IR 05000324/1978029

IE Investigation Rept 50-325/78-29 & 50-324/78-29 on 781023-25 During Which 1 Item of Noncompliance Was Noted: Licensee Permitted Unqualified & Improperly Informed Individual to Guard Security Posts on 781016

ML20062E973
Person / Time
Site:	Brunswick
Issue date:	11/06/1978
From:	Kenna W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20062E948	List: IR 05000324/1978029 ML20062E944 ML20062E954 ML20062E964 ML20062E968
References
50-324-78-29, 50-325-78-29, NUDOCS 7812130310
Download: ML20062E973 (15)

Text

,

.

'

.

UNITED STATES

[gh* "8Cu, 'o, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l y g REGION 81

- '-* 101 M ARIETT A sTRE ET.N W t

o, ' [ ATL ANTA. GEORGI A 30303 s' ,,,,.

u *

IE Investigation Report Nos. 50-325/78-29 and 50-324/78-29 Subject: Carolina Power and Light Company Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-325 and 50-324 Southport, North Carolina Allegations regarding guard training documentation, number of gua rds on duty and guard and employee conduc Period of Investigation: October 23-25, 1978 Investigators: . .

'

__- -% u h b M. V. Annast , Investigatof

'

Da't e Of fice of the Director m ( m 11 (a T4 W. J. Tobin,gPhysical fati Security Intpector Security and Investigation

-

Section Safeguards Branch

[. Y

~

,

Reviewed by: - +w A //,'g/ /f

~ ,,- 'enna,yhtef fare Safeguards Branch '

7 812130 J/a

__

-

.

.

TABLE OF CONTENT 1. Introduction 11. Scope of Invest igation Ill. Conclusions IV. Details of Investigation Persons Contacted Allegations, Discussions and Findings Additional Review of Guard Training Exit Interview Exhibits Statement of Individual A Statement of Individual B Training record of Individual B

..

.

e i-

,

IE Investigation Rpt. Nos. 50-325/78-29 and 50-324/78-29 -1-

.

1. Introduction Individual A, a former guard employed at the Brunswick site, wrote a letter on September 23, 1978 to the Burns International Security

"

Services, Inc. (BISSI) regional office in Atlanta, Georgia. The letter lodged a formal protest against BISSI for the discharge of Individual A on September 5, 1978. Copies of this letter were also

< addressed to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Labor Relations Board, Employment Security Commission and Carolina Power and Light Company (CP&L).

Portions of this letter contained allegations relating to security guard conduct and trainin The specific allegations, based on a

,

written statement furnished to NRC investigators by Individual A, (Exhibit E-1) were stated as follows:

l Occasionally, especially at night, there are only three or four

,

guards on duty and the plant is inadequately protected.

Sleeping on duty is a real problem. *1any guards and watchpersons have been caught sleepin A CP&L employee was caught by the alleger smoking marijuana. He is still employed at the plan Guard training is not being conducted properly in that employees are required to sign training sheets indicating that they have received training when, in fact, no training has been give Employees are threatened with dismissal if they don't sign the training sheet The Office of Inspection and Enforcement, Region 11, conducted an investigation into these allegations at the Brunswick plant on

Oct ober 23-2's , 197 This investigation was conducted under the authority provided by Part 1.64, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulat tens.

11. Scoye of Investigation The investigation encompassed interviews with present and terme:

guards and watthpersons, _ discussions with CPh!. security management a n.!

plant personnel, review of training retords and procedures and indepen-dent inspet t ion of the physical set urity program onsite Kesult- et inquiries c ondm ted by BISSI and CPat regarding the allegation > were als<. examined The invest igat ion involved 32 manhour s by twe Nht investigator f

, - < - - - , , - , , . - - -g

.

