) for the remaining QVP document reviews.

2. A surveillance was conducted in October by PQA to confirm follow-up actions by QVP in response to management-assessment recommendations made by Technical Audit Associates. A report was prepared by PQA on the findings of this surveillance.

Technical Audit Associates (TAA) performed an audit of this Program in November as a part of their review of the Plant Verification Pro-gram. Lead QVP personnel (Supply System and Bechtel) responded to inquiries concerning significant issues in the Program. The NRC Resident Inspectors were present during the audit sessions.

4. At the Program Director's request, a presentation was made to mem-bers of the Project Management staff in December for a round table discussion of the methods by which the QVP has met its 50.54(f)

Response commitments. This consisted of a "process"-oriented review of the reports being published by QVP, interpretation of results, and data-gathering methods used. A follow-up critique of this pre-sentation was requested by the Program Director to provide recom-mendations for successfully concluding QVP activities and reports, currently scheduled for the second quarter of 1983.

5. During this reporting period, attrition reduced the staff levels of the QVP office by two and the Bechtel Reverification Group (BRG) by three (one engineer being reassigned). Project Management reasses-sed the manpower requirements necessary for the timely completion of the program and has begun to restaff. BRG has added one engineer, reassigned another, while the QVP office has added one engineer.

V ATTACHMENT 1 Page 2 of 5

6. During the course of our work in 1982, the program has been scrutinized by the following audits and surveillances:

Overall Pro ram T e of Surveillance Date Performed B Audit January 1982 Project QA Management Assessment April 1982 Corporate QA Audit June 1982 (On-going) TAA Audit July 1982 Project QA Surveillance October 1982 Project QA Audit (will commence January 1983 Corporate QA presently)

Bechtel Reverification Grou T e of Surveillance Date Performed B Audit June thru July 1982 Bechtel QA Audit September 1982 Project QA Site Contractors T e of Surveillance Date Performed B 5 Audits January thru October 1982 Bechtel QA 69 Surveillances December 1981 to October 1982 Bechtel QC The overall results of these surveillances has given us high con-fidence in the Program's performance and administration.

C. SYSTEMS COMPLETION

1. The following is a brief report for each of the active site contrac-tors'everification activities.

o Contract 210A Peter Kiewit Sons Complete, reported earlier.

o Contract 21'ittsbur -DesMoines Steel Complete, reported earlier.

o Contract 215/250 WBG/Bechtel Reinspection of contract 215 hardware items required for reveri-fication has been completed. The following is a summary of the work during this report period:

('

ATTACHMENT 1 Page 3 of 5 Containment Drywell Structural Steel. All reinspections of the pipe whip supports and structural steel in the dry-well have been completed. Deficiencies identified are currently being evaluated by the Architect-Engineer (A/E).

Results will determine whether additional hardware inspec-tion will be necessary.

RPV Hydro, RPV Hydro Support, and Wetwell Hydro Boun-daries. All hardware items requiring inspection for the RPV and Wetwell Hydro boundaries and support systems have been inspected by the Bechtel Quality Control organiza-tion. Deficiencies were identified on Quality Control Inspection Reports (QCIRs) and are being reviewed by the A/E.

Balance of Systems. Hardware reinspections have been com-pleted. Sixteen system reports have been written by BRG and approved by Bechtel QA. Reinspection results for the remaining twenty one systems will be evaluated and the reports completed as outstanding QCIRs and NCRs are dis-positioned. Some QCIRs are being reevaluated by the A/E to ensure that the dispositions made are complete and technically adequate.

o Contract 216 The Naldin er Cor oration Complete, reported earlier. The NRC Resident Inspector review-ed this report in depth and performed his own field investiga-tion of a sample of the hardware reinspected in this contract.

In our participation in this review, we discovered that some copies of drawings were not legible. This information was given to the Project and is being acted upon by Project Management.

o Contract 217 Sentr Complete, reported earlier. The NRC Resident Inspector review-ed this report also, and has found some deficiencies. An ad-dendum to the final report for this contract is being prepared for clarification and to respond to questions raised by the Inspector.

o Contract 218 Fischbach/Lord (F/L)

The contractor has completed review of FAM Technical subcontractor engaged to perform reverification) hardware Services'his reinspection. All but one of Fischbach/Lord's reverification system letter-reports have been submitted to BRG for review.

To date, no deficiencies of such a nature or number as would increase the original lOX reverification sample have been iden-tified. F/L has completed the draft of their final contract report, which is now under review by BRG and the QVP office.

