IR 05000285/1989010

From kanterella
Revision as of 18:53, 30 January 2022 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Insp Rept 50-285/89-10 on 890227-0303 (Ref 10CFR73.21).Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Physical Security Program,Including Mgt Support & Security Program Audits & Security Training & Qualifications
ML20248D232
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 03/21/1989
From: Caldwell R, Earnest A, Everett R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20248D203 List:
References
50-285-89-10, NUDOCS 8904110420
Download: ML20248D232 (2)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:- -_-- _ _ - _ _ _

 *
.  ,
,
*  -
.

APPENDIX U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

NRC' Inspection Report: 50-285/89-1 License: DPR-40 Docket: 50-285 Licensee: Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) 1623 Harney Street i Omaha, Nebraska 68102 Facility Name: Fort Calhoun Station (FCS) Inspection At: FCS, Blair, Nebraska Inspection Conducted: Februar 27 through- arch 3, 1989 Inspectors: . 3 / 89 i (ut. 4(/A, C6MwettnPhysical S'ecurity Specialist Date Security and Emergency Pr paredness Section

   /2   U/ 99 X'8.%rnEs1, Physical' Security. Specialist Ddte '

Security and Emergency Preparedness Section C w-Approved: h.8/MMA - kJ2/ MC) R. J. Everett, Chief, Security and Emergency Date Preparedness Section i Inspection Summary  ! Inspection Conducted February 27 through March ?_ 1989 (Report 50-285/89-10) I' Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspecto- of the licensee's t physical security program. The areas inspectea within the physical security program included management support and security program audits; protected and vital area physical barriers; protected and vital area access control of personnel, packages, and vehicles; compensatory measures; and security training and qualification Re ults: Within the program areas inspected, five apparent violations E G,.ntified (inadequate compensatory measures, inadequate access convol. in'dequate protection of safeguards information, inadequate lock , and k v contr.1, and failure to report, see paragraph 3). One deviation from e licenset onmitment w s identified (see paragrcnh 4).

Due to the n e rous examples of non-compliance and the repetitive nature of there violation:, the NRC inspectors determined that the licensee's , physical security program had deteriorated since the security upgrade

        '

effort began. It appears that security and plant management have reduced their oversight of day-to-day operations in order to concentrate on the extensive efforts underway to upgrade major portions of the securitMCLOSURE CONTAINS progra '

        -

SAFEGUARDS INFORIAATIO 0904110$$$$$$$$ss M PDC UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE IS DECONTROI. LED L______ __ __-{W---- _ --- ------------ -

. . .
. , ,
 *        l
. r a' .
 -

l l

        !

PROPOSED AGENDA

        )

Omaha Public Power District Meeting with NRC i i April 12, 1989, at 1:00 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE OF MEETING B. Beach j II. MEETING SUBJECTS " J. Everett l COMPENSATORY MEASURES ACCESS CONTROL  ! PROTECTION OF SAFEGUARM INFORMATION LOCK AND KEY CONTROL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS III. DISCUSSION K. Morris IV. NRC COMMENTS Region IV Staff LICENSEE COMMENTS OPPD Staff V CLOSING COMMENTS B. Beach l i , i l k i i l i i l l I l l . I

l L___-_._ _ _ - - . _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ }}