ML20059M173

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Summary of 900806 Meeting in Atlanta,Ga Re Corporate Emergency Preparedness & Recent Drill Performance. List of Attendees & Viewgraphs Encl
ML20059M173
Person / Time
Site: Harris, Brunswick, Robinson  
Issue date: 09/13/1990
From: Stohr J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Eury L
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
NUDOCS 9010030219
Download: ML20059M173 (38)
v • d • e


Text

._.

SEP133999 Docket Nos. 50-325, 50-324, 50-261, 50-400 License Nos. DPR-71, DPR-62, DRP-23, NPF-63 Carolina Power and Light Company ATTN: Mr. Lynn W. Eury Executive Vice President Power Supply P. O. Box 1551

- Raleigh, NC 27602 Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

MEETING

SUMMARY

- CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PERFORMANCE This letter refers to the meeting-conducted at CP&L's request at the NRC-Region II Office in Atlanta,- Georgia, on August 6,1990.

The purpose of the meeting was to allow CP&L to make a presentation 'on corporate emergency preparedness, and H. B. Robinson's recent drill performance.

It is our opinion that this meeting both informative and beneficial, in tnat it provided a.better understanding of CP&L's -emergency preparedness at the corporate level.

I f

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please let us know, i

Sincerely.

(Original signed by JPStobr)

J. Philip Stohr, Director Division ofLRadiation Safety and Safeguards

Enclosures:

1.

List of Attendees 2.

Meeting Summary 3.

Licensee Handout cc w/encls: --(See page 2)

\\\\

9010030219 900913

{DR ADOCKOSOOg1 1C d $~

f

i Carolina Power and Light Cortpany 2-SEP 131990 cc w/encls:

R. B. Starkey, Jr.

Vice President-Brunswick Nuclear Project Box 10429 Southport, NC 28461

.i J. L. Harness Plant General Manager Brunswick Steam Electric Plant P. O. Box 10429 Southport, NC 28461 C. R. Dietz, Manager Robinson Nuclear Project Department H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant P. O. Box 790 Hartsville, SC 29550 R. E. Morgan, Plant General Manager H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant P. O. Box 790 Hartsville, SC 29550 R. B. Richey, Manager Harris Nuclear Project Box 165 New Hill, NC 27562 C. S. Hinnant Plant General Manager Harris Nuclear Project Box 165 New Hill, NC 27562 C. S. Olexik, Jr., Director Regulatory Corrpliance Harris Nuclear Project P. O. Box 165 New Hill, NC 27562 l-R. E. Jones, General Counsel Carolina Power & Light Company P. O. Box 1551 Raleigh, NC 27602 (cc w/encls continued - See page 3)

y n

W Carolina Power and Light Company 3

[H 131990

)i

-(ccw/enclscont'd)

Ms. Frankie Rabon Board of Commissioners P. O. Box 249 Bolivia NC 28422 Chrys Bagget State Clearinghouse Budget and Management 116 West Jones Street Raleigh, NC 27603 Dayne H. Brown, Director Division-of Radiation Protection N. C. Department of Environn.ent.

Health & Natural Resources P. O. Box 27687 Raleigh, NC 27611-7667 i

Heyward G. Shealy, Chief

-Bureau of Radiological Health Dept. of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, SC 29201 McCuen Morrell, Chairman Darlington County Board of Supervisors County Courthouse Darlington, SC 29535 H. A. Cole Special Deputy Attorney General State of North Carolina P. O. Box 629 Raleigh, NC 27602 Robert P. Gruber Executive Director Public Staff - NCUC P. O. Box 29520 Raleigh, NC 27626-0520 bec w/encis:

(See page 4) l l

1 i

5 8

i 4

SEP 131990 Carolina Power and Li9ht Company 4

bec w/encis:

Document Control Desk DRP Section Chief NRC Resident Inspector i~

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Connission Star Rte. 1,. Box 208 Southport, NC 28461 NRC Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Conmission Route 5, Box 413 Hartsville, SC 29550 NRC Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Re9ulatory Connission Route 1, Box 315B New Hill, NC 27562 i

l 1

Ril RP RII RP RII DRSS RI - sS hGlasman DVerrelli WRank n D ollins7/j%

9/y/90 9/g/90 9////90 9////90

t 4

ENCLOSURL 1 LIST OF ATTENDEES AUGUST 6, 1990 Carolina' Power & Light Company R. A. Watson, Senior.Vice President - Nuclear. Generation C. R. Dietz, Manager - Robinson Nuclear Project Department A. B. Cutter, Vice President - Nuclear Services-R. B. Starkey, Vice President - Brunswick Nuclear Project L. I. Loflin, Manager - Nuclear Licensing R. E. Morgan, Plant General Manager - Robinson Plant C. R. Gibson, Director - Plans and Programs - Harris Project.

J. D. Kloosterman, Director - Regulatory Compliance Robinson Plant M. F. Thompson,, Manager - Emergency Preparedness and Spent Fuel Management L. S Rowell, Senior Engineer - Generic Issues M. C. Morrow, Emergency Preparedness - Robinson Plant Nuclear Regulatory Coninission J. L. Milhoan, Deputy Regional Administrator, Region II (R!I)

E. G, Adensam, Project Director, Project Directorate 11-1, Office-of Nuclear Reactor Regulation J. P. Stohr, Director, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards (DRSS), RII D. M. Collins, Chief, Emergency Preparedness and Radiation Protection i

Branch, DRSS, RII D. M. Verrelli, Chief, Reactor Projects Branch 1, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP), RII W. H. Rankin, Chief, Emergency Preparedness Section, DRSS, RII E. D. Testa, Senior Radiation Specialist, DRSS, RII M. M. Gluman, Project Engineer, DRP, RII G. W. Salyers, Emergency Preparedness Specialist, DRSS, RII l

[

I l

d ENCLOSURE 2 MEETING

SUMMARY

AUGUST 6, 1990 a

A _Managenent Meeting was held at CP&L's request to-discuss H. B.. Robinson's recent exercise performance, as well as corporate emergency preparedness (EP)

~

-topics,, The Deputy Regional Administrator opened the nieeting by expressing NRC concerns relative to Robinson's perfornance during the June 11990 EP exercise and Brunswick's inconsistent EP perforn:ance.

Additionally, interest was' expressed in CP&L's actions to improve _EP performance at al1~three sites.

The licensee-subsequently presented a comprehensive root-cause analysis which addressed exercise problemsoat Robinson, and planning corrective actions..The licensee

?

committed to several corrective actions including a redemonstration_lof cmergency response capability during a t raded exercise to! be conductediat Robinson prior to year end. A corporate averview was presented which described the organization and thef mannerg in which the corporate EP organization works 4

with the individual site EP organizations.

This ' overview also included a status of ongoing site-specific issues.

During the meeting, the Deputy ~ Regional Administrator solicited CP&L's n3anagement opinions relative to whether NRC actions had contributed to CP&L's performance in'the EP area.

One licensee representative expressed the opinion that the NRC tends to drive licensees toward increasingly, challenging scenarios.

The Deputy Regional Administrator closed the meeting by' stating ~

that:the NRC is seeking consistently good performance among all CP&L's nuclear sites.

l

1 ENCLOSURE 3 L i..

1.-

l L-I i:

I l

l PRESENTATION i

ON l-EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS REQUESTED BY CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY-I O

u NRC REGION II AUGUST 6, 1990 l

l e,.-,

.g,,

,r m

  • - -.- --- -. --- - + -- -

--r-----

i y

CAROLINA' POWER & LIGHT COMPANY EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PRESENTATION-L AUGUST 6, 1990' INTRODUCTION-R.

A.- WATSON RNP EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS i

OVd'i! VIEW - 1990 EXERCISE C. R. DIETZ-EXERCISE WEAKNESSES L. S. R0WELL I

ROOT CAUSE ASSESSMENT L. S. R0WELL CORRECTIVE ACTIONS IN PROGRESS / COMPLETE R. E. MORGAN FUTURE /LONG TERM' O. R. DIETZ Sul#lARY C. R. DIETZ CORPORATE OVERVIEW CORP. EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS M. F. THOMPSON-BNP EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS M. F. THOMPSON HNP EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS M. F. THOMPSON CORPORATE ACTIONS A. B. CUTTER SUMARY R. A. WATSON

o.

RNP 1990 ANNUAL EMERGENCY EXERCISE' I

OVERVIEW-CHALLENGING 3CENARIO PERFORMANCE OF RNP ER0 UNSATISFACTORY WEAKNESSES IDENTIFIED l

NOT TESTED-0R PREVIOUSLY CHALLENGED REPETITIVE BASED ON INEFFECTIVE: CORRECTIVE ACTION i

l ERO - EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION i'

=

q RNP 1990 ANNUAL EMERGENCY-EXERCISE ROOT CAUSE ASSESSMENT CHARTER I

INDEPENDENTLY IDENTIFY AND ASSESS THE FACTORS WHICH LED UP TO OR CONTRIBUTED T0 THE VIOLATION AND OTHER WEAKNESSES IDENTIFIED IN THE JUNE 1990'RNP. EMERGENCY-PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE TEAM MEMBERS LEWIS S. R0WELL SENIOR ENGINEER (TEAM LEADER)

NLS NSD

. STEPHEN A. BROWNE PRINCIPAL SPECIALIST HP&C - NSD DOC GAINEY SENIOR SPECIALIST QA/QC ROBERT A. INDELICATO PROJECT SPECIALIST EP - NSD PHILIP D. LESLIE SENIOR SPECIALIST SECURITY - NSD 1

CHARTERED BY:

CORPORATE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS REPORTED TO:

PLANT GENERAL MANAGER l

i

4 1

ROOT CAUSE ASSESSMENT (RCA)

EVENT (S) 1 I

p i

/\\

SCOPE?

N'/

1 l

SMALL SITE

- - ~ -

COORDINATOR i

i' REVIEW INFO' IMW MD N ME AND SELECT IMNTIVE

' VAUDATE REPORT AND

~ COMMUNICATE ' l j l

^

+

TECHNIOUES -

ROOT NSE(S)

R M MENDA N LARGE RCA

=

TEAM THIS EVENT l

BENEFITS

-I O DATA M N

- EVENT AND CAUSAL FACTOR CHART

  • INAPPROPRIATE ACT(S) FOCUS

- HUMAN PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM l

  • STANDARDlZED APPROACHES

- BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS

  • COMPREHENSIVE

- CAUSAL ANALYSIS

- SITUATIONAL ANALYS!S -

e..+,.

s.m..,

m s,,.,

.e--r.

,m

..k.

{

l i

\\..

c I

RNP 1990 ANNUAL EMERGENCY EXERCISE l

IDENTIFIED WEAKNESSES:

1 FAILURE TO ADEQUATELY IMPLEMENT THE NOTIFICATION i

PROCEDURE FOR PLANT AUGMENTATION STAFF.AND TO ACTIVATETHETSCANDOSCINATIMELYMANNER i

l 1

{

FAILURE TO CLASSIFY GENERAL EMERGENCY IN THE TSC ADEQUACY OF THE PROCEDURE FOR ALERTING EMERGENCY RESPONSE PERSONNEL DEPTH 0F THE EMERGENCY RESPONSE ORGANIZATION DOSE PROJECTION INCONSISTENCIES LACK OF TEAMWORK NOTIFICATIONS I

..----..-_.~,.,,r.,_....__...

,_._,-__..___,._._,._._..-.._.__.~,.,.,-..~,..,..,..u,__

~..

.~>,__...__.4..

l l

['.

i j

RNP 1990 ANNUAL EMERGENCY EXERCISE ROOT CAUSE ASSESSMENT INFORMATION ASSESSED:

I 1990 EXERCISE SCENARIO

)

l CONTROLLER / EVALUATOR LOGS, NOTES, AND PLAYER CRITIQUES i

l t

NRC COMENTS OF 6/20/90 1

NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-26/89-27 (1989 EXERCISE)

RNP BRAINSTORMING MEETING NOTES OF 6/22/90 SITE AND CORPORATE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FILES INTERVIEWS CONDUCTED WITH APPROXIMATELY 40 INDIVIDUALS (SUPERVISORY AND NON-SUPERVISORY) 1 l

J l

l RNP 1990 ANNUAL EMERGENCY EXERCISE R00T CAUSE ASSESSMENT i

SIGNIFICANT AREAS ASSESSED:

)

l

)

l AUGMENTATION OF TNE ON-SNIFT STAFF l

ACTIVATION OF TNE OSC AND TSC EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION i

l l

DOSE PROJECTION l

NOTIFICATION OF THE STATE AND COUNTIES f

i s

4 l

I l

l

\\

l

o

)

l RNP 1990 ANNUAL EMERGENCY EXERCISE L

ROOT CAUSE ASSESSMENT-j AUGMENTATION AND. ACTIVATION I

i PROBLEM STATEMENTS:

1 a

I SITE EMERGENCY C0ORDINATOR (SEC) DID NOT KNOW THAT AUGMENTATION HAD BEEN ACCOMPLISHED.

NEITHER THE TSC OR OSC WERE FULLY ACTIVATED IN

[

l A TIMELY MANNER.

i i

)

ROOT CAUSES:

I i

INEFFECTIVE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS i

PROCEDURAL EFFECTIVENESS i

I METHOD F0k ENSURING AVAILABILITY OF PERSONNEL VERIFICATION OF PERSONNEL ON SITE l

GUIDANCE ON ACTIVATION OF FACILITIES WITHOUT FLLL STAFFING

L 1

l RNP 1990 ANNUAL ENERGENCY EXERCISE ROOT CAUSE ASSESSMENT l

EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION AND DOSE PROJECTION l

l PROBLEM STATENENT:

TSC FAILED TO RECOGNIZE AND ANALYZE DATA AND CONDITIONS INDICATING A GENERAL EMERGENCY l

CLASSIFICATION.

1 ROOT CAUSES:

SCENARIO TEANWORK/C0 M ND AND CONTROL IN TSC DOSE PROJECTION COMPUTER SOFTWARE t

-,ry.,..u-w,-r*-*---

-*"--v-*-*--

      • -s--w'
  • -r-*'*r--*r**
  • - = - - * ' ---******r-- - " * = '* " - * * ' * * *

'"'"" * * * - " ' * * * " " " " ' * * * * * ^ ~ ~ ~ * * * "' ' ' "" ' ' * ' ~ ~ ' " " * - ' ' ' "*' * --

i e

i I

i..

1 l

RNP 1990 ANNUAL EMERGENCY EXERCISE

)

l ROOT CAUSE ASSESSMENT l

1 l

NOTIFICATIONS PROBLEM STATEMENT:

i NOTIFICATIONS WERE A WEAKNESS.

i l

I l

i ROOT CAUSES:

l ATTENTION TO DETAIL FAMILIARITY WITH PROCEDURES i

+

t

=

3 l

l

l i

f RNP 1990 ANNUAL EMERGENCY EXERCISE j

ROOT CAUSE ASSESSMENT i

SUMARY f

i SEVERAL ROOT CAUSES IDENTIFIED I

i i

MULTIPLE COMPLEX EVENTS i

ASSESSMENT WAS TH0 ROUGH l

RECOMENDATIONS WERE MADE l

t 5

w---,

,ww...,--

3-.r----,-.---,.

,,,-y,,.-~w.,-3,,-,-.--ymo,,,,,,...,.,,,.mr

.w,,,.,m_.

ww... <,,,.,,,v-w,.

ee.-r-,w r,-,--.,-,+ry...,,

w..,.,,,w,,..--c

RNP 1990 ANNUAL EMERGENCY EXERCISE 1

l CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

)

I IN PROGRESS:

I AUGMENTATION AND ACTIVATION l

3 EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION AND DOSE PROJECTION NOTIFICATION 5

t i

4 i

e 4

.,,,,,--,,-n,,,,,-v,,,-,.-,,--

,,-,,n-,

,,n,,,

.,, _,,,,-,r-n-,.,-,---

-,--,n,-,n-,-

,,-,-n.-n.---,-,-

RNP 1990 ANNUAL EMERGENCY EXERCISE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS AUGMENTATION AND ACTIVATION INEFFECTIVE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS MANAGEMENT ATTENTION WILLINGNESS TO MAKE HARD CHOICES PROCEDURAL EFFECTIVENESS PRIORITIZED CALLOUT OF ERO PERSONNEL ERO CALLOUT STRUCTURED TO NORMAL 9/7/90 DUTIES l

l..

RNP 1990 ANNUAL EMERGENCY EXERCISE 1

l CORRECTIVE ACTIONS i

1 AUGMENTATION AND ACTIVATION

(

l METHOD FOR ENSURING AVAILABILITY 0F PERSONNEL i

l l

WEEKLY WATCH BILL 8/10/90 1

1 I

STATE-0F-ART TECHNOLOGY 8/10/90 i

ROUTINE TESTING WEEK OF l

8/13/90 h

VERIFICATION OF PERSONNEL 0N-SITE 8/10/90 LOG IN BY POSITION ComVNICATE TO SEC GUIDANCE ON ACTIVATION OF FACILITIES 8/10/90 KEY POSITION IDENTIFICATION ACTIVATION TO RELIEVE OFF-SITE DUTIES f

. ~ _. _,. _..,.,,,... -.

\\

l RNP 1990 ANNUAL EMERGENCY EXERCISE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION AND DOSE PROJECTION i

SCENARIO i

COMIT RESOURCES I

DEFINE SCOPE 4

INDEPENDENT REVIEW f

TEAMWORK /C0 MAND AND CONTROL IN TSC 8/31/90 TABLE T0P/ TEAMWORK TRAINING 1

COMAND AND CONTROL CONSERVATIVE CLASSIFICATION CLASSIFICATION RETRAINING l

DOSE PROJECTION SOFTWARE 9/7/90 C0 ORDINATE PROGRAMS BETWEEN OPERATIONS, TSC, AND EOF DOSE PROJECTION TRAINING

RNP 1990 ANNUAL EMERGENCY EXERCISE l

CORRECT 1VE ACTIONS HQ.TIFICAIIONS ATTENTION TO DETAIL 9/7/90 l

ON-SHIFT COMUNICATOR DESIGNATED ADDITIONAL TRAINING QUALITY COMUNICATION FAMILIARITY WITH PROCEDURES 9/7/90 ENHANCED TABLE TOP EXERCISES i

1 l

l

\\

i

)l RNP 1990 ANNUAL ENERGENCY EXERCISE I

i CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

?

i FUTURE /LONG TERM:

i l

TRAINING CLASSES AND QUALIFICATION 9/7/90-TO SUPPORT. INCREASED LEVEL 0F l

SUPPORT FOR THE ERO (15 CLASSES) l EVALUATE AND RECOMMEND APPROPRIATE 9/21/90 l

LEVELS OF EXPANDED SHIFT C0VERAGE POSITION DESCRIPTIONS REVISED TO 9/30/90 REFLECT ERO RESPONSIBILITY l

TEST AUGMENTATION / ACTIVATION AND 10/15/90 i

REDEMONSTRATE EFFECTIVENESS OF i

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS BY COMPLETION OF TABLE TOP EXERCISES EVALUATE ER0 STAFFING COMMITMENTS 10/15/90 AND ADJUST AS APPROPRIATE REDEMONSTRATE EMERGENCY RESPONSE 11/30/90 DURING FORMAL GRADED EXERCISE ACTIONS BASED ON CORPORATE 1991 ASSESSMENTS e

. - -, - + -,. - ~ + - - - -. - -

- - ~ - - * - ~ - - ~ ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - - ~ * + * - ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - " - " " * * ' * ~ ' ' ' * ~ " - " ' " " " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

i j'.

RNP 1990 ANNUAL. EMERGENCY EXERCISE i

SU H RY i

1 MULTIPLE PROBLEMS AND ISSUES l

CAUSAL FACTORS ARE COMPLEX CORRECTIVE ACTIONS STRUCTURED TO BE AGGRESSIVE l

1 AND THOR 00GN l

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS STRUCTURED TO SUSTAIN I

EXCELLENT FUTURE PERFORMANCE 1

i I

PERFORMANCE WEAKNESSES ARE CONSIDERED i

SIGNIFICANT BY THE RNP STAFF AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE INTENDED TO PRECLUDE RECURRENCE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS PROVIDE NULTIPLE BENEFITS TO OVERALL PERFORMANCE 4

l i

CORPORATE OVERVIEW l

i l

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND l

SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT SECTION I

CORPORATE EP FUNCTION l

1 ASSURE-PLANS / PROCEDURES ARE CONSISTENT WITH FEDERAL / STATE / LOCAL GUIDELINES AND PLANS i

l INTERFACE WITH AND SUPPORT OFF-SITE EP ORGANIZATIONS l

C0 ORDINATE AND SUPPORT THE PLANTS' EP EXERCISES AND DRILLS i

PROVIDE EP SUPPORT TO THE PLANTS ROUTINE SPECIAL PROJECTS dar---@

ew "

,y e-1y y

yye-9 vre-y--er-yf-waq-mmmm-g w,

rwg--ew-ew.w.w-ys-,g,3-+e,.geme--te%eM*>e,%,e,-a+em-egwg.w owa,-me p p w. *ow

-wg-*m-a< w - e-o m w-ge- * - -

m-s epv-er a er e-N-~aw+-'em-e-->agerwen-we

i r

L CORPORATE OVERVIEW l

l l

CP&L EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS HISTORY i

i EARLY 1980'S:

PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT i

k j

MID 1980'S:

HARRIS LICENSING ISSUE i

LATE 1980'S:

OPERATIONAL PHASE i

l STATE /C0UNTY/ LOCAL SUPPORT DRILLS AND EXERCISES a

REAL EVENTS l

l

,,.,.,.--....,-,,...-n-,..,--------....----,-.,..-.~...,_.-,-.,.-nn,-nn..~...

_.., ~.

..n..

--e

w.

i j

1 l

l CORPORATE OVERVIEW i,

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS INITIATIVES PUBLIC AWARENESS /COMUNICATION J

C&OS LINKS WITH PUBLIC SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT TASK FORCE i

l PLANT GENERAL MANAGERS-EMERGENCY PLANNERS (PLANT AND CORPORATE) i r

i

\\

i

'---*+.we..

-.w.-

-e.--ee

..--w---.--+-.m_--,-w.,w.-

.-e--~--

- -.rmr.

-m-- -=

c--.-

.-e

-.rs.e-.-

--e.-e-ea-+ w. - - - + - -

_+..__,.--m_

w

l t

s.

l CORPORATE OVERVIEW i

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR P.90 JECT EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS t

l i

l I

L i

l CORRECTED WEAKNESSES l

CYCLIC WEAKNESSES i

ROBINSON AND HARRIS IDENTIFIED WEAKNESS 4

P t

6 l

l

'i 4

_ _ _.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ -.. _.. _ _ _. _ _ _, _.. _ _ _. - _ _.. -. _.. _ - ~ _ _.. _ _ _ _. _. _. _, _ _.. _, -. _ -,.. _ _ - - -. _ _ _. - _

CORPORATE OVERVIEW BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS CORRECTED WEAKNESSES EVENT DECLARATION FLOW CHARTED EALs INCREASED STA/ SOS TRAINING SCENARIO ADEQUACY PROVIDED CORRECT RESOURCE PERSONNEL CORPORATE SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT TASK i

FORCE i

ACTIVITY CG0RDINATION OSC FACILITY UPGRADE i

OSC/TSC ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES i

i l

l l

1 m,.,

_,4,_.

.. ~.

....,,,_.....__-.,_...-_._.._._s.

_______,,-.__..____...__...___..,.-..__.,..____________..___.~._m

1 CORPORATE OVERVIEW t

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS l

i CYCLIC WEAKNESSES l

l 1

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS TRAINING L

TASK SPECIFIC TRAINING VS. GENERIC IMPROVED SCHEDULING & TRACKING PROGRAM INCREASED USE OF MINI TABLETOPS TRAINING MODULES BEING CONSOLIDATED-l ACCOUNTABILITY l

PROCEDURE REVISIONS EVALUATING NEED FOR MORE CARD READERS PURSUING IMPROVED SITE ALERTING SYSTEM i

0FFSITE NOTIFICATION HANDS ON TRAINING ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR CR COMMUNICATORS

~

FAX MACHINES I

9 vg---

-.y-,.----.-we

+ w p r ' e r e w~

e'-*-***'

i--e-re-*-W*we

-***=me-rw---*

ewe *wr*ee w w-'

+

-**r

--ee----

+ * - -- -

-s"***'*' ' ' -d*+-

+-*r

l CORPORATE OVERVIEW

)

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AUGMENTATION (IDENTIFIED AT ROBINSON AND HARRIS) 4 i

i CORRECTIVE ACTION l

BEEPER DRILLS-(MONTHLY VS. QUARTERLY)

ANALYZING PRESENT AUGMENTATION METHOD l

CONSIDERING INCREASING GROUP PAGE l

LOOKING AT DEPTH 0F POSITIONS

'I l

l l

l l

i L

l l

l

..~.

- -- _._ - _ ~.-.-_ - - _ - - -

)

- r.

CORPORATE OVERVIEW 1

l BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS i

HAVE SUCCEEDED IN RESOLVING WEAKNESSES THREE NRC ITEMS REMAIN OPEN i

ACCOUNTABILITY AUGMENTATION PNSC REVIEW 0F PLANS SELF ASSESSMENT CONTINUES WITH WEAKNESSES l

IDENTIFIED AND IMPROVEMENTS MADE i

PURSUING RESOLUTION OF CYCLIC WEAKNESSES j

AGGRESSIVE ON WEAKNESSES IDENTIFIED AT I

OTHER PLANTS i

STRONG COMITHENT BY PLANT MANAGEMENT FOR THE EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM 1

l 4

.......r...

..,____._,,v_,..7,__._,_,,_____.....-..._,,,,,,_,,-.,,.,,___.,_.._.,,,,m..,.,

. r

l.

i CORPORATE OVERVIEW HARRIS NUCLEAR PROJECT 1

i EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS THREE NON-CITED VIOLATIONS

)

l l

EVENT DECLARATION i

IDENTIFIED-1987 l

CLOSED 1988 i

PROCEDURE CHANGES NOT SENT TO NRC IN 30 DAYS IDENTIFIED 1988 CLOSED 1989 AUGMENTATION IDENTIFIED 1990 OPEN l

)

li,,

i l'.'

CORPORATE OVERVIEW j

i HARRIS NUCLEAR PROJECT EMERGENCY FREPAREDNESS i

AUGMENTATION i

1 l

I CORRECTIVE ACTION RESTRUCTURED METHOD 0F AUGMENTATION f

IDENTIFIED AND TRAINED ADDITIONAL TEAM MEMBERS

)

CONSIDERING AUTOMATED CALLING l'

t I

l.

l CORPORATE OVERVIEW l

HARRIS NUCLEAR PROJECT EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM MAINTENANCE i

1

{

SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGING SCENARIOS FOR DRILLS AND i

)

EXERCISES i

MANAGF.NENT ATTENTION TO EP l

AGGRESSIVE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN BY PLANT MANAGEMENT ON EP ISSUES TRAINING 1

INCREASED EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS TRAINING BY EP STAFF DURING LICENSED OPERATOR RETRAINING FACILITIES DEDICATED TSC AND E0F USE OF DRILL CONTROL ROOM CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ADDITIONAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATOR TRAINING BASED ON LESSONS LEARNED FROM BNP AND RNP MOVE TSC C0ORDINATORS TO OSC TO IMPROVE COMMUNICATION FLOW BASED ON THE ONLY NRC OUTSTANDING IFI FOR AN EXERCISE 9

f

,._..-~-,--.,...,,,,.m-.,_,.,.,,.r_-,w,,,,%,.,y.f.uw-,..--,w.,-www,m-,,--,

.--,._._,,---e~,~.....-me,--.

i

.r.

i CORPORATE OVERVIEW I

i.

5 5

CORPORATE EVALUATION 0F SUPPORT FUNCTION l

4 i

CORPORATE FOCUS MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT AND DIRECTION j

EQUAL RESPONSIBILITY BETWEEN SUPPORT (STAFF) AND PLANT (LINE) FUNCTIONS l

i

l

i i

i e,

l l-o l

CORPORATE OVERVIEW 1

i

?

l' EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS ACTIONS 1

l PEER MANAGEMENT INTERACTION:

(CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS) i MONITOR TRENDS TO IMPROVE CONSISTENCY / QUALITY i

REPORT TO CORPORATE MANAGEMENT i

h l

,,. ~ _, _. _ _.. _ _ _ -...., _ _. _.... _ _

. _.,.. -.. -...... -,... - _,... _

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20059M173&oldid=4460439"