IR 05000483/1990018
| ML20062E562 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 11/14/1990 |
| From: | Danielson D, Ward K NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20062E561 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-483-90-18, NUDOCS 9011210085 | |
| Download: ML20062E562 (4) | |
Text
4
,
.,
j
.
r
.
-;
0,SL NUCLEAR Rt:0ULATORY C0ftfilSS10N f
REGION M1
!
Report flo. 50-483/90018(DRS)
Docket N6. 50-483 License flo. NPF-30
!
.
Licensee: Union Electric Company i
Post Office Box'149 i
Mail Code 400 St. Louis, MO~ 63166 Facility llame:
Callaway Nuclear Plant i
Inspection At: Callaway Site, Steedman,110.-
t inspection Conducted: October 1 3, and November 5, 1990.
$
Inspector' _M
!A**~
h/
fo evK. D. Ward
_Date
'
'
Approved By:
b
/h/
fo D. H. Danielson, Chief
=Date '
!
Haterials and Processes Section-
~
Inspection Summary inspection on October'l-3 and flovember 5.- 1990 (Report No. 50-483/90018(DRS))
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced safety inspection of inservice inspection (151). activities including review of program (73051),: procedures-(73052), observation of work activities'(73753), and data review (73755).-
,
+
,
l Results: 110 violation or deviations were identified.
Based-on the results of the inspection, the llRC inspector noted the following.
t
The inservice inspection program was adequately planned with appropriate
,
priorities' assigned.by the licensee'
<
The licensee's staffing of the.lSI group was adequate, and the personnel
,
were very knowlbdgeable and conscientious.
!
llanagement involvement _ and commitment to a-quality 151 effort.was evident.
l-
'
.
9011210085 901114 i
PDR ADOCK 05000483
'
O PDC 2s
'
.
.
..
.-
_
_
_.
!
-
.
,
.,
- -
'
,
REPORT DETAILS
>
>
1.
Persons Contracted
'!"
,
Union Electric' Compt.ny (UE)
'
.
- R. Affolter, Superintendent. Systems Engineering.
i
- J. Gearhart,- Superintendent-QA
'
- T. 11cFarland, Superintendent Project Engineering.'
- L. Kanuckel, Supervisor, QA
'
.e
- S. McCracken, 151 Engineer
- K. Schoolcraf t, QA. Engineer,
'
S.Petzel,QA,AudItCoordinator
T. Pettus, Steam Generator Engineer.
t U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Consnission (NRC)
- B. Bartlett, Senior Resident _ Inspector, C. Brown, Resident inspector;
-
Nuclear Energy Systems (NES)
!
S. Larson, Site Supervisor Westinchouse Electr'ic Corporation (W)-
I l
J. Izzo, ET Coordinator Conam Inspection (CONAM)
i 11. Chambers, tevel 111 Analyses.
I Nartford Steam Boiler Inspection and-Insurance Company (HSB)4 H. Potter, ANil
.
.?
cThe NRC inspector also contacted and interviewed other licensee and.
-
contractor employees..
-
- Denotes those present -at the exit -interview on Noveinber '5,.1990.
,
2.
InserviceInspection-(ISI) Unit-1
,
^
-a.
ReviewofPrograms(73051).
t Westinghouse, CONAM,'CE,.and NES performed the ISI-in_accordance with ASHE Section XI,-1980 Edition,-Winter /1981 Addenda..The' staff-size was sufficient to ensure that the ISI work was! adequately performed.
The licensee did not make a request for reliefLfrom-the AS!!E Code this outage. 'The NRC. inspector' reviewed a UE.QA' Audit,..
,
No. AP90-020, of ISI, activities conducted.by qualified personnel to'-
verify compliance with the.'ISI program.;
J l
I
'
'
>
.
,
.
I
.
-.,,
b t
l
.
b.
Review of Procedures (73052)
j All applicable ISI procedures were approved by the Authorized Nuclear i
insertice Inspector ( Allll) and'were reviewed by the NRC inspector.
!
The ultrasonic examination (UT) pulse echo detection-instruments and
'
tran!ducers of various angles, sizes, and, frequencies were used.-.
The aondestructive examinations,(NDE) were' performed in accordance?
with ASME Section V, 1980 Edition, Winter 1981 Addenda, i
c.
D'.ta Review and EvaluationL(73755)
l
>
(1) General;
'
The examination data was within the criteria. outlined in the applicable flDE' procedures (and.ASME code requirements. The NRC1 inspector's review included examination of documents'. relative
to ilDE equipment, data, and. evaluations.
(2) Eddy Current (ET) Examination;
Westinghouse utilized a bobbin coil, and the motorized rotating.
l pancakecoil(MRDC)'probefortheET.
The ET was performed-i utilizing the Zetec MIZ-18 multifrequency/multiparameter ET equipment, and the data analyses was performed utilizing the Zetec -DDA-4 Analysis System.
The.results.were as follows:-
Steam (Tubes Tubes Plugged i
e Generating Plugged Previously
'
+
A
11-
+
'16 12:
.
During this outage,'all the steam generator mechanical plugs f
used were-Inconel 690. No sleeving'was performed this outage.
-
d.
ObservationofWorkActivities'(73753)
'
,
The NRC inspector observ'ed work activities and.had. discussions.
with-personnel during _the ISI activities. ~ These observations
included the following:
~
(1) UE QA personnel performing audits-on_tlESDISI: activities, j-The audits consisted of observing personnel performing ultrasonic and liquid' penetrant. examinations'in accordance
',
l
'with their p_rocedures.
-(2) Westinghouse personnel performing eddy current examinations on many. steam generator tubes.-
(3) The ET examinations utilizing the Zetec MlZ-18 multi--.
frequency /multiparameter eddy-current.' equipment performed
,
l by Westinghouse personnel.
3a
'
,
q a.
,,,
,
'
!
.
l
.
t
,
(4) The data analyses utilizing the' Zetec DDA ? analysis system l
performed by Conam personnel.
J (5) AN!! performing an audit-on Westinghouse ET. examinations.
_
The audit consisted of the ANII observing Westinghouse
!
personnel utilizing'the Zetec 111Z-18 ET 1(
equipment in accordance with their procedures.-
(6) NES personnel performing ultrasonic examinations on pipe j
welds No. FW-404,-No, FW-407 and'No. FW-408, shown on 150 No. 2-BG-09.
o'
(7)- NES personnel performing liquid penetrant examinations.on:
!
pipe welds No.; FW-011 and No., FW-258,: shown on ISO.
!
No. 2-AB-01.
j
>
i The NRC inspector reviewed the qualifications and certification.
f of all inspc aion personnel on site performing ISI to ensure
ceder. nonce with SNT-TC-IA.
')
No violations or deviations ~were identified.
3.-
ExitInterview(30703)
!
TheNRCinspectormetwithlicensee'. representatives (denotedin'
,
'
paragraph 1) at the-conclusion of the inspection. T.ke-NRC: inslector y
summarized the scope and findings of-the inspection noted_in t11s report.
The.NRC-inspector also discussed the likely informational content of the i
inspection report with regard to documents or processes: reviewed'by.the
-
NRC inspector during the inspection. The licensee did not identify any.
.!
such documents / processes as proprietary, a
't L
'
a
>
!
I
!
l.
i t
i
{
'4
'
"
1.
,
,
'
I
_
,
,
'
{
,r