IR 05000312/1989016

Enforcement Conference Rept 50-312/89-16 on 890915. Violations Noted.Major Areas Discussed:Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-312/89-16 & Indications That Findings Represent Decrease in Mgt Commitment to Emergency Preparedness

ML20248G708
Person / Time
Site:	Rancho Seco
Issue date:	09/21/1989
From:	Good G, Yuhas G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML20248G705	List: IR 05000312/1989016 ML20248G703
References
50-312-89-16, EA-89-180, NUDOCS 8910100345
Download: ML20248G708 (16)

Text

^ + ";^ <g y g

^

'

a% '

^

5.;; ' ~ t ,

-

%" ' Y "* -

.

}h (li;;f~

W p ; M Q" %; <F M [C .. ~y &' Q;,qs

~

,""% " 3 wP/L '

p.g my

.

v_. ~ .ac & ., .. . .,.

Qhih :h j [A j g -c .

hih ,

'

~, k JN% C <

'

Wm,, +'

,

L

• kg , h:

p M jl4 " ' ' '

,y ,q , , 1 i' X r q ./ g .*7

,,

. sI e

,

i >H .. . , . . ~3: ,

.f; . ,,

ft '

,

! $$_gl ,

.

q .

c,

~ .

lU.IS.LNUCLEAR:REGULATORYiCOMMISSION

.

.

'

,

• - ,

,

' -

,

REGION V; '

4 ,

, ,7 , ,

,

,

,

1. ' . W+' ~ ';,. '

t e i. ' ;Q '0l '!

m i ,. ,  ;

a

'

> ' >-

'f.'.

- '- u

.. ,

. "

,Q , M' ...

. . ,

'

g . [' ,

'

" _

~ ReportIN'o.

f4 9p

,.

.

.  ; _a

'50-312/89-16 4 s

., .

, . g :l W4 y f Dock'etLNoh -

-

150-312L '

,

_

>

,

Mi '

+

,

t/  !

. , .

>

LicehselNo': . DPR-54 ,

'

am %cx

..

f, m

.

' e 't.,

~

,

, y ' " ' fil li.icensee: Sacramento. Municipal' Utility District? 1 3  ;

g6 :14440 Twin' Cities, Road * " '

'

s4 - -

$' i . Herald, California 95638-9799 , " '

....

o [ " /j

,

,-

->

. Facility Name: 1 Rancho:Seco Nuclear Generating Stationi

,

,

> <

l q

[

^

<

Conference :at: Region V Offices, Walnut Creek,-California: >

,

- q, ,

q

'

' ' >'> , .

,ConferenceLConduct,edD September'15,'1989, EA No.-89-180 ,

q

, .. .n

. /a l'20/M

'

m' '

fins ector:'

'

'

,

-

N

.  ; ;G.'M. Godd M mergency, Preparedness Analyst = Date Signed y '

Approved 'byi *

' _ Gregory, P. yuhps, Chief -

'

n

-

,

dlhlITfTi b^

sDate.Signedf % 0,

y T!

'

' Emergency'PrVaredness' ." V 9

'

'

+s s .

_

'

.

.

. and: Radiological Protection' Branch

,p-- p - --

^

'

,

7 g

.

.

.

. .. . . [j Conference Summary: An Enforcement Conference was. held on September 15,~1989p ? 'l at the RegiontV: office to discuss ~theLapparent violations identified during anL 9 LAugust 28 - September 1,,1989,2 inspection of'th'e licensee's. emergency: .

'l

'

47 preparedness program (Inspection Report No. 50-312/89-14). ?In-addition to the: ;j apparent v,iolations identified, indications that the findings" appeared to-f representla decreasesin management's commitment to the' emergency preparedness

. M ufprogram Were discussede

p + ,_ ,

s yg:!. c 3,--y; +

', ,p Q, 3 ,

j ,,

-

+ .A R,'..s.Uy . yqq ., e , =

3-

, ,

1]

,y j. .f. } 'q } , ' > ,

,.i

'it;s f.8 L y .:

5, i . un

.f

'W .; .,

> ,

. w -M 7 6 ,

!

q .}.

,

'

,

]

.-  ? .

'

. , p. ,q?v-3]. l

-

.

,t'

p- ,

s g

-

.

o ,

,

h':L.' ( f'] #y4: l '

%, 9 ]

g, >

%, qj j

%M 'fg " j- ,

'b i

1 y. /

,

e j  ;

' -'

< .. , k j,

4

. . . '

'lw; , .r s  !

'

i

" I PDR ADOCK 05000312

], G PNu

,'  :

nl ;

l) .r

']

. m . w

-

. _ _ _ . . -. __ __ _ _u_J

-

w +

,a - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - -

m

74

,

. ,,

'

3 , (. . f , y

,

DETAILS

. Enforcement Conference Participants NRC Participants J. B. Martin, Regional Administrato B. H. Faulkenberry, Deputy Regional Administrator J. L. : Crews, Senior Reactor Engineer R. A. Scarano, Director, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards R. P. Zimmerman, Director, Division of Reactor Safety and Projects ..

A. E. Chaffee, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Safety and Projects G. P. Yuhas, Chief,' Emergency Preparedness and Radiological Protection Branch S. A. Richards, Chief, Project Section II F. A. Wenslawski, Chief, Facilities Radiological Protection Section M. B. Blume, Regional. Attorney A. D. Johnson, Enforcement Officer R. G. Marsh, Field.0ffice Director, Office of Investigations A. 'J. D' Angelo, Seniori Resident Inspector G. W. Knighton, Director, Project Directorate V, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR)

5. A. Reynolds, Project Manager, NRR E. M. Podolak, Senior Emergency Preparedness. Specialist, NRR G. M. Good, Emergency Preparedness Analyst SMUD Participants-D.-Kebter, Assistant General Manager, Nuclear J. Shetler, Deputy Assistant General Manager

'

P. Bender, Manager, Quality and Safety S. Crunk,. Manager, Nuclear Licensing D.. Yows, Manager,: Environmental Monitoring and Emergency Preparedness J. Toresdahl, Supervisor, Emergency Preparedness s *

i . .

,

SMUD Observers J. Buo'naiuto, President, SMUD Board

, ,

Ts Baxter,' Counsel to SMUD R. Scott, Public Information Specialist

> Enforcement Conference

- ~ OniSeptember 15, 1989, an Enforcement Conference was held at the Region V

-

office-in Walnut Creek, California, with the individuals listed in f, paragraph 1-abovedn attendanc > ,

The Regional Administrator opened the meeting with the statement that it appeared that several problems were. identified during a recent inspection of the licensee's emergency preparedness program and that this meeting was an opportunity to understand the facts and circumstances surrounding the inspection findings. The Regional Administrator then turned the t'

_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _

,

, ___ __

'

[ .

'. . g-L, l meeting over to the Director, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards, who reviewed the licensee's history in the area of emergency preparedness. The Division Director noted.that the licensee's own audits L had identified problems with. emergency preparedness training spanning the past few years. The Division Director also noted that Rancho Seco ha received a SALP category 2 rating :with an improving trend, during the last evaluation period.

'

Following the Division Director's presentation, the emergency preparedness inspector summarized the three apparent' violations identified during her inspection. After each one of the apparent violations was presented, the licensee was. asked if they had any comments with respect to the accuracy of the' findings as presented. The licensee representatives commented that the findings supporting the apparent violations and the information presented.in the inspection report were factua The licensee was provided with an opportunity to make a formal respons The licensee's presentation described the District's preliminary assessment of the problems and the planned corrective actions as noted in their handout, Attachment 1. During the introduction, SMUD's Assistant

^

General Manager.(AGM), Nuclear, stated that the training problems stemmed from inadequate training documentation and that, in his opinion, the

" individuals assigned to the active Emergency Response Organization (ERO)

could have performed their jobs in an acceptable manner if it had been

, necessary. -In spite of this opinion, the AGM expressed his concerns that

• '

< the training had not.been completed and that the problems resulted from a lack'oftmanagement controls. He also indicated that he was disturbed to d' _be one of,the individuals lacking the prescribed training since he

.

ithought he had' received'all of the necessary trainin i- , ,-.

'

.

l The licen'see's assessment of the problems was divided into two areas: (1)

Lthe failure to conduct the semi-annual health physics drill, and (2) ERO maintenance and training. The following paragraphs are intended to summarize the information provided by the licensee in the two

/ 4 -

aforementioned area '

I E With' respect to the failure to conduct the semi-annual health physics c  : drill, the licensee admitted that the drill was missed and that the fact that the drill was missed was not identified internally. The licensee's

. preliminary assessment noted the cancellation of_the June 15, 1989, dress

. rehearsal and the lack of management controls as the reasons for missing the dril The licensee stated that a health physics drill has now been

-

scheduled for September 27, 198 Regarding the maintenance and training of the ERO, the licensee acknowledged that the emergency preparedness staff recognized that staffing problems existed in May 1989 and that, as a result, they initiated a weekly review of the ERO. Further, the licensee acknowledged the training documentation problems and admitted that the documentation problems were associated with the completion of the training exemptions that are issued to individuals who participate in drills and exercises.

_ _ _ . . __

r acm y s m

- -

---

~l

'

f ,, w^

<

dif](3 - - i f i ' * qq y , ,

-

~ 3-

fy } $ d, '

'l k pg ' s - . <

,

u% v'Thelicen$eestatedthatpartoftheEROmaintenanceproblemstemmedfrom [

lE I r' the use'of two databases, one for training and one for the ERO. The '

l'icensee . stated'that a manual process was used to transfer individuals y from the;ERO database to the Emergency Response Telephone Directory

?

'

(ERTD)' ' The- AGM stated that during a meeting,with the' emergency

.

7 , .,V .' preparedness staff in-' April 1989, a conscious decision was made to place

'" *

" designees" in the ERTD, but that, at the time, he was not aware that-

,

assigning " designees" to the essential list was inconsistent with the _

emergency plan implementing procedures (EPIPs). As used by the. licensee,

" designees" signify individuals not fully qualified for their emergency response duties in accordance with EPIP-560 At.this point in the licensee's presentation, the Manager, Environmental Monitoring and Emergency Preparedness (EM&EP), was asked to comment on this decisionmaking process. The EM&EP Manager stated that his major i concern was to keep an adequate level of staffing for'the essential l positions in the ERO and that he made.a conscious decision to add '

individuals to the.ERTD, without first verifying their training statu He stated ~that the status of the training documentation had a bearing on  !,

this. decision and that he thought it was better to have individuals  !

identified, based on.their experience and expertise, than to have a list - .,

with empty positions due to incomplete training. The EM&EP Manager i further stated that he had the individuals placed on the list as alternates,'with the intention to catch up on the training when time permitted. .The Deputy AGM stated that although they felt that most o j the individuals could have performed their duties, they could not make that guarantee for all of the individual Following the above conversation, the licensee described-'their planned corrective actions. These corrective actions included bringing the ERO ,

training current and to issue an ERTD that clearly identifies active and I non-active personnel. The licensee indicated that the essential ERD l training was complete with the exception of one individual. Also, the i licensee stated that they intended to proceduralize the data transfer, i control and use of the training and ERO database l The staffing of th'e emergency preparedness organization was also j discussed. The licensee stated that destaffing in the emergency preparedness department was based on.the potential.for receiving an exemption from the annual emergency exercise requirement. The licensee  !

acknowledged that their closure plan identified the need to restaff this '

' area if the NRC did not grant the exemption. The licensee indicated that the problems that were identified represented a lack of management i control and that they were not just; caused by a lack of resources since i they began before the June election. The licensee was asked to comment on their ability to complete train ~ing with the reduced staff levels in emergency preparedness. The AGM stated that they had miscalculated the number of individuals needed in the area of emergency preparedness and that the reduced staff levels had an impact on their ability to recover from the previously' identified training documentation problem Accordingly,2the licensee stated that they had issued an across the board

,Stop Work Order on destaffing and had withdrawn.the request for an s exercise exemptio ;

$

'

? i . _ _ ______---_____-_-_____A

wyg ,

.

-

, ,,

-- <

-

,

,

.4Q *

i ; i (( ~

r s

,-

mg. . .

s

'

r

>ev ..

s

$'"b s , ,

"

[ .The? licensee's'.Manageri Quality <and Safety,$also made a' presentation. He

~ mentioned that the'. 50.54(t)' audit that was performed in 1989 identified Jproblems with the training documentation. . He'also stated that the audit included interviews with a number of individuals'on the ERO and that a

>c ' determination had been made that the individuals could have. performed 2 itheir duties in spite'of the. auditor's inability'to v.erify. training

.c ~through documentatio However,the stated that.the auditorsLdid not +

! investigate.the implications beyond determining _the individuals!~ m technical. competence and, therefore, did'not identify the problems identified'by the inspector.1 Further, he stated that problems with ' i

>

'

emergency preparedness' training were-'also identified in the'1987 and 1988 '

50.54(t)+auditsh The Manager also responded to the comments made by the inspector at the" -

exit ~ interview, regarding the fact-that no one had-initiated a " Potential s ,

A Deviation'from Quality (PDQ)" report.' : He; acknowledged that,this'. issue

-

'had,been.previously identified by the.NRC' Resident Inspectors.. The

'

Managerestated that a' clear direction has now' been sent.to al1 ~

~ Departments and that heihas developed a.new slogan. The new. slogan is

.^g' "When!in; doubt, write:a PCQ."

ts; i, . .

,

'

Jo . (The licensee concluded their presentation by stating that the findings '

,;' 'were' valid,Cthat.they have initiated aggressive corrective actions, that W' itheyLare committed to como11ance and to-the protection of the health and {

. r , ' safety of:tha public. The licensee also stated that management has a

,

_high le. vel of commitment to the emergency' preparedness program and that

'

they would obtain NRC concurrence before making any future changes.

,

r s '

'

After the licenseefconcluded their presentation, they were asked to

> C comment on any other. areas where there may have been " miscalculations"

'

, affecting staffing levels. The AGM responded that he was not happy with- the closure plan in the' area of training., The AGM stated that this area t

had been one area that was cut back too far, too fas The next topic discussed was the licensee's. September 13, 1989,- response tolthe~NRC's September 6, 1989, 50.54(f)' letter. The-scope of this discussion centered on the need to conduct a controlled closure and that the process needed to t,e handled in a formal manner. The area of emergency preparedness was identified by.the AGM as the only issue to be resolve The NRC Enforcement Officer.then_briefly addressed the NRC Enforcement-Policy.

l- -In closing remarks, the Regional Administrator commented that he was

'

. satisfied that the licensee'was acting satisfactoril He reminded the

' licensee that the area of emergency preparedness has a high profile in

' terms of_ safety significance and that now is not'the time to relax. He further stated that if the licensee requests relief in certain areas, l these requests would be considered in' a reasonable manner, with the public's interest considered.

Attachment 1. SMUD Handout - Rancho Seco, NRC Enforcement Conference, September 15, 1989

_ _ _ _ _

k n

1. '

^

.I i

[ f ,I s Y

e

, , h.4 ,, ...~..i: - ie .,

, ..

,

s " " , 99"! 3;lpp '...

'

'

h' l, c,

'

'  !

,

3.j s * , ; ,Q @[, , , '

i y U.'

K'

^

% , *, i - * ATTAQlME2C li ' T l.p ' ' ^~ . i. M .

C. '! 4/

, '

cfM,N.,Y,- '

g,[ NMh.;,em;y , ,

,'

,

[L .

,

. ,,-

'

,

' Nff'.,, ; .

49-k.,.,e 1 t v. . ,-

,

g. .n., .f ;{i r i i

J

'U;4- d).v. s .p, ,f, e ..' q, , * )g g

5 ' '

s

1. I-

',,, . (}

i ' !:;

..

/j g' .1 .3j*4 z

,

< -,/, i "} ) %+

.

' .,

>

\- <\.  : '\ ,

L< l,, , + .

-

I g < - 4 .'3,. -q ,

s" n .

.

' .l._;y }/{,', g, '..,. _ j l f.)%(

- ,

s ,

, ', ,

<

, , j- 't

. ) l,,

, . . . ,

, ,

o

, f .,

<

;, . o- o ,

, i e . > ,

G .: ~f . ; f / [s . El,'s } ). *) - '

.,...,.' * .

~

, 3

. .,

. ,3 ,

, o.,

,-

,'1, .

,.

6i

.

,

-

(, ' %;,

'. ' '

.s .k' '

'

'{ 'lf '.

[1, ,

.. g

,' jai 'Ifnn *

. ,. ,

.i :

U .

- , .  ;, ( 1

3 ,(. . . 2, s... ,,

,'

' i" '

. r , , Vl .

'

0 x'-

-

,

r

, , . .; ,

,

4-

c 9e r=-

/

6\y r5- tq 4 a

-

.

,. ,

y3 o'3:

kN; 4,

, ,

- ,

, , j.I-jp

,

' I',. .f)

• , /. (.

E A

-

fa

.o w~g3y6 ==gg.-=W g/

{.S Q-] +. m ,

.'

,

=n=_=g == == .

.

,

'

, '

• .-- F- , ~ T- --- --,{;p;,,, , ,.

-

(' ;

"-

,

' -

f. - . >

' ,

g"en~=w =9 . EEE ss:g d:- cp4/ )gl'

E I >?4 3,., $a

,/

.. ~lti--

.,l t

l '

. .

.,. ._ i y-D ), . .

'

I[ [ -

,

O Wg  ;

3 gu... + j a

.

,

,

v 7..gp'l -

.

. ,

- .

y,as

- .s.-d# k@ . .:e m m

.!

-

.

-

.

<

I

.

- ,

'

.. .

.i

[1] [jj J' { ,

v

,

,

- . o, ,. ==w mt 1,

,

. . , .

,, 7 .s >

2.sts=%_ i  ; - -

r t g

'

.j? , k s gma

<

, _

c . .

h . .

w > .

n u .x O L'  ; .

. .

L ud;), M G;

,

'

otz= c'

7 20,4 EZO

'

s 2 @e 0 ZWO si .

'

u

.

'

M $%' d,! .

'

1. ,

. 'k

l l

l

4

)

'

.,

e g

f G

,

.

,.

J

• .. .

' .

0, 2-0 r r r r e e e e t l t d t

_ E u e h e n e

u e

C K S B K N n l n

E a i m u a a R D J D

. . P .

E . .

.

.

F . .

. .

. .

. .

N .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

O899 .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

C 1 .

. .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. .

,

T . .

.

5 . .

.

.

.

N 1 r

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

E e . .

.

.

.

Mb m

. . .

.

. . .

.

E

. . .

t e .

.

.

.

.

C

. .

t p .

e

.

n .

R . .

S .

e s

.

.

-

O .

.-

m s m

.

.

F .

.

s e

a r

.

N

- .

g

- n s o s E i o

A s r a t

c P C u t y s d c u R o i

r t

i l

l c

_

N r t s a n

-

t n i u o I D Q C

-

.

.

-

. f

-

'

'

l

- l i

r D

s l o c i a h i

s t

i w

y n -

h i

O S P e R N L r E O h t f o e I

T l a e i v

A e b t L H c O o O l R -

I V a E m u o F n e rg n v f n O A i

t i ct sn E i

- a e n ora i

C m o m st e r e

.

I T S t

s er O l en t p N d t

c ne ee L d u nm oe vt oe A n sr mp l

I T o ri eu emo N c pq r E

-

o e c gr o T t n g

-

t t O e i

e o P r nn gi r n u i n u si id s ar l l i

a aa F At Fh a e a (

2 l o l i

, r D

s n l

e i c i o

u l s t d d ay a e e sh l l

d L h rP e u c a c el A S e h n l c U h t a d u n i

.

el c N e Ra e e s N s l h l i

c sH a cl i AL r s ss r e S r L e el D I

x r a av M R I l E Du n eit l i

s)

D h a r c9 E l K 9 n et Di8s S S Rn y/

l i

r e 8 A e d h2 D /-

TC .

r u 5i s s ser e

sP1 CSI

/m l i a s 1 e p r v h d UY n a e

e De r et n DH i g 6S rl a a NP i r M d g

-

d d e O S o e C 9

-

-

T n en eH 8 CHT o l i

sR p N

E d

e l

e du sN u l o o/

O L V u e c. l nc ch e w1 T EA s t

st v T (1 E

s o an ii e V C (i Dw D -

EH I

F .

R O - - - - -

U E -

L I C 9 9 9 9 9 A N 8 8 8 8 8 F E /1 / / / /

U 6 7 9 6 Q / / /

E 6 6 6 S ~

,

,

'

'

l t

g i

s

- s

- e c

e o r

l r f

-

- o o o P l

a r f L s t e n f

A n b f

o

-

_

r a o o l a

_ U e c )

i s u -

N h 9 i v n n N e d 8 e a g R n / r M i

S AL a 7 s 2 d e d

- L I

s e / n s n I

R e s a i a

M D r i

v 9 c r

E D e t n e w S S r s 9 9 o x e 9 a 8 8 i E

o c / /

t a

i v

T C I

9 t S e 1 2 u d e CS 1 s N r o

1 1 l al e n R UY ,

s e

O I

F l a e vu a l e

DH T 5 c T ( e s s ed l v

NP N 1 o C d r i c eis l e

A t o a rh r O E M e P r n eM e r

e f ocDesL S

CH S n

u E

V r h e

x s o ot c -i T S e r g E O L E J t a

I T u ci n R l s et rl eis nP M i u T EA S f u C l e s a cc S o qe E l iu l

s u or ed A R e n r et et EH n el u R DeR rf r n PxE az n R Y o d d D A ri e ae O l e oam i

U R t a f h C P -g t t zd pme r L A l l

o Sc H n c c in or l l I

A N e c

D E gr i

u u aa co p F

I M n k cl l

N nte d

n d

n ml nF m rl I I I

L a ar i

N i

r n o o or i

E C LD A Be C C FD - -

R L P s m P a m m m ( _

'

I l

' ,-

s

- '-

• n

' T R

D t

u s a u E t t

.

o-( S t a

t y g S n r .

o d o i n d g i et c f f i e s n t

a d e a i f

e i f c d r t ti f i G ai S n c a f en i

N .D t l y di e S d a I

N l

e O I c -

e u I

A t

cn e o R

E

tf i

O u s e q

i d D e R R R rh r p f

.

E s o u i T o cl e Ano f y de O D n Te g o l l p R i

n Pi t a o E N i Eac g ml e A

l ee k c n r e ns a l

af i

i k o v t e e E n o n o r ul i

c f d l p

C sp t

na a t N r s y nu t r r o

s e

m9 A ee l k AQ y p s o8 c/0 n

o PR e e n N

i e )d i l

t E ey ( n t a R od3 c T vc w 4a d p e/ e S i t n

-

t s t p N T ce d 5. g d i

d e e11 s e e r g I

A N ag t 0n t u r y n n r i

A i

E a 5n a t M V e d Tab i

C I i i i E

-

t miAr a t i

A u R O

1 E I n QT n Q A - N R F I E O - - - - - - -

E C 9 9 9 9 9 9 1 N 8 8 8 8 8 8 /

E / / / / / / 9 U 1 5 5 7 6 8 -

Q /

4 / 9 E 6 2 S ~ /

f L

- ,

~

N O

TI N I

SO

-. OI T P A YI C S B F I L

E DA S S RU OQT U

A C EFT A

B ROS A

T A E Y E S C E N Y D A N S O RO O B E N HP T S R A y G O E T R C S A E SP LE E E M E E R I D ERTD N

D =

E R R E A F S

P N A

E R R T P L A

Y U N L C A U A

N M D E =

VI G L I

D L R GS G E NI R I

E ND S DE NA Y /C M N R I

I NB B SN E I O F SA AC I

A D AD RE AT R LN TR RA T OCET C

D EFT ROA

-

,

(

'

'

, i!f t  ; l

2_

_ 0

.

e

.

_

_ i v

.

t c

A e -

.

v s s n i

t e e o c s N G e A s

a a N s

-

b b d I

a -

a a n N b n t I

a o t a a a A t a

N D D e R D d y v T n O f i

i t

f a R l p c D o E A N l e f m s o v o i

s e A t r i t i n c e o f i

E o s A s t t e S u n C c -

l s y N t e y e N d a i f

O n d

-

n t i

d A Tj n b t I e n n l i

i a a n T r r a o b y N N t e C u s a l E E a d A c r r a

M e D i l

o e e T c E r P m N S n g yD g t r l c

S a l

rT V n n e e I

E n eR I

i o T A S d

i i

s pE T

C i n c l

b -

t a

M S u g

u o- E a i s g h f

r r e A pon R n t n T z n O e o R i o o p D

-

R Y t c ol O O l

a s L

Tl E R a / t e C R r e e Re A u e n E u R t Enn N q l p en D d o e r o E g e u e os u sr n I i M d t N n c l I

a l u

l i

ae o i a o u r L

E n M Fp N

i B

r r r v sse i

A P T E iP R L P u a a P a m a a a

-

l

n

,o

.

_ e l

u d

- h e

.

c e S d

_ o l

i l

M r

D g

.

-

-

-

-

f

.

i n

o l e e

.

u i s

- s f d c s e e

.

.

.

r

.

-

l

-

o r R g r

r e l

o t e x r Y n g n E t o S i

f f

e n R c N n f .

d l o A

i r o s a c r O e e

-

e t u -

M T t

n s se es v I

T t n

s e c r

s e n n

t n

M N ee cg i

a C e D u g e A o n A U E M

ms e s n

e n a

W n n s a r m S e e S gce l u h e E V

o o R

h c f o g S ao c s a

.

f E nr n si c I

T r e

r e f n r n S aP i

n er ge C d d o a e a S m-g no ot snx E

O r

O r l P i v

m A R i

t n a ein t a ch eaE R i

Y O k k

.

e y W n R

tain czir e nu cla C r o

r o m c

n w

-

e A u ar eao n un l

W W t i e a h

t N qT e - rgs el a D m g r g I

t n E p p r e

d n M d d a sORPA N o o m h e r

I L

E ia n n P o- - - -

N t S

t S C o

E mitW t

A S R L P m a P a a a m a a

, -

y ' g

-

)

.

.

. :

)

'

-

.

7'

1@

. 2-2 .0R 1

.

- .

-

-

.

.

n i

o t

. s t a

t l

n u e s

M e m m A R u a R c l e r t o n g G i d D n o O u/ s o r R A d s P P r r e n P o P o Y E c e

i t

T d .c I

L oR c e A A e g w S n e e .

U i i

v v Q o n r e

i t

h i

a t c

c r n e r

nT I r

a o R - - C m e

-

(

-

. f( -

'

.

! , l ll l l1 j1 ll il lllllll

f;;)l l!!ii )I !! i l

.

-

.

7, . + .

J

-

6,

2-

0n

-

-

-

i c

l b

u P

f o -

y t

f e

a S d S N e e t t c d n O a n n e I

S i

t i i a a m U i n l p h t

i

.

L m t

m C d s o l

a N

i n e m l

a o C H o O V i t

o C C c f e A t

o t r

a d n e e n e s i v t t i o m g t c

i t e n c g i e r

m e a d r m t n

i n o o o r a F C C P M e a e a a

-

f

i ll 1lt