IR 05000483/1986013: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:
{{#Wiki_filter:,
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
 
==REGION III==
    .
Report No. 50-483-86013(DRS)
Docket No. 50-483  License No. NPF-30 Licensee: Union Electric Company Post Office Box 149 St. Louis, MO ,63166 Facility Name: Callaway Plant, Unit 1 Inspection At: Callaway Site, Callaway County, M0 Inspection Conducted: May 12-14, 1986
  %. 9 Ma    ,g Inspector: K. D. Ward Date b  h D. H. Danielson, Chief  4 Approved By:
Materials and Processes  Date Section Inspection Summary    ;
Inspection on May 12-14, 1986 (Report No. 50-483/86013(DRS))
Areas Inspected: Special, unannounced safety inspection of an allegation concerning unacceptable magnetic particle examinations performed on supports in the auxiliary buildin Results: No violations or deviations were identifie hgoo483 ADOCK PDH  PDR G
 
,
.
DETAILS 1. Persons Contacted Union Electric Company (UE)
* Randolph, Manager, Callaway Plant
*S. Miltenberger, General Manager, Callaway Plant
*A. Neuhalfen, Manager, Quality Assurance
*J. Laux, Superintendent Quality Assurance
*K. Bruckerhoff, Engineering Evaluator L. Kanuckel, Supervisor Engineer C. Slizcwski, Supervisor Engineer Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
* Little, Senior, Resident Inspector C. Brown, Resident Inspector The Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company H. Potter, ANI The inspector also contacted and interviewed other licensee and contractor employee * Denotes those present at the exit intervie . Allegation (Closed) Allegation (RIII-86-A-0003): On January 6, 1986, the Region III Enforcement and Investigation Coordination staff received information from the Office of Investigation (OI) pertaining to Magnetic Particle Examina-tions (MT) that were performed at the Callaway Plant. The alleger stated that the Daniels International Technical Service night shift superintendent (known only as Bob) would just throw the magnetic particle powder around the welds and say, "That it was Good Enough." According to the alleger, the individual would at times skip the weld altogethe The alleger thought that the individual may have falsified those MT reports. The allegers direct knowledge of the individuals activities was limited to the last week of May 1984, when the alleger assisted the individual in conducting 40-50 MT's on supports in the auxiliary building. The alleger also stated that he thought that the former dayshift NDE supervisor who now resides in Lake of the Ozarks, Missouri could fully identify Bo ,,
NRC Review The NRC inspector interviewed three UE individuals that were supervisors in QA, an individual that was an engineer for Daniels, and the Authorized .
Nuclear Inspector that was onsite in May 1984. During these interviews i the NRC inspector was informed of the name of the town where the former l Daniels dayshift NDE supervisor lived. The NRC inspector telephoned the individual and he stated that while he was working at the Callaway Site he knew two Bob's and that they were both excellent inspectors. He did not know of a superintendent named Bob. He stated that to the best of his knowledge everyone followed procedures and that all the NDE was performed properly. He also stated that the MT in the auxiliary building was completed prior to May 1984. He indicated that his home is near the Callaway Plant and that he didn't mind living there because Callaway is a safe plan I In reviewing Daniels QC and construction organizational charts and training records it was determined that there were two superintendents working for Daniels construction in May 1984 that had the first name of Bob. One individual was an insulation superintendent and the other individual was an iron worker superintendent. The superintendents were not qualified in nondestructive examinations (NDE). The Daniel Quality Organization, which included the Technical Services Lab (TSL), did not have any superintendent There were approximately 7,500 Q (safety-related) and non Q (non safety-related) supports in the auxiliary building. All the supports in the auxiliary building are ASME Class 2 or Class 3 and only required a Visual Examination (VT). The VT's were performed in accordance with ASME Section III, 1974 edition 1975 addenda. All welds attaching supports, lugs, brackets, stiffeners and other nonpressure attachments to pressure parts on all exposed surfaces were Magnetic Particle (MT) or Liquid Pene-trant Examined (PT). These tests were properly performed and were performed by qualified personnel. The site staff performed a record search back to November 14, 1983, for the NRC inspector, and found that there was no MT performed on support attachments in the auxiliary building from November 14, 1983, to the present. In reviewing the ASME N5 data reports, it was revealed that the last three systems in the auxiliary building were code stamped the first part of May 198 The NRC inspector reviewed Daniels MT and weld repair procedures, all the Daniels Technical Services Lab (TSL) NDE personnel certifications that had the first name of Bob or Robert, that MT during certification May 1984, and approximately one third of all other NDE personnel that were onsite from 1977 through 1984, and found them all to be properly qualified and certified. Additionally, the NRC inspector reviewed the certifications of the QC inspectors that had the first name and surname of Bob, Robert, Rob, Ron or "R" and that was onsite in May 1984. These individuals were also found to be qualified and certifie o
 
.
..
It is also worthy to note that historically the following organizations have reviewed Daniel personnel certifications and qualifications; observed /
witnessed the various NDE methods; performed audits; and performed NDE record review _
Daniel QA
_
Daniel Construction Group Level III
_
Daniel Technical Services Lab Level III
_
Daniel Construction Group Level II or Level III
_
Daniel Technical Services Lab Level II or Level III
_ UE QA
_
ANI
_
NRC These activities and their acceptable results also provide assurance that the NDE activities at Callaway were of a high quality and were performed in accordance approve procedures by qualified personne Conclusion a
Based on the foregoing, the NRC inspector did not substantiate th6 allegation. The Daniel superintendents were in construction and were not qualified in NDE. Also, there were no superintendents in Daniels Technical Services Lab. All NDE personnel were properly qualified and certifie All supports in the auxiliary building were Clae 2 or 3, and only required a visual examination. There wasn't a MT performed on a support attachment in 198 . Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted under Persons Contacted) at intervals during the inspection period. The inspector suninarized the scope and findings of the inspection. The licensee representatives acknowledged the findings as reported herein. The inspector also discussed the likely informational content of the inspection report with regard to documents or processes reviewed by the inspector during the inspection. The licensee did not identify any such documents / processes as proprietar '
  .  -
g-_
y  % - -
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 19:32, 16 December 2020

Safety Insp Rept 50-483/86-13 on 860512-14.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Allegations Re Unacceptable Magnetic Particle Exams Performed on Supports in Auxiliary Bldg.Concerns Unsubstantiated
ML20195D041
Person / Time
Site: Callaway Ameren icon.png
Issue date: 05/27/1986
From: Danielson D, Ward K
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20195D033 List:
References
50-483-86-13, NUDOCS 8606020075
Download: ML20195D041 (4)


Text

,

.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION III

.

Report No. 50-483-86013(DRS)

Docket No. 50-483 License No. NPF-30 Licensee: Union Electric Company Post Office Box 149 St. Louis, MO ,63166 Facility Name: Callaway Plant, Unit 1 Inspection At: Callaway Site, Callaway County, M0 Inspection Conducted: May 12-14, 1986

%. 9 Ma ,g Inspector: K. D. Ward Date b h D. H. Danielson, Chief 4 Approved By:

Materials and Processes Date Section Inspection Summary  ;

Inspection on May 12-14, 1986 (Report No. 50-483/86013(DRS))

Areas Inspected: Special, unannounced safety inspection of an allegation concerning unacceptable magnetic particle examinations performed on supports in the auxiliary buildin Results: No violations or deviations were identifie hgoo483 ADOCK PDH PDR G

,

.

DETAILS 1. Persons Contacted Union Electric Company (UE)

  • Randolph, Manager, Callaway Plant
  • S. Miltenberger, General Manager, Callaway Plant
  • A. Neuhalfen, Manager, Quality Assurance
  • J. Laux, Superintendent Quality Assurance
  • K. Bruckerhoff, Engineering Evaluator L. Kanuckel, Supervisor Engineer C. Slizcwski, Supervisor Engineer Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
  • Little, Senior, Resident Inspector C. Brown, Resident Inspector The Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company H. Potter, ANI The inspector also contacted and interviewed other licensee and contractor employee * Denotes those present at the exit intervie . Allegation (Closed) Allegation (RIII-86-A-0003): On January 6, 1986, the Region III Enforcement and Investigation Coordination staff received information from the Office of Investigation (OI) pertaining to Magnetic Particle Examina-tions (MT) that were performed at the Callaway Plant. The alleger stated that the Daniels International Technical Service night shift superintendent (known only as Bob) would just throw the magnetic particle powder around the welds and say, "That it was Good Enough." According to the alleger, the individual would at times skip the weld altogethe The alleger thought that the individual may have falsified those MT reports. The allegers direct knowledge of the individuals activities was limited to the last week of May 1984, when the alleger assisted the individual in conducting 40-50 MT's on supports in the auxiliary building. The alleger also stated that he thought that the former dayshift NDE supervisor who now resides in Lake of the Ozarks, Missouri could fully identify Bo ,,

NRC Review The NRC inspector interviewed three UE individuals that were supervisors in QA, an individual that was an engineer for Daniels, and the Authorized .

Nuclear Inspector that was onsite in May 1984. During these interviews i the NRC inspector was informed of the name of the town where the former l Daniels dayshift NDE supervisor lived. The NRC inspector telephoned the individual and he stated that while he was working at the Callaway Site he knew two Bob's and that they were both excellent inspectors. He did not know of a superintendent named Bob. He stated that to the best of his knowledge everyone followed procedures and that all the NDE was performed properly. He also stated that the MT in the auxiliary building was completed prior to May 1984. He indicated that his home is near the Callaway Plant and that he didn't mind living there because Callaway is a safe plan I In reviewing Daniels QC and construction organizational charts and training records it was determined that there were two superintendents working for Daniels construction in May 1984 that had the first name of Bob. One individual was an insulation superintendent and the other individual was an iron worker superintendent. The superintendents were not qualified in nondestructive examinations (NDE). The Daniel Quality Organization, which included the Technical Services Lab (TSL), did not have any superintendent There were approximately 7,500 Q (safety-related) and non Q (non safety-related) supports in the auxiliary building. All the supports in the auxiliary building are ASME Class 2 or Class 3 and only required a Visual Examination (VT). The VT's were performed in accordance with ASME Section III, 1974 edition 1975 addenda. All welds attaching supports, lugs, brackets, stiffeners and other nonpressure attachments to pressure parts on all exposed surfaces were Magnetic Particle (MT) or Liquid Pene-trant Examined (PT). These tests were properly performed and were performed by qualified personnel. The site staff performed a record search back to November 14, 1983, for the NRC inspector, and found that there was no MT performed on support attachments in the auxiliary building from November 14, 1983, to the present. In reviewing the ASME N5 data reports, it was revealed that the last three systems in the auxiliary building were code stamped the first part of May 198 The NRC inspector reviewed Daniels MT and weld repair procedures, all the Daniels Technical Services Lab (TSL) NDE personnel certifications that had the first name of Bob or Robert, that MT during certification May 1984, and approximately one third of all other NDE personnel that were onsite from 1977 through 1984, and found them all to be properly qualified and certified. Additionally, the NRC inspector reviewed the certifications of the QC inspectors that had the first name and surname of Bob, Robert, Rob, Ron or "R" and that was onsite in May 1984. These individuals were also found to be qualified and certifie o

.

..

It is also worthy to note that historically the following organizations have reviewed Daniel personnel certifications and qualifications; observed /

witnessed the various NDE methods; performed audits; and performed NDE record review _

Daniel QA

_

Daniel Construction Group Level III

_

Daniel Technical Services Lab Level III

_

Daniel Construction Group Level II or Level III

_

Daniel Technical Services Lab Level II or Level III

_ UE QA

_

ANI

_

NRC These activities and their acceptable results also provide assurance that the NDE activities at Callaway were of a high quality and were performed in accordance approve procedures by qualified personne Conclusion a

Based on the foregoing, the NRC inspector did not substantiate th6 allegation. The Daniel superintendents were in construction and were not qualified in NDE. Also, there were no superintendents in Daniels Technical Services Lab. All NDE personnel were properly qualified and certifie All supports in the auxiliary building were Clae 2 or 3, and only required a visual examination. There wasn't a MT performed on a support attachment in 198 . Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted under Persons Contacted) at intervals during the inspection period. The inspector suninarized the scope and findings of the inspection. The licensee representatives acknowledged the findings as reported herein. The inspector also discussed the likely informational content of the inspection report with regard to documents or processes reviewed by the inspector during the inspection. The licensee did not identify any such documents / processes as proprietar '

. -

g-_

y  % - -