ML20083Q445

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Extension Until 840504 to File Petition for Review of ALAB-763 & Extension to Page Limits for Petition.Related Correspondence
ML20083Q445
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 04/13/1984
From: Strumwasser M
CALIFORNIA, STATE OF
To: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
ALAB-763, NUDOCS 8404230073
Download: ML20083Q445 (1)


Text

n JOHN K. VAN DE KAMP RClh1CD CCHHLrc"yycg St:ts of Cclifumla l Attomey Gene,al

__ DElunntENT OF JUSTICE  ;

April 13, 1984 N V* uw witMimE flot't.n4Rt1 Met No {

im ncr us wem  !

(211) 7M2M4 l lion. Samuel Chilk, Socrotary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 j gsg g BRANCH Dear Mr. Chilk* '

Pacific Gas and F.loctric Company (Diablo Canyon Nucicar Power 1

P l <i n t , Units 1 and 2), U.U. raucionr Hogulatory Comminston Docket ,

No. 50-275, 50-323 l Governor Georgo Doukmojian, whom we repronont, wishes to appon1 to the comminnion cortain innuon addronned in the recont donign quality assuranco record decinton of the Atomic Safoty and Licensing Appeal Board on the reopened record, At.AH-763.

i l In the ordinary course of ovents, review of nuch a decision, which, as we understand it, functions an an initial docinton, would lie by means of an appeal under noction 2.762 of the i commission's rulos. llovcver, since the matter was heard by the Appoal noard, rathor thrn a liconning board, wo understand review to ho by means of a petition for review purnuant to noction 2.786 We are informed that, prior to our involvomont in thin j caso, section 2.786 has boon followed under the name circumstancen.

ALAD-763 in 120 pagon long. Given the fact that our petition will constituto our initial and only challongo to that docinion, the ton-page nominal limit on petitionn for review and fiftcon-day period to prepare the potitions are not adoquato for the pronont cano. Wo are thereforo requesting of your office, by thin lottor, an extonnion of the timo and page limitn for petitionn for review undor noction 2.762, to conform to the customary rulon for

briefing appeals from initial docinions. Specifically, wo ask that the timo for filiug our petition be extended to May 4, 1984 (thirty days from norvice of the decision) and that wo be granted loavo to file a petition of up to noventy pagon in longth.

1 Thank you for your conalderation of this requent.

Very truly yours, J0llN K. VAN 07
KAMP Attorno General l { Y&

J. STRUMWADSE';

MICllAEL)Counseltotho Special Attornoy General

^

cc Sorvico List

. , 0