ML20134P358

Notice of Violation from Insp on 960929-1109.Violation Noted:Five Required Channel Checks for Fuel Handling Area Pool Sweep Exhaust Radiation High High Instrumentation Not Performed;Work Order 00159564 Not Revised

ML20134P358
Person / Time
Site:	Grand Gulf
Issue date:	11/25/1996
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20134P349	List: IR 05000416/1996017 ML20134P347 ML20134P358
References
50-416-96-17, NUDOCS 9611290053
Download: ML20134P358 (2)

Text

_ _. _

H o

i ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Entergy Operations, Inc.

Docket No.:

50-416 Grand Gulf Nuclear Station License No.:

NPF-29 4

j During an NRC inspection conducted on September 29 through November 9,1996, two

}

violations of NRC requirements were identified. In accordance with the " General l

Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," NUREG-1600, the j

violations are listed below:

l A.

Technical Specification Surveillance Requirement 3.3.6.2.1 states, in part, to perform a channel check every 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> for secondary containment isolation l

instrumentation, which includes the fuel handling area pool sweep exhaust radiation

]

high high instrumentation, i

j Contrary to the above, from September 20-22,1996, five required channel checks

~

for the fuel handling area pool sweep exhaust radiation high high instrumentation were not performed in that operators read and recorded data from incorrect alternate instrumentation.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement 1) (50-416/96017-01).

t i

B.

- Technical Specifications 5.4.1.a states, in part, that written procedures shall be j

implemented covering the applicable activities recommended in Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, Appeadix A, February 1978. Paragraph 9.e of Appendix A to Regulatory Guide 1.33 recommends written procedures for the control of 3'

maintenance.

l Procedure 01-S-07-1," Control of Work on Plant Equipment and Facilities,"

I Revision 31, Step 6.7.6 states, in part, " Changes to the work package will be handled by one of the following three methods: (1) Revision, (2) Correction, or (3) Minor correction. A revision to the work order is classified as an i

increase / decrease in the scope of the work."

?

Contrary to the above, on October 28,1996, Work Order 00159564(clean and 3

inspect 480 volt Motor Control Center '1831) was not revised to reflect a decrease in work scope to only inspect the motor control center.

t

{

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement 1) (50-416/96017-02).

i 1

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Entergy Operations, Inc. is hereby required to l

submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region IV,611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400, Arlington, Texas 76011, and a copy to the NRC Resident inspectors at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply j

should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each 9611290053 961125 PDR ADOCK 05000416 G

PM e

w.

2-violation: (1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the

~

violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Your response may reference or include previous docketed correspondence, if the correepondence adequately addresses the required response, if an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.

Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Because your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), to the extent possible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be placed in the PDR without redaction. However, if you find it necessary to include such information, you should clearly indicate the specific information that you desire not to be placed in the PDR, and provide the legal basis to support your request for withholding the information from the public.

Dated at Arlington, Texas this 25th day of November 1996 l

j

,