ML19329F618

Forwards Des Review in Response to AEC 720107 Ltr.Bureau of Domestic Commerce,Nbs & NOAA Comments Encl

ML19329F618
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	02/08/1972
From:	Galler S COMMERCE, DEPT. OF
To:	Rogers L US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML19329F616	List: ML19329F617 ML19329F618 ML19329F619 ML19329F620 ML19329F621 ML19329F622 ML19329F623 ML19329F624 ML19329F625
References
NUDOCS 8007030405
Download: ML19329F618 (10)

Text

-3

)

_ . . . __ . _ . . _ . . _ = _

.. m / '  ;'-

f y .'. j .)-!Ti "i l'..".C :'~iT!'J w.v.5m ycn.ri.c. . .'50.1" C.'IETMTI'.' OF Ci';; '.I.~i':1 .-

k.!d, .

50-329 50-330

..' - (> 0 '[^.

S 'Y' O p.(jT .['hN.yh.

T.

February 8, 1972 g --

g+Oj,0.:.

n.-[.[.

x

<>. .,f,.!<6 j t

',7. _ z,g.

+. ;, ::, - -

}-

Mr. Lester llogers g g-Director  !

Division of Radiological and Environmental Protection U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D. C. 20545

Dear Mr. Rogers:

This is in response to your letter of January 7, 1972. He

, have reviewed the draft detailed statement on the environmen-tal considerations for the Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2 of Consumers Power Company.

In order to give you the full benefit of the Departments analysis, _1 am enclosing the comments from the Bureau of Domestic Commerce, the National Bureau of Standards and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

We hope this information will be of assd. stance to you.

Sincerely,

) Sidney ll R..

Galler

/. -< b*

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Affairs Enclosure 8007030 4

- - g-

, , , , ..# e+-~-

.- - - -. . - - - . . .. - ~

m

-f , '; ...a..~ .... . . .

'A .~... ;o:  :.::- = . . : . :. .. x. ; . . :, . . .. .

hN.

M.;/v.

n. c.c. :::;23 ;

n. .

Pchruary 0, 1972

• 3

..;:0G.XDUX FOR Dr. Sidncy Caller '

g From: 2dwin 3. Shykind s W; g

Subject:

Con =ents on Draft E.I.S. Midland Nuclear Power Plants 1 and 2

.h. . .un rac cxception or a .,.cw minor econom;.c cc== ssions, the E.I.S., for the proposed nuclear pouer plant at Midland,

ichigan, in an adoc.unto evaluation. Secauce of the ncycl uso cd en-:ccas heat from the nuclear reactors the design .

provides for a significant reduction in ther cl pollution to the local aquatic environ =cnn.

A feu crocs could be more extensively discussed. In the eve.luz. tion of non-nucic*.: alternatives, the applicant biases the results by proposing alternatives which are not quito comparable to the nuclear facility and do not sati.ify

.y not incluc..ing :.c cos c.

4 . .

ene appu.cann,s objectivas. c.

i si.ca.c.-generating equipment for the fossil-fuel alternat:.vos the nima costs are not presented. Other factors which should be included in the fossil-fuel analysis is the cost

, of reducing thcraal pollution to equivrl.cnt leva'.s (nucicar option) and the cost of by-product rc=cval from atmospheric pollution.

A. In evaluating the advantages of a cooling pond over a cooling tower, the applicant could have provided additional information. One might want to know the environ =cntal imoact of the clume, drizzlc, ac.d salt condan2ation created by the cooling tower. Although construction of the tower would increase total construction costs by $36,000,000, a rough calculation reveals only a hundredth of a difference between the tuo profitability index numbers.

(There is a possible discrapancy in the applicant's evaluation of the environmental i:.ipact of the pond

'and the tower. On page 115 of the report, the applicant states that both tower and pond constitute significant environmental changes. However, he states that the tower dcas not represent an adverse environ =cntal effect.) .

I t

t 8

4 9

L*

. .--- -. - - - ~ . . - - - ._ .~,i

._.._q....

