IR 05000312/1989006

Forwards Safeguards Insp Rept 50-312/89-06 on 890424-28.No Violations Noted.Evaluation of Plant Security Sys Conducted Through Extended Augmented Sys Review Requested.Rept Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790(d))

ML20247H728
Person / Time
Site:	Rancho Seco
Issue date:	05/11/1989
From:	Lamastra M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:	Firlit J SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
References
NUDOCS 8905310303
Download: ML20247H728 (3)

Text

--

,

x m

t . ,%

-

'

SNUCLEAR AFEGUREGULAT p.WBF'ORY COMMIkBIMi%on e' lON o W '

~8 o g neason v

, ,1 .

1480 MARIA LANE, SUITE 210

)

% f ]

WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 948064308 4,***++ / l MAY 111989 I Docket No. 50-312 Rancho Seco' Nuclear Generating Station Sacramento Muncipal Utility District (SMUD)

14440 Twin Cities Road Herald, California 95638-9799 Attention: Mr. J. Fir 11t Chief Executive Officer, Nuclear Gentlemen:

SUBJECT: NRC SECURITY INSPECTION - RANCHO SECO This letter refers to an announced routine, Safeguards inspection of your activities at Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station authorized under NRC license No. DPR-54 conducted by Mr. D. Schaefer of this office on April 24-28, 1989.~ It also refers to the discussion of the preliminary inspection findings held by the inspector with Mr. P. Caudill, Assistant General Manager, Nuclear Support Services, Rancho Seco, and members of the Rancho Seco and SMUD staffs on April 28, 1989. Further, this letter refers to a telephone discussion between Messrs. L. Houghtby, Rancho Seco, and D. Schaefer of this office, on May 4, 198 Areas examined during this inspection included activities related to physical protection as described in the enclosed inspection repor Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examination of proceduras and representative records, interviews with facility and contract personnel, and observations by the inspector During this inspection, the Region V inspector was advised of your recent evaluation of the plant security syste This evaluation, conducted through i your Extended Augmented System Review and Test Program (E-ASRTP), identified several areas within the security program requiring improvemen Please i furnish Region V a copy of this E-ASRTP report, when availabl g Within the scope of the inspection, no violations were observe o 08@ In accordance with Section 2.790(d) of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, gg Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, documentation of the findings of your o.to safeguards and security procedures are exempt from public disclosure;

" therefore the enclosed inspection report will not be placed in the Public Qf Document Room and will receive limited distributio no 3@ We have determined that the enclosure to this letter contains Safeguards Q Information and must be protected against unauthorized disclosure in g accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 73.21.

- C0 MCIM*32. OC.N7AIUS

$$$$$5[$ "' SAFEGU ARDS INFORM ATION -,_._-

VAGE 15 wouzzous ,

J

- , _ . .

- _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _

o

'

• ~

., ,

'

- *

- 1,'dY. I i 1989-2--

Should you'have any questions concerning this letter, we will be glad to discuss them with yo '

Sincerely, W ; " '-

Michael A. Lamastra, Acting Chief Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards Branch

?

'

Enclosure:

Inspection Report No. 50-312/89-06 (IE-V-891)

REGION V/JG .

DSchaefer L/

L iller-M MSchuster

MLamastra

$ /10/89 [/$/89 6 /// /89 5 /gs/89 UEST COPY ] REQUESTA0Py ] R UEST COPY ] REQUES hY ] >

YES /: NO ] YES // N0 / ES / NO 1 ] YES / N / ]

V G' V SEND TO PDR~7 YES /.440 J V

i l

!

__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _