ML20084Q349

Requests That J Keppler Respond to Listed Issues Re Evaluation of Facility Completion.Caseload Forecast Panel Evaluation of Plant,Taking Into Account Issues Discussed, Also Requested

ML20084Q349
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	05/10/1984
From:	Sinclair M SINCLAIR, M.P.
To:	Palladino N NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
References
NUDOCS 8405210221
Download: ML20084Q349 (7)

Text

- ... - , . -- . _ _ ...

i 5711 Summerset Drive  ;

Midland, MI 48640 l May 10,1984 PRINCl_ PAL S_TAFF g gpN P  ;

D/RA 9  !

Chairman Nunzio Palladino Nuclear Regulatory Commission RA

?AO

(

SCS N

1717 H Street SGA AL .-

Washington, D.C. 20555 ENF File lu  !

t

Dear Chairman Palladino:

i If you are ever to get the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NBC) house in order, l then you cannot allow the kind of actions that Mr. James Keppler has taken on the  ;

Midland nuclear plant issues go unquestioned. I Last Friday, at a public meeting in Midland, Mr. James Keppler, Regional IH NRC director, stated that he believed Consumers Power Co.'s (CPCo) projected  ;

schedule for 11nishing Unit 2 of the Midland nuclear plant by December,1986, was I

" attainable". He then said that there would be no Caseload Forecast Panel evaluation of the plant's completion by the NRC at this time as has always occurred in the past l when the utility has made its forecasts. Needless to say, the utility has never been l right.  !

Thus, at a time when an objective evaluation of possible construction completion is most needed by the public, he is deliberately withholding it.  !

He has made this statement without confronting significant problems at this nuclear plant that are a matter of record, and that not only raise questions about

whether the plant is licensable, but whether the plant can be completed at all.  ;

I Before Mr. Keppler could have, with any degree of integrity, told this community f

- that the CPCo completion schedule was " attainable", he should have had answers to i at least the following serious problems, some of which I had in my April 2d~~1984 l l

statement to the Commission. Some of these problems are insurmountable in the  !

i time period from now until December,1986.

1) The diesel generator building (DGB) does not meet FSAR requirements, accord-ing to the report of the special task force selected by the NRC to study it, the Brookhaven  ;

Task Force. Previous to their study, Dr. Ross Landsman, chief soll inspector at i Midland, and the Army Corps of Engineers, consultant to the NRC at Midland, both

,. stated the building is inadequate. . This makes that building unlicensable, if the NRC ..

l follows its regulations. {

l

. 2) During underpinning, the soils bearing capacity under the concrete piers [

was found to be 1/2 the bearing capacity that was set out in the original analysis--  :

the basis on which the engineering design for the underpinning was made. This is %d k '

causing significant unanticipated problems on site. b 8405210221 840510

~

MAY 141984 i PDR ADOCK 05000329 9 PDR

Page Two

~

Chairman Nunzio Palladino May 10,1984 f

3) NBC standards for underpinning the auxiliary building called for holding the movement of the building to 1/8" tolerance. Yet there are now so many cracks ,

developing in this building, that it has been necessary to establish criteria for which ones are to be mapped and reported to the NRC. (Stone and Webster Public Meeting, l February 9,1984).

.4) Almost at the sams time that the Construction Completion Plan (CCP) was ,

approved last October, there were 9 Stop Work Orders that affected all safety sys-tems because of design and document problems. This held up its implementation until the end of February,1984

5) At the present time, only 2% of the CCP has been implemented. l These are just a few of the many serious problems at Midland that make it questionable whether the plant can be completed. If Mr. Keppler says publicly that

)

CPCo's December,1986, schedule is attainable, isn't it essential that he explain i how he will resolve these intractable issues in recommending that an operating license be given for this plant?

j A good example of Mr. Keppler's own predictive powers can be found in his hearing testimonyon May 3,1983, a year ago, in which he thought.that the CCP would  ;

be approved within 3 weeks of that date and that within 6 months of the date they would know how it was working (see Attachment 1). That would have been last October--the date when the CCP was finally approved. One year later, the project is only 2 months into its implementation.

In their lawsuit terminating their steam contract, the Dow Chemical Co. charged ,

that CPCo kept 2 sets of books on construction completion and costs,-one for the -

public and Dow, and the other, an internal set, that reflected reality. Given these l ' charges, why is Mr. Keppler so ready to believe CPCo at this late date on their construction completion date? l

, Dow also charged CPCo with having the knowledge that the soils were poorly I

compacted sitewide in 1977, and that, in fact, the soils' testing techniques were  ;

deliberately altered to provide favorable results (see Attachment 2).

l. Mr. Keppler should explain why he did not vigorously pursue this information l- which was also disclosed during the hearings several years ago. He should also  ;

explain to the Commission and to the public how such a key sitewide problem can

~

l be overcome and corrected to get this nuclear plant on line by December,1986 i In my statement before the NRC on April 28, 1984, I asked that the Commission l personally involve themselves in assisting the public to get a realistic assessment -

of the construction completion date for the Midland nuclear plant, if indeed it can  ;

be completed. i i

, -, -, , - ,---.o a -,r .---., , - - - - , , - - - - - , - - , _ , . , , _ . , - , - - , a, , . - , - , , . , , , . , , ---w--.,,- -

I

. PEgo Three Chairman Nunzio Palladino May 10,1984 r r

It is hard for us to believe that you have sanctioned and that you support Mr.

Keppler's position that he stated here in Midland on May 4 I am asking you to require Mr. Keppler to reply to the issues discussed here l and to explain to you and to the public how they can be resolved, j I am asking you again to give us an objective Caseload Forecast Panel evaluation of the Midland nuclear plant that takes into account the issues we have set forth here, ,

f

= I deeply appreciate your attention to this problem.  :

Yours sincerely, [

r I

Mary Sinclai MS/jt f Enclosures (2) cc: Commissioner Victor Gilinsky Mr. James Keppler l Commissioner James Asselstine .5*e ,Worr~d/cg/n e-Commissioner Frederick Bernthal Sem . 6ay/ 8 / ey  ;

Commissioner Thomas Roberts ,,,,,m,,  % A /hos/d Judge Charles Bechhoefer  %,4,6 //. //d e.s Judge Frederick P. Cowan , gg ;;7/,,, r, e F-

- Judge Jerry Harbour Secretary, U.S. NRC  !

Michael I. Miller, Esq.

William Paton, Esq. j Mr. Wendell Marshall

• Ms. Barbara Stamirls .

James E. Brunner Governor James Blanchard Attorney General Frank Kelley Roger Fischer, PSC i Joe Tuchinsky, Michigan Citizens Lobby i Lynne Bernabei, GAP l L

i i

i i

ATT ACIIMENT I !

A n m) ..

\

l

, /7 p 3 15674l 1

be met in order for you to provide reasonable ,

2 assurance that the Midland plant 3

can be completed consis tent with regulatory requirements. In your 4

.1 5

opinion, how long will it take for these programs '

to be implemented so that you can judge th eir 6 i Effectiveness?  ;

7

[ A

, 8 would say that we'd probably be in a 8

good position to judge their ef fectiveness within six months. -

10 11 12 i

13 14 15 i l

{ 16 I

I 17 !

l 18 I i

19 i 1 20 l

\ G l 21 l

22 6

23 24 25 4

.. ~

/ C6iS 1 -

Q Within six months. Within six m~onths of \

i 2

the beginning of the program?

3 A

Well, within six months from now. 1 4

Q But some of the programs.have not yet been 5

either begun'or implemented, is that correct?

6 g a 7

That's correct. But I believe that the I- .

i

-j I believe that the staff is close to approving the $

8

-d IDVP-ICVP programs, and I think that Region III I 9

should be in a position to -- well, let me qualify  ! [

10 it by saying ths'. depending upon the acceptability 11 f of the answers provided by Consumers Power Company, N i;

12 g which the staff really hasn't reviewed yet', that 7

13 a if the ' ques tions that we've asked are answered we

• should be in a position to approve the construction 15 '

completion program in another three weeks or so. x 16 l ,

3 That will give us a period of five months f 17 e

or so to observe how things are going, and I would y' 18

?

like to think that that would be a--- at least give p 19 us an indicator as to how things are going. 1 20 '

4 21 But, by my answer, I'm not proposing that 22 we would stop any overview programs at that time, or anything else. No qualifica tions on that '

23 statement.

24 )

25 Q But in six months you could determine whether the programs are performing as you would

2 l

156' I expect or as you hope?

2 A That's my guess at t'h i s point.

3 Q l tiow , how long do you think i t would take

( 4 i a construction verification program to determine 5

the problems at Midland?

6 A To do the whole program? Oh, I have no 7

idea at the moment.

8 0 Well, given your experience at Zimmer and 9

your es timate of the comparison between-the two 10 plants, how long would you estimate that process 11 would take simply to identify the exi5 ting problem?

12 A

I can't say in case of Midland because 13 it's really a comparison of apples and oranges right 14 now. '

.15 Q Has your staff ever given you an 16 indication of how long they believe it will t ak e ?' i 17 A I' No.

18 Q Now, in answer to one of Judge Bechhoefer's 19 questions,you mentioned that Midland would be --

in  !

any comparison of plants in Region III would be 21 considered poor in QA performance. I believe that '

22 i was your tes timony ?

" l MR. PATON: I object.

24

{

MR. MILLER: I don't believe that's a fair 25 characterization of his tes timony . I believe he said ,

1

23 "

1 15677 it would be one of the lower plants.

2 BY MS. BERNABEI:

3 Q

4

..\ .

Okay, one of the lower plants?

A Yes.

5 Q

6 Now, you're familiar *with the Commission meeting in the 7 summe r of 19 82 in which the Commission examined 8I of -- well, the quality assurance performance 8

quality assurance questions with the

( staff, are you not?

10 l Quality assurance problems in the industry.

11 A Yes.

12

,c Q (Aj/ I3 And, at that meeting, five plants were mentioned as th e five --

I I4 I it --

don't know how'd you say

• 15 I

five bad plants in the United States in terms l

16 of QA performance, is that correct?

A In the 17 testimony by the NRC to 1

[ Congressman Udall 18 months 18 l

ago there were five plants that were singled out as 19 having major quality assurance difficulties.

O 21

! And Midland was one of those plants?

A 22  !

That's correct. 1 Q

n i Mr. Keppler, I believe your testimony was f i

th a t 24 *

-- do you believe the third party overview ,

g i

15 programs should -- well, I believe the f -- one of

• the -- well, two of the major factors in giving n

i

' LE3AL l'EPAXTMENT ATTACHMENT 2 t,,,,,,, o t3,,,,,, o,,,, , os,,,

, r r,,. I,=, F,.e.c.. x se. e, and GearrelCounsel J E 8. -

Jul.e A Cenham floge Judd L 5ecen H Rechoed Cheenbees

. ., .J hh ANea S Bese O K Petereen Chades D Dewsaa Jenses w Dennpeer

] t l'

[ Wallmeat E W.eaec John P Dicke#

1 e Meaet'ed Aseerar s Cathetene M GWoon N' fnq e3 U George F Helt wUIII WIIJ Robert J Byers Lewone H Horesany Howerd E Clark Susan flerk Secoedy E Hagea Wayne A Kirkey Devid A Make6enis Front R Knea 3resor Arturarfs James W Keessler Frederic A Lubheet General offices: 212 West Michigan Avenue. Jackson, MI 49201 e ($17) 788 0550 #"

• rt D McCe'eum wraer B o.,ect o.al Number e (517) 788-1257 '

Re0,"u"fe' e,

.t.