. . . -, n s- . .

fI

13. h'o qua::'d ion the 3.'.ch of an . enviro: ..cntal stater.:en:

co .,.ey  : t.,) ., . .. m. g..., . . ,u. . , . .u .; ... .. t,. .: e s..,.,.,.:-.sv . ., .e . v. .. .r.u.. g

.s. .. .

Inn on . ... . . . .s ... . . . . .3t ,. <,,. e m,

. . .w. . ,. , o g e n .... .. ,. t .e. ,..0u

. . , .. . 3...u z

o ,u .. .... ../.i ,... .r .e o.a . c u . . .u.:.. .. > , o . ...o , . .e cvr._, . . .

.evu ,

.requirc.; abou 5 :: 103 cg.i n , of ':ator.an hour. .f f the c'.c.::. line is a closed r.yt. tem th.n make-up

. water uc,ula.bc concit.cr..Lly locs. This operational.

racdc 5 0 not cicarly c:.:ple.ined in the E.I.S. and-although distinctly related to the project could 1n vc u u..

..,,a rJ.ca . . - Ac c.,.u.,

e.

2. ., me .

Wo additional r inor discrLpancies are: (1) the applicant does not effer an c:.:planation for the use of two different discount rates in two reportsa and the.uce of 19'17 as the baca year for hi:. analycia; cnd. (2) tha np.olicant hac. not

. co:.aic'creci tha r.accib'1c ir.:p .ct on operationci costs of the propcacd.ch..nge in the acceptabic TDS icvol in 1974 fror.1

. 0 .'r.am to 3:2 a.a O c.or.,

O i

S

. P t

6 5

6

. f e

1 i

9 0

I

! e

. . 4 1

J

. . - - .. . ~ _ . . .- - -- - - - - - -

y.

e,, *) .

I * . . . .

e

s. t ,*

.u... ... ..... ,

t-VA::.rd..;un. D.C. ':C . /.

.s.

,2 .14.r.u r. r v .':3 , 3 "7:! . (

T... Dr. Sid;wy N. Caller "d.S/r:.viron::.ca e.1.'.f ~nirc

?

r- ,..m 1 c. .->. , a + r/.- --.

.fNY:.

v- .~

Cff$cc of Stande.rd ?ciarence Detc c :,..:a: 3cvicii of "Dr:ft De niled Statencnt on Envfrr',nennect Ccnaidoratfora

!.y the ::.!:. /.ta:aic :: car: y ca.::.it.c;' ,, H vicion o3 Pc. !t.n c. s,f c:.1 c.?

Pny.'ran~.cntal Prote ::fon' 3c3n:ed :o :he Propce,ed I;scuence of a

• Coc :: enc *cn ?czni: to the Consumern ?cvar Conpa.y for thc 'fid:cn.1 P.' a r. : inita 1 cnd 2 " (is'oc:".c: .':cs. 50-320 cnd 50-330) Issued Jdnucry 7, 1972 T::e !!ctionc.1 Surecu of Str.ndards' revicti of the draf s:crenant 'co.:

l'ct:n enrrict'. out 'rith 'priunrv ccnn1derntien cdvc-- to (3) the dcace .c prion 4

i od 3m.-Icvc1 radf o;.crivity relocacd ta t'ne environnent especic3 ': e.=:

e. ,o. . ag s...<.,.~..e.

a . ., ... o,, e c c.q . <.c. u_, .<os < . ,

,,...cm._a .n. , . . . . ,

. . . .... . . . . . . .n. ..c .-....., ..

c.. .

t der,t:ncy of the described im:-invol radiocctive effluen: =onitorin,;

pro::rc . 'fhe conneurs arc li=ited to :he t.dequccy an:! dc t.11 cf t' a a

environnantal scnteren:.

Thece connents crc.to he construed cs ::us;gostions .for chent.cn cnd clarifientions in the docu.en uhich unuld hel, in:crnrc:ction of the caccrial presented.- ?crticulcrly cn rc::ards the ccr :ents en lo::-icyc1 radienctivity eff3uent =onitorin cnd raduccte systen tonitorir;,.-:t ,

is fnperte.nt to recocai:c that uhnt is under consideration is en

.npl.'.cr tion for a ec'r.true:f on narr.it. As such the 1cck of de.tniled de. cription of the canitoring pro ~rce niaht he c:<cused prcvided the nrovit:fonn for adce,uc:c acnitori;.c arc included ' If the. cuplientfoa sn.ra for an operatine, scr ait a c:uch nore dccciled deceription of the tonitorint; pror.;rn.: vould cppear essential. ,

1. Cm' rc3. - As a 7.cacral con =cn: uc are imnressed with the cosc.C c:en.u:0 cnd thorouc.hnc=s of this draf t docu; cont. Most envirorciantal ccnsiderc-tiona have been discussed in depth nnd with quanti:ntive connariccn of how the planned environ =cntal effluents compare uith cnistin:t cnd futur:

• e

.i .. if 'J.

,- g a .

g -+=

v ,

2-cminston st.ndards. Thus the totcl dissolved solida (TSS) rc ccced by the plcat and the therac1 cifluent relcaced cre diccusaac in ,

detail for c varicty of cbndition cnd arc ccapored ia en encily interpratchle =snnar uith cxistina cad futurc rc;ulstions. Ac dic-cucteu. ,oclcu, tnc comycr:. son c:. rce.occt.vc c r.uent wit.a cx :,n; end proposed rc3ulttions and guidelines is not ns cle:rly presentcd.

2. Mcdior.ttive Rffluant. Estinctcs of the ccount of radioactive ef'lucnt ualch will be relocsed to the environnant fro ncr al opcr:-

tions appear to bc influcaced by three considerations uhcre ecsuspcions t.rc nccesscry:

(a) the frcctica of the fuel clercata Whosc cicidin; has failed; (h) the efficiency of the dominerclizers for removing rcdioactive species; cad (c) cssumptions cs to the fraction of the timo the reducate systen will be abic to operato at pock cificiency.

In encimatin:: esiflui ;t lovels it is nanumcel tha t operation of the plant vill occur with 0.1 percent icilcd fuel cad 1 percent dilfunica of critica throu;h defoetivo cle.dding, th:t propef ly opercting d2-cineralizers till have a rc=ovci efficicacy of 100., cnd cn undsf'nad c.scumptica that thc radunste systcm will not be cbic to operate ct all times :.t peek officiencies.

The draf t report stacc: that under the above cssc=ptions. "The r.ut.ntite of r:.diocctivity that 'is relecsed to the environment will bc : 22 11 .

frcction of thc limits act forth'in 10CFR Part 20 of the Co :issica's Regulctions, cnd the caounts vill be kcpt cs Icu cs practic Lic in accordance with 10CFR Part 50.25c." It is further stated that, "The dischar;c of rcdiocctive gases from the plant uill bc withi.n the limiting conditions of opcrction in 'the Consission's proposcd /ppcni x f to 10C?R Part 50." Quite cocplcto ar3n=ents arc =cdc th:t the ceditionci radiction burden to poopic in the environs of the picnt will be c sucli i

fraction of that due to the natural radiation b'ackground.

It is felt that the draft repo.-t could be strengthened and n,.de core infor=ctive by a more quantitativo discussion of the ir..pcc: of varicticas in their assu.aptions. For exc ple: What vould be the impccc if onc

. assumes 1 percent failed fuel cic=ents instond of 0.1 percent? What would be the iupact if domineraliz;rs were 10)cfficient'in renovc1 of radioactive species rather than 10 ? Khat were the assumptions as to thepeak at fraction of the time the rcdweste system vill bc.able to operate officicacy?

What if these cssu=ptions are changed? In cdditica to the above information which would de=onstrate the retc of change of expceted radiocctive effluent level with the assu=cd values of these qucatitics, infor=ation should be presented uhich makes the case thct these assuacd values are valid and can be expected to bc maint:ined

.or improved upon durinZ the life of the plant.

. 'It is proposed that the sbove considerations could best be presentcd in the context of a quantitctive comparison with the guidelince ' con-tained in~ the Commission's proposed appendix I to 10C71 Pcrt 50. The

'ect ' chat I.ppendix I to ICC72 ? art 50 has noc 'yec been acept:a s a.ul .

noc "oe a deterrent to chia method of presentation since the primary purpose of this. proposal 1*s as a cuentitative base against which varicu; assumptions mcy bc judacd and mado convincing. '

e - _

g .,, q ,

r

-3

3. En,@onctivo Efflue..t : avironnan t .1 3:ani torin<* , 1hil'c it is stated i in-the 6d.it report that com?rchcasivo rt.Jiofo;;1ccl cnd ecological

. .; ro:;rnma vill be conducted prior to c.ad during the operatica o-f the platit. there is no appeccichle description of such a progrr.= in thc '

report. *a nMc V-7, indice.cas a list of monitoring sites tehcre vr.ricus

~

ctd uent uct.surcuents trill be or are being undc. Appendin C presents a ntatement of ' the qualificctions of Trt.ccrl:.b Division, ICN Corporctio..

and indict.tes that a spccific cnvironnental su:vcillcnce progrr.a (not yet undcru y) vill be conducted for the Consuncrc pcuer Cossany - }.idland Site. No indication is givcn of the on-site t.n process ac'itorin, n

Progr .m other the.n 'to indicate some nonitoring points in the re.dua$te

. system r.nd .ste.ges in the radwaste syttcm process control t/ acre acni-toring vill be done.

Ic is felt th: a mora co=pleto doncription in the report of the environ::.cntal conitoring ;,roarr.= trould be beneficial. It in also ic:t the.t a deceription of the on-site cnd ras.7nste systen ncnitorin~.:..

progrr.: 1.hc.uld he included. It is only through this la ter tonitorin; proarn thnt the sscu ptions discussed under (2) chova can be vcrified and controlled throughout the opercting life of the plant. Such onitor ng progrca descriptions should conte.in sufficient infor.stich to dcmonster.tc that =casurencnt necuracy can be verified. The on-site ef fluent :..onitorin; progrs= should be suf ficiently acceribad to =ahc convincin; that the monitoring. recuirccents described in the recent i.EC "Safc:.y Guide 21 - >:ccsuring cnd Reportins of Effluents from Nucisar power plants," Deccaber 29, 1971, will be satisfied.

e 0 5

I 8

. I

. . l i

i 1

l 1

1 9

e i._.

. -* ,, .. , m. r s,-

/ . . , i *. .

i .. .. . ...... ....

,. , -- 7,j . , . .

.........s

. .. ... ... .. ... . . . . . . .. .. ... .. ... ..........s.- . ...

%:,'.:/'O. '

,.,.,, ., . .. :gecun.1 '.iasthar Sc:vica'. .,_....

D..e . . . .s ...

, , , .........,s.,

L.

.c .J. '.l.ve . .c . ,. . f ,,

%....,,, s.~. J . 9./.*.,? 10 .

!*e -

/ G.1. ,.!,*...., .h t .. ,. - .~. .e

r & -(',e (g. ,

. . ,. ,..,/ Tp @.

?._ . ..g.

.. 'S U: ... m:. on the /.1:C Environuentcl Stctc.ncut on Midiced Plc.ht..'

.3 f.:

.. 1 . . ... u. - .

.- 'c ::' ' '-

,1,,3 s ,,4 ,

.,..on, u.g t.:

.e.... .w . 1,_. ..

m Direc::c,r, Offica of Ecolc3y .nd Environ =cntcl Conservation g ,

,  ;-l/

.~

I;w : ction:.1 W:.ther Servica has revitwcd the AEC Environ =cntcl .-

Stcw :nt oa tha ~i'lcud Nuclocr Plant located in Xichiccn.

Ec plan;'s cooling systcm has been ensinaared to.. ."li::it the -

te sp:rn: urc of tha pond discht.rne to cppro:ctmately 1*F cheve ths t ec. .ma::ura of ths river. . ." '.hers: fore, chia 1.ac.r.cd w.:::.r d1Laherga 1.10:2 tha Tittabrat;;.20 River uill not cause cny cliac.tologiccily not. ccc.bic w. rec.ing nor plcy c. significe.nt part to cny cu=ulctiva th:::c.1 cacr:;y inerense.

