ML20137N807: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Adams | |||
| number = ML20137N807 | |||
| issue date = 01/30/1986 | |||
| title = Forwards Safeguards Insp Rept 50-312/85-34 on 851114 & 1202-12.Requests Comments within 30 Days Re Aspects of Security Program Warranting Attention.Insp Will Be Conducted to Resolve Concerns.Rept Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21 & 2.790) | |||
| author name = Scarano R | |||
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) | |||
| addressee name = Rodriguez R | |||
| addressee affiliation = SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT | |||
| docket = 05000312 | |||
| license number = | |||
| contact person = | |||
| document report number = NUDOCS 8602040255 | |||
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE | |||
| page count = 2 | |||
}} | |||
See also: [[see also::IR 05000312/1985034]] | |||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:P" | |||
, | |||
. | |||
- S AFEGU ARDS INFORMATION | |||
4 | |||
JAN 3 01986 | |||
Docket No. 50-312 | |||
Sacramento Municipal Utility District | |||
P. O. Box 15830 | |||
Sacramento, California 95813 | |||
Attention: Mr. R. J. Rodriguez | |||
Executive Director, Nuclear Operations | |||
Gentlemen: | |||
Subject: NRC INSPECTION | |||
This refers to an announced, special, safeguards inspection at Rancho Seco | |||
Nuclear Generating Station, begun on November 14 and continued December 2-12, | |||
1985. It also refers to the discussions of our inspection findings held by | |||
the inspector with members of the Rancho Seco staff on November 14 and with W. | |||
Hammond and others at the conclusion of the second visit on December 6, 1985. | |||
Areas examined during this inspection included activities related to physical | |||
protection as described in the enclosed inspection report. Within these | |||
areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and | |||
records, interviews with facility and contractor personnel, and observations | |||
by the inspectors. | |||
Based upon the results of the team inspection conducted on December 2-12 we | |||
note certain aspects of your security program which we believe warrant your | |||
attention as set forth in Paragraph 2, Phase II of the enclosed inspection | |||
report. We would appreciate your comments'concerning these matters within the | |||
next thirty days. . , | |||
Also, as set forth in Paragraph 2, Phasi II of the enclosed inspection report, | |||
we will be conducting a more detailed i spection to resolve a significant | |||
number of concerns developed during this. inspection. | |||
In accordance with Section 2.790(d) of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, | |||
Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, documentation of the findings of your | |||
safeguards and security measures are exempt from public disclosure; therefore, | |||
the enclosed inspection report will not be placed in the Public Document Room | |||
and will receive limited distribution. | |||
We have determined that the enclosures so designated contain Safeguards | |||
Information and therefore are subject to the controls of 10 CFR 73.21. | |||
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, we would be pleased to | |||
discuss them with you. | |||
O | |||
SS 312 | |||
Cg Bh | |||
Oo DR | |||
e6020%A | |||
UCLOSURE CONTAINS | |||
SAFEGUARDS INFORY.ATION. O | |||
PDR h | |||
UPON SE?ARATIcy Int 3 j | |||
PAGE IS D300tiraouEn. SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION [[y | |||
, | |||
r | |||
. , | |||
* | |||
.e 4 | |||
o | |||
-2- | |||
JAN 3 01986 | |||
Enforcement action by the NRC relating to the inspection will be the subject | |||
of separate correspondence. | |||
. | |||
Sinceral , | |||
, ) | |||
Ross A. :scarano, rector | |||
Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards | |||
Enclosure: | |||
Inspection Report No. 50-312/85-34 (IE-V-723) | |||
cc w/ enclosures: | |||
L. G. Schwieger, SMUD | |||
W. J. Hammond, SMUD | |||
G. Coward, SMUD | |||
S. Redecker, SMUD | |||
G. McCorkle, SGRI, NMSS | |||
P. M. McKee, ORPB, IE | |||
bec w/ enclosures: | |||
Mr. Martin, RV | |||
Mr. Faulkenberry, RV | |||
bec w/o enclosures: | |||
Mr. Cook, RV | |||
LFMB | |||
RSB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS) | |||
Resident Inspector | |||
Project Inspector | |||
State of CA | |||
REGION V/ dot | |||
Norderhaug li ler A. Johnson Schuster Mo tgomery Scarano | |||
"b 1/9/86 | |||
1/.2*J /86 1/f[f86 1/ /86 1/)0 /86 1p86 | |||
}} |
Latest revision as of 20:44, 18 December 2020
ML20137N807 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Rancho Seco |
Issue date: | 01/30/1986 |
From: | Scarano R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
To: | Reinaldo Rodriguez SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT |
References | |
NUDOCS 8602040255 | |
Download: ML20137N807 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000312/1985034
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:P"
, . - S AFEGU ARDS INFORMATION 4 JAN 3 01986 Docket No. 50-312 Sacramento Municipal Utility District P. O. Box 15830 Sacramento, California 95813 Attention: Mr. R. J. Rodriguez Executive Director, Nuclear Operations Gentlemen: Subject: NRC INSPECTION This refers to an announced, special, safeguards inspection at Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station, begun on November 14 and continued December 2-12, 1985. It also refers to the discussions of our inspection findings held by the inspector with members of the Rancho Seco staff on November 14 and with W. Hammond and others at the conclusion of the second visit on December 6, 1985. Areas examined during this inspection included activities related to physical protection as described in the enclosed inspection report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and records, interviews with facility and contractor personnel, and observations by the inspectors. Based upon the results of the team inspection conducted on December 2-12 we note certain aspects of your security program which we believe warrant your attention as set forth in Paragraph 2, Phase II of the enclosed inspection report. We would appreciate your comments'concerning these matters within the next thirty days. . , Also, as set forth in Paragraph 2, Phasi II of the enclosed inspection report, we will be conducting a more detailed i spection to resolve a significant number of concerns developed during this. inspection. In accordance with Section 2.790(d) of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, documentation of the findings of your safeguards and security measures are exempt from public disclosure; therefore, the enclosed inspection report will not be placed in the Public Document Room and will receive limited distribution. We have determined that the enclosures so designated contain Safeguards Information and therefore are subject to the controls of 10 CFR 73.21. Should you have any questions concerning this letter, we would be pleased to discuss them with you. O SS 312 Cg Bh Oo DR e6020%A UCLOSURE CONTAINS SAFEGUARDS INFORY.ATION. O PDR h UPON SE?ARATIcy Int 3 j PAGE IS D300tiraouEn. SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION [[y ,
r
. , * .e 4 o -2- JAN 3 01986 Enforcement action by the NRC relating to the inspection will be the subject of separate correspondence. . Sinceral , , ) Ross A. :scarano, rector Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards Enclosure: Inspection Report No. 50-312/85-34 (IE-V-723) cc w/ enclosures: L. G. Schwieger, SMUD W. J. Hammond, SMUD G. Coward, SMUD S. Redecker, SMUD G. McCorkle, SGRI, NMSS P. M. McKee, ORPB, IE bec w/ enclosures: Mr. Martin, RV Mr. Faulkenberry, RV bec w/o enclosures: Mr. Cook, RV LFMB RSB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS) Resident Inspector Project Inspector State of CA REGION V/ dot Norderhaug li ler A. Johnson Schuster Mo tgomery Scarano "b 1/9/86 1/.2*J /86 1/f[f86 1/ /86 1/)0 /86 1p86
}}