%ncent P Prevenser David R Rosd Gregory A Sendo April 30, 1984 i';'u ,"**'*

Dennis L %glione Theodore J Veget Mecheel G Wdson Attorarys Dr. Frederick P. Cowan Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Panel 6152 N. Verde Trail Apt. B-125 Boca Raton, FL 33433 Mr. Charles Bechhoefer, Esq. Dr. Jerry Harbour Atomic Safety & Licensing Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Panel Board Panel U.S. Nucicar Regulatory Commission U.S. Nucicar Regulatory Commission East-West Towers East-West Towers Room E-413 Room E-454 ,

4350 East-West Highway 4350 East-West Highway Bethesda, MD 20014 Bethesda, MD 20014 Gentlemen:

Consumers Power Company has become aware of apparent discrepancies in records of several borings made during the 1977 investigation of the settlement of the administration building at Midland. I have attached copies of records illustrating the differences. The documents attached have previously been provided or made availabic to the parties either in the soils hearings or by inclusion in responses to questions under 10 CFR 50.54(f) or 1

in the FSAR. At least two of the boring records in question were introduced into evidence by Mrs. Stamiris in the soils proceedings in 1981. (Stamiris Ex. 27, identified at Tr. 4290, introduced August 13, 1981 at Tr. 4339 and Stamiris Ex. 19 ID at Tr.' 3437, introduced August 13, 1981 at Tr. 4339) a e > -- - , , ,

2 The apparent discrepancies in each instance relate to a parameter used in the " standard penetration test." The Board may recall that the l t

i standard penetration test is carried out by driving a sampler into the ground with known force and counting the number of blows needed to penetrate a .

, i pre-determined distance in the soil. The number of blows is referred to as the " blow count," which provides an indication of the density of the soil. A

[

t force is administered te the sampler by dropping a weight attached to the boring mechanism from a specified height, referred to in the boring records as the " fall." (See the space designated " sample hammer weight / fall" five f boxes down on left of boring records.) Some of the versions of the boring records show a fall of 18 inches; others show a fall of 30 inches. I am l i

advised that the applicable ASTM specification would call for a fall of 30 t i

inches.

4 The Company has reached no conclusions as to the cause or significance, j if any, of the differences in the records, and the matter is under investigation.

I Very truly yours, ,

. )nry /En% \

i James E. Brunner  !

CC .0L/0M Service List f r

5 .

t l

1 l

, . + . . . . - , ,_ . - . . . _ , . - . . _ , , - . _ . . . . - _ , , , , _ . . . . . . . . . , . . . , , _ , , _ . _ _ . . . _ , - .

v. _ ._ ._

• ~~~'

B 0iMMG L0G  : u:= m r= l.~2

~

.1111 . .

i-"- ' ~ -

E.

l r Evapcra :: 6 A=rihary tity. l gt 7,,,tg3 g.gA l... ,,. g , , , , ,

.- . _...... . ~ ..

.,ne.  ; .~ .. .. . . . . _ _ . . . . . . . . . . . .

%.5 6/25/77 f .*2 5 /7 7 sine'e:cn Srill:.nc) CMI-55C 5* 1 j ,, ,j,,,,e,.,,

g, es.

.e..........,e, .... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . ........... -

14 631.C feg N:tes ,

............... g ... ... . . . . . . . . . .

140 lb/3r :nches i None J. P. Givens

, ..: PC MCTa atsoM

! l h,* I

' .1, h.. .

EM I*

g

.%!. l !; * ..

...u.. 7.UU.',

t3 I

r I ........-w- .....u.. ....

3,,.., , , ,

i y [ I * '-...".. .

I pll gi t;; 2.;

t  : 1-g 1 : *

• Sn.e 0

, 7, s.

9M 0-3.5* silty Sand, tan trill)  !* auger to 6.5* w ."

f 1SP/SM) Drilling v t.. . ja us s l 629.5

3. 5" .:h .,.

3,3,4,3. Cen- e t e raf.n.et #' *#A**"* ""f N I* '**'

55118 '8 I 3C 15 1 19 $11 3 p1 4.5-6.5

• Claycy ran:' to sandy Clay, y .: gray, ve.y sti*f, slight te low ]* .] f *

• 7 [f.y

' P.5 )

55116113123 12 11 112 q' i 2, Fla s ticity, slight moisture t sc/C:.) g g,4*5 ,p yse - 8 623.5 5 ** '#.' IIllII e #

ssL16 16i 33 10 15 l 18 3 9.5-12.0' clayey silt, brnwn, ped f,' I"4 10 - flIlo Hll N= 4. .t- TSr 621.0 12 ,",

pebbles to 1/2 , rust stain. Iow Mf -

55 fit l 1s 8 30

- 10 15 115 Tireisture. lov .>1a sticity fe) frill) ep; 4,$. .sr 12.0-15.5' silty Clay, trown vita 04E-4/

sslit ilsl Ss 10 21 37 15 5 trace gray, lov plasticit3, low [ c, 617.5 15.1 gt .imoisture.' pebbles to 1/t*, hard:C1.) $ gn:.u -sand) ssh16815 56 '13 24 32 615.0 It . - 6.0' sand, gray, meh md 076=4.5+ TSr 55l18 e

10 17 614.0 ,

vf---crained, " erols t, trace silt, very f-T5 r-121 32 15 612.5 20.. / -

12.0-16.0 3rown sandy Clay, vit.r- W =8.5+ TSr [W l.

=

i i__ =

{.seemssandf CI.) reiln

..34 ---

- b'aW s 55115 121 2s 111 ! 14 115 608.5 2,/

' jilt.0-20.5' Grav r m-d . de-se (s?) (Fill

• sN u 7"

20.5-24.5' szlry Clay, brown wata ~ :[ ops.4 .g7 -* h.k7

^

31 '3. reddish tint very st ff (C:.) 5 m pA 55118 121 43 10 1 21 22 607*0 26 .

t

• 605.0 28 -

22.0' 3rown freddish tint een elf rill.1 w{e a7 'enu~* fj;ing on ved

• 2

'L e av ssils 121 52 15 24 35 l24.5-26.0' r.andy Clay to clayey i ' 30 -

.l sand, with seams of sand, stones rEo'T 6 inch (rill) ;oh [. h.. (,I*rod v3 # g ,4 j

eslls 'Is l 5e 12 1 13 45 26.0-26.C* E11ty sand, dark gray, f,h. r 6 '

~

~

LA =' m&

' h,2 , dense, trace to lattae crganics E .' --

s s .' 2 r 12 EE- 62 BE 600.0 33 - .

I g..o!(sy) (71113 35 - "p' h 28.0-31.5* silty e.,g,9 ~., 1 0'

• WO 13817 12 Pi* a7 clay, brown, hard be:ause water P1 g., ,,ashin g 8t. u?:

596.5 36.1 s C 1,(rill) up sides and out r* ri8L

{29.5 Sand sear 31.5-33.0* Sandy Clay, brown, hard, hole'

_(cL) tan sand. seas at 12.0' Op10 (sand) r)p11 4.5+ Tsr

'Spuo) 33.0-36.J' rine to medau= Sand,

, brown, very dense, trhee clay, low Opl3 OP12 (sand)

(sand) 4.[T

. reisture (sP) Opl4 (sand) '(

- Total Depth 36.5*

rievation Botton 596.5 Water at while drilling

't.4' hM water level at 5.1' af ter drilling.

'bM

.AT}

or. es L.os

Lev

= pl/f7

.c

.m 95316529

• • '* ~

....s.......... - * * ' - *

._~.

e..............-... Evaporator and Auxiliary *oller Building E

[. :

2A.210-153 M V2sior. le

, s . a. , ,_ _

C~- *

. s .

Dis =e1 Generstar Building l 5 5186 E305 l 90* l g,g,

. . . . . ..n. . .m . ..

( Ab:31 i 9/29/77 9/30/77 Singleton

.....n m

< i 3 , ,,

CME-550

.,.."....n. 5 .a. g.a.

31.5' ,

M.A. N.A* 12 N.A. 629.4 See notes M.A.

r 140 1t/30 in. None Jerry B. Givens

. e

• PEfetTR AT60M r:

! i g : nows .

I i g.: ;r  ::

.I s

g. .  : y .:

g g .

it j.i f1*

3 g Lp i t t 629.4 0

- 8 - - - - -

• 0-4.5' Silty to sandy Cle1, gray, 5" suger to 20.5',

slight to low plasticity, (CL)(rill) set easing, besar 17 10 11 624.9 45 yJ 4.5-7.4' sand, tan, mediw's dense, drilling with 4' lS 1. 5 ' 0. 9 ' 21 g _ tricone roller slightly moast (till) (SP) bit and recirc-L ig1.a E 34+ 10 to 24/4 622.0 7.4" .

I ulating water.

621.4 8" y,7.4-s* cenerete mudmat 55 L . 5' O.F 16 5 5 11 - 4-25.5' silty to sandy Clay, gray, t 1 = 4 TSr little gravel, low moist. Iow Op 2 (sand) ,

as 1. 5' 0. S* 31 16 17 14 . i plasticity, very stiff to hard (CLlop 1. sar ple (till) breaks up at 3.5 55 L . 5' O . 6- 26 10 10 16 . 5 TSr 15" 0o 4 = 4.5+ TSr 55 1. 3- o.T 47 10 22 25  ; T_ qp $ . ,,,pg,

. - crumbles, low 55 1.5 1.2 65 15 29 36 . ,2, moisture 20"* Op 6 = 4.5 TSr ss A.a A.0 33 16 Jb JJ g op 7 = 4.5 TSr

, , [ [ op 8 = 4.5+ TSF ss 1.> A.9 as 30 JJ 33 . 9 23-24.2' Sear of clayey 5:nd, with no 9 (tio) .

603.9 d*53 [ trace organics, grayish brown 24.2' Tan, medium sand sear, low 4.5. TSr Op 10 (sand) ss 1. 5' O.f 107 30 44 63 pid } mois t.

jk-- Op 11 (sand) 55 1. 5' G .6' 113 Ja 45 64 30 l

Wiin-U medium 25.5-31.5' Silty Sand, brown, grained, wet, very dense Hole caving in ss 1. o' c.r 132+ 44 102 e97., n . s. rWG ($m at 21' so used 3/4 bag quick cel

• tottom of boring at 31.5' I t'ater level at

. 10.4' after

. drilline.

~

Hole backfilled with soil after

. c ot. ole tien.

.3 d ,

..m.,-.....

.~

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ete el ceneraser evilding n .

l  !

Revision 13 6/82 i

D.1-319 4 - - _ -,, - - - , , - - - _ , . , - - . - , - - - . - , - - , _ _ - . - , - --- - - - - , _ - ,. , . .. . ..

BORING LOG l neot.u o ocuru r w sl722.ol i il o

loissee. acnw.- or atoa.l.-. -.s. ci s c. c. so c so-

. . .. . . . . l.. _,

imr:sec.ou ,f.~ .... ... .....

, ..... ,i...........

7 s/zo!77 eiesIn s. . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . , . . . . . , ca-sso s~ l ----- gi.s-l / 2. -

(*7..').4- ($ EE No a-ES C o t..)

anu.ve.cwews no w/n - l o ou e

, s. : . . . m o. . .

.i: . a -. . . . . . . .

..:: i 1. ,1 '::

i i  : .

