IR 05000483/1986005

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Physical Security Insp Rept 50-483/86-05 on 860310-21 (Ref 10CFR73.21).Violation Noted:Failure to Have Adequate Alarmed Barrier from Owner Controlled Area to Protected Area
ML20197E142
Person / Time
Site: Callaway 
Issue date: 05/12/1986
From: Axelson W, Belanger J, Creed J, Knicely J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20197E096 List:
References
50-483-86-05, 50-483-86-5, NUDOCS 8605150177
Download: ML20197E142 (2)


Text

r-

%

.-

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

' '

REGION III

,

m

-

,

,

Report No. 50-483/86005(DRSS)

License No. NPF-30 Docket No. 50-483 Licensee: Union Electric Company P. O. Box 149 - Mail Code 400 St. Louis, MO 63166 Facility Name:

Callaway County Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1 Inspection Conducted:

March 10-14, 1986 (onsite) and March 17-21, 1986 (in-office)

Date of Last Physical Security Inspection:

April 29 through May 3, 1965 Type of Inspection:

Unannounced Physical Security Inspection 5 itM l

Inspectors:

h. S.

J. R. Kniceley'

Date Physical Security Inspector

%. %

SlalSG J. L. BelangIr'

Date Physical Security Inspector Reviewed By:

J. R. Cr%ed, Chief Date Safeguards Section Approved By:

/

[/

TM W. L. Axelson, Chief Date Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards Branch Inspection Summary Inspection on March 10-21, 1986 (Report No. 50-483/86005(DRSS))

Areas Inspected:

Included a review of the Security Plan and Implementing Procedures; Management Effectiveness; Security Organization; Security Program Audit; Records and Reports; Testing and Maintenance; Physical Barriers -

Protected and Vital Areas; Lighting; Assessment Aids; Access Control -

Personnel, Packages, and Vehicles; Detection Aids - Protected and Vital Areas; Alarm Stations; and Communications.

The inspection also addressed licensee Enclosure contains B605150177 860512

'

PDR ADOCK 05000483 Upon separation this G

'PDR Pa9e is Decontrolled

m

.

-,

.

actions on previously identified program weaknesses / concerns.

A review of allegations of security improprieties made by an anonymous alleger was also completed.

In addition, the inspectors eeviewed the licensee actions taken as a result of telephone threats made to the plant.

The inspection began during-the day shift.

Results:

Based on this inspection, one violation was identified:

Physical Barriers - Protected Area:

The licensee failed to have an an adequate alarmed barrier from the owner controlled area to the protected area.

The allegations of security improprieties could not be substantiated.

However, as a result of the actions taken by the licensee to address the allegations, the above noted violation was discovered.

The licensee's investigative actions and increased security measures pertaining to the security related telephone threats were reviewed and considered adequate.

(DETAILS:

UNCLASSIFIED )

Enclosure contains SAFEGUARDS INFORMAT!0N Upon separation this

page is Decontrolled