ATTACHMENT 1 Page 4 of 5 o Contract 219/234 O.B. Cannon Complete, reported earlier.

o Contract 220 johnson Controls The final reverification report for this contract has been re-viewed and approved by BRG. The report is currently under re-view by the Supply System for concurrence.

D. PREPURCHASE AND INACTIVE CONTRACTS

l. In the Twelfth Progress Report, we reported that we had searched the records of all WNP-2 contracts to be certain that all QC-I and SC-I work had been addressed. The list of contracts obtained from that effort was added to Attachment lA. However, two identified con-tracts were inadvertently omitted from the list. They are both Pur-chase Order contracts and have been entered in Attachment lA of this report.

Document reviews and contract evaluations continue and the fourteen contracts remaining are expected to be completed soon.

2. The audit by Bechtel of test documentation for cranes and hoists installed by WBG which began during the previous reporting period has been completed. The results revealed that not all testing con-formed to the appropriate code requirements. Pursuant to this find-ing, a program has been initiated whereby all cranes and hoists not already turned over and tested by Supply System's Test and Start-up organization (TSU) are now being retested by Bechtel and TSU.

Reinspection of the Diesel-Generators by TSU is continuing. It is expected that this task and a completion report will be available soon.

E. SPECIAL TASKS

l. Deficienc Document Review Progress continues on task reports documenting the veri.fication activities accomplished. The examination of procedures governing the processing and use of the various site and contractor documents is continuing to determine:

o Which documents disseminated technical information to the field?

o What was the extent of engineering latitude?

o What reviews for technical adequacy occured as part of the nor-mal processing?

ATTACHMENT 1 Page 5 of 5 o What special reviews for technical adequacy were performed'?

o If audits for procedural compliance were conducted and what the results were?

Documents disseminating technical information which were not sub,ject to examination for technical adequacy may be selected for indepen-dent review.

The status of document reviews and contractor document evaluation is summarized in Attachment 1B to this report.

2. Personnel Qualifications An examination began during this period of personnel qualification reviews conducted'nder the Restart Program. The results of this examination, combined with similar information from the Project Quality Assurance review, the Deficiency Document review, and the Systems Completion task will be assessed to determine investigation is warranted.

if further Receivin Ins ection Bechtel's report on the repeat inspections for material to be in-stalled in System 58 has been reviewed by the QVP offices and re-turned with comments. The final report is expected to be issued soon.

The examination of receiving inspection reviews performed during Restart Program is continuing. As in the Personnel Qualifications Task, the results of this examination will be combined with similar information from the Systems Completion task and the Project Quality Assurance review for assessment to determine tion is required.

if further investiga-

4. Grout Evaluation Pro ram A report documenting the history, sampling, and results of field testing of in-place grout at WNP-2 has been completed and is being reviewed prior to its transmittal to the NRC. This report estab-lishes that, based on the results of the investigation and evalua-tion by the Architect-Engineer, the quality of grout is satisfactory for its intended use or has been identified for replacement. This activity is also reported as 10CFR50.55(e) Item 73.

n ATTACWENT 1A Page 1 of 5 THIRTEENTH PROWESS REPCAT SUPPLY SYSTEM REVIEW OF FREPlHCHASE AQ) INACTIVE CONTRACTS STATUS REPORT I

I I DESCRIPTION OF I STATUS OF OW%R FINAL I I STATUS OF OW~ EVALUATION I CONTRACT(R I CONTRACTOR'S WCRK I OOQMENTATION REVIEW I RESULTS OF OOQNENTATION REVIEW I ON NEED FOR REINSPECTION (X GNPLETE) I (X COMPLETE) 1 2808-2 General Electric l NSSS I No Deficiencies I

7 Science Systems I Seepage Control From

& Technology I Ponds I No Deficiencies I I 17 Pathway Bellows I Refueling Bellows INo Significant Deficiencies I

18 Farr Comply I Standby Gas Treatment I & HEPA Filters I No Deficiencies I I 22A Joy Marufactur- I HVAC Fans Ihb Significant Deficiencies ing I I

23 Bryon Jackson I Standby Service Water INo Deficiencies I Pumps I

24 WICO Inc I Shop Fabricated Tanks I No Deficiencies I I 28 Buffalo Forge I HVAC Fans I No Significant Deficiencies I I 31A Whiting I Turbine Generator and IPotential Deficiencies, Rein-I Reactor Building Crmesl I spection Reconaended I

32CD Clayton JIB Overhead Cranes INo Significant D ficiencies I

35A Cree Co. I Pumps & Motors INo Deficiencies I I 36 Acme Concrete I Productim & Delivery INo Significant Deficiencies I of Concrete I I I I I

1AT Page 2:of,5 THIRTEENTH PROGRESS RERRT STATUS,REPlRT'TTAORENT SUPPLY SYSTEM REVIEW OF PRERHCHASE ARK INACTIVE CONTRACTS I

I I DESCRIPTION OF I STATUS OF OWER FINAL I STATUS OF'WNER EV(lLUATTON) I" I CONTRACT(8 I CONTRACTOR'S WORK I OOONENTATION REVIEW I RESULTS OF DOCLNENTATION REVIEW, I ON NEED FOR REINSPECTION I>

I (X COMPLETE) I (X COMPLETE) ~ I 41A Velan'alve .r ! I hbclear Valves INo Significant Deficiencies I I I

41B Anchor/Darling:s I Nuclear>Valves INo Deficiencies I'.

I I I'

42A Fisher Controls I Control Valves

'No D ficiencies .100 .- "-- -*--.I'-

I II 42B Fisher Controls I Control Valves I'No Significant Deficiencies -zoo---" - -- "I I E

I I-Ia 47A Westinghouse I" Switchgear 100 INo D.f'iciencies 100

• I a 48 Westinghouse I 480 Volt Substation I No Deficiencies 100 I I

'li 49 I-T-E Imperial I Motor Control Centers INo, Significant Ceficiencies 100 ~ I:

I t I Ij 51A ESB Inc. Batteries I No Deficiencies 100 51B Power Conversi~l Battery Chargers 52 Solid State Controls I

I,

'iv a'100 Uninterruptible Supply Power 100 "100 INo I

INo Significant Deficiencies Deficiencies 100 100 I'3 Stewart I Diesel Generators IOpen Documentation Deficiencies 95 Stevenson 55 Westinghouse Containment Electrical 'I INo Significant Deficiencies It I,

II Penetrations I' 57 Kinemetrics I Ac'cele rotte ters INo Deficiencies 100 I I

ATTAONENT 1A Page 3 of 5 THIRTEENTH PRO(BESS REPORT SUFPLY SYSTEM REVIEW OF PRERNCHASE QG INACTIVE CONTRACTS STATUS REHRI I

I I DESCRIPTION OF I STATUS OF OWNER FINAL I I STATUS OF OWNER EVALUATION I mNTRACTCR I CONTRACTOR'S WCRK I DOQNENTATION REVIEW I RESULTS OF DOCWENTATION REVIEW I ON NEED FCR REINSPECTION I I (X COMPLETE) I (X COMPLETE) 58 lelco Instrunent Racks INo Significant Deficiencies I

59 GE I Instrunent & Control INo Deficiencies I Boards I I I 60A Sentry Equip- I Sampling and Analysis INo Significant Deficiencies ment Corp. I Systems I

I I 62A Okonite I Cable I No Deficiencies I I 628 Raychem I Cable INo Significant Deficiencies I I I

62C Rockbestos I Cable IOpen Document Deficiencies I I 67 H K Porter Air Hmdling Units INo Defxciencxes 100 I

68 BIF Isolation Valves INo Significant Deficiencies I

69 Velan Check Valves INo Significant Deficiencies I

71 Air Products & Hydrogen Recombiner I No Deficiencies Chemicals 73 Elgar 15KVA Inverters INo Deficiencies I

90 Leckenby Pipe Whip Restraints IDeficiencies Identified And Being I I Corrected thru Management System I

92A Ingersoll Rmd I Sampling Probes I This is an Active Pre- INo D ficiencies I I purchase Contract I I I I

~

p

ATTAQ%ENT 1A Page 4 of 5 THIRTEENTH FROKESS RERRT SUFPLY SYSTEN REVIEW OF PRERBCHASE AM) INACTIVE CONTRACTS STATUS REPCAT I

I I DESCRIPTION OF I STATUS OF OWKR FINAL I STATUS OF OWtKR EVALUATION I CONTRACTCR I CONTRACTOR S WCRX f DOCNENTATION REVIEW I RESULTS OF DOCLMENTATION REVIEW I ON NEED FOR REINSPECTION I (% COMPLETE) I (% GNPLETE) 92B Kaman Sciences Vacuun Brewer Valves I This is an Active Pre- )No Deficiencies I purchase Contract 93 GPE Controls Vacmn Breaker Valves I Na Deficiencies I

