ML19318A058

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises That Disputed Items Between Applicant & Intervenors Tx Pirg & C Hinderstein,Re ASLB 800530 Order,Have Been Resolved
ML19318A058
Person / Time
Site: Allens Creek File:Houston Lighting and Power Company icon.png
Issue date: 06/11/1980
From: Copeland J
BAKER & BOTTS
To: Wolfe S
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML19318A056 List:
References
NUDOCS 8006180398
Download: ML19318A058 (2)


Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - _

1 y

4 sq i

{l BAKER & BOTTS Q

i Onc sucss. e's ATA Ho06 TON.TEXA8 770o2 j

UE8' HON E I7'N N3" M1 wAA,sisse6 Ton o, race

,igst.x 7s.rvre 1703 PCNNLYLVAfesde AVGN.W.

)l s t;Coga4WniCAt tolf 1l wAswusoton,o c.tooos (m) rio.::,r3 stousvoie p.l 1sttenout teot:457.ssoo (aor; 4sr.5534 WAf'HittG10u.15, C.

?aj June 11, 1980 3!

cp c) n 4

a y

~ Doc q

={

9 (15NRO h

-5,

Sheldon J. Wolfe, Esq., Chad onan 2

.JUNj 3 p

'd.

?-

7.tomic Safety and Licensing omYMkrefny id 9

b

. Board Panel s

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

/27 k'uce T[

Washington, D. C.

20SSS

.e d

/

l 4 t@

9

Dear Mr. Wolfo:

As you know,. following the Board's Order of May. 30, N

1980, regarding the production of certain documents by Mr.

2 Howard 'Saxion, both TexPirg and Ms. Hinderstcin filed mo-

]l tions opposing production of those documents.

After several i

telephone calls, we have been able to resolve the dispute J.

and no further action by the Board is required at this time.

i, 4

With respect to Item 1 on page 2 of the Order, I

[

have now been udvised that neither Ms. Hinderstein nor 7

TexPirg has a written co ?ract with Mr. Saxion notwith-standing his testimony to the contrary in his deposition.

-i Mr. Scott and Ms. Hindcrstein have both promised to send ma

^5 E

a letter stating that they have no written contracts with Mr. Saxion.

-1 With respect to Item 2 of the Order, Mr. Saxion f;

-4 :

will provide un with a list of all those projects in which he has participated when we take his deposition on June 17.

Q' Although I would have preferred to have had this list in advance, I consider this to bn a reasonable compromise.-~~

With respect to Item 3, Ms. Hinderstein and Mr.

"cott have advised me that neither Mr. Saxion nor his firta Jl nos completed any of the studien spetrifically. involving iI

~

citics on the Brazos River.

They have both conouitted to advise me as to when Mr. Saxion ompletes his work on such 1

-n 5

A.

Y/2 fo 4J'

/b:5D E

n 3

u 0 0 6 I 8 0 379 -

  • r

'\\

CAMCR & BoTTS

\\

l l

Sheldon J. Wolfo,'Esq..

Page,2

)

projects.

Ms. 11indor' stein and Mr. Scott believe that when the stuosos are completed they will be made public.

i I havo advised t. hem that if they aro 'not made public, and if we cannot work out an agreemont to produce them,.T would an-ticipate that the b'st way to resolve this issue is to e

subpoena Mr. Saxion, his employer,,or any other party in tho, possession of such documents.

1 very ituly yours, l4 l'.

/

=

, Grego y opcTand

'ittornoy for 1l Houston Lighting & Power Company JGC/66

_ 1 cc:

l Ms. Carro Hinderstein Mr. James M. Scott

~I Mr. Howard Saxion 1

i e

l i

_..