ML20125E513

Notifies That Aslab Assumes Mb Ashare Will File & Serve Submission Per 850603 Order.Briefs on cross-appeals from ASLB 850417 Partial Initial Decision Due on 850703 & 11

ML20125E513
Person / Time
Site:	Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date:	06/10/1985
From:	Shoemaker C NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
To:	Ashare M SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY
References
CON-#285-372 OL-3, NUDOCS 8506130144
Download: ML20125E513 (1)

Text

. 'h]%

jo,, UNITED STATES 3[ o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j $ [.h c ( 'f ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL PANEL

,Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 l

June 10, 1985 Martin Bradley Ashare, Esq.

Suffolk County Attorney ggg',

H. Lee Dennison Building USNRC Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 .

'85 JUN 11 All :42

( Re: Long Island Lighting Company (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1) GFFU F h w -

00CKUINGA SERVKf Docket No. 50-322-OL-3 BRANCH

Dear Mr. Ashare:

It has come to the attention of the Appeal Board that, by June 3, 1985 letter, you advised the Commission that the law firm of Kirkpatrick and Lockhart no longer represents Suffolk County in this proceeding and, further, that  :

henceforth you "will represent the County in all Shoreham related proceedings." In these circumstances, the Appeal =

Board assumes that you will be undertaking the filing and service of the submission called for by the Board's June 3, 1985 order.

As the June 3 order made clear, the terms of the -

Board's May 15, 1985 order, as amended by its May 20 order, 5 currently remain in effect. As matters now stand, therefore, the County's briefs on the cross-appeals from the Licensing Board's April 17, 1985 partial initial decision -

are due to be filed on July 3 and July 11, 1985, respectively. In the event that the County desires to r obtain an extension of time for the filing of those briefs, the Appeal Board will expect it to file a motion to that effect at least several days before the first of those ", .

deadlines. The motion should, of course, refl 9ct the d positions of the other parties to the proceeding with regard 4 to the sought extension. j Sincerely, h_

C.. WM '

ho PD C. Jean Shoe a er Secretary to the 2 Appeal Board cc: Donald P. Irwin, Esq.

Fabian Palomino, Esq. -

Bernard M. Bordenick, Esq. "

Herbert H. Brown, Esq.

1 E

blo2.  :