94 B F Shaw I MSRV Discharge INo Deficiencies I I I 12409 Buehler thclear I BNtR High Density Spent I I No Significant Deficiencies Products I Fuel Racks I

6426 Wright- I Interim Construction IResults not yet available Schuchar t-Harbor I I

6809 Bethlehem I Reinforcing Steel INo Significant Deficiencies 75 I I 6904 Welk Brothers Annular Sleeves INo Significant Deficiencies I

6905 Welk Brothers I Skiaaer Surge Tank 99 I& Significant Deficiencies 90 I I 6912 Pybus I Skimer Surge Tank )No Significant Deficiencies 75 I I 6917 Texas Pipe I Fuel Pool Liner h INo Significant Deficiencies 75 I Accessories I

7012 Brwd Industrial I Separation System INo Significant Deficiencies I I 205 Stewart Erikson I Reactor Building (No Significant Deficiencies I Substructure I

206 Bovee Crail General Construction lOpen Documentation Deficiencies 95 I

ATTACHMENT 1A Page 5 of 5 THIRTEENTH PROGRESS REPORT SUPPLY SYSTEM REVIEW OF PREPURCHASE ANO INACTIVE CONTRACTS STATUS REHHT I

A I DESCRIPTION OF I STATUS OF OWNER FINAL I. I STATUS OF OWNER EVALUATION I CONtRACTOR I CONTRACTOR S WmK DOCUMENTATION REVIEW I RESULTS OF DOONENTATION REVIEW I ON NEED FOR REINSPECTION (X COMPLETE) (X COMPLETE)

I 206A Peter Kiewit I Architectural Const 99 INo Significant Deficiencies 90 I

Structural Steel !No Significant Deficiencies 160 I

209 Rigging Int. I Rigging of Reactor (No Deficiencies 100 I Pressure Vessel I

210 Peter Kiewit I Architectural Const. 99 10pen Oocqnentation Deficiencies 90 I I 213 PDH I Primary Containment INo Significant Deficiencies I Vessel I

I Testing Laboratory 25 lOpen deficiencies I I 225 HcHillin Bros. I Hake Up Water Punphousel INo Significant Deficiencies I I I

I 226 Sime I Reactor Building INo Deficiencies 100 I I Excavation I I 233 B F Shaw I Spray Pond Alteration INo Deficiencies I I I Reactor Internals I l Instrunent Hodificationsl lNo Significant Deficiencies 25 .

THIRTEENTH FROGRESS REPNIT Attachment 1B Page 1 of 4 OEF ICIENCY DOQNENT REVIEW SU+lARY QC - I CONTRACTS QIALIT< CLASS-I SEISMIC-I SITE OO~ENTATION SISJECT SITE WCRK PERFCRMED TO QVP REVIEW I

PCN PEO CWR - - ECN RCC CO NCR RFI I I 1 205>> IStewart-Erickson Yes 6 E 7 Yes 7, Yes Yes 7 Yes 11 Yes I 5 I

