Text

Forwards Response to Util Re Bills D0184 & D0185 for Plant OL Application Review Costs by Various Program Ofcs Through June 1984
	ML20248D652
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	07/20/1989
From:	Holloway C; NRC OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER
To:	Berry K; CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
References
	NUDOCS 8908110100
	Download: ML20248D652 (27)
	v • d • e

_

j

[ At ', i p W -*

I'. _4@%y t

[ *j') yg -

.g

.g UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION rg " l wassimaTou, o. c. 20sss

/ < D u w,-J g.

f s j y l

Docke* Nos. 50-329 and 50-330

)

i Consumers Power _ Company ATTN: Mr. Kenneth W. Berry Director of Nuclear Licensing 1945 West Parnall'Roaa Jackson, MI 49201 l- Gentlemen:

y Your letter dateo June 7, 1985, raised questions concerning the bills (Bill Nos. 00184 ana 00185 dated February 11,1985) for the Midland 1 and 2 operating license application review costs by the various program offices through' dune 1984. We have completed the review of your concerns and Enclosure 1 to this letter addresses each specific comment raised in the attachment to your letter. In addition to reanalyzing areas questioned by your Company, all_ costs including NRR contractual costs for the OL review for both Midland 1 and 2 for the review period from post-CP issuance through June 23, 1984, have been reanalyzed. From this reanalysis, we have decreased the previously invoiced costs as follows:

Review Office Midland 1 Midland 2 HRR Contractual -5278,438 -5174,906 HRR hours - 21,392 (548.5x$39) -

663 17x539)

-Region III hours -

144 (4x536) -

144 4x 536)

ACRS hours + 22,515 450.3x550)

Total decreases $299,974 $153,198 As shown above, we have decreased the previously invoiced NRR contractual costs by $278,438 for Unit 1 (232,738 for review through Septemoer 30, 1983 and 545,700 for review from October 1,1983 through May 31, 1984). For Unit 2, the decreased adjustment in NRR contractual costs is 5174,906. The reasons for these adjustments are basically due to a contract cost adjustment for A2121 and the deletion of some other contractual costs as being generic studies.

As a result of the adjustments addressed in Enclosure 1 and the NRR contractual costs adjustments, attached as Enclosure 2 are revised Invoices 00184 for $3,077,400 for Midland 1 and D0185 for $2,997,259 for Hidland 2. With these invoices are revised data sheets showing the decreased adjusted costs for each unit through June 23, 1984. For Unit No. 1, the previous costs were $3,749,786; the adjusted costs are 53,449,812. For Unit No. 2, the previous costs were $3,150,457; the adjusted costs are 52,997,259. i

" DFol 8900110100 0907PO PDR ADOCK 05000329; J g y PNU'

p . . ,

x -

'* d i

2 Since you withdrew the Midland 1 and 2 operating license applications on July 11,1986;- the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board authorized the witndrawal'of the applications on December 17, 1986, and the Midland construction permits were revoked on December 18, 1986, we have computea the total costs for Midland 1 and 2 through December 18, 1986.

The HRC's final action as a result of these applications having been filed was December 18, 1986. The costs from June 24, 1984 through December 18, 1986, for Midland 1 are $237,433. When these costs are added to the adjusted costs of $3,449,812 specified above for the period through June 23, 1984, the total review costs through December 18, 1986, are $3,687,245. The costs from June 24, 1984 tnrough December 18, 1986, for Midland 2 are $92,461. - When these costs are added to the adjusted costs of $2,907,259 specified above for the period through June 23, 1984 the total review costs through December 18, 1986 are $3,089,720.

Enclosure 3 is an Invoice for $80,141 for Midland'2 for the period from June 24, 1984 through December 18, 1986. This amount plus $2,997,259 equals $3,077,400 which is the maximum billable for an OL application that was withdrawn, cancelled or facility licensed prior to January 30, 1989.

The data sheets reflecting costs by review offices are included as part of Enclosure 3 to this letter and are broken down into five six-month billing cycles. Since Midland 1 still exceeds the ceiling of $3,077,400 originally billed on February 11, 1985, and was withdrawn in 1986, no additional billing is necessary for those costs after June 24, 1984.

Enclosures 4 through 6 to this letter are requested and supportive data that are referred to in Enclos ne 1. Enclosure 7 is a summation of costs as billed in 1985 and tne current adjustments. ..

In summary, a total of $3,077,400 is still due the NRC for the review of each withdrawn Midland application. Our letter to you dated July 8, 1985, discussed the issuance of revised bills and granted your Company an extension of the payment due date to 15 days from the billing date shown on the revised bills. Therefore, the interest will be waived for each of the two enclosed revised invoices D0184 and D0185, if payment is received for each within 15 days from the revised invoice date. For late payment of these revised invoices, see the items on the invoice regarding interest, penalty and administrative rates and costs and the accrual period if timely payment is not made. For the new invoice for Midland 2 for $80,141, the interest will be waived if payment is received within 30 days from the invoice date.

You are advised that this letter constitutes NRC's final action with respect to the review of the debt owed the United States Government for the Midland 1 and 2 operating license application reviews. Once these current invoices are paid, totalling $3,077,400 for each unit, we will consider Midland 1 and 2 closed from a fee standpoint.

l l

3 We' apologize for the delay in responding to your letter. Let us assure you that every effort has been made to check the details relating to the -

costs for Hidland I and 2 and to be as complete and specific as possible. We hope that the additional information we are providing will

-resolve all of your concerns regaroing the costs billed to you. If further information is needed, a letter would be appreciated.