.' *

IE Investigation Rpt. Nos. 50-325/78-29 and 50-324/78-29 -2- I l

III. Conclusions The investigation disclosed that the allegations were not substantiate One item of noncompliance was identifie IV. Details of Investigation Persons Contacted A. C. Tollison, Plant Manager K. E. Enzor, Plant Administrat2ve Supervisor D. E. Novotny, Plant Security Specialist J. B. Walker, Jr. , CP&L Senior Industrical Security Specialist L. A. Rogers, Plant NRC Coordinator J. D. Powell, Plant Security Chief B. W. Riley, RII Project Inspector In addition to the above, confidential interviews were conducted

'

with thirteen guards and watchpersons presently employed, one former guard and one former watchperso Allegations, Discussions and Findings Allegation: Occasionally, especially at night, there are only three or four guards on duty and the plant is inadequately protecte Discussion: The investigators examined duty rosters and individual guard pay records for the period of June 5 -

September 5,1978 spanning the time during which Individual A was employe CFR Part 73.55, as presently implemented, requires a minimum of five (5) a rmed guards to be on duty capable of responding to an intrusion or threat. The licensee has established procedurally that at least the minimum of armed responders are required to be on duty. Examination of the records and interviews with sut'rvisors and guards revealed that there were always a minimum of five a rm guards on duty capable to respond to emergencies. Addittenal!)

there were watchpersons on duty on each shif t . The Cent ral Alarm Station is cont inuously manned in addition te the armed responders, as required by 10 CFh Part 73.5 .{ i nd i_ng : The allegation was not substantiated. Ne items et noncompliance or deviat ions were ident i f ie . Allegation: Sleeping on duty is a real proble Many guards and watchpersons have been caught sleepte . - . -. .-

.

.

,- .

IE Investigation Rpt. Nos. 50-325/78-29 and 50-324/78-29 -3-Discussion: Interviews with guards, watchpersons and super-visors revealed that there had been two cases of individuals

-

caught asleep while on dut Records showed that both had been dismisse Individual A identified a watchperson whom he had allegedly caught sleeping and reported to the shif t

'

superviso This could not be verified because no written i report was made of the incident and supervisors were not aware of any problems involving the identified watchperso Findings: The allegatinn was not substantiate No items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie . Allegation: A CP&L employee was caught by the alleger smoking marijuana. He is still employed at the plan Discussion: Individual A stated that he had caught an employee smoking marijuana inside the protected area in one of the plant building Individual A was required to make a written report of the incident to the Plant ".a n a g e r . Mien interviewed by the investigators, Individual A admitted that j this was the only incident of alleged marijuana use of which he had direct knowledge. He further stated that no control room operators or other operations personnel were ever involved but that he suspected some maintenance people of using marijuana. He stated that he believed this because he could occasionally smell the smoke in areas containing maintenance personnel .

The investigators reviewed the incident repert and discussed this assue with the Plant Manager. Individual A's report stated that he confronted the suspect who immediately threw the alleged marijuana cigarette butt into an air conditiening duc At this time individual A admonished the suspect verbally and reported the incident to his suspervisor. The supervisor asked Individual A to make a written report and to ret rieve the c igaret te but t . Some t ime later, Individual A retrieved the alleged mar:1uana cigarette butt and filed his repor He was questnoned by the Plant Manager about the exact sequence of events. The Plant Manager aise questioned ,

'

the suspe<t who denied any complitsty in this intident Betause the rigarette butt, which was subsequently 1ound contain marijuana, could not be (onnected directly to the suspect and because of the elap.ed time, the Plant "anager found that that the evidente would be legally insuttissent to take disc spl anary at t ion against the suspect as ne a s t ua '.

u s e- of mar.juana could be proven. The suspect wa s i n f o rm that any employee caught using marijuana would be dismissed

-_ _

- __

.

.

.

-

t

,

IE Investigation Rpt. Nos. 50-325/78-29 and 50-324/78-29 -4-Finding: The allegation was not substantiated. Nc stems of ,

noncompliance or deviations were identifie " Allegation: Guard training is not being conducted properly !

in that employees are required to sign training sheets indicating that they have received training when, in f act ,

no training has b-en given. Employees are threatened with dismissal if they dor.'t sign the training sheet Discussion: Burns International Security Servic es , Inc.,

the contract guard force, has a training program which consists of the trainee reading voluminous training manuals -

on topics listed in ANSI N18.17 and Regulatory Guide 5.2 When a trainee completes reading a chapter, he is required to sign a training sheet certifying that he has read and understands that material. The information is then recorded on the individual's training record by the training of fice Plant specific training on patrol procedures, alarms and other similar material is conducted on-the-job by performing duties with an experienced guard. Again a signed training ,

sheet is required to verify completion of a particular phas Weapons training is conducted formally in the classroom and firing qualification is conducted by the training officer on the rang l When all phases of training are completed, a written examina- l tion is administered to the guard traine Successful complet ton of the exam certifies a qualif red guar The investigators questioned guards and watchpersons in detail regarding the signing of the training sheets. One individual stated that he was not sure whether he signed training sheets before or af ter receiving the training. lie could not recall reading the traintnc manual chapters on search an.1 seizure, legal phrases, self defense, crow i c.:r.t r. !