6 E I Yes 3 Yes 7 I Yes Yes 7 I Yes 11 I Yes I 206>> IBovee-Crail I Yes I I I 7 I I I 206A>> IPeter Kiewit Sons>-. -I Yes I ~ 6 Yes I I Yes I 3 I Yes I 7 I Yes 3ll Yes 7 I Yes . I..AO ).".'Yea .I .. 6 I Yes 7 Yes 11 Yes 207" IPit tsburgh-Des Moines I Yes I 6 I Yes I 3 I Yes I 3 Yes I 7. I Yes 3l I I I I I 209" ILampson Inc, ~;. I Yes I 6 0 I 7 I Yes I 3 I Yes I 7 I Yes 3 I Yes 7 I 0 I 7 0 I 210>> IPeter Kiewit Sons'- I Yes I 6 Yes I I Yes I 3 I Yes I 7 I Yes 3 Yes 7 I Yes I ll I Yes I 21OA IPeter Kiewit Sons', . I Yes I,6 I B I 7 I Yes I 3 Yes 7 I Yes 3- I Yes 7 I B I 7 I B I 6426" I Wright Schuchart +rbor I Yes I ~ 6 I E I 7 I Yes I 3 I Yes I 7 I Yes I Yes 7, I Yes I 11 Yes I 213>> IPi ttsburgh-Des Moines I Yes I 6 I Yes I 3 I Yes I 3 Yes 7 . I Yes 3t I Yes 7' Yes I 11 I Yes I 213A" IPittsburgh-Des Moines,, I Yes ~ I 6 I Yes. I 3 I F 7 I Yes I 7 I 7. I Yes 7 I Yes I ll I Yes I 215 I WSH/Boecon/GER I ~ .-, Yes, I 6 I Yes,l 3 I F I 7 Yes I 7 I F' 7. I Yes 7 I Yes I ll I Yes I 216 I Wal dinger Yes I 6 I Yes I 3 F I 7 I Yes 7 I 7, I Yes 7 Yes I 11 I Yes... I .I 217 ISentry I Yes I 6, I Yes I,. 3 I F I 7 I Yes I 7. I F 7. I Yes 7 I Yes I 11 I Yes I 218 IFischbach/Lord +,, I Yes I 6 I Yes I 3 I F I 7 I Yes I 7 I F 7, I Yes 7 I Yes I 11 Yes I 219 IO.B. Cannon, te, ~,, I Yes I 6 I Yes I 3 I F I 7 I Yes I 7 I F 7 I Yes 7 I Yes I 11 I Yes I Controlsi, - 6 3 F 7 Yes 7 7 Yes 7 Yes I 11 I Yes I 220 I Johnson I Yes I Yes I I I I I I ) I I 221>> IPacific Testing<Labs z I Yes I 6 I E- I 7 I Yes I 3 I Yes 7 I Yes 3. I Yes 7 I Yes I ll I A I 221A IPacific Testing,.Labs;I I Yes I 6 0 I 7 I Yes I I Yes I 7 I Yes 3 I Yes 7 I 0 I 7 I 0 I I 225" IMcMillan Brothers I Yes I 6 0 I 3 I Yes I I Yes 7 I Yes 3 I Yes 7 I Yes I 10 I Yes I I 226 ISime Contruction Co. I Yes I 6 I E I I Yes I 3 I Yes 7 I Yes 3; I Yes 7 I Yes I 3 I Yes I 233' IBF Shaw Yes I 6 I Yes I I Yes I 3 I Yes 7 I Yes 3 I Yes 7 I Yes I 11 I Yes I 234 IO.B. Cannon I Yes I 6 I Yes I 3 I Yes I 3 I Yes 7 I Yes 3. I Yes 7 I Yes I 11 Yes I ~p 235 IGE ISLE Yes I 6 I 0 7 I Yes I 3 I Yes I 7 I Yes 3 I Yes 7 I 0 I I 0 I

>>e 4, ~ ~

NOTES: LEGEND:

A - Review not conmenced PCN - Project Change Notice

- No QC-I Work performed.prior to 7/80 PEO - Project Engineering

- Nonconformance Report Directive,'CR

- Special Review ~

- No QC-I or QC-II/SC-1 Documentation closed prior to 7/80 RFI - Request For Information

- Docunent not used'orathis contract ECN - Engineering Change Notice

- Docunent reviewed under CAR 1475: CWR - Contractor Waiver Request

- Denotes Inactive Contract RCC - Request for Contract Change

- Numbers indicate action in Flow Chart, Page 4 C.O. - Change Order act's>>

= lose

THIRTEENTH FROGRESS REPORT Attachment 18 Page 2 of 4 DEFICIENCY DOClNENT REVIEW TASK N3NQ)NFORMANCE REHHT NCR REVIEW SENARY 0 ISCRE PANG IES NO. OF NCR'S I I IOENTIFIEO I CLARIFICATION I CONTRACT I CLOSED PRIOR I I REQUIRING I FROVIOH)-

CONTRACT CONTRACT(8 ACTIVITY I TO 7/80 I SAMPLE I" CLARIFICATION I NCR CLEARED 205" Stew-Erikson Rx Bldg. Substructure 31 4 I Bovee-Crail General Construction 417 I 42 I 206A% I Peter Kiewit Sons' Arch. Construction 387 I 39 A I Pittsburgh-Des I I I Moines Steel Co. Structural Steel I 3 1 I 209% I Lampson Inc. Rigging of Reactor Pressure I I I Vessel 2 I 0 I 210% I Peter Kiewit Sons' Arch. Construction 41 I 5 I 21OA Peter Kiewit Sons' Arch. Construction 8 I 8 I 6426" Wright Schuchart I I I Harbor Interim General Construction 113 11 I 213" I Pittsburgh-Des I I I Moines Steel Co. Primary Cont Vessel I 10 1 I 213A" I Pittsburgh-Des I I I Hoines Steel Co. Primary Cont Vessel Retrofit 75 I 10 1 I 215 I WSH/Boecon/GERI Mechanical Construction 1016 I 126 11 I 216 I Waldinger HVAC, Plunbing 420 49 14 14 I 217 I Sentry Fire Protection 3 I 1 I 218 I Fischbach/Lord Electrical Construction 375 I 37 6 I 219 I 0.8. Cannon Special Coatings 13 I 2 I 220 I Johnson Controls Instr linen tat ion 27 I I 221" I Pacific Testing Labl Testing 6 I 1 I 221 A I Pacific Testing Labl Testing 8 I 8 I 225" I McHillan Brothers I Makeup Water Pump House 24 I 2 A I 233" I BF Shaw I Spray Pond Alterations 4 I I 0 I 234 I 0.8. Cannon I Wetwell Coating I 1 0 I 235 I GE IS&E I IhC Board Hodification I 8 I I I I I I I 3094 I 347 A I "Inactive Site Contract A: Review in progress, final data not available at this time.

8: No QC-I NCR's closed prior to 7/80

THIRTEENTH FROGRESS REPORT Attachment 18 Page 3 of 4 DEFICIENCY DOCENT REVIEW SINMARY QC - 1 CONTRACTS 4'

vr ~ ~ Ig r r QUALITY CLASS-I SEISMIC-I CONTRACTCR DOCUMENTATION,:,' r ) r SITE WMK PERFUMED SIHJECT TO VP REVIEW INTERNAL DOCUMENTS I I Contract Contractor GD Rev ew Status+ OCO Review Status+I 205" 'tewart-Erickson NCR Yes Complete None - Complete I r 206<< I Bovee-Grail I IR I Yes I = 3 I NCR I Yes-. I 3-- I 206A>> I Peter Kiewit Sons'07" I IR I I 3 INone I - I - I I Pittsburgh-Des Moines I I Yes I 3 I I Yes I =-3 I Lampson Inc "-

I I I I Complete I I 0 I Complete I 210" I Peter Kiewit Sons'10A I IR I Yes I Complete I None I - I Complete I I Peter Kiewit Sons' N/A I Complete I N/A I 8 IComplete I 6426" I Wright Schuchart Harbor I I Yes I 5 I I Yes I 15 I 2D>> I Pittsburgh-Des Moines I CAR I Yes I 3 I ECAR I Yes I 3 "I

• 2DA" ( Pittsburgh-Des Moines I CAR I Yes I Complete I ECAR I Yes I Complete I 215 I WSH/Boecon/GER I I IR I Yes I Complete I FCR I C I Complete I 216 I, Waldinger OR Yes I 9 I OR I Yes I, 9 I 217 I Sentry I IR I I Gmplete I IR I 0 I Complete I 218 I Fischbach/Lord .I IR I Yes I Complete I IR I Yes Pllylete I 219 0.8. Cannon I IR I Yes I Complete I None I - I Complete I 220 I Johnson Controls I ISR I Yes I Complete I KRN I Yes, I pxnplete I 221>> I Pacific Testing Labs I I Yes I Complete I I Yes I Complete I 221A I- Pacific Testing Labs I I I Complete I I 0 I Complete I =.

225" I McMillan Brothers I ICL I Yes I 5 I CAR I Yes r I'. 5 I 226= I Sime Construction Company I I Yes I 3 I I Yes I -3 I 233>> I BF Shaw I I I - I I A I - I 234 I 0.8. Cannon I iR I Yes I Complete I one I - I Complete I 235 I GE ISLE I N I Yes I 6 I NoneI - I - I N)TES: LEGEM):

A - Revi'ew not conaenced IR - Inspection Report 8 - No QC-I Work performed prior to 7/80 CAR - Corrective Action Report C Special Review CR - Deficiency Report 0 - No QC-I or QC-II/SC-1 Docrmrentation closed prior to 7/80 ISR - Inspection Surveillance Report CD - Deficiency Document QR - Quality Report DCO - Design Change Document ECAR - Engineering Corrective Action Report

- Denotes Inactive Contract FCR - Field Change Request

+ - Numbers indicate action in Flow Chart, Page 4 WRN - Johnson Controls Field Request Notice

ATTACHMENT 1B -.

.Page 4 of 4

.-'HIRTEENTH PROGRESS REPORT FLOW CHART FOR REVIEW OF CONTRACTOR INTERNAL DOCUMENTATION 7

Write Report No 1 2 3 4 5 6 11 Coordinator Checkl i s t Procedural Logbook Sampl e Decision Write Interface Intervi ew Review Review, Review To Report Sample YES No 8 9 10 Document Revi ew Decision Selection To Increase Sample Yes