1 sincerely, Signed by:

C. James Holloway, Jr.

C. James Holloway, Jr., Chief License Fee Management Branch Division of Accounting and Finance Office of the Controller

Enclosures:

1. Response to CPC's Concerns

2. Reviseo Invoices D0184 and 00185 w/ data sheets

3. Invoice for Midland 2 w/5 data sheets (No. H1459)

4. .ACRS Supportive Data

5. Contractual Data

6. Listing of Contractual Costs for Each Unit (2)

7. Table reflecting Summary of Costs and Adjustments (w/5 Midland 1 Summary sheets)

CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED l

l

,~

4 DISTRIBUTION w/Encis.1, 2, 3, 6 & 7:

PDR.

LPDR GJohnson, DC/DAF EBlack, OC/DAF RFonner, OGC RVillafranco, NRR CHarwood, NRR EPotent, NRR CJHolloway, LFMB LTremper, LFMB Aeib0ecket711esr503329/330I E D LFMB AM Files -

w/all encls. f/ Unit 1

& 1, 2,8'6 & '7 for Unit 2 LFMB Reactor Files LFMB R/F (2).

OC/DAF R/F DW/RMD/ Consumers!2 i

^

.4 0FFICE : FMB e

OC/DAF M

OC/DAF SURNAME: loway:lb EBLACK GJohnson DATE ; 7 /89 7/ /89 7/ 89

Enclosure 1 Responses to Consumers Power Company's Letter Datec June 7, 1965 Re bill Hos. D0164 ana D0185 Docket tios. 50-329 ano 50-330 By letter dated June 7,1985, Consumers Power Company (CPC) raised questions relating to Bill Hos. D0184 and 00185 for the review of Midland 1 and 2 applicat1ons for operating licenses. The bills were for professional staff hours through June 23, 1984, and related contractual services costs through May 31, 1984. The following items are in response to CPC's concerns and appear in the order listed in the attachment to CPC's letter.

I. Accountino Questions:

A. For Unit 1, the bill and CPC's letter referred to the billed hours by NRR professional staff as 46,855.8 That figure represented a reduction of 3,556.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months for general administration and other unbillable services, and 1,726 hours0.0084 days 0.202 hours 0.0012 weeks 2.76243e-4 months of hearing time for a total or 5,282.5 that was subtracted from the total regular review hours of 51,138.3 shown on the computer printouts which were sent to CPC. Our reanalysis of the 52,138.3 hours3.472222e-5 days 8.333333e-4 hours 4.960317e-6 weeks 1.1415e-6 months have now shown that 4,091 hours0.00105 days 0.0253 hours 1.50463e-4 weeks 3.46255e-5 months in lieu of 3,556.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months of administrative tasks, generic studies, etc.,

are to be excluded from billing. This includes 2.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months for training and 20 hours2.314815e-4 days 0.00556 hours 3.306878e-5 weeks 7.61e-6 months against advanced concepts to which you refer. For hearings, the hours should be 1,740 in lieu of 1,726. These two total 5,831 hours0.00962 days 0.231 hours 0.00137 weeks 3.161955e-4 months to be subtracted from 52,138.3 leaving a balance of 46,307.3 to be billed in lieu of 46,855.8 for a difference of 548.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months for which CPC should receive credit. Therefore, a decreased cost adjustment of )

$21,392 ($39 x 548.5) has been made for revised Invoice D0184 for Unit 1.

CPC subtracted their costs from the billable hours (46,855.8) l rather than total hours (52,138.3) and subtracted hours for j codes (R16, 100, 125, 26) that did not relate to hearing, but j rather to the SER and ACRS phases of the OL review which are j fee recoverable, j i

B. For Unit 2, the NRR professional staff hours shown on the computer printouts which were sent to you totaled 50,311.1.

From this total, we have deducted 99.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months for administrative effort, travel, training, etc., and 9,092.3 hours3.472222e-5 days 8.333333e-4 hours 4.960317e-6 weeks 1.1415e-6 months for hearing effort rather than 9,075.3 as previously reported. This leaves a balance of 41,119.3 to be billeo l rather than 41,136.3, which is a dif#erence of 17 hours1.967593e-4 days 0.00472 hours 2.810847e-5 weeks 6.4685e-6 months . )

Therefore, a decreased cost adjustment af $663 has been maae i for revised Invoice D0185 for Unit 2. Like in item " A" above, i CPC has included billable code hours in the 9,174.8 figure they used to arrive at these hours. The 41,119.3 hours3.472222e-5 days 8.333333e-4 hours 4.960317e-6 weeks 1.1415e-6 months citeo above are correct and do not include unbillable hearing or ;

other items. l

l ,

( .

2 C.. The variance, for Hidland 1, between what was invoiced and the documentation in the form of computer printouts from the Regional offices, is as fc110ws:

Hours NRC CPC Fiscal Year Invoiced Documentation Documentation 1974 1012.7 997.2 1009.21/

1983 2361.0 2368.0 2368 1984 1707.5 1725.5 1735 2_/

For 1974, NRC added 15.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months to the Region III documented total-of 997.2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months to arrive at the billed hours of 1012.7. This was done because there were- 16.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months for-inspection work by Dolphins !

Whitesell (an IE-HQ employee - see page 7 of the Region III FY 1974' computer reports sent to CPC) that were not included in the IE-HQ computer printout listing those IE-HQ employees who performed inspections at Midland and these hours were not in the 997.2 Regional, total. The 16.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months were reduced by ~1 heur before D0184-was issued in 1985 because the 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months for inspect;or, and enforcemer* activity Code 200 is not fee recoverable. Page 4 of the Regio.. III' computer report and the 997.2 specified total included this one hour for Jesse Pagliaro. The 1012.7 hours8.101852e-5 days 0.00194 hours 1.157407e-5 weeks 2.6635e-6 months billed are correct as billed in 1985.

For FY 1983 and 1984, 7 hours8.101852e-5 days 0.00194 hours 1.157407e-5 weeks 2.6635e-6 months and 13 hours1.50463e-4 days 0.00361 hours 2.149471e-5 weeks 4.9465e-6 months , respectively, were deleted from the Region III documented totals. Therefore, the 2,368 hours0.00426 days 0.102 hours 6.084656e-4 weeks 1.40024e-4 months for FY 1983 were reduced in 1985 by 7 hours8.101852e-5 days 0.00194 hours 1.157407e-5 weeks 2.6635e-6 months to arrive at the billed amount of 2,361 hours0.00418 days 0.1 hours 5.968915e-4 weeks 1.373605e-4 months . The 1725.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months were reduced in 1985 by 18 hours2.083333e-4 days 0.005 hours 2.97619e-5 weeks 6.849e-6 months to arrive at the billed amount of 1707.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months . Therefore, the billed hours for FY 1983 and FY 1984 are correct as billed in 1985.

The 00184 and 00185 billed total of 17,488.1 (Unit 1) and 11,315.3 (Unit 2) have now each been reduced by 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months for the item addressed in IV.A of this document.

l 1/CPC's letter showed a documentation total of 1009.2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months . Page 8 of l the Region III printout for FY 1974 shows a documented total of 997.2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months .

2I CPC's letter showed a documentation total of 1735 hours0.0201 days 0.482 hours 0.00287 weeks 6.601675e-4 months . Page 7 of the Region III printout for FY 1984 shows a documented total througn '

May 5, 1984 of 1316.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months . Separate printout pages for the week of May 12,1934 show 124 hours0.00144 days 0.0344 hours 2.050265e-4 weeks 4.7182e-5 months ; the week of May 26, 1984 show 90 hears; the week of June 9,1984 show 81 hours9.375e-4 days 0.0225 hours 1.339286e-4 weeks 3.08205e-5 months and the week of June 23, 1984 show 114 hours0.00132 days 0.0317 hours 1.884921e-4 weeks 4.3377e-5 months . The addition of these 409 hours0.00473 days 0.114 hours 6.762566e-4 weeks 1.556245e-4 months to 1316.5 results in a documented total of 1725.5. ;

~

v .- .

-l l

3

0. It appears that Consumers has incorrectly interpreted the note-at tne bottom of the contract / consultant cost cata sheet for FUi 5-3077. There are two separate charges listeu en the y sheet. One charge is shown for $183,790 which is applicable to 41dland 1 and 2. The second charge of $36,698 represents a one-fifth share for Midland 1 and 2 of- the additional contractual costs of $183,488. The other four stations involved were Bellefonte 1 and 2, Comanche Peak 1 and 2, San Onofre 2 and 3, and Washington Nuclear 1. Consequently, the sum of $220,468.is correct for Hidlano 1 and 2 ($110,244 per unit) as billed in 1985.

II. Documentation Questions:

A. Attached as Enclosure 4 is the ACRS supporting documentation which shows that 837.9 hours1.041667e-4 days 0.0025 hours 1.488095e-5 weeks 3.4245e-6 months were spent on Unit 1. A reexamination of the documentation for Unit 2 shows that 757.7 hours8.101852e-5 days 0.00194 hours 1.157407e-5 weeks 2.6635e-6 months were expended rather than the 307.4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months which were originally billed. Therefore, an additional $22,515 in costs has been added to Unit 2 (450.3 x $50).

B. Attached as Enclosure 5 are the statements of work anc other supportive data for all contracts listed on Enclosure 6.

III. Deletion of Costs - Commission Order Rule or Contested Hearina Rule:

A. We have reviewed the question of whether the time chargen oy liessrs. Landsman and Gallagher should have been charged to routine inspection (as it was) or rather the time as a result of the December 6, 1979 Order and related to the contestea hearing. The time was properly charged. As the order indicates, soil settlement problems were brought to ilRC's attention by CPC in August 1978. The time charged by Landsman ana Gallagher was part of the necessary NRC followup of the soil problems at tiidland; followup that would have been necessary even if no orcer had ever been issued or there nad been no contested Fearing. Additional time spent by Landsman eno Gallagher in preparing for the hearing were charged to the hearing-relatec codes and not inspection-related codes.

Consequently, that time was not in the billed amounts.

8. As CPC indicated in their letter, the NRR contractual costs prior to FY 1984 for both units totaled $2,170,963. A reexamination of these contractual costs shows that 550,638 should not have been charged Unit No. 1, but $7,194 additional in contractual costs should have been chargeo for Unit tio. 2.

Consequently, the contractual costs for the two units comoined is reduced by $43,444 ($50,638 less 57,194). The costs for all contractual services have been rereviewed for the period from CP issuance through Septemoer 30, 1983, and are listea for each unit on the two sheets that comprise Enclosure 6.

, . 1

\

1 i

4 C. We have reexamined the i1RR professional staff hours expended for Hidland 1 and 2 and ary additional hours directly relating to the 10 CFR 2.204 hearing aspect of the soil issue. With the exception of thosa additional fee-bearing hours accressed in Items I.A anc B above, all other nonfee-bearing hours were subtnn:.1d from the total hours previously billed. All other houta si ch as any staff effort for preparation of an SER are fee reccierable and are correctly charged as previously billed in Frb5.

IV. Questionable Billings:

A. The nine individuals listed in your letter have been, or still are, employees of Region III. The hours shown are chargeable to Midland with the exception of four hours charged by William Key for each unit in 1978. Therefore, $144 has been deleted from Midland 1 costs and $144 from Midland 2 costs.

B. We have reexamined the contractual costs relating to FIN Nos.

A-2001 and A-2121. The costs of $282,400 under FIN No. A-2001 were Midland-specific hnd are therefore billable to Midland.

Tta $671,100 for A-2121 has been reduced to $306,900 between the two units. Therefore, $364,200 ($182,100 per unit) has been treated as generic costs and thus a decreased cost adjustment of 5182.100 has been made for each unit on revised Invoices D0184 and 00185 included as part of NRC's response.

NRC FORM ass U.s. NUCLEAR CE!ULATORY COMMISSION i(NVOICE NUM8E;t (2C INVOICE isec 00184 MAEE CHECKS PAvastl TO THE W.S. NUCMAR REGULATORY COMuisSION. A&>ERENCE THE INVOICE NUMaiR ON REMITT ANCE Ar G i ,NVOICE DATE

""* U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ;

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION AND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT DIVISION OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE I J(fL 2 0 W WASHINGTION. DC 20NIE 2.<ss NuMsEn m n; I atFsRENCE NUMeER M -

I 7 Docket No. 50-329

' Consumers Power Company I m* Tact:

ATTN: Mr. Kenneth W. 8erry **=5 j Director of Nuclear Licensing Janet M. Rodriguez 1945 West Parnall Road TearaoNe Jackson, MI 49201 ***

A%.

j *w 3 301 A92-4200

~

DEscRimoM AMOUNT This invoice covers costs per 10 CFR 170.21 for operating license review for Midland 1 for the period from post-CP issuance through June 23, 1984. It is a r? vised invoice for the same amount billed .

on February 11, 1985, but shows adjustment in costs after l consideration of the issues raised ir the licensee's letter dated !

June 7,1985, ano NRC's r'.: analysis or NRR's contractual costs:

Revised costs througn June 23, 1984 - $3,449,812 l Unbillable Amount - ..

-372.412 i Amount Currently Due 33,077,400 $3,077,400 4

i a

I l

l

Attachment:

i Costs by Offices l

l AMOUNT DUE , i FACILITY REVENUE CODE: AA903 OPR Sa r- 53.077,400 e i TEZMS. Interest win accrue trom tne envoice osts et the annuas rate of % Payment s due enmooisteiv. However, enterest wiH be wasvec si payment 4 is received within 30 cows from sne envoice oste. Penet y sno somenestrative roes wu be assesseo on e.oetinauent evoice Accaonst. terms sno con-omons ere n.eneo. ,, .ooi.e.o.e. *9*. from F=bruary 11 85 (date oT originai invoice; it payment is not receivec by NRC within 15 days from this invoice date. ,

NOTE. If vare are any ouespons soout tne exstence or amount of the oeot, contact the enoevidual nameo above. For NRC cent conectson proteoures. m-cluonng anterest sno ponerty provmaons. see 31 U.s.C. 3717. 4 CFR 101-105. and 10 CFR 15.

FNrl ACllDF 7 L___________

q ,, .. .

Consumers Power Company Adjusted Operating License. Review Costs Through June 23, 1984 FACILITY: Midland 1~

DOCKET NO.: 50-329 Costs Per Professional Program Office Professional Staff-Hours Staff-Hour Contractual Total Review Staff-Hour Expended Costs Costs Costs

1. -NRR 539 46,307.3 $1,805,984 $934,549 52,740,533 2.; IE-h0 36 307.0 11,052 --

11,052

3. REGIONS 36 17,484.1- 629,428 -- 629,428

4. ACRS 50 837.9 41,895 -- 41,895

5. NMSS 38 708.0 26,904 -- 26,904 TOTAL COST: 53,449,812 1/

1/ Th e cost of the OL review through June 23, 1984 exceeds the maximum fee of $3,077,400.

In accoraance with Footnote 2 of 170.21, 53,077,400 is the maximum amount that may be assessed.for the OL review under 10 CFR 170 as revised June 20, 1984.

ll Enclosure 2

~ INVOICE NUMaan u.S. NUCLEAR RE!ULATZRY C2MMISSION . l

==c roam me (2-8 81 .

INVOICE Rev1 sed D0185 ph, . . . .

1 i q INVOICE 1)Att f MAILE CHECK 5 pat AeLE TO THE u.E. NuCLEAA AGGuLATO*Y COMMf8580N. REFtRENet THE aNvolCE NuMetR ON mtMITTANCE. AND

"" U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF ADM8NISTRATION AND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT .,f' tQ g g

- I DIVISION OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE ucaNoE NuhdesA W mammund WASH 6NGTION. DC M atFensNcs soundsen ##r saammene r2 Docket No. 50-330 I courAct: i Consumers Power Company aAME ATTN: Mr. Kenneth W. Berry Director of Nuclear Licensing Janet M. Rodriguez rete, N.

1945 West Parnall Road --

Jackson, MI 49201 c. iNu se zn

492-4200 l

3 AMOUNT l DESCarnv.s This invoice covers costs per 10 CFR 170.21 for operating license review for Midlano 2 for the period from post-CP issuance through s' June 23, 1984. It is a revised invoice for an adjusted amount from 53,077,400 (billed on February 11, 1985) to $2,997,259. It takes into consideration the issues raised in the licensee's letter f dated June 7, 1985, and NRC's reanalysis of NRR's contractual I,

costs:

i i

Revised costs through June 23, 1984 - $2,997,259 52,997,259 Amount Currently Due I

i l

l i

Attacnment I Costs by Offices I AMO*JNT DUE s- r- >

' 52.997,269 FACILITY REVENUE CODE: AA903 OPR I

% Payment s due immecastery. However. snterest wat be weevoo a cavment TERMS. Intere d was accrue trom tne mvoice cate et the annues rete of .

Acomunes terms anc con-ts ree.nz within 30 cavs trorn *9*,tne invoice f rom oste.y Penetty eno som rustretrve charges wdl be aussssso on e o Februar amone ers ettaeneo. n .oin.cet..

is not received by NRC within 15 days from this invoice date.

NOTE. If there are any ouestens enout the enssience or amount of the rmot, contact the enorvidual named above. For NRC deot conecten proceour ciudmg anterest sno pensity provisene. ese 31 U.S.C. 3717,4 CFR 101-105 and 10 CFF.15. ENCLOSURE 2

n 4

-Consumers Power Company Adjusted Operating License Review Costs Through June 23,1984 I

FACILITY: Midland 2 i

DOCKET NO.: 50-330 Costs Per Professional Program Office Professional Staff-Hours Staff-Hour Contractual . Total Review Staff-Hour Expended . _ Costs Costs Costs

1. NRR $39 41,119.3 $1,603,653 $918,541 $2,522,194

2. IE-HQ 36 166.0 5,976 -- 5,976

3. REGIONS'- 36 11,311.3 407,207 -- 407,207

4. ACRS 50 757.7 37,885 -- 37,885

5. NMSS 38 631.5 23,997 -- 23,997 TOTAL COST: $2,997,259 Enclosure 2 2 of 2 L_--__--- - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ - - _ - _ _ - - - - - - _ - _ _ - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - _ _ - - - - _ _ - - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - _ ---___ _ _ _

", //k u -

, mac comen see u.s. NuCt.EAn cE!ulATonY Coh4 Mission mvoica mune G-88)

INVOICE n ;., ! d' -

./

^

,>s H1459 esat teseeCILS Par AeLE To TMg u.s. MucLAAR RDeu5. 4 TORY CateNoeloN. reference tME eNoect NuteneR ogs REMITTANCE, AG INvoict D&il

" "

u.s. Nuctsan neous.avony comannesseou oprics or AonsNnsinavloN ANo nasounces mANAcameNT gg .2 0 1989 DivistoN or ACCOUNTING ANo r1 NANCE l tuceasenumesRn.,,em.em, wAsNnesmos ocsNes I

to: Rmnewet wuusen m.mmmmm.

Docket Nn. En 110 Consumers Power Company ca"'^c'-

ATTN: Mr. Kenneth W. Berry ,

"^"'

Director of Nuclear Licensing 1 Janet f.. Rodricuer 1945 West Parnall Roac reLePaowe Jackson, PI 49201 m. i =uime t .

l , * */ 492-4200 otoCRIPTion, AMOUNT This invoice covers costs per 10 CFR 170.21.A for operating license review for Midland 2 for the period from June 24, 1984 through Decemoer 18, 1986, as sununarized below:

From 06/24/84 through 12/22/84 - 562,837 From 12/23/f4 tnrough 06/22/85 - 5,373 -

From 06/23/55 tnrough 12/21/85 9,254 From 12/22/85 Inrough 06/21/86 - 744 From 06/22/86 through 12/18/86 - 14.253 Total Costs from 06/24/84 -

! 12/18/86 592,461 L Unbillable Amount -12.320 Total Amount Due on this Invoice 580,141 1/ $80,14~

1/ This ano concurrently issued Revised Invoice D0185 equal i maximum enargeable at time application was withorawn in 1986 (53,077,400), i i

l l

Attachments: l Costs by Offices (5 sheets) l l

AMOUNT DUE i 580,141 FACILITY REVENUE CODE: AA903 OPR '5= ' -

7 %. eewment is oue immaa.ieiv. However. imerset we no we o er osvment Tenm A ime see we scen= tmm sne e co com et ine annus rete of le footwed within 30 cave ffDm tne trWoece este. Penettv eno noministrotrve enerose wm De amnesseo on e gewiouent envoice. Annetsones terme ano con- i omans are snaaneo. n soonceo,e. :

NOTE. If tnere are env ouestions scout tne omsetence or amount of tne oeot. contact tne enovveousi nomeo soove. For NRC osot collection orocoeures. in-i teuoing imessor eno penserv omvesons, ese 31 U.s.C. 3717,4 CFR 101-105. eno 10 CFR 15 ENCLOSURE 3 i

g __ __

l. ,

L ,

jr

p. .c Consumers Power Company I

. Operating License Review Costs From 6/24/84 Through 12/22/84 FACILITY: Midlano 2 DOCKET NO.: 50-330 Costs'Per P' professional-Program Office Professional Staff-Hours Staff-Hour Contractual Total Review Staff-Hour Expended Costs Costs Costs

.1. NRR $62 193.0 $11,966 $ 3,247 $15,213

2. IE-HQ- 53 85.0 4,505 -- 4,505 3.- REGIONS 53 355.4 18,836 24,283 43,119 i

4. ACRS 62 -- -- -- --

5.. NMSS 58 -- -- -- --

TOTAL COST: 562,837

.. f . . .

Consumers Power Company.

0perating License Review Costs From 12/23/84 Through 6/22/85 FACILITY: Midland 2 l

DOCKET NO.: 50-330 l

L ' Costs Per. Professional Program Office Professional Staff-Hours Staff-Hour Contractual' Total Review Staff-Hour Expendel._ Costs Costs Costs-

1. NRR- 562 -- -- $1,901 51,901

2. 'IE-HQ 53 31 $1,643 -- 1,643

.3..' REGIONS 53- 34.5 1,829 -- 1,829.