and response to crimes in progress, although he res a l l reading other chapters in the manual . ,

W i th the one exception previously discussed, all of the interviewed guards and watchpersons stated that thes s i gn the training sheets only after they had actually re eiwd the nn-the job training and had read the required t hapters i in the training manuals. All guards and watchpersons inter- l viewed denied any knowledge of cocrs son or threat s of .tismissal j involving the t raining sheet !

__

. .

i IE Investigation Rpt. Nos. 50-325/78-29 and 50-324/78-29 -5-  ;

Finding: The allegation was not su,bstantiated. No items of noncompliance or devations were identifie Additional Review of Guard Training The investigators audited records and conducted interviews with personnel regarding the status of the program subsequent to the dismissal of Individual A, on October 5,1978. During review of the training records and interview with Individual B, a newly qualified guard, the investigators found that Individual B was not properly qualified. He stated that he had received all the prescribed training but had not taken the final exam. (Exhibit E-2) The individual's training record (Exhibit E-3) however, shows the final examination successfully administered on October 16, 1976, as evidenced by a completed answer sheet in Individual B's file .

The training of ficer stated that he put the exam and answer sheet , with instruction to administer the exam into Individual b's shift supervisor's in-basket during the afternoon of October 18, 1976. The shift was scheduled to work that day from 4:00 p.m. to 12:00 The next morning, the training officer found the completed exam in his in-basket, graded it and entered the results on Individual B's training recor The shift supervisor was questioned by the investigators and denied ever seeing or admintstering the exam to Individual The control of the exams and answer sheets was rather informal and several guards admitted that they had been given exac.s in the past to take to their post and complete at their leisure under ne supervisio .

When this situation was reported to management, the test adminas-tration procedures were immediately changed to insure supervision, cont rol and accountability of the test item Individual B also stated that he had not fired the M-14 rifle for f amiliarization but had qualified with the pistol and that he had received only three hours of weapons training, rather than ten hours listed on the training sheet. The t raining of f icer admit ted that he had misread his notes and had erroneously filled out the training sheet showing M-14 rifle familiarization which is not required by the approved scrurity plan and is an addattonal requirement internal to the guard organization. The discrepansy in the number- of hours involving weapons t raining result ed f rom ,

differing opinions regarding training time The investigators !

l found that three hours were spent on < lassroom and range inst rui t ten

,

The additional t ime involved t are and cleaning of weapons , st udy l

i l l L

,

, , _ . . _ , - e m ,

-. - _ . _ . ..

.

. .

',

IE Investigation Rpt. Nos. 50-325/78-29 and 50-324/78-29 -6-of nomenclature and transportation to and from the rang Individual B was properly qualified with the pistol as required .

'

by the approved security plan, but the time listed for pistol

,

training was incorrectly entered as six hours. Only four hours were allotted for pistol training and a total of eight hours was expended for all weapons trainin Further investigation disclosed that Individual B had been formally upgraded to a guard and so designated on the payroll effective October 16, 1978, two days before the questionable i

+

final exam was given. Review of duty logs revealed that he had performed duty as guard on October 16 and 17,1978 when he was, as yet, unqualifie The single case of the questionable exam appeared to be an isolated incident and no other cases involving improper guard qualification or documentation were identi fie CFR 73.55(b)(4' Physical Security Organization states, in

,

part, that a licensee shall not permit an individual to act as a guard unless such todividual has been properly qualif ted and has demonstrated an understanding of the licensee's security procedure The investigators found that Individual B was permitted to act as a guard when there was no documentation or other eridence that he had completed the required qualification traintng and demonstrated his understanding of the licensee's security procedures. This is

<

an inf raction (78-29-01) . Exit Meeting An exit meeting was held on October 25, 1978 with persons listed in paragraph IV. The investigators discussed the preliminary findings of the investigation and the separate apparent item of noncompliance involving guard traning. CPhL agreed with the noncomp! ance and stated that a CP&l. plant scourity specialist had been assigned on

