ML20247K151
| ML20247K151 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Brunswick  |
| Issue date: | 09/12/1989 |
| From: | Ebneter S NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Eury L CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8909210090 | |
| Download: ML20247K151 (77) | |
Text
,
y
-~
', pq p.
sf' 1
.p g-4 m-
- SEP.12' 1989
-s.
1 Docket Nos. 50-325, 50-324
. License-Nos. DPR-71,_DPR-62i H
Carolina Power and Light Company
.' ATTN: Mr. Lynn W. Eury.
-Executive Vice President Power Supply-P. O. Box 1551 Raleigh, NC-27602 1
S' Gentlemen:-
SUBJECT:
MEETING
SUMMARY
- BRUNSWICK UNITS 1 AND 2 This. refers.to the meeting conducted at your request in the Region II Office on' September 7, 1989. '.The purpose of the meeting was for CP&L to present a-self assessment of the Brunswick facility, as' well' as plans for further
. improvements in engineering and_ technical support.
A list of attendees and a r,opy of your handouts are enclosed.
It is _ our opinion ' that this meeting was beneficial in that it provided a
+
better -understanding of the actions you have taken to promote improvement at the' Brunswick fac_ility during the SALP period (September 1, 1988 - August 31,
?1989).; Based on your presentation, we feel that the approach you have taken to 1
_ improve your' technical support group is on the right track. Like the revamping of.your technical: support group, the formation of the central design organiza-tionL also interests us, in that it too is-intended to improve engineering-effectiveness.
In this vein,.we_are'looking forward to discussing the Unit 2
- recirculation pipe replacement in the near future as mutually agreed.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code. of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its
. enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
Should youl have any questions concerning this matter, we will be pleased to
-discuss' them.
Sincerely, (Original signed by SDEbneter)
Stewart D. Ebneter Regional Administrator
Enclosures:
(See page 2) g921oo90890912 p
ADOCK 05o00324 PDC si ZEV$
_________-__-_____D
?
3.y gv arolina. Power and Light Company-2
.SEP 12 1989 J.
Enclosures:
1.
List of' Attendees.
H 2.2 Licensee Handouts-cc w/en ls:
i:
R.- B. ; Starkey, Jr..' Manager.
F-Brunswick Nuclear Project L
Box.10429
' Southport. NC 28461 J. L. Harness
' Plant General Manager P. 0. Box 10429 Southport, NC.28461 Mark S. Calvert Associate General Counsel
' Carolina Power-& Light Company P. O. Box 1551-_
Raleigh, NC 27602.
. R. E. Jones, General Counsel Carolina Power _& Light Company P. 0. Box 1551 Raleigh, NC 27602 Grace'Beasley; Board of Commissioners.
P.'O. Box 249 Bolivia, NC-28422 Chrys Bagget State Clearinghouse Budget and Management 116 West Jones Street Raleigh, NC 27603 Dayne'H. Brown, Chief Radiation Protection Branch Division of Fetility Services
- N. C. Department of Human Resources i:
701 Barbour Drive
. Raleigh, NC 27603-2008 H. A. Cole-Special Deputy Attorney General State of North Carolina P. 0.-Gox 629 Raleigh, NC 27602 (cc cont'd - see page 3) 4
o 3
g, -
.s Carolina Power and L.ight Company 3
.SEP 12 1983 (cccont'd)
Robert P. Gruber Executive Director Public Staff - NCUC P. O. Box 29520
'Releigh, NC 27626-0520 State of North Carolina bec w/ encl:
Document Control Desk NRC Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Star Rte. 1, Box 208 Southport, NC 28461 i
RII-P RII:I RP RII: P l
9 d / /89
/ $ /8 0
/89
1'.
.i l
ENCLOSURE 1 LIST OF ATTENDEES SEPTEMBER 7, 1989 Carolina Power & Light Company.
R. A. Watson, Senior Vice President,' Nuclear Generation R. B. Stdi key, Jr., Manager, Brunswick Nuclear Project l-J. L. Harness, Plant General Manager R. B. Helme, Manager, Technical Sapport J. M. Brown, Manager, Brunswick Engineering Section L. I. Loflin, Manager, Nuclear Licensing R. M. Poulk, Project Specialist Nuclear Regulatory Cjmmission S. D. Ebneter, Regional lidministrator L. A. Reyes, Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP)
A. F. Gibson. Director, Division of Reactor Safety (DRS)
C. W. Hehl, Deputy Director, DRP E. G. Adensam,- Director, Projects Directorate 11-1, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR)
L. Spessard, Director, Division of Operational Assessment, Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data D. M. Verrelli, Chief, Reactor Projects Branch 1, DRP W. H. Ruland, Senior Resident Inspector - Brunswick, DRP R. E. Carroll, Jr., Project Engineer, DRP N. B. Le, Project Manager, NRR J. J. Lenchan, Reactor Inspector, DRS L. R. Moore, Reactor Inspector, DRS R. B. Shortridge, Reactor Inspector, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards (DRSS)
C. A..Hughey, Reactor Inspector DRSS
.W. B. Gloersen, Reactor Inspector, DRSS
,s ENCLOSURE 2 i
l i
CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY t
BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT i
MANAGEMENT MEETING SEPTEMBER 7.1989 l
OPENING REMARKS AL WATSON BRUNSWICK OPERATION FROM RUSS STARKEY 09/01/88 TO 08/31/89 BOB HELME CENTRAL DESIGN ORGANIZATION MORRIS BROWN UPDATE
SUMMARY
RUSS STARKEY
y+
,f RURPOSE
.o PROVIDE INSIGHT ON:
BRUNSWICK OPERATION THIS SALP PERIOD WHERE BRUNSWICK IS HEADING TECHNICAL SUPPORT AND CORPORATE ENGINEERING
--m.-___
D' TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION l
SECURITY EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS MAINTENANCE / SURVEILLANCE PLANT OPERATION RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS SAFETY ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING / TECHNICAL SUPPORT CENTRAL DESIGN ORGANIZATION
JULY 198 ugh AUGUST 988 LEGEND b R 11 AVE 3
BRUNSWICK lillnumS 1..
N g..
FPC BRUNS RilAVE
'SCE SERI UTIUTY
4 0? IRA"::0XS ? EASE V::0X::0XS/
OP3 RAT:.XG :EAC"0:R 25 24 20--
15 --
10 --
5--
0 AYER&GE BilP PRET!005 IEP CUIRENT S&IP PERIOD 1
e V0f 0\\ SMVARY l
1 JULY :', :'987 t:1 rough AUGUST 31, 1988 l
4 I
11 Ill IV V
BRUNSWICK 1 0
0 2
16 7
BRUNSWICK 2 0
0 2
15 5
RE610N 11 AVE O
O 2
16 4
1 1
4
.1 VIOLATION
SUMMARY
1988 AND 1989 SALP PERIODS I
11 Ill IV -
V BRUNSWICK 1 88-0 88-0 88-2 88-16 88-7 89-0 89-0 89-2 89-11 89-7 BRUNSWICK 2 88-0 88-0 88-2 88-15 88-5 89-0 89-0 89-0 89-9 89-7 REGION 11 AVG 88-0 88-0 88-2 88-16 88-4 89-89-89-89-89-1989 VALUES INCLUDE VIOLATIONS IDENTIFIED BUT NOT RECEIVED l
l
~RS 353 v \\
~
s J _Y
, ' 987 "1roug, AL GUS" 31, 1988 LEGEND b NATL AVE
}
' M-I l
b Pl. ANT T(PE 2
{u-q b
o O
d m.
6
~
j ts-to..
5" i
Gk NATL AVE CN WE BRUNSWICK BW 3A\\T P !
L33s P33 UX" 30 --
27 26 22 20 --
10 --
0
- N10M, WPMIOUS W CIBM AVEA2 SDPE@
SEPE@
PMIOUSSilP 1
v.
3SI? E S CUMULATIVE TOTALS 1989 SALP'
-k.1988 SALP 60 3
37 38 1
40 --
32 43 5
23 24 2
20 -
17 "16
'O 6
7 3
0 SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG 3SI?
LERs BY MONTH 1989 SALP PERIOD 15 11 10- -
l]2 6
5- -
3 3
2 i
1 GX 0
SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG
l 3L \\SW C<
_ERs JULY 1,1987 through AUGUST 31, 1988 LEGEND 43 PERSONNEL (other) = 1 PERSONNEL (test / col) = 2 k PERSONNEL (maint u
PERSONNEL (operating) = 6-8 0THER (MCLUDMG C4 = 8 COWPONENT FAILURE = 4 n.
5 j
DESIGN / CONST. = 16 a m-17 PERSONNEL (total) = 17 1s -
r g
io..
=
daissaii 5-0 Pl. ANT PERSONNEL
n.
BITSWICK.XRs l
60 - -
53 44 40--
23 20 --
g 0
PLANT PERSONNEL 1988 SALP 1989 SALP 1988 SALP 1989 SALP BREAEDOWN OF PLANT LERS BREAKDOWN OF PERSONNEL LERS FOR 1988 SALP AND 1989 SALP PERIODS FOR 1988 SALP AND 1989 SALP PERIGDS OTHER PERSONNE1.
(INC. CAL) 6 6
(OTHER)
I 4
CONPONENT PERSONNEL 5
15 2
5 FAILURE (TEST / CAL)
DESIGN /CONST.
16 9
PERSONNEL 8
2 PERSONNEL PERS0l#iEL 6
12 (TOTAL) -
17 23 (OPERATING)
. AV33AG3 D3XR 07 3x "I:?S
- ?33 :.000 C3ZI:CA1 Ers.
JULY 1,1987 through AUGUST 31, 1988
,M "
.54
.u
,52
.a Ex.a bEO,u.
t O
O.M "
O N.24~
03
@:.ts-x
.is-
.10
.n..
O g..____.__.....
.3 BRUNSWICK 1 GE 1987 AVE BRUNSWICK 2 NATL 1987 AVE - !
J - NAT' AW FON Fl. ANTS > TWO Ft>RS CPU.AT:NG DFEhl
4 9
AV33AG3 XUY333 07 R3AC"03 "3:?S
]
?33
- .~000 CR::'?::CA:1 ~:0U3S i
0.6 --
0.54 0.42 0.4 - -
0.28 0.2- -
0.1 0.11 0
BSEP 1 BSEP 1 BSEP 2 BSEP 2 G7E 987 GE 8 1988 SAIP 1989 SAIP 1988 SAIP 1989 SAIP BTR AYERAGE 7
/
BTR AYERAGE
- No AUTOMATIC REACTOR TRIPS E 1989
'?O'?AL XD3XR 07 AU?OMA'..'::C :R3 ACTO:R '.?IPS JULY 1,1987 through AUGUST 31, 1988 u..
g 4.0 ML u.
5 2.s2 y.
k I
yu-H3 4 LQ-J<
F f 1.5 -
i.o -
.s -
?
a
~
BRUNSWICK 1 GE AVE PER UNIT BRUNSWICK 2 NATL AVE PER UN:I
':'0"A' XUY3IR 03' AU.'OYAT::C :RIACTO:R "RI:?S 2-1.5 --
1--
1 0.5 --
0 BRUN5flCE 1 BitDNSTJCE 1 BRUNSTICE 2 EtchTWICK 2 1988 SAIP 1989 SALP 1986 SAIP gggg agIp
- NO AUTOMATIC REACTOR TRES M 1989
F
.. ~
SECURITY o
PREVIOUS SALP CONCERNS NO CONCERNS NOTED o
ACTIONS TAKEN:
SECURITY SPECIALIST NOW REPORTS TO PLANT GENERAL MANAGER SIZE OF CP&L SITE SECURITY ORGANIZATION WAS INCREASED IN SIZE FROM THREE TO FIVE PEOPLE (SECURITY GUARDS, ETC. ARE CONTRACT)
COMPLETED COMPREHENSIVE INTROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF THE SECURITY PROGRAM TO IDENTIFY POTENTIAL VULNERABILITIES INITIATED ACTIONS FOR SYSTEMATIC RESOLUTION OF IDENTIFIED POTENTIAL VULNERABILITIES INSTALLED DURESS ALARMS AND SENSORMATICS AT PERSONNEL ACCESS PORTALS
SECURITY (CONT)
L o
ACTIONS TAKEN (CONTINUED):
IMPLEMENTED SECURITY REMINDER SECTION IN WEEKLY SITE NEWSLETTER DEVELOPED, AS PART OF THE FIVE YEAR PLAN, A PLAN WHICH CONSIDERS POTENTIAL REPLACEMENT OF SELECTED SECURITY EQUIPMENT
l SECURITY (CONT) o RESULTS/ ACCOMPLISHMENTS AS NOTED IN THE 1988 SALP, " SECURITY CONTINUED TO BE A STRONG ACTIVITY AT BRUNSWICK."
o CONTINUING OPPORTUNITIES IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FITNESS FOR DUTY REQUIREMENTS IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GENERIC LETTER ON SURFACE VEHICLE BOMBS
o PREVIOUS SALP CONCERNS l
FAILURE TO PROVIDE FOLLOWUP NOTIFICATION TO STATE AND COUNTY AGENCIES FROM THE CONTROL ROOM o
ACTIONS TAKEN:
REVISED NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE TO REQUIRE FOLLOWUP NOTIFICATION (NOVEMBER 1988 AND JUlJ 1989)
CONDUCTED SHIFT TRAINING ON THE REQUIREMENT FOR FOLLOWUP NOTIFICATION (JULY 1989)
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS (CONT) o RESULTS/ ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
TWO ANNUAL EXERCISES CONDUCTED DURING THIS PERIOD ONE ACTUAL EVENT REQUIRED TSC ACTUATION (LOSS OF OFFSITE POWER-JUNE 1989)
TSC FOLLOWUP NOTIFICATIONS DURING THE LOSS OF OFFSITE POWER COMMENDED BY COUNTY OFFICIALS HAVE DEVELOPED AND IMPLEMENTED EAL FLOWPATHS o
CONTINUING OPPORTUNITIES:
CONDUCT DRILLS TO ENSURE CONTROL ROOM FOLLOWUP NOTIFICATIONS ARE MADE TO STATE AND COUNTY AGENCIES STRENGTHEN ANNUAL DRILL SCENARIO
MAINTENANCE / SURVEILLANCE o
PREVIOUS SALP CONCERNS:
LACK OF A REPETITIVE FAILURES PROGRAM BACKLOG OF WORK REQUEST / JOB ORDERS (WR/JO)
INOPERABLE EQUIPMENT ON THE CONTROL BOARD
(
MAINTENANCE / SURVEILLANCE (C_QNT) o ACTIONS TAKEN:
FOCUSED ATTENTION BY MANAGEMENT ON WR/JO BACKLOG FOCUSED ATTENTION BY MANAGEMENT ON INOPERABLE EQUIPMENT ON THE CONTROL BOARD (SEPTEMBER 1988)
IMPLEMENTED A REPETITIVE FAILURE PROGRAM DEVELOPED IN CONCERT WITH TECHNICAL SUPPORT (APRIL 1989)
ESTABLISHED CONTINUOUS MAINTENANCE COVERAGE TO PROVIDE BETTER OPERATIONS SUPPORT AND MAINTENANCE FLEXIBILITY (MARCH 1989)
CONTINUED PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROGRAM (ON GOING)
ADDED CP&L SUPPORT PERSONNEL PLAN.50 PERCENT CONTRACTOR REDUCTION (1990)
PLAN TO HAVE NO CONTRACTORS BY YEAR END 1991
[
I MAINTENANCE / SURVEILLANCE (CONT) o RESULTS/ ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
CONTINUED REDUCTION IN WR/JO BACKLOG SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN CONTROL BOARD EQUIPMENT PROBLEMS REPETITIVE FAILURES ARE BEING IDENTIFIED AND CORRECTED IMPROVED SUPPORT OF OPERATIONS IMPROVED SAFETY SYSTEM AVAILABILITY o
CONTINUING OPPORTUNITIES:
CONTINUED REDUCTION OF WR/JO BACKLOG PREVENTIVE AND PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAMS
v CD E
l ru l
-- E l!
v l
i o
.m v
o s,
~,
.o I
e f
.ammum
- l l Cn l
o
.o Cn
- l l
l cn
=
-R
)
o
- y i.
~
'd l
l
.l l:
- e a
o m
CD l
l l
W cu u
l l
L c
m mc l
l m
cu l
l l
l l
l l,
c H
l l
l m
ll l
- E-
~
N m
e.s l
l
--g a
o o
l l
l W
F--
L i
.o l
o c
l l
l C
l w
co l
l ll co I
f I
I O
O*
OOO v
m 4
4
_________._____.________a
cn w
W I
m
' m l
i j
j LP j
l l
~ 2 cn
~
w i
r l
h l
l "y
to ic l
l c
l
. j' l
l N :
l l
~~4
.v m
l l
_.)
l l
8 6
cm l
l l
jm C
cu l
a -u l
l l
I m" l
l 8C cn to l
l l
o
_v l
I a
O l
l l
l l
l 1
i l
l C
o Z
j j
l m.
l l
m;c l
cn j j
j l
l 3
h l
l i
l i,
d i.
i.
I 0
~# m m
cn /
l l
~
cn l
l l
l I
l m!
l l
m.:
l l
w l
w!
l I
I I
I l
c l
d d~
d d
d a
4 l
e il 3
8 8
mes,0m 4
l!l
.a p
e S
g M
u A
l l
,\\
l l
,l 3 m' 4
7_
W l
u J
l l
- l
,,\\
4 n
4 u
J 4
l 9 m h/a; l;l
\\
9 0
y a
8 s
M 9
4 0
1 J
/
- 2 g!.
. $ ?,Z.
l l
, j,
l l
4 R
r p
W 5
e<
-/ /
A d
tl ql.
0 l
\\
l l
l' sO i
3
' v .. / / t_< / V r
m a
5 M
l
- s 0o
!l, l
l l
l l
l l
l 5
M b
2 e
e 5
F g3 a
l l
l l
l t
ll.
.l.
1 n
u
- 3 a
o 5
/ '
J n
l l
l l
l l
l l
l lkf 8
o 5
.V.?//. ?
c 9,
~
e N
5
> /
D i
l a
l l
l l
l l
ll l
l 8
-_4
-.. ?/.//:V' h v
8
_2 o
N 9
_5 d/i>i//
1 l
- l l
l l
l l? ?/ f
l l
l 2.
- ???? '
t 7
c
' ' IC ' / < > L O
4
/>i '
l
- l l
l l
l
_3%:
__2 J
/
g/, / '/ 'O:' l'-
?'
?
p
/
e
/
/kf S
_5 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
8 s
4 2
WR/
0s e
e 9
O
i i
n n
U U
x.
e 2
9:
o 1,
8-
/
9#
3 8-1
/
- 4 3-
- 8 2
-. /
g a
2 7
m h8 1
T
/
e l
6__
b 8
u i
- /
8 o
r s
T
.u t
3, d
a 8
1 : /
r t aS o
9 B
8 -
/ -
2 9-4 l
a 0
- /
7 1
o 3
~
r
/
t 8
n 0
o 7
9 C
8 f
1
- /
o s
a 2+
5^
1 9
/
s u
t
~
a 6 a-4-
t 2
- /
9_
S 9
5-0:
2
/
1 0
0 0
5 5
1 Number l
g p
e S
p p
g u
A
_ g
_ o 1-l 3
_ k l
_ c R_
l l
- 'i u
l
_ a J
_ B 1_
g o
_ l l
a 5 M-6 k
_ t c
_ o n
T a
5 y~/.l '
l l
l
- u 6
/'
J B
- i 1
. ?i n
-< ?f 9
o 8
i t
_ 9.
9 e
_ 6 1
c y
~,
j k
a s <
7, ^r,'
/ '
M t
g o
{
r P
=
=
7 e
r 5
r i
j j-,
f l
3.,
p
((
F A
0 2
l/jW/
.M@
.l 4
5
- ' j ra W~'
?
L: f, L
M 6
2 6
=
6
- 3 l
l l
'l
' - b e
F
- 2 7/,-
/V/
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 5
0 5
0 5
3 2
2 1
1 WR/J0S l
.u:
OUTSTAXDIXG REPETITIVE.
COMP 0XEXT FAILERES (12/88 - 11/89) 250--
215 200 150-l-
DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JLM JA.
l L
l PLANT OPERATIONS o
PREVIOUS SALP CONCERNS:
LACK OF ATTENTION TO CHANGING PLANT CONDITIONS PLANT TOLERATED A HIGH FAILURE RATE OF PLANT EQUIPMENT OPERATION FOR EXTENDED PERIODb OF TIME WHILE IN TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION ACTION STATEMENTS PLANT PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED DURING NORMAL SHUTDOWNS SIMULATOR MODELING
6.
PLANT OPERATIONS (CONT) o ACTIONS TAKEN:
INCREASED MANAGEMENT PRESENCE IN THE POWER BLOCK (ONGOING)
ROTATION OF SHIFT OPERATING SUPERVISORS BETWEEN SHIFTS OPERATIONS INVOLVEMENT IN THE RESOLUTION OF IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES HAS BEEN IMPROVED PRIMARILY THROUGH ENHANCED CONTROL ROOM DISCIPLINE (ONGOING)
SECOND CONTROL OPERATOR STATIONED FOR EACH CONTROL BOARD DURING POWER OPERATIONS (APRIL 1989)
ADDITIONAL LOG KEEPING REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED (SEPTEMBER 1988) i RELOCATION OF THE MANAGER-OPERATIONS TO THE CONTROL ROOM (OCTOBER 1988)
ELIMINATION OF ONE LEVEL OF OPERATIONS SUPERVISIO.N (OCTOBER 1988)
MEETINGS WITH SHIFT PERSONNEL BY THE SITE MANAGER AND THE PLANT GENERAL MANAGER (DECEMBER 1988)
PLANT OPERATIONS (CONT) o ACTIONS TAKEN (CONTINUED):
WORKING LUNCHES BETWEEN THE PLANT GENERAL MANAGER AND EACH OPERATING SHIFT ON A ROUTINE BASIS (SEPTEMBER 1988)
QA AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT MANAGEMENT CONDUCTED OPEN FORUM MEETINGS WITH EACH SHIFT CLEARANCE CENTER ESTABLISHED TO PROVIDE ENHANCED CONTROL OF CLEARANCES (JULY 1989)
" TEN MOST WANTED LIST' ESTABLISHED TO CORRECT INOPERABLE EQUIPMENT (SEPTEMBER 1988)
IMPLEMENTED STANDARD ATTIRE FOR OPERATING PERSONNEL WORK IS IN PROGRESS TO UPGRADE THE SIMULATOR SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE
I PLANT OPERATIONS (CONT) o RESULTS/ ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
PERSONNEL BETTER UNDERSTAND SENIOR MANAGEMENTS COMMITMENT FOR SAFE OPERATION THROUGH ATTENTION TO DETAll AND INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTABILITY.
o IMPROVED CONTROL ROOM DISCIPldNE IMPROVED SUPERVISION OF FIELD ACTIVITIES IMPROVED PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND ROOT CAUSE DETERMINATION IMPROVED OPERATOR AWARENESS OF PLANT CONDITIONS, ADVERSE TRENDS AND EQUIPMENT PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION IMPROVED COMMUNICATIONS WITH MANAGEMENT AND OTHER SITE GROUPS CONTINUED REDUCTION IN THOSE EQUIPMENT PROBLEMS WHICH AFFECT PLANT OPERATIONS IMPROVED CLEARANCE PROCESS THROUGH CONSOLIDATION AND IMPROVED ACCOUNTABILITY 4
n PLANT OPERATIONS (CONT) o CONTINUING OPPORTUNITIES:
CONTINUE TO IMPROVE THE LEADERSHIP AND DISCIPLINE OF OPERATIONS ON-SHIFT PERSONNEL CONTINUE TO IMPROVE DISCIPLINE AND ATTENTION TO DETAIL IN THE FIELD.BY AUXlLIARY OPERATORS IMPROVE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE CLEARANCE CENTER CONDUCT A SIMULATOR UPGRADE STATUS PRESENTATION TO REGION 11IN THE FALL OF 1989
m s,~ -
RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS o
PREVIOUS SALP CONCERNS COLLECTIVE DOSE DECREASING BUT STILL l
HIGH o
ACTIONS TAKEN:
INITIATED UNIT MANAGER'S ALARA dVERSIGHT MEETINGS (OCTOBER 1988)
MANAGEMENT FOCUS ON TEAM WORK, COMMUNICATIONS, AND "DOING THE RIGHT THING RIGHT"(SEPTEMBER 1988) l INCREASED SUPERVISORY PRESENCE IN THE PLANT (SEPTEMBER 1988)
INDEPENDENT ALARA MANAGERS ASSIGNED TO MAJOR PLANT PROJECTS (JULY 1989)
THE CONTINUED DECREASE IN CONTAMINATED SURFACE AREA ADDED NEW, MORE SENSITIVE WHOLE BODY FRISKERS IMPROVED CONTAMINATION CONTROL BY CHANGING TO A SINGLE EGRESS POINT FROM THE POWER BLOCK 1
RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS (CONT) o ACTIONS TAKEN (CONTINUED):
LESSONS LEARNED ARE BEING INCORPORATED INTO FUTURE PROJECTS (ONGOING)
REDUCTION OF SITE PERSONNEL (COMPANY AND CONTRACT)
DECISION TO CHEMICAL DECONTAMINATE THE REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM THIS OUTAGE DECISION TO REPLACE THE RECIRCULATION RISERS AND SAFE ENDS THIS OUTAGE CONTINUED DECREASE IN RADWASTE VOLUME SHIPPED l
RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS (CONT) o RESULTS/ ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
IMPROVED MANAGEMENT AWARENESS OF ALARA CONCERNS IMPROVED MAN-REM REDUCTION, ESPECIALLY DURING NON-OUTAGE ACTIVITIES (LOWEST IN RECENT HISTORY)
CONTAMINATED SURFACE AREA LOWEST IN RECENT HISTORY PERSONNEL LEAVING THE POWER BLOCK RECEIVE A WHOLE BODY FRISK o
CONTINUING OPPORTUNITIES:
COMPLETE REPLACEMENT OF THE NOTED RECIRCULATION PIPING IMPROVE CONTRACTOR ACCOUNTABILITY OF DOSE CONTINUE TO IMPROVE MAN-REM ESTIMATING FOR PROJECTS CONTINUE MANAGEMENT'S FOCUS ON "DOING THE RIGHT THING RIGHT" TO MINIMlZE REWORK
._Q
D WE P
2 S E B G P
A P A
I W
P. D IP OR H
P E S
9 N AH 8
BRS N V E
/
I A
T 1
S 0
0 A
/
e W
9 E
a P
t 0
0 P
a A
I D
R H
S P
E T
N S
A B
W 0
A s
R v
O e
I g
L a
O r
S ev
,X-F A
O R
N O
W S
I B
R A
O P
P M
N O
I C
c 0
0 0
0 M
0 0
0 0
0 0
5 0
5 0
5 0
5 3
3 2
2 1
1 hR UNy TfyE^R CUBI C "ETERS l
c
\\
~
7
\\
~
4 8
i 7
8 1
~
/[C i 8
~
7 4-I x'
9
\\
0 r68 N
\\
O )a-
\\
St r5 a
8 I
d
\\
R9 A'
N 8
0 t
P s-i 4 u-8 M u-g O (A--
7%
i 8 5
C
's -
3 R-4 W
3
.B x
v l
E S. -
2 9
2 R
U-T 7
8 3
.sv-
- P-N E-1 S
8 AB-M 2
i 8 9
0 7
3 9
6 i 7 2
8 w
g1 7
5 4
5 5
2 5
5 0
1 4
3 2
0 1
"y F
2a 42 t
s,-
C 7
8 N.
s N'
Y
,x x
R
)to-Ns i 8 T
a-6 d
S 9
N U8 9 -
N D
(1 -
NIT s
N-I U -
N' N'
R s
sEP-
\\
i 8 v
,R 5
M-E x
P R-x EN-x x'
A SM -
x' N
x B
N N
\\'
x q
4 r
8
- N-N
~
x A
3 l -
8 8
7 6
5 4
3 2
1 9
8 7
6 5
4 1
0 0
0 0
0 O
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
k c0n oEv 2orI(2 tI
SAFETY ASSESSMENTS o
PREVIOUS SALP CONCERNS:
SAFETY SYSTEM AVAILABILITY SAFETY ASSESSMENTS AND REVIEWS FAILED TO ADEQUATELY ADDRESS KEY ISSUES AND WERE SLOW BEING IMPLEMENTED SAFETY AWARENESS OF SENIOR SliE MANAGEMENT WAS BARELY ADEQUATE HUMAN PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM (HPES) IMPLEMENTATION DELAYED FAILURE TO AGGRESSIVELY RESOLVE IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES QUALITY OF INDEPENDENT AUDITS / ASSESSMENTS
~
SAFETY ASSESSMENTS (CONT) o ACTIONS TAKEN:
INCREASED MANAGEMENT PRESENCE IN THE POWER BLOCK (SEPTEMBER 1988)
MORE STRINGENT REQUIREMENTS FOR REMOVAL OF SAFETY SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTED
- DISCRETIONARY LCO'S (SEPTEMBER 1988)
MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT IN AGGRESSIVELY RESOLVING IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES HAS BEEN STEADILY IMPROVED (ONGOING)
PROCEDURES DEVELOPED TO ESTABLISH SITE CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM AND POLICY ON ROOT CAUSE DETERMINATION, WITH MANAGEMENT TRAINING CONDUCTED (NOVEMBER 1988)
TECHNICAL ASSISTANT TO THE PLANT GENERAL MANAGER POSITION ESTABLISHED AND FILLED WHICH WILL COORDINATE THE SITE CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCESS (AUGUST 1989)
4' -
SAFETY ASSESSMENTS (CONT) o ACTIONSTAKEN (CONTINUED):
PROCESS IMPLEMENTED TO PERFORM HPES EVALUATIONS ON PERSONNEL ERRORS PER CORRECT!VE ACTION PROGRAM (JULY 1989)
APPROXIMATELY FORTY (40) SITE PERSONNEL TRAINED TO PERFORM HPES EVALUATIONS (JULY 1989)
SITE HPES COORDINATOR POSITION ESTABLISHED AT A SENIOR LEVEL (AUGUST 1989). EXPECT TO FILL POSITION SEPTEMBER - OCTOBER 1989 INDEPENDENT AUDIT / ASSESSMENT TEAMS CONTAIN ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL TRAINED IN THE AREA OF THE AUDIT / ASSESSMENT CORPORATE TASK FORCE ESTABLISHED TO DEVELOP IMPROVED GUIDANCE AND TRAINING ON 10 CFR 50.59 SAFETY EVALUATIONS FORMALLY TRAINED SEVERAL MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL IN INPO FIELD OBSERVATION TECHNIQUES
l s '
SAFETY ASSESSMENTS (CONT) o RESULTS/ ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
SAFETY SYSTEM AVAILABILITY HAS SUBSTANTIALLY IMPROVED NUMBER OF SELF-IDENTIFIED PROBLEMS ARE INCREASING ROOT CAUSE DETERMINATION HAS IMPROVED RECENT INDEPENDENT AUDITS / ASSESSMENTS ARE FINDING THE PROGRAMMATIC PROBLEMS APPENDIX R LOSS OF OFF-SITE POWER PROVIDED 10 CFR 50.59 TRAINING TO PLANT NUCLEAR SAFETY COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND ALTERNATES AND TO TECHNICAL REVIEWERS t
_-..-..._-----__-A
SAFETY ASSESSMENTS (CONT) o CONTINUING OPPORTUNITIES:
ESTABLISHING A POSITIVE CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM / ROOT CAUSE " CULTURE" AT ALL LEVELS IMPROVING THE " THRESHOLD" AT WHICH EVENTS ARE IDENTIFIED TO THE CO.RRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM COMPLETE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE HPES PROGRAM IMPLEMENT 10 CFR 50.59 SAFETY EVALUATION GUIDANCE AND TRAINING WHEN ESTABLISHED 4
TRENDING OF ADVERSE CONDITIONS I
m
9 8
i 9 1
8 8
8 1
i 9 O
1 Y
T IL 7
6 I
8 B
0 i 9 O
1 A
L IAV 4
6 8
1 i 9 A
O 1
N1 UIT'N U
5 MI i 9 8
C EP 1
H T'
SY 4
S 2
i 9
8 O
1 YTEF
/
3 8
A i
9 S
'1 7
2 8
0 i 9 0
1 4
3 2
1 O
0 0
O 0
Eh i
,. mi 9
,8 9
1
^
y/di 8
8
_9
~
1 YT yAi -
IL
.7 I
1 8
B 0
9 1
A L
//
Le IAV 6
9
'///,
8 2
A 9
0 1
N2 UITN Ai U
5 4
MI 8
C 1
9 EP 0
1 H
TSY Ai 4
4 S
3 8
9 O
1 Y
TE hi 9 F
38 AS 1
I4i 2
i 8
2 /
9
/,
1 4
3 2
O O
O 0
b$g5
Il s
Z4 E
0
.O
.O 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 O
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
1
/
1 9 i 0
8 0
6 2
SAF E
1 Y
[/'/
S 0
Y 9 i
/
1 8
0 S
7 4
DG T S E Y
M E
1 A
R 2
3 U 4
N
/
AV A
1 9
.O I
8 0
L i
8 5
A B
I L
IT Y
1
.0 9 i 0
8 1
9 3
l I
ENGINEERING EFFECTIVENESS i
o DEALS WITH TWO ENGINEERING ORGANIZATIONS:
ON-SITE:
TECHNICAL SUPPORT CORPORATE:
CENTRAL DESIGN ORGANIZATION (CDO) o PREVIOUS SALP CONCERNS:
SYSTEM ENGINEERING PROGRAM l
OBSOLETE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ENGINEERING WORK REQUEST (EWR)
PROCESS o
CENTRAL DESIGN ORGANIZATION 1
t I
L------
7-u ENGINEERING EFFECTIVENESS TECHNICAL SUPPORT
- o
. ACTIONS TAKEN SYSTEM ENGINEERING DETAILED EVALUATION OF SYSTEM ENGINEERING TASKS (JULY 1988 TO NOVEMBER.1988)
INTENSIFIED TRANSFER OF DESIGN WORK TO NUCLEAP. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (NED) (AUGUST 1988)
INITIATED SYSTEM TRENDING PROGRAM (SEPTEMBER 1988)
ESTABLISHED EWR GROUP (GEPTEMBER 1988)
SYSTEM ENGINEERING DIVIDED INTO THREE GROUPS (OCTOBER 1988)
INCREASED ACCOUNTABILITY ON ROOT CAUSE DETERMINATION (OCTOBER 1988)
ESTABLISHED MISSION STATEMENT (DECEMBER 1988)
____m_..__.-.__.-_m_
ENGINEERING EFFECTIVENESS TECHNICAL SUPPORT o
ACTIONS TAKEN (CONTINUED):
MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING TRANSFERRED TO TECHNICAL SUPPORT (FEBRUARY 1989)
TRANSFERRED 18 PERSONNEL FROM BESU/BECU TO TECHNICAL SUPPORT (MARCH 1989)
TRANSFERRED SEVERAL TASKS OUT (MARCH 1989)
DEFINED SYSTEM ENGINEERING PROGRAM IN PLP-06 (MAY 1989)
DEFINED EXPECTATIONS WITH OPERATIONS (JULY 1989)
IMPLEMENTED SYSTEM ENGINEERING POSITION DESCRIPTION (AUGUST 1989)
ESTABLISHING BASIC WORK FUNCTIONS / PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS (IN PROGRESS)
ESTABLISHING " TRAINING MATRIX"(IN PROGRESS)
TECHNICAL SUPPORT ORGANIZATION CHART Bob Helse MANEEll - 1ED0lICAL SUPPORT HonardLindsey Annette Pope IFES / DIS Ut SIFCG / Ostage Coordination SheilaWilliac-Mile llaldron Alf)
U2 SIFCG / Ottaw Coordination i
I teraardWilson traceAltean llaconlierth MANAGDt - NUCLEAll SYSTDI EEllEDLIE MANEDt - EMIlEERING PRDICTS MANAGut - Bir SYSTDI ENEllEIRIE Jie Boom EdOsidley Petenotonto Sepervisor -listlear Engineering Sepervisor - Asintenance Sapport Sepervisor,- As Systes Engineering 6 Senior Engineers 5 Senirr Engineers 4 Senior Engineers 1 TKhnician 4 Technicians 1 Tu haical Aide JoelLeviwr Chris Johnson les Hewleti Supervisor - Reactor Systes Engineering Sepervisor - Cosponent Engineerin Sepervisor - Perf. & Rel. EngineeriM 6 Senior Engineers 8SeniorEngineers 2SeniorEnsimers i Technician 6 TKhnicians 2TKheicians Steve Boyce Larry theatley CertisSchacher Sepervisor - ECCS E nineering Sepervisor-ISI/IST Sepervisor - Cooling Systes E Mineering 7SeniorEngineers 5 Senior E Mineers 4 Senior Entiseers 4 Technicians John O'Connor ton lierrn George Caseron 9spervisor-ElectricalSystesEngineering Sepervisor - Projects Sepervisor - Tsrbim Systes Engineering 6 Snior Engineers 4SeniorEngineers 3SeniorEngineers i Technician iTechnicalAide Tamer Calhell Sepervisor-Cheoical/FPEngineering 2 Senior Engineers - thesical 3SeelerEnsinaers-FireProtection l
i Tu haician L
liste: This reaision is du to the Organizatiaal Anartsis (August 30,1999.)
.e ENGINEERING EFFECTIVENESS TECHNICAL SUPPORT o
ACTIONS TAKEN (CONTINUED):
ESTABLISHING INDIVIDUAL SYSTEM ENGINEER PLAN (IN PROGRESS)
PLANS TO RELOCATE INSIDE THE PLANT (1990)
CORPORATE ORGANIZATIONAL ANALYSIS (JANUARY 1989 THROUGH AUGUST 1989)
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTED TO REPLACE OBSOLETE EQUIPMENT OVERHAULED AND UPGRADED EWR PROCESS RESOLVED EWR BACKLOG ISSUE (JANUARY 1989)
p, ENGINEERING EFFECTIVENESS TECHNICAL SUEE.QBI o
OBSOLETE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PROGRAM IDENTIFICATION OF OBSOLETE EQUIPMENT INHERENT PART OF EWR PROCESS EWRs IDENTIFY SPECIFIC PROBLEMS INVESTIGATION OF EWRs DETECTS GENERIC PROBLEMS WITH A VENDOR MODEL LINE NEW REPETITIVE FAILURE PROBLEM TIE-IN WILL ALSO DETECT GENERIC PROBLEMS PARTS PROCUREMENT PROCESS ALSO
'0ENTIFIES PROBLEMS PROJECT ESTABLISHED TO ADDRESS IDENTIFIED SPECIFIC OBSOLETE AND SURPLUS EQUIPMENT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED PROBLEMS HAVE BEEN SCREENED, PRIORITIZED, AND SCHEDULED PER EWR PROCEDURE DESIGN PROCEEDING FOR EWRs SCHEDULED FOR 1989
.____-_________--__a
ENGINEERING EFFECTIVENESS TECHNICAL SUPPORT OBSOLETE EQUIPMENT (CONTINUED):
o BUDGET SUBMITTED TO COMPLETE DESIGN FOR EWRs SCHEDULED FOR 1990 INSTALLATION BEGUN AND WILf_
CONTINUE IN THE UPCOMING REFUELING OUTAGES PROJECTS INITIATED TO ADDRESS GENERIC OBSOLETE EQUIPMENT PROBLEMS MANUAL VALVES (ABOUT 300 REPLACED)
BAILEY RECORDERS GEMAC RECORDERS DIESEL GENERATOR ALLEN BRADLEY RELAYS INTERFACE IN PLACE BETWEEN STORES AND PROCUREMENT ENGINEERING TO IDENTIFY REPLACEMENTS FOR INTERCHANGEABLE OBSOLETE PARTS
I ENGINEERING EFFECTIVENESS-TECHNICAL SUPP0BI l
l o
ENGINEERING WORK REQUEST PROCESS COMPLETELY OVERHAULED AND UPGRADED i
PROCESS ADDED SAFETY SCREENING FOR INCOMING EWRs INCORPORATED EXPANDED PRIORiTIZATION SYSTEM GENERATE NCR FOR SCATO CONDITIONS ISSUE MANAGEMENT REPORTS ON PROGRAM ESTABL!SHED EWR GROUP TO PROCESS EWRs COMPLETED SCREENING, INITIAL INVESTIGATION, AND DISPOSITION OF BACKLOGGED EWRs ON SCHEDULE BACKLOG REDUCED FROM OVER 1900 TO ABOUT 500 EWRs INCOMING EWRs BEING DISPOSITIONED ON SCHEDtA.E
o E_NGINEERING EFFECTIVENESS TECHNICAL SUPPORT o
EWR PROCESS (CONTINUED):
CONSOLIDATED DESIGN FUNCTIONS IN NED ALLOWS EWRs REQUIRING DESIGN WORK TO BE TRANSFERRED TO NED MORE QUICKLY ALLOWS TECHNICAL SUPPORT TO FOCUS ON INVESTIGATION INSTEAD OF IMPLEMENTATION TRANSFER PROCESS INVOKES PLANT MANAGEMENT REVIEW, BUDGETING, AND SCHEDULING
- e. -
l ENGINEERING EFFECTIVENESS TECHNICAL SUPPORT o
RESULTS/ACCOMPUSHMENTS IMPROVED WORKING RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN TECHNICAL SUPPORT ENGINEERS AND MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS INCREASED MANHOURS SPENT ON SYSTEM OPERATIONS, RELIABILITY, AND REPAIR BY THE SYSTEM ENGINEER-ENGINEERING PERSONNEL ARE BECOMING MORE KNOWLEDGEABLE IN THElR SYSTEMS AND SYSTEM INTERACTIONS ROOT CAUSE DETERMINATION HAS IMPROVED VALVE EROSION PROBLEMS LOSS OF OFFSITE POWER EVENT EHC MALFUNCTION (U/1)
CORE SPRAY PUMP MOTOR FAILURE ROSEMOUNT ATTU FAILURES -
COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN TECHNICAL SUPPORT PERSONNEL AND OTHER GROUPS HAVE IMPROVED
1 ENGINEERING EFFECTIVENESS
' TECHNICAL SUPPORT o
CONTINUING OPPORTUNITIES FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF SYSTEM ENGINEERING PROCESS CENTRALIZED LOCATION OF THE TECHNICAL SUPPORT UNIT INTO THE PROTECTED AREA OF THE PLANT
1 OPEX E:PC:: SSFI ACTIOX IT3MS 120 110-Ik 100 - -
90 80 70 --
60- -
50-.
40--
30 e
20-.
10--
O INITATED 4TH '87 iST '88 M '88 E '88 4TH '88 iST '89 M '89 EG QUARTER
SEIJ-rU3 RAT 3D XC3s T3CEn1 CAL SUP?0R:'
CUMULATIVE O
40 4
30 - -
i 20 - -
g/
10 - -
0 AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JLN JUL 1988 1989
EACKLOG F/TRS TO BE DISPOSTIOXEJ (Pre January 1988 Backlog) 2000 1707 1500 1000 500-g 0
12 4
11 11 9
18 16 12 12 14 12 24 DATE 1
- EXGIXEERIXG WORK R:EQUESTS (REQUIRING DISPOSITION) 125 100- -
- n..
illllilli a
NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JLA.
AUG SEPT OCT
OUTSTAXDIXG EWRs 1500 --
1134 1000 -.
687 lillili 1988 1989 l
ENGINEERING EFFECTIVENESS CENTRAL DESIGN ORGANIZATION o
MODIFICATION AND BASIC TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER INITIATED (1987 - 1988) o REORGANIZATION AND TRANSFER OF SITE DESIGN FUNCTIONS ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION SECTION PHASED OUT REMAINING SITE DESIGN FUNCTIONS REASSIGNED TO NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (NED)
TECHNICAL SUPPORT DESIGN FUNCTIONS REASSIGNED TO NED o
TRANSITION AGREEMENT BROAD GENERAL PLAN FOR TRANSFER OF FUNCTIONS ESTABLISHED NED AS " ENGINEER IN CHARGE" DEFINED MODIFICATION FUNCTIONS FOR NED AND BNP J
]ll s
n n
I,g g
g op g
g g
is g
g g
r r
it r
r r
r g
g t -
g e
g n
n sw n
n n
et n
Et Et
- o Et Et E
Dl k n k o k o fl k o ko k g i
Et g
r r
tl r
r n
r u
k o ici cp cp io cp cp ci lab cp r
ig ip dF iy g
is c
ig l
we wi wu o
wt ut we i s wt se sS ss Md ss s5 sD rA s5 nn n
n n
n n
n l
t ui u
u t e i
t t
c&
rm t
r r
ni r
r r
e r
g B
g ai g
a B
l a
E l
E P
l sec ivre S
e ic l
fo gn iru g
ee ei n
nv ie i
gR r
n Ey e
t g
re e
in ef ea r
t S n
e c
e u
i rn m
ei g
)
gg hg an I
n d
nE n
g a
e n
ng n
l E
o Mr t
n go i
n c
soi t
a ng e
ni mi e
t c
(
e en g
it l
D st e
mi e
re au eu j
l r
c er n
er d
n tt o
l u
ge e
et Pe o
I r
a w
ee M
ns h
s nt P
nn ii t c n
gs e
ei t
gn cS i
i n
S Mg c
ni e
b so S
l n
e Em jd o
ec D
tE j
d on R
De E
c c
o A
ra R
ed r
P u
jn P
oa N
r P
lg 7
g g
g n
n sn l
i ai li g
l r cr ar n
ie ie ie i r ve ne re re in an en eg Ci hi ti ea g
cg eg nn n
en Mn a
E ME E
igm n
E n
t g
l du i
o t
no sg r
gr g
ak en t
no l n c
Di ns p
ai i
g Ro t
om rp cr n
t lf Ce et ire e
r as aa t
eS ire lf n iD ey it ci cr rs n
t n eg u
ee r e n
eS gn eg nn et ad n
ne l n e
pt hn EI EE igm pe ca ig P
n At e
n E
S M
E p
C il(
.1ll l
I
1 g.
g) a a
e d
I E
E 5
9 w
2 is e
is 9
II l
il E
e i
e a
a e
1 if i
9
!a!
Rij I
E 18 le s
y i
s I
le i
as 4
l8.
m it i!
fj tg
[I s
-1 s
as a
a g
vi
.e-35 E
g lI l-mi 3
t 2
[
31 4
4
~
4 i
h
)!
I d!
l 11 W
%)4
!s!
i 5L I
1 5
d!
2 I
f!
d P
il s=
ij
=5 gi g5 s-gr c-
$3 3
8
$8 g
i
ENGINEERING EFFECTIVENESS CENTRAL DESIGN ORGANIZATION o
TRANSITION ACTION ITEM STATUS 20 OF 23 FUNCTIONS / ACTION ITEMS COMPLETE o
NED REORGANIZATION MARCH 1989 (OLD)
AUGUST 1989 (NEW) o NED SUPPORT IS EV! DENT ON SITE IMMEDIATE RESPONSE TO PROBLEMS SERVICE WATER LUBE WATER SUPPORTS REACTOR CORE ISOLATION COOLING SYSTEM F013 t
SERVICE WATER DESIGN O
CONTINUING OPPORTUNITIES DESIGN INFORMATION TRANSITION AND ASSEMBLY CONTINUING INTERNAL SSFis l
r
SUMMARY
o THE BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT IS STRIVING TO BE, AND TO BE PERCEIVED TO BE ONE OF THE BEST OPERATING PLANTS IN THE COUNTRY.
o OPERATION AT THE BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT IS IMPROVING THROUGH COMMUNICATIONS TEAMWORK
" PRIDE OF OWNERSHIP" DIRECT MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT o
CORPORATE AND SITE MANAGEMENT HAVE
. DEMONSTRATED A WILLINGNESS TO PERFORM IN-DEPTH ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS AND TO TAKE EFFECTIVE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS o
MACRO-VIEW OF OVERALL OPERATION DURING PAST YEAR SHOWS IMPROVEMENT IN ALL AREAS o
AS STATED LESS THAN ONE YEAR AGO, NECESSARY PERSONNEL ADJUSTMENTS HAVE BEEN ACCOMPLISHED
STATES OF CRESAP :ECOMMEXJA" IONS AEGE'ST 30,1989 80
( X)
(405) 60 - -
P 40 - -
~
g)
(75) 10 11 0
CORREND IM M EAT Ef!BN o > BT CBBBAP 10 M INIFETED AFTER TIE Om1IONE ANALTIRB.
-4.w=_.....
_m..m_s...i...
as,.
i.ac
I D
ED]
~
F D
[R T
CQ I
PES T
I C
E J
G O
lh R
P
~
m_
u s
R S
9 A
R 8
O E
9 T
1 L
C C
A s.
U R
T l
N N
O K
C j_
C l
ju TRE lj Y
I OCS s
A W
PN4 M
t PA0 Y ls S
UN1 T
x SET I
N S
T4CU A
R USCH x~
i U
USIECIIRC 4
r E
CEMPEAPGE R
BDOSTMOES B
.x A
smcrru
(
,v r
Imyrm l
rrm st ypr s
v
,v mcri p r n e
A a
M I
IF A^
s, u hv.
(
w N
- \\
A s
J 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
4 2
0 8
6 4
2 1
1 1
jJ o11Q OZ 1
i t
il I
3 t
I 0 C
.iiJ 9
y g
]
g
/f9 f8
. j9
- 1 gs g 8
8 l
a-.
9 1
j p r
E g
xg T
_F
~
jg7 i
1 x
i8
/////
I 1f,
9_
1 S
N O-6 y
i8 x.
9g9 O
/
g11
[
S 3
R
/
58 O
9 h1 4
T C
4 A
8 R
s i9 1
T S
R O
N T
y 3
C 8
O A
C STS g9 R
g 1
g SRNR TC C
$s g
ROOO
'r OTCT L
CATA s
i8 g
g 2
ARGR W//
A RTNT g
TNMN 9
T NO O 1
OCEC C G O
PAC CETE T
SSUP 1
EBOS g8 vg9 y
A x
x g1
^
x g
_ x
_ x g
x e,
0 8
9 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 8
6 4
2 0
8 6
4 2
2 2
1 1
1 1
i*
C
yu4; 2
I T 9
I 8
FO O R 9 T
1 F
G S N E I C
S I T E T M S O G A N MC 4
@N@
IN R
S TG TR O
3 P
R T
E G
R k
K 2
C 1'
\\
G E
\\
\\
H
\\
k C
\\
1 s
8 j
R 8 Y
T 9
/
G 1
T
/,/,/
IL
/
A 4
/
U N
R TG Q
\\
h l
3 l
l N
R T
G
\\
x 2
5 7
.R 8 06 o
0T 9 2
G 1
lllllllll1ll1)illL!
, o
- r g
9 e
4 1
l l
l l
^ - - " - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
^ - - - - -. _,
^~%