..~.

'l,[** 1I I: . : "I (.s Z3. 4

-Q' ' ,La'r . O L: W o*u* :; .s e Y.4L) f*' dt a c. m ' *

! r v ~

• a *** * * : ' *.

A o '~KY, M SL '

f%

Q_ l' 7./ GA

., c. C ,, ., _ _

a. .

W .*: 1.5' C..* * \ 2.1 l 17 l/0 l tl *Y l(,2+.f h'Y.1 *M+ 5 '~ 7 ** ' # ' ~ D . T*o !'EO' V**

C/t S*N A* , S G Dr.eLs us C. W *f

%!) , . . , , . T~~# s

1. E',**~f k. U!LL) (AP)t"3C +" 78/=:eN

' ::Y.'.I2 T.C. g .:s is : s .:. .s .n. ' s tC eto si'.s"g,Z2. 6'*

.__ - 'V "..'.."W c , c ,. . . ,,,,.7

. 3 :.L Cof. ..

s a g g,s..-'sc.. . t a e5 tg si eG t.t.4. gg,., m y .. , g, S . ,,u ,.7 :,3,,,, w ,

, . . s . .'7is.n cr, s. .r ss a.u vst, sow naisi. n"o W W -~

Rwnow nn /.E'ec.f t 3l .

l !! t / 7 6 14

_v

- W.& i%L .=,wo e W PL(s':?!L cq t!*y, Vdf.,.f $71.4 7.$'

s . <

, Z13l/.5 sc.t 2.0 l ic e tc t I: ~~~ v4 /, op ,*i,y.a. 7: ,

'$.. C '.s:11. C't.C'* C. 7 l / 3 t. Z%.t'l [ \ MS'J Q o.'*;3 x k s b l

.M se t.s u cl

'O

s e n . .

Z'stst.C't!.L'; G C l /S l 2. l 3 f a Q.

..e e

~~

n 7' 3.573

) , e s . s e s >

~ ~~~ ~

W

.u.

/'

• Op @ x ,,g,5+

r.i v-'

Z's:ltS'i :c'5 57 lt& lLCl3;

. . A,y.a' 'et #

Q p s's - e t :st n p

' /.%,3 z.tr e4.n. 5cr*c.nuoc c: , e,= 5cd.k to yey seue RQ_A*t[v l .

Wssio.i ei o.t 50 itol33lzS a V.g. :Tvs. r.* trist'2 Mv.A1

- . rres Mtarver :s .r 1.v

• Sc o.g.::.

n * . .

a ., .._

t :: s t.C' lo. '.s's 1o 7 l ? a e .: :. l 0 3

~'

g,y L42:.s. 31.s't ,=

n.rte,:n~o sso g

wn, l qp ar0 = 4.g-g I , a i i i . . us imraiseat t: 4,ws y g

yca y psy.,sg'?2A7' 4 5 re W S$;**.5'l6.Lo's //.5 s 3 & l .<.' 2 l .'. +. .

.i' .~. p t's es) 4 b:l..on.,:; ict ? . - .a:.l .gg7,g & . % 'Tc TA t. D E? rti = 3 /. C'  ?.3

• 8 'U%

9 F 2 (7,0 * *M l -

st. errm- =,.o 9, * ,, c=,,n ,

~ A Op.dll(CAND j .

lic:.E c, v.a c.,

• 80 z. S ' s o u

. 2l.4 2A G #;is

~

C. et.

0033 I

- wA rce i.11. "

t  : l . A r 10.4 A Fr

• J h8/4LiA/G, i

i l

l

, j

.b H ot.E 8A c-Eft {

1 d vira c o u.

1 ure. cou

,~ P!..T s'~/ O s)

'. l a i i

! i 3 e+  !

I " 95316874 1 j

1 i i

...m.....

J , . . . . .

. . . . ...... , . . ... . . . . , . . -. . l . oin.m a s.,., s.,, , , ,,. . _ .g w,

i. , o

. _ _ . ...i. ,... _ .

..--...--.--..........-q 1 I l I-I

n , g g3 p g eg n *-**** 3~..  ; . ... . . . . ,

L. O L2 - y.:::A*: , rar.: . *.'.;;"  :-*:..!C

• I

,' O V I". t is L2 1 1

.. g . - ...* e......... . . . . .

ese; ntnt :::: S ild: t ' I fl3E IIII  ! 9?* l a 1 g* l 9f;gr..'e<!;/**ay  ! ., tete.. It.sc.a . . . . .* .. .t3; a ,

y;

. . . . . . . . . , . . ............***".*.*.~.... l..-.%......... , . .. ......

. !1 . l (29.4 1 Se,e n::es  !

, , _ . . . . . . . g...~..-...... g Je rrv D. f: vens 140 13. / It inanes I *isnc 1

...j.. e j PCsecTe af so.s slows .

.: Ti ..".

...l ..;.

.;,. *; j ; !.;. . i r

. *a***'"..*~-.**=

..~.....w a

.3

.1 g

.t: .;;.

! .;. l: ' *

. . 429.4 o _

. m , .. ..n., c: as.. . a ,. . n. .u e, ..

l l j l ,. := .:ss m tv. ,= ,,, = .e, =a.n,.

w., 4,,an,.

,,.., , . . _ .. t ling y;y

.. e *.t1 .s .5,.. san med = cense.

55 11.e.. .. ;. 2 . , g- p . .

,a..

a ... m;;;9 tr m i :s>>  :::

4. e.te , '.uvatir w us: ..

3.. 2: te :4u . . ..n,

.. v :

- ss u.4i:.. ...

a  :: , c....

0,

.., p 3 .

-'. . - - -- + - e : t - e t

.:y se su.=y :., . ,: y. c. . . .,

ss . sic. .

. 10

,.1 ea--.s

• s==ve.. ~ .e.:g ss icity. ve:y g 1 gg.

.= m : . :sm

.. r..>  :.si n . u i : i 24 ,

3g;g (E13'07 3

• sag) brea.ks up a

.

• I SS T 5iC.s. 26 a AG e ;" . 6 ( .g~ IIT

- e . ' 15 OD 4 = 4.5 ah p.at..se .. * *

• i *s 4 as f6 Op 5 = sa :p

. CTO:21e s , 1

&& 6.hal.a. ei . 11 1 2 5 0 .M . .

ncis tu.re

. 20 07 C = 4.1

&& p.a,..., a. . .s , .2 g 4.

- 7- CP i = 4.1

• as a..a p .., as

.. . 4. e 42 77 3 24.2' fea:P ef clayey sand, with = f )..

4.3. -

603.9 d*5p e9 trace 4.:' c ga..

Tan. cs. =ediumgrayasssaad a:c.n sea., :W 3; 1C',and('

55 IL.S 10.t* 1C7 e 3; I 44 t 62 ) yg D *

• I ' ""'I sa I.a h.. ..a e an , 4>. .a $ N j$... :b'$ ;.3. sul:y sa-c. :: ,n.

3..

3: J.av' .T

m. 4 ic ' i 337.3  ::.1'Q*C. riedium trm grained, we:. ve:/ dense a!.*...s.u rs c.o.c.t . 3/4 bag qui Total depth = 31.!'

El* 38tt :

• 357.9 t: ster level 25-* 10.4' after drilling.

sole ba=kfi with scil a}

• . cor::ple tica.

l

• Za fest . ".

I =

~

\

l .

f i

l t

.3,

..... ... ..... .. ... Daeoe1 Ce .oratar D.:11 dint f .. D f

.t* - 8'*'45103 4*

. :a.310 104 2/19 95316530 I

, = * * " - - - - - ~. - ~--

1 l

...-. s. ..~ . . . * . . . - - .

l

\