, September 11, 1976 and was undergoing plant orientation and trainin The dutses of the on-site security spet ialist are te supervise the guard cont ract and to be responsible for security system installation and maintenante, guard training and requali-fication, liaison with local las enforcement and all other duties directly related to the mangement of the site security program CPhl. feels that the assignment of the security specialist sill signif icantly improve the management of the security progra Exhibits - Attache _ __ - _ _ _ _

.

sacire-i ;

t STATE;;Er:T

,

I, "EgpgVlQ Q At Q , rake 'tbe folicwing s ta t<..~ent l

'

freely ar.d toiuntarily to $ icAges d. S gg A $T teho ha!.

identif;ed hinself to ne as a representative of the !.uclear Regulatory

,Cc~..ission, an agency of th? United 5'tates. (18 U.S.C.1031)

'I~ id Lti)CdTS L \b T E. D B 6s.c4 A p?.,6 60 H Y Sgg ggy' l ViObAT\OQS OF NEC, R Oti.4 09., 0.6 4 0 L. AT c 4 5 .  !

i O c c A 5 s e g e u s 4 , E s ? s c.a A c c Y AT Vn64T, "TNE9.3- AM l CQ LY "T N Q.E tE., OR Fo04 GOAS,95 OW DOTT AM) f T wiS PLAdr id T.c A DE QU AT Ei Y  ? ?.oT Cc "T E D .

. S w.E E.9sQ cQ DJTT' tt A ikCAL E I CD 'S h -  !

M 9 TOM GO AG. )g PyW r) Q b'tc.,M E9 go 4 S HR0G S E T AJ

'

c.,8 0 G. W T" t L E.E,?)W G .

GVA10 'T Q. A ld t M G tt M O T' Pb(t W E CA3 0 p C C,,;T Q l G." M N o t' E C , 5 A Q,6 Q.E G 0tQ.E 9 T O P E O P E O. c.T .

$G4 T9.Dr ) QW G $ 4E E," Tab v+J D i c.tN'I ' 4 G 7 OT INEl A hJ E Q E c 6t V 6 tj T R,.A *. d i 4 G iMY d nW f'A t f 40 ,

TQ At Ct 4 G kh TbECW G)V E y . EM? uoy E E.5 ALG ;

'T *QA Av e jE.D t4iT A )\s M i% et. tF T*EY Dodr I

,

et c 4 TW6 T t? es ci d a t % E ET .

C-. ? 4. \.-- 4. M 9'd C, C. .W% "I" f c A0c4T A I

\D b C.O. h N Y., DhbSk7QI i N o L.1 d C b 6. b\ b V be ,

Mho i40 m 0 4 AN) 9.f.Po M E 4 "Y Ai's 10 4 S.tT i 0 6 .

T-SE oM sW c sp E. :rt o P H Aa. tao eW b og T*s $ a

'T'A A T I A RJE A p o c t E. DC. E., A1500T . TW d.chy YC TOO L 9 0 E 's T t c 0 , Tet. 0$6 oF MB9.\doAyn gy

.

(ems ty r.t)

- - __

_-____ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ --_ _1

_ _ _ _ _ _ _

. .

.

. ,

c owT Lou 9, Oc % o PGfL ATO 44 16 404C%isTgyr, T"H s t i4 c 60 f) E, b hub cF v4 T' A(UE.ht o f" c c c ci,g,5 o

L A%T 17EM-- ,

_

O.* -

J

,

(' -

-

.

The ata.e official s'. ate ent is true and correct to the best of r y Lna led.e .

-

__10 K,<

d d_ 1NPl/l200L k yamm I '.d-m. ss

.

n. u L!n *I AKE., A $ 9dT av es L 2__ . Qt.T kS AILDM i.gss tw,n na su,u e

Ekaisir E '

L- - - _ - - - - - - - - -

I .

.

.

. b .At V G*2 STATE:'ENT l

l n3ke the following statt- nt I, b_ DdtDd_4 ,

_

freely and voluntarily to h ir.,Wu:W!FL dbOVAAT -

who has identified hi r.self to r.e as a representative of the nuclear P.egulatcry Co...ission, an acency of the United States. (18 t!.S.C.1001)

, ,

'

[ Q$rt $4040 %W E h8%H t M A'T l O d (_CnO S)tTl u g

\ .