4. ACRS 62 -- -- -- --

f) 5. NMSS 58 -- -- -- --

TOTAL COST: 55,373

_ . - _ - ._ _ -__--._____-.-.---.____-_.--__--_---_--_-___-___--_LA

6. .... . L

-Consumers Power Company I Operating License Review Costs From 6/23/85.Through 12/21/85 FACILITY: Midland 2 DOCKET NO.: 50-330 Costs Per Professional Program Office Professional- Staff-Hours Staff-Hour- Contractual . Total Review Staff-Hour Expended Costs Corts- Costs

1. . NRR $62 4 $248 $8,900 $9,148

2. IE-HQ 53 2 106 --

106

3. REGIONS 53 -- -- -- ---

4. ACRS. 62 -- -- -- --

~

5. HMSS 58 -- -- -- --

l TOTAL COST: 59,254 r

a_- __ _ _ _ _ - _ - -_

y,' .

s l:

'.. I 1

ll .i Consumers Powar Company Operating License Review Costs From 12/22/85 Through 6/21/86 l FACILITY: Midland 2' 1

DOCKET N0.: 50-330 i i

Costs Per Professional Program Office' Professional Staff-Hours Staff-Hour Contractual'

~

Total

. Review Staff-Hour ; Expended Costs Costs Costs

1. NRR $f2 12 $744 --

$744

2. 'IE-HQ 53 -- -- -- --

3. REGIONS 53 -- -- -- --

'4. .'ACRS 52 -- -- -- --

5.- NMSS- 58 -- -- -- --

TOTAL COST: 5744 e

_.m.__.___m. _. .-._____._m._.__._.____m__m___._-..__..___.m__. .._____m_._ - _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ ___._____m_.________

a

-4 I

r- ,

Consumers Power Company

' Operating License Review Costs From 6/22/86 through 12/18/86 3

FACILITY: Midland.2 DOCKET N0.: 50-330 o

.J Costs Per Professional

- Program Office Professional- Staff-Hours Staff-Hour Contractual Total-Review- Staff-Hour Expended Costs Costs- Costs

. l~.- NRR -$62 211.5 $13,113 -- $13,113 c 2. - IE-HQ 53

- 3. REGIONS 53 21.5 1,140 --. 1,140-

- 4. ACRS. 62 -- -- -- --

5. NMSS 58 -- -- -- --

TOTAL COST: S14,253 9

___--m._ ______-__.__w.____.__________m_. - - _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -

c p( -

c 1

\. '

I l

l J

1 l

l l

ENCLD5URE 6 .

CETAIL OF NRR CONTRACTUAL CDST5 FOR N!ILM81 (30-3291 d

CP ISSUANCE TMU 9/30/B3 DECKABES M0 MR CONTR. MR CMTR. 1NCREA3E5 !N CMTRACT CDf!I 81LLED CDSTI FTER CDSTS BASD NDS. 2/11/B5 REVilW DN EVIEN REASDNS FDR ECREAES AND INCREAKS NOME 0.00 0.00 0.00 UNIT 2 DNLV.

40413 0.00 0.00 0.00 WIT 2 DILT.

A0446 se.800.00 83.050.00 183.050.00) CDSTS PREVIOUBLY I!LLED TU UNIT I DNLV.

A2001 141.200.00 141.200.00 0.00 W CHAWE.

A2106 ;6.200.00 l6.200.00 0.00 NO CNMBE.

A2118 0.00 78.100.00 78.100.00 WT PEVIDUELY SILLD FOUW BURING NRC EVIEN.

A2121 3:5.!!0.00 153.450.00 (182.100.00) PREV. s&71.100: NDN 8306.900 ETED 2 UNITE.

A2312 0.00 0.00 0.00 NO CupE FOR WIT 1: SE UNIT 2 CDNPUTAT!DNS.

42315 2.500.00 0.00 (2.500.00) ELETD ECAUEE NEMING COSTS.

- A3349 7. 3 5.50 14.571.00 7. 3 3.50 MS PREVIDUBLY IPLIT OF 814.571 FOR I MD 2. NON UNIT I DNLt.

A3363 10.814.00 6.a33.50 (4.178.50) M5 PEVIOUILY IILLD A8 810.814 FOR EACH UNIT: NON INCREASD TD s!3.271 BETEEN THE 2 UNITS.

A3366 . 15.500.00 0.00 (15.500.006 ELETED AS EINE ENERIC STUDY.

AI714 f.606.00 0.00 ' il.806.00) DELETD ECAUSE EARING CDETS.

A6415 ::.C:1.!J ::.0:1.50 0.00 ND CHANGE.

A6437 4.049.00 6.027.00 1.178.00 NAS PREVIOUBLV 88.098 ETE2N UNITS 1 MD 2. NON IS so.00 FOR UNIT 1 20 44.647 FOR UNIT 2.

A6437 0.00 6.050.00 6.030.00 CDITE FOUNO NOT TO HAVE PREVIDUSLY BEEN 8!LLG FCR PERIDD ENDING 5/ !/84 A6438 17.01'4.00 0.00 ' (17,054.00) NB 834.108 FDR UNITS 1 AND 2 NON ALL FDR UNIT 2 HLT.

12172 3 .600.00 ::.30.00 (12.250.00) NAS 87!.200 ETNEE THE TN3 UNIT 5: NDN 846.760.

82340 13.700.00 13.700.00 0.00 W CMNGE.

3234 5.980.00 5.980.00 0.00 NO CHANE.

6:077 110.244.00 110.244.00 0.00 ND CHANSE.

53004 0.00 0.00 0.00 UNIT 2 DNLY.

16588 2.682.00 2.tB2.00 0.00 NDCMNE.

56826 121.250.00 121.425.00 175.00 NAS PREVIOUSLT I!LLD 8242.500 8ETEEN 2 UNITS: NON 8242.850.

E6878 92.7 0 .50 85.000.00 (7.72.!0) M8 PREVIOUBLY 8ILLD AS 8185.445 ETED 2 UNITS: 408 8170.000.

68013 9.445.50 7.502.50 (1.943.00) MS PREVIDUELY I!LLD AS 818.891 KTED 2 UNITI: NON IS 815.003.

68020 2.667.50 545.00 (0.1 0 .50) MS PEVIDUSLY llL11D AS 85.3% ETEEN 2 UNITI: UN IS 8545 FOR UN!T 1 HLL

$90*5 49.000.00 44.900.00 14.100.00) NA5 PREVIOUSLT IILLED ETED 2 UNITS FDR 898.000: 88.200 NAS BED DELETO AS IEARIE CDSTS BETED THE TND UNITI.

t0620 2.000.00 0.00 (35.000.00) ELETED AS E!M EERIC STUDY.

