ML20079F343

From kanterella
Revision as of 04:43, 23 April 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests NRC Complete Three Listed Steps to Determine Validity of Allegations Re Potential Safety Problems Before Authorizing Plant Operation
ML20079F343
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 01/11/1984
From: Oconnell J
CALIFORNIA, STATE OF
To: Palladino
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
References
NUDOCS 8401180235
Download: ML20079F343 (2)


Text

COMV TTE ES SA E Ao

!'Caav!N'O C A; eCRNia ;=x4 EDUCGTION 96448

  • 42 OG'NG AND LONG TE Av CaaE N ATL:A AL DESCoACES SAN'a Eano ama cesicg S'JO .* E, ca$EO eo4}b'<' L ta.. a e ar F ar a Ca 9p-c C:<E W .'.!S* EE C ONO STREET C = ' A c t C A 9M30 Ealifornia llegislaturq. L fh ? 7 ]j

= 47 943 Jack O'ConneH ASSEMBLY',' AN THI ATY.FIFTH D! STRICT VICE CH AIRM AN EDUCATION COMMITTEE January 11, 1984 SERVED J Ai! ' ' " "

Mr. Nunzio Palladino Chairman, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 ',,,'.,,,1 t a . ,. .

-- 3 J

,, M....v.p-Q

Dear Chairman Palladion:

It has been brought to my attention that within the past three months, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the Intervenors in the licensing proceedings for the Diablo Canyon nuclear plant have received more than 100 allegations by plant workers concerning potential rafety problems at that plant.

These allegations portray a project where quality assurance and quality control have suffered a serious breakdown. ,

I have been informed that the Diablo Canyon nuclear plant is now ready to operate, and I am concerned that the plant be authorized before a full investigation of these serious allegations is conducted.

I believe it is in the interests of both the public and the SEC to resolve all safety questions at this plant before it is .

licensed to operate. Given the serious and well-documented nature of many of the allegations, and the fact that they relate to issues which were not uncovered and/or corrected during the course of the two-year design verification program, I am requesting that the NRC complete the following steps before authorizing plant operation:

1) The NRC will authorize a complete investigation by its Office of Investigations into the causes of the quality assurance / quality control breakdown at Diablo Canyon, including charges of retaliation against workers who report t problems or mistakes, the falsification and destruction of records, and intentional management decisions to violate l the Atomic Energy Act.

O y Ph . _ _

Page Two An independent body will conduct an independent audit of the entire P. G. & E./Bechtel designcommittee.

review, including a 2) provision for a broad public eversight

3) An independent body will conduct a comprehensive quality control re-inspection of all safety-related hardware in the plant.

Particularly in the case of Diablo Canyon, with it's troubled history, I believe the completion of these three steps, and a resolution of the problems they might uncover, to be necessary to assure safe plant operation.

Sincerely, 7 l clu [ w.}?

JACK O'CONNELL JO:rcw e