@F EtGSTT Q OESTio yaa, TSE AWSLCE *aM6i~

W iT 4 4 g c o y?,,,,,5 oF $(o e ty 4y V446, Po s wrep r6Y 4-4 0y op To T m w as l 00 T to r2. i rT 60 r6Y H E W 6 d E S._ T o c$:

A0 6% 6 4 # 06 Te o u od Oc.,T o Ph 6rt. l 8, l9')7 ACT

'

O fL &T- 'T WE,

fd(LE.e ousE Te -t' 0 0 L G d 6 %'T 5 O EJ -5 RBooT QEePoes Teeieice

, ou Oaona A j

'W , T GEJEt 9's o sp %G H r a s - \ % a.t T- TOG Tf2 W1 Ut U G 54E67 od WEPrPoes co41Q4 VoJ Mous H t-W T 3 teo Wou Ss o s" Hi vi- sq To m WiU c . "'.T U Rbb i T10 0 TA 6-M 66'T Mouas sx Wet) p cF M ch'sBEk 9\STOL T It ,# \ d s OG Pt V y T u3 0 bd SS C T'

%creov vo wies e s .

. r eaw w3 l

TRG E W-o 0Q s o7 tot h w ERPo,..s

. . l

'

l [G.n s(M T E.-3). l l

__ . _ _ . _ -

.

. .

i TQ,pr g Q [Q g , [ 4 $le; G pt546f D65p dMMEO@ '

qg KO b1G Q h0$ TO\Y\Y $ S

~~

t fbr itsH -

i

!

l l

I

!

l l

!

l i

~

r

_ _ _

i The aM/e o'ficial statc. mer.t is true and ccreect to the best of r y Lns,l ed;;e .

he{u...N,UM-I hO ' '

'

to'19';18 1_ _ ._ . ' g2,.

' Wi!*;:55 OATE SIGriAlttRi , ilAll l - - - . ,

,-

jj UIIIOS

'\ 3O' T AKf h AT b OOT 4 Mt T"~'._,,

LOCAi10:1 NAgh_ _

ST Aif ytug

~

i = t.1. t CL t f' F_- !

l l

.

.

. .

,

_

_ ~ _

_ .

.

.

. _ b-S 7 K

R . .

.

. TT TT

. . .

. . . ..

T I

r .

t A

nlTT-T.Si l 6 a

S T M ( < $_ SB T T n.ST 3qT A. \

p m, r r Ti.}l R

.

S5T. N $_

E' t T t R 3SSi c S' 7hQ N J

M J- E D , _ {

R __

_ ~

A U

C S

__ _

N _

. __ T_

O I R _

d_

T O ,. e A

R T

C _

_

L

E U _ ,_ _ _ /_

T P R 752 .

N O 3 5 s Ss S'sST$ 5C

,5

T S i. bha b i j) j I $b j

}b!_S_

WI.Jd .'p/

i

- 1 ,I t

c

T N

N I p10 bhdt o

i ec d

>

h t o _

C kl f

p} _

S l

P NI i I } })I_ I l l) t

_

o

.

s _

_

A R A

_ o _ __ _ _

I C

, M__

U N

__ _

T _

A . ,

_

- ,

S 5 S 5 %8%%

=-

D R E

$h Ll f, 6,'S

~ ~

] '-

1) 1?-

1 6 6. t - l

' )

'- \- 77] 1N7 - 1

['_7.. ]o 5

'

A T - - - - - -

U A 1 17 3 ~l 3' 3,

- - - S( 6

• i

,

)[( }

C D - 47Hg - '

2]

- - - - - Q 0 72 - i J}

- .

R

-

0 o o. 0 0 0

- -

0 o o _ -

1 l'

-

o-O F 1 1 I I

g g'

[

' ,

' I T u_

-

j _t_1 1 j

_ f_

-

-

S T

____ ,

_ _

N E

M

- E

R

1. I D U E

"

r Q

E ST R

U! F$ _

D A

R CP 5 iI c '.

I 6 1 2I

.

, } 77

_

.

$_ g_

.

B G !

!I !

$_f_

.

R N

I

. C

- l_1 _

_

O N I

5 A 5 R 5 T L S

_

_

A R E ,

I C 1' 5 5 5 1 5 5 5 4 2 2 4 4 1 '. . ' 1 i

I 2 ,

C 0D . . . . .

_

1 ,

E

._ l_R_I

_

!

P , _

S t

s ) ) )

-

e s . .n

) r s t t a w r c n i

= 1 S- s a A r e nP n L

_ ) