ML19318A055
| ML19318A055 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Allens Creek File:Houston Lighting and Power Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 06/12/1980 |
| From: | Wolfe S Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| To: | Hinderstein C AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED, HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO., TEXAS PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19318A056 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8006180395 | |
| Download: ML19318A055 (2) | |
Text
s
.\\
~
e e
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA t'
4 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Doeg J{Jg 1 s q * @
THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSINS BOARD Sheldon J. Wolfe, Esquire, Chaiman Dr. E. Leonard Cheatum, Member s
s Gustave A. Linenberger, Jr., Member v)
-C^'d In the Matter of HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY Docket No. 50-466 CP (Allens Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1)
ORDER (June 12,1980)
In an Order dated May 30, 1980, the Board granted in part Applicant's i
Motion To Compel filed on April 29, 1980 with respect to certain identified documents which had not been among those documents previously furnished by Ms. Hinderstein and TexPirg.
i On May 31,1980, TexPirg filed a Response To Applicant's Request For Further Board Action Re: Motion To Compel, and on June 3,1980, Ms. Hinder-stein filed a Motion To Quash Applicant's Motion To Compel Production of Documents. With respect to said Intervenors' submissions, which, in substance, either requested reconsideration of our Order of May 30, 1980 or opposed Applicant's Motion To Compel, in a letter dated June 11, 1980 (copy attached),
Applicant's counsel advised that the three interested parties had been able to resolve the disputes regarding the three items listed in the Order of May 30th.
~
1/ For the record: On June 10,1980,'.,the Chaiman's secretary was unable to con-tact Ms. Hinderstein and Mr. Scott, counsel for TexPirg,in an effort to schedule a conference call. Applicant's counsel, Mr. Newman, advised that he would try to resolve outstanding disputes regarding production with the two Intervenors and that he would place a conference call on the following day.
In'the" afternoon of June lith, the Chairman's secretary phoned Mr. Newman's office, which advised that Mr. Newman was attempting to resolve differences with the two Intervenors and tgt Y4I o'
THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS 8006'18'O395 C--
P00R QUAllTY PAGES
--Mv
Accordingly. TexPirg's and Ms. Hinderstein's respective submissions setting forth their objections are denied as having been mooted. Further, since the parties have resolved their differences, the Order of May 30, 1980 is vacated.
FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Nd SheldonJ.W('fe,EsqJire Chainman Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this 12th day of June,1980.
1 Footnote 1 (continued):
it might not be necessary to arrange a conference call. Later that afternoon, the Chairman's secretary, returning a phone call from Mr. Copeland, advised that the Chairman requested that he be advised of any resolution by noon on June 12th and, absent resolution, that a conference call be placed. Mr. Copeland replied that a letter would be hand-delivered to Mr. Wolfe on June 12th and that a con-ference call would not be necessary.
.