IR 05000324/1978027

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Repts 50-324/78-27 & 50-325/78-27 on 781018-19. Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Security Plan Access Controls,Communications Controls & Security Organization
ML20062E681
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/01/1978
From: Gillespie F, Mcguire D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20062E675 List:
References
50-324-78-27, 50-325-78-27, NUDOCS 7812110251
Download: ML20062E681 (3)


Text

I .

.

  • 0 (

!

i

    • "'4g UNITED sT ATEs I l

+ Io, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[ 3- 4 R EGION 11

r 101 M ARIETT A STREET. o j ATL ANTA. GEORGI A 30303 g, .....f v

Report Nos. : 50-324/78-27 and 50-325/78-27 Docket Nos. : 50-324 and 50-325 License Nos.: DPR-62 and DPR-71 Category: C Licensee: Carolina Power and Light Company 336 Fayetteville Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Facility Name: Brunswick I and 2 Inspected at: Southport, North Carolina Inspection Conducted: October 18-19, 1978 Inspector: D. R. McG ire, Reviawed by: , , L h_I.$

F.'P. Gillespie,/ Chief

/if /f')

'Dite Security and Investigation Section Safeguards Branch Inspection Summary

'

Inspection on October 18-19, 1978 (Report Nos. 50-324/78-27 and 50-325/78-27)

Areas Inspected: Routine unannounced inspection of physical security progra Areas inspected were selected portions of the Security Plan, applicable portions of 10 CFR 73.55 that were to be implemented by May 25, 1977, including Security Organization, Access Controls, and Conununication Controls. The inspection involved 12 inspector-hours on-site by one hPC inspector. The inspection was initiated during off-shif Results: Of the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance were identifie 'l 2.1( O 2LT l i

.

. ..

,

RII Report No. 50-324/78-27 and 50-325/78-27 I-l DETAILS I Prepared by: h -O -

/C[J//ff D. R. McGuire, Physical Security Inspector Oate Security and Investigation Section Safeguards Branch Dates of Inspection: Oct7er18-19,1978 b

Reviewed by: 1 t. pdi'

F. P. Gillespie, thief ae Security and Investigation Section Safeguards Branch Persons Contacted

  • A. C. Tollison, Jr. , Plant Manager, CP&L
  • D. E. Noudtny, Security Specialist, CP&L M. E. Shealy, Shif t Supervisor, CP&L M. L. Clemmons, Burns Security Shif t Lieutenant
  • J. D. Powell, Burns Security Chief Numerous other plant personnel were interviewed during the course of the inspectio * Denotes those present at the exit intervie . Physical Security Plan The security plan that- the licensee is currently operating under is Industrial Security Plan-Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Units 1 and 2,

'

Revision 5, approved in part by an NRR letter dated April 5,197 . Security Organization The evaluation of the licensee's security organization in terms of its structure and functional responsibilities with respect to establishing and enforcing physical security policy and programs in his physical security plan and other regulatory requirements of 10 CFR Part 73 was found to be in compliance A review of shif t log records indicated that not less than five armed responders (guards) were on duty all shif ts since October 15, 197 . Access Controls The adequacy of the licensee's control of personnel, vehicles, and packages entering and exiting the protected area in terms of commit-ments made in the physical security plan and specific regulatory

.

. . . _ . _ .

  • * 9

.

RII Report No. 50-324/78-27 and 50-325/78-27 I-2

requirements was assessed by the inspector and found to be adequat No items of noncompliance were note <

.

. Communication Controls

,

A review of documents and discussions with the licensee were conducte From this, the inspector determined that the licensee's communication system as described in their physical security plan and specific regulatory requirements of 10 CFR Part 73 was found to be in complianc No items of noncompliance were note . Exit Interview At the conclusion of the inspection an exit interview was held with those individuals indicated in paragraph 1. The results of the inspection were presented as described in the report.

i

.

i

_ - . .y.-. _ , ,.._,;