20624 30.000.00 0.09 (30.096.00) DELETED AS BEIN6 EERIC STUDY.

TDTALS si.116.;i: sBB:.644 ts:2.7;84 TDTAL CRDIT DUE CPC D MR CONh. Gil THRU 9/30/B3.

TDTALS 4e.605 .50.905 (4!.7001 RGUCTIM IN CDNTRACTS A0413/416 FDR PERIDD 00M 10/1/83 TliRDUSH 5/31/B4.

i:AND TDTAL *1.212.987 8934.549 ts278.4 8)

W* 6.;26 - DELETIMS

93.33 - ADD!i!DNS s <2=.7:si Page 1 of 2

1 i

)

l I

i EELD3URE 6 KTAIL OF MR CONTRACTUAL COSTS FOR NIBLMO 2 (50-330) {

CP !$5UANCE THRU 9/30/B3 l KCEASES MD hRR CCNTR. MR CONTR. INCEAKS IN CDNTRACT COSTS BILLE: CDSTS AFTEI CDST$ BASD NOS. 2/11/25 REVIEN DN EVID EASONS FOR KCKAKS MD 1EKA"ES NONE 82.500.00 0.00 t 2.500.00) DELETD. HEARIN COSTS.

40413 16.000.00 816.000.00 0.00 NO CiiANGE.

40444 0.00 3.050.00 3.050.00 Apel COSTS PREVIOUSLT IILLD TO WIT I DNLV.

141.200.00 141.200.00 0.00 ND CMME.

A2106 - 0.M 0.00 0.00 UNIT I DEY.

A211B 6.00 78.100.00 78.100.00 NOT PREVIOUBLY 8!LLD: FOUM puRIE WC EVID.

A2121 3 5.550.00 153.450.00 (182.100.00 PEV. 3671.1004 NON 83H.900 SETED 2 WITE.

A2312 22.000.00 0.00 (22,000,003 KLETD

HEARIN PREPMATION ON CONTENTID$.

42313 2.MO.00 0.00 (2.500.006 KLETD KCAUSE EMINE COSTE.

A3349 7.;B5.50 0.00 (7.285.50) MS PEVIDUSLT 8!LLD AE 814,571 ETED 2 UNITS. NON WIT I DEV.

237.43 10.814.00 6,635.50 (4.178. 8 ) MS PREVIOUSLV IILLD A$ #10.814 FOR EACH UNIT: NON IEREAED TD 813.271 KTED TE 2 WITE.

AIJ68 15.*00.00 0.00 (13.500.00) KLETD AS K!E IDDIC ITWY.

A3714 B.804.00 0.00 (8.8E 001 KiETD KCAUSE EARIN6 CDETE. .

4 415 '3.C 1.D 23.031.50 0.00 No CHANK.

A4437 4.049.00 4,647.00 598.00 MS PREVIOU$LV 88,MB BETUDN WITE 1 AND 2. NW !$ 86.0 7 FOR WIT I AND 54.647 FDR W!T 2. .

4437 0.00 4.670.00 4,670.00 4 458 17.054.00 CDSTI FOW0 NOT TD NAVE PREVIDUELY BEEN SILLD FOR PDf00 IN0!N6 5/31/84.

34.100.00 17.054.00 12172 MS 834.108 TOR W!ft ! ANO 2: NON 4LL FOR WIT 2 DEV.

35.600.00 :3. 2 .00 (12. 50.001 NAS 871.200 ETEEN THE TWO WITB: NON 846.700.

52340 13.700.00 13,7M.00 0.00 NO CMNSE.

32354 5.980.00 5.VB0.00 0.00 NO CHANGE.

53077 110. 44.00 110.244.00 0.00 NO CHAME.

95004 5.000.00 0.00 15,000.00)

KLITH KCAUSE EARING CUST3.

16588 2.682.00 2.682.00 0.00 NOCMNE.

4 826 121.:M.00 121.425.00 175.00 MS PREVIOUILT llLLED $242.500 MTNED 2 WIT 5: NOW 8242.850.

36B78 92.7:2.M E5.000.00 47.7:2. 2 )

BB013 9.445.50 MS PEVIDU6LY !!U.El AS 8185.445 KTNEEll 2 WITS NON 817C.000.

7.502.50 (1,943.00) 1802B 2. A67.30 MS PEVIDUELY IILLID A5 #18.891 IGNED 2 UNIT 5: NON IS *15.005.

0.00 (2.667.50) 46035 49.000.00 sel PREV 100ELY !!LLD AB 85.3M KTEEN 2 WITS: NON 18 8545 FDR WIT I DNLt.

44.900.00 i4,100.006 MS PREVIOUSLT 81LLD KTED 2 UNITS FOR 898.%0: sB.200 MS M620 KD KLITD AS EARIN CC$TS ETEFJi THE TND UNIT 1.

0.00 S 00 0.00 MIT I ONLY.

fB624 0.00 0.00 l 0.00 UNIT I DEY.

TUTALS 51.054.56! 8879.675 (*174.906)* TUTAL CEIIT DUE t.PC ON NM CONTR. CDSTS THRU 9/30/E3.

TUTALE ;g.86s !8.866 +

CONTRACTUAL COSTE FDR 10/1/51 TMOUGH 5/3t/84 iCDNTRETI A3742. 4457 AND B3077).

GRAND TOTAL 81 093.447 59tt.541 (8174.9066 es - 278.52 - KLET!DNS

10L447 - ADO T!DNS I u7aan Page 2 of 2

)

. __ . . _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - --- ------- - -- --- --------- - - - - - - ~ - -

J

+ '

y 4

I gclosure7 Summarv of Billed Costs Under f>0184 and 00185 For Miciana units ano 2 toocket Nos. 00-a29/330) ana Adjustments as a Resuit or LPC's 6/7/85 Letter ano NRC's Review Description Midland 1 Midland 2 NRR Contractual Costs thru 9/30/83 billed 2/11/85 $1,116,382 $1,054,581 NRR Contractual Costs (10/1/83 thru 5/31/84) billed 2/11/85 96.605 38.866 Total Amount for 00184/00185 (2/11/85) $1,212,98/ $1,093,447 for NRR Contractual Costs Adjusted Amt. for Contractual Costs thru 9/30/83 883,644 879,675 Adjusted Amt. for Contractual Costs for/10/1/83 thru 5/84 50.905 38.866 Total Adjusted Contractual Costs thru 5/84 934,549*

918.5g*

Total Amount Billed for 00184/185 on 2/11/85 $3,749,786 $3,150,457 Contractual Adjustment thru 9/30/83 - 232,738 - 174,906 Contractual Adjustment for 10/1/83 thru 5/31/84 - 45.700 + $3,4/1,346 $2,975,65i Deletion of Hearing Hours - 21.392** -

663**

$3,449,966 $2,9/4,688 6/7/85 Ltr. Item II.A. - + 22.515***

$3,449,956 $2,997,403 6/7/85 Ltr. Item IV.A. (4 hrs x $36 per unit) -

142 - 144 Adjusted Costs for Midland 1/2 thru 6/23/84 $3,449,812 $2,997,259 Costs for the following six-month cycles:

1. 6/24/84 tnru 12/22/84 $+If7,187 + 62,837

2. 12/23/84 thru 6/22/85 + 4,908 + 5,373

3. 6/23/85 thru 12/21/85 + 40,501 + 9,254

4. 12/22/85 thru 6/21/86 + 584 + 744

.5, 6/22/86 thru 12/18/86 + 14.253 + 14.253 Total Costs for 6/24/84 - 12/18/86 $ 237,433 $ 92,461 Total OL Application Review Ccsts througn 12/18/86 $3,637,245 $3,089,720 1934,t49 is M,di,987 less $232,738 and $45,700 for Unit 1 and $918,541 is 1,093,447 less $174,906 for Unit 2.

- CPC's 6/7/85 Letter Items I.A. (548.5 hrs x $39 = $21,392) and I.B. (17 hrs x $39 =

$663).

- - CPC's 6/7/85 Letter Item II.A. (450.3 hrs x $50 = $22,515).

(T : *,:

Consumers Power Company

' Operating Licens2 Review Costs From 6/24/84 Through 12/22/84 FACILITY:. Midland 1-I DOCKET NO.: 50-329 Costs.Per Professional

- Program Office Professional Staff-Hours Staff-Hour Contractual' Review Total Staff-Hour Expended Costs Costs Costs

'1.

NRR $62~ -- --

$84,796- $84,796-

2. IE-HQ 53 99.0 $ 5,247 --

5,247

3. REGIONS 53 346.0 18,338 68,775 87,113

4. ACRS 62 .5 31 --

31

5. NMSS 5B -- -- -- --

l TOTAL COST: $177,187 l

l l

l

__L_..-__L-------..---..---------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - --

E4

~

4 e

Operating. License Review Costs From 12/23/84 Through 6/22/85 1

FACILITY: Midland 1 DOCKET NO.: 50-329 Costs Per Professional Program Office. Professional Staff-Hours Staff-Hour Contr: ctual Total.,

Review Staff-Hour Expended Costs Costs Costs

1. NRR $62 -- . --

$ %?9 $. 429

2. 'IE-HQ 53 50 $2,650 --

2,650

<3. REGIONS 53 34.5 1,829 -- 1,829

4. ACRS 62 -- -- -- --

s5. NMSS 58 . -- -- -- --

TOTAL COST: $4,908 l

i Consumers Power Company Operattng License Review Costs From 6/23/85 Through 12/21/85 FACILITY: Midland 1 DOCKET NO.: 50-329 Costs Per Professional Program Office Professional Staff-Hours Staff-Hour Contractual Total i Review Staff-Hour ' Expended Costs _

Costs Costs

1. NRR $62 -- -- $ 18,703 $18,703

2. IE-HQ 53 2 106 --

106

3. REGI0lis 53 -- --

21,692 21,692

4. ACRS 62 -- -- -- --

5. NMSS 58 -- -- -- --

TOTAL COST: $40,501 l

l l

l 1

I_ . ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

m... .. . . . , ,

LO.

l . Operating License Review Costs From-12/22/85 Through'6/21/86 l

L FACILITY: Midland 1-l; l

DOCKET 110.: 50-329 Costs Per Professional Program Office Professional' Staff-Hours Staff-Hour. Contractual Total Review Staff-Hour: Expended Costs- Costs Costs

1. NRR $62 3 $186- --

$186

2. IE-HQ' 53' --- -- -- --

3. REGIONS 53 -- --

150 150

4. ACRS 62 4 248 -- .248

'5. NMSS 58 -- -- -- --

TOTAL COST: $584

~';, ! j

. Consumers Power Company

, Operating License Review Costs From'6/22/86.Through 12/18/86 FACILITY: Midlano 1 DOCKET NO.: 50-329 Costs.Per Professional Program Office . Professional Staff-Hours Staff-Hour Contractual Total

. Review Staff-Hour Expended Costs Costs Costs

1. NRR- 562. 211.5 $13,113 --

513,113

2. . IE-HQ 53 -- -- -- --

3. REGIONS 53 21.5 1,140 -- 1,140 4.. ACRS '62 -- -- -- --

5. iiMSS 58 -- -- -- --

TOTAL COST: $14,253

_ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ ____

ML20248D652

Text

Enclosures:

Attachment:

Navigation menu

Search