To d:ccraina whe. naather nodificctione an SSO cere cooling pond

:c)> L vc on the caviron=cnt cnd the ,2cpulace the An.oliccat solicited 3 .

c. coc. .r.honsive mateorolo; ice.1 study from the Dechtel Co=pany. The "i:ccht il 20.part" or study nddressas itself, in pcrticulcr, to the pot:ct.tini ~or incrcr.cca fog c.nd, in the vinter, for ice dsposition

c. ic.ent terrcin. h'ith n- resident population of 41,000 and a businas.-londing populction of 34,0CD.within 5 miles of the plcnt, a potent".cl :.dverso impact on the safety o~ vehicular traffic cen-La expac ed. *fhis imp:et stcas not only from the c.dditional fe; dnys cs indicated in the study, but clso beccusa clong the coolin; pool's st ca fo; plur.a, a core intense fog ccn be c>:pacted. Further, cecordin3 t.o tha study, under yecccribed conditions, the staca fc; pluuc may have a downwind cutant of as much cs 9 miles from tha source durin~. those fcu dsys ccch winter conth when the mini =u tenparntura is 0*F or less. Such a situation could, uith tha more ,

inten:.e. c.nd parciscant fog, i= pact on the operations of the Tri-City ,

(Sc";in:.u) 1.irport chout 7 miles away and the Midland (3crstou) Airport, '

S niles away.

, 1

\

'fac !.pplicant vill be gathering more detailed on-site matcor,ologicci

-dcta from the Four Corners ?lant thir, vinter. We encourage this effort  ;

cc one r.:ct.ns to varify. cud improva,the fo3 predictin; modci used by Ecchtcl. _Hos. aver, va cantion that c,are should be taken in applying c model developcd for a climatolo;1cally disparate region. i 1

. l a.

T l

9 '

O e

t

'in co..e lle :iO.1, t!;: find it ?.070 70.".00n7.110 00 COP. Cur Uit'.i t} 0 *daciti. nl

• !c M . ;*. ..n ti.-J l.pplice..Tt ' 4 ur.d ccu;t.cn cd p.*o,.oni t ion thn;- the ;,,.,,c,,.;

. . . . J e e; ; . ..: h : LI;c fesc,ucncy of ia,;, Ot;1FJ ;I:t n t'..a ( uc:st I.ons rc.!;;.;d t . w . , tic .'in.1 t!.e h.p:. :: s t c;.. w;.t 's t, ent:.;e:,:. o; i.,ctec,.colo3y to u;.ich sea c(.dra.:s.1 ourceives to be e,uite adequate. ,

) J af?

..../....$ ,  % .* /.L. -s MJ% .

/

C. az ;  ?. Cce .n: an '

. D;rectoc, Xc. tic..a1 17.ther Service k

9 .

O t

I

• I 9

4 0

8 l

e 9

e

. )

e i.

l i

l I

1 1

. e l l

.. 1

,. ._m . -

• * , ,i, ,, _ . . ,. .

- ~ . - - - . - - - - . . - ~ . ~ - - ~ ~ - ~ + * - " ~

A

% ( h.' '

.?

8'

,4

!.',,,.1 **.. , . w....e .d.

a

......1.*............*.....t...... 8 . e..

. .. .. ......... . ......%.....e.

g

. .y. ',..,

..j.. . u .v .. Nm

. . . . . , . .... .., . . . .. c .r.... .

.c....n.:,..,...t,.,..,,....., ...6.:..

r. ......ry la, 1972 -

,j Silver S,>rin;;, Mcrylc.nd 20910

. . . . . . . .s. ,

. :.. : . :. ' c. ~ . 1,atni~e,.d ::.wivor.. ental S cte..:ent by l.tC on Midinnd

..t...........:6,.

3.e. ....

... '. '1' G... . .

' .b... !.s. :/ .,/,

r .. p r,

.. . . /: . .

-2 s . s.',-

'.Qs.

n...,. . . . . . . .- .. . .. ..v.. ., r.p...c ... o.. . . ,.,../ g.Mw

. e .o,'g)4,y..s s \

OUica uf '.*calo;ytt.nd Environnantal i 4 p-

, -l.y Ct.n:. cry: tion i .-]'.h

,' , l.'

t .-:-\ "

9:~ ,/

'\ '/

. . w.t c.....a . . . ..w.. 6 0 u. w ...s , .1 / .1.e./ t. ./ s.

, 4

<,,/ % ,f s/

I.

w&.uf'"\ Y'Y

.Ti. backaraand un:cric.1 acnt in suppor: of the "Drcf: S t e n c=ca " . i. y__,.;, .

d*: a* U. S. . W ...

• a ~Ener ;y Ca:rmin:: ion is the n.mt in f o r. .::tior.

s.., have r.r/.. .ted for .:.a vivicion of Rocc or !icensing of the J.EC. Concents L..... . . .

. . . . . . .... ,.. O .. ..D. ..., ..

, r w. 4 w,. .,.. v s.e u.,.

. .. o, T u.:. C ..i n o ... , ,., , on ,3w..oe . , .. ;.

.:n ...

Ja.' 25, lh'.'! ::nd Jnacary 5, cnd hhracry 4,1970. In c.ddition, c ., .. . . . .. . ... ,. . ..

3 a. s , o. .. .>. . . - . n.>,

c. ... ,

as. . . . . .

n ...c,

. c . _ ,. ., . cu, .o

. . - . . . . . . s.,..s i:at,aty !.unic:::n: S..crutcry for Environ =ent:1 Affcirs, Dept. of Coa-

. :eca on .n:c . 2, 1971. -

O...... c .v .. . . ,3. . t. :. e . . . ,. . . . .,,. o n . s.,,. - . co,olo,,.c

... y i .

, .,.pec. s oc .s..c s.iu,....

a ..: .s.

n,4.,

. ... ...f r: .::ir. c., previously indict.ted, nc=cly, that the Don Ch:mical marcorc-1.;;ic:.14 ta is not ap?roprit.tc for ha nucicer site end thct, until ,

<.,c.n !.co- data hoconc avn13 abic, uc h .va used the Sagincu \irpor de:c to :.::.h : our ctuos.sharie diffusion estinctes. These estica cs taken froa our Jca. 5, 1570 con.::nts cud cc:pr. rcd to the cpplicent's es:* cates

o. . . . ,.

.,,. . . 9.. . _9. ... d 4 . 9-5 o."

'... .euo, p1. .~.. .a.'. . ...v.-' . u- ... .c.. s.a' '.'sc,,o. ... c o s follous at the exclucion dis:cacc of 500 n: .

7 Relenc:- Perf od NOAA Applicent Ratio.X0.U./A a1.

2-hr- 7x10-4 see n,-3 2x10-4 sec m-3 3.5 24-hr 3.<10-4 " "

3x10-5 u n 10

. 30-day '3x10-5 " "

1x10-5 u a 3-Annual. 8:dO-6 " "

6::10-6 " "

'1.3 j> .

m r . - . , m. yr

• ..

• n

.}

( s p.

P

.... L.s. . 1 a t. . , , ... s d.;. .....

. .. ,.2

. . .C i.1 ..3 ... %. . , c. . ,. . 1. t......

s...>. ,, t .,,. .. . .,7 0 . .O .u..,,.. ..,.,..r...

.,,..w...

t.i r : c.g d to tM Mc;tur.cy c f fc,3;.ing cad icing n O:. &e Midlar.1 coatin,,,

g.... .,,.

, . ., a .; , e o. i . . . . .s. . ....s va. .r .

p. . . . . ... _s.f J c....s e o.. .. J .,

s.,.....

...w. .. s p. . .,,%..

....ca.....,.......

... ....s.... .. m.....m .. u..... .. . . ev. . , . . ,.

. , . ..u ..t.

. .c c . .. . , c _. a..a c... c. c. .. <.....s; .

s. .w , . .

. . r a .- '....s. -,,p '?~

~. O

. .3....-

. u.n'..' *. a 3 c... . Oi . ~.5. e o * '*.w.. ' . . . . " . . ' , ca..t.

.. . .", *O

..t..

n. .a. s a .v .. e w,. L , ... *).L.J.s-

. . (.

CO .. .:u., a.C3 ,.. C .6. A e O ,,., ,..c, . , . L'.L..1 ..

,,.O

. . ., C....,.. . s v..

u3f, C d .o.w.g ,

-.........3v...(t.,

J u. 6..- .. ,,0 no .m , .

.e.. . . s. . . , . ,

C O S . .J. . ,.. .. C s.4. . .,,.: . , . .. . . . . . , .

.vu C......u..., .....:...

6. .. 6.

.. ,y(.... (.1..vo.....

. . . . . . . . . . a. .. O .. ,. s., .,. .,,0.. 3. s.. .s 3. G.. > c.g g.*.O o" w' C Q." ".Vw5 .'b. .'.'7 4'., . "* . '**b.-

..s ..a . C -

s,.G. .. . CG.. .. ...

. . .. . . S1 .. t. O . n

.u .p.... . . s. s. . c,. .. . t..s.., . .- u.a . . . . . .t a - s o -.

. .. p A.. w .S.l.a ..

wC si ..

.4..^.

A C O'.'. .".t^. * '6"..*.". ~i lL*.*. .*. C.'"...'.'. '6 6". G'.1 ~ w* " w"' C'J ." w'". V ~ " .# 0". . *> . " . ' 5'0 " '." w C w' '."*.. w* '".c'., s.~...#.~..,

.c..,.....,,.

s..-..... w.4..,.....%,.,. , g .j- '/ J. -

ap a.. .t. .; C .. G r

.s . . s. s. Q..e.V . O T C.t. G~3. s.....

. .,., , C C.-....w...L..

. . ,. e . .. .. e . . *) -

6 1.. t. . . .. a.

... +.

..s,.., w . ...

v.  %.,,,A..,.

9 %

r.

. , ,*). . .f0 ..a. _ g l2 y ,.

e,

.o gw ,- . w . V .! .

p ..y. g.S g .

(...... , ,.so-,.

. . . . ~ . , .Vo. . i :.s

.s.u. , E. s., h... w .c.

3 ww . .s u-u

. / ,, 5 t..a. .. u. .. s.. s .....s.

- C -e..e .~

.: 3 . . , .. g....

..~..,

a., s........p . . . ~,

.ev. . . . * / 7,

4. .u . . . . . . . . . . ..-o..... ...w e. A C 6. 0 e.C3

.. s nA O i . ..j ., .a s.3. C n.w. . .-.,a ...e L. . ....r.....

.a . . . .. O .. ./ .s, . . e... s. .v .s....

. ., 3,, ,,.,..r

... t u.0 6.s. , L..- .,. L,al ,.

. , S v. . o.... s.. . . s. .,  :. .,

av . . .

C ,va.-1. s.s .. ,.. .s ' 4. v . . . L.'d 2. ,1. ., ;,..:s,........

s .-

,sJ-w ., .w.. .O

. =. .s 6.... Sg6. e.CL,,a ..v. t.....j . : . ,.. , O A ..s. %. . : pv.. . .: .

1 s: s.

.1 A. .. .a ... w;. . .o . .w. .t. , . ... . . .. ..O C C. . ,. . . . . .,... . . L. ,,. s.. :..3 h a .,u.. ,. t ,. C,.,. s.a. .; m._ wuu ,. . .: ,.6 0 .J . . w, k' 2

.s .. ., ., .: r , .. . . . ....3.........s.

. s. , ......m

'

• 1

// .

i s =. w . e.>.. M <.' n r .

1r ... , \r ... . n.... 1:.o. vts.., .., C .,. , ,, a.

l Lir hsw.cca :'avirOr.-:a .::1 Lab.

Air Re:;ourcc.n Labort. tories cc: Mr. Robert Rocco,ICS k

4 l .

ff

. l h

0

'l 1

I

-, , .-. *