IR 05000324/1987022

From kanterella
Revision as of 03:07, 15 February 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $50,000 Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-324/87-22 & 50-325/87-22
ML20245G595
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/26/1989
From: Thompson H
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To: Utley E
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
Shared Package
ML20245G597 List:
References
EA-87-165, NUDOCS 8906290188
Download: ML20245G595 (2)


Text

x -r F

. . - - - - -- -

o .,

s

,

,

.. incao ...

. .

..

  1. o g UNITED $TATES -

, 4 f, g : E p, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIO 'j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

' a k **..+ JUN 261989 : .

.

Doc'ket Nos.. 50-325'and'50-324 License Nos.. DPR-71 and DPR-62 P EA 87-165 L

Carolina Power and Light Company ATTN: Mr. E. E. Utley ' . .

Senior Executive Vice President Y i Power Supply and' Engineering - '

and Construction ..

Post Office Box 1551-

'Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 l

-

Gentlemen:-

SUBJECT: ORDERIMPOSINGACIVILHONETARYPENALTY(BRUNSWICK)

This refers to your letter cated July 1,1988, in response to the Notice of 1 Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty l(Notice).sent to you by our letter dated May 5. 1988, related to NRC: Inspection Report Nos. 50-325/87-22.and 50-324/87-22 sent to you by.our. letter' dated August 27, 1987. .Our. letter and Notice described one Environmental' Qualification (EQ) Category B problem regard-ing the environmental qualification of electrical equipment important to safet This problem affected a moderate number of components and plant systems and it resulted.from inadequate field inspections / verifications and inadequate desig . interface controls. To emphasize the need to ensure qualification of. electrical  !

equipment important to safety, a civil. penalty of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000)

was propose The NRC staff has reviewed your response in which you admit the deficiencies but protest the im The protest.is based upon arguments that (1)the position of a civil NRC failed penalty.that you " clearly should have to establish known" about the EQ' violations prior to November 30,1985;(2) the NRC impro-perly cited CP&L for.a: Unit 2 deficiency that was corrected prior to operation following.the November 30, 1985 deadline; (3) the NRC incorrectly classified the violations as significant; and (4) the NRC incorrectly grouped the violations as an EQ Category B proble After careful consideration of your response to the Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty, the NRC staff has concluded, for the

.Monetary reasons given Penalty, in that the App (endix attached to the enclosed Order Imposing Civil 1) the." c applied, (2) the violation involving the Vulkene wire in a Unit 2 motor operator j should be withdrawn as the deficiency was corrected prior to operation after the  ;

' deadline, (3) the NRC correctly classified the violations as significant, and (4)'considering only the remaining violations, the NRC still concludes that an EQ . Category B problem existed. Accordingly, the NRC staff hereby serves the ,

enclosed Order on Carolina Power and Light Company imposing a civil monetary J penalty in the amount of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000). The effectiveness i of your corrective actions will be reviewed during subsequent inspection i

{DR ADOCK0500g4 ,

--- _ -

'

t

-

..

-

. .

P - Carolina Power & Light C ,

In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rule of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosure )

.

.will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Roo l l

Sincerely,

!

k df Hug L. Thompso J (ep ty Executi Direitor for j N lear Materials Saflp , Safeguards, '

-;

and Operations Support .

.i Enclosure: l

'

Orcer w/Apppendix

..

cc w/ enc 1: i R. Starkey, Manager '

Brunswick Nuclear Project J. Horness, Plant General Manager i

- ,

ll