ML20080G543

From kanterella
Revision as of 01:29, 22 April 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Completion of All Appropriate Reviews of Design & Const Before Considering Any Proposal to Relicense Facility
ML20080G543
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 09/13/1983
From: Hart G
CALIFORNIA, STATE OF
To: Palladino N
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20080G533 List:
References
NUDOCS 8309200309
Download: ML20080G543 (1)


Text

e 5,g .t . g ..' To C ow w T. . $

4 'y 4 E3uc. oe.

_ .-....-. -.a .. % ..... m m.

g gg N ,Q

,,,. c. m '.,; .' ;. N.7W4A.

~ . - . . .E. SOU.CES

. - . . Aesc.W

- W.

.A

, w. .c. o.. .c . . . m.. 00,g.,;'pCK C T " "*'

....,...,.g...,

        • ft:3".'..",'o**

c cc

. . ..c. .. . ~.

@paliform.a fate cuat)3 SEP 19 P232

.. a..'ua' am ,oc.

C "' ' ' * *'" */ 'ic?,

  • ^

" " 0FFICE OF SECR:Tu

    • 'i?2".T.22o. " *" GARY K. HART 00CKETJNG & SEfeyg,;

SENATOR EIGHTEENTM DISTRICT

. CHAIRMAN EDUCATION COMMITTEE DOC!CT NUf,iSER PROD.& UTIL.FAC..$g p]$ 33)

. . . ., . . e.wm-September 13, 1983 Mr. Nunzio Palladino, Chairman Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1717 H Street Washington, D.C. 20S55

Dear Mr. Palladino:

I understand the Nuclear Regulatory Commission will shortly consider relicensing the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant.

Given the history of persistent design and construction problems at this facility and the potentially catastrophic consequences of an erroneous decision by the NRC, it seems inappropriate to consider licensing prior to the NRC hearings on design problems.

The residents in the counties around Diablo Canyon are understandably concerned about the question of the safety of thi's facility. Any decision to relicense, made before the completion of the design review, can only increase public concerns about the adequacy and objectivity of the NRC in this matter.  !

I urge you to complete all appropriate reviews of design and.

construction before considering any proposal to relicense Diablo Canyon. Anything less will only damage the NRC's credibility and further exacerbate public fears about the dangers of this plant.

S' erely, ARY HART GKH:jc:ms 830920d309 8309L PDR ADOCK 05000275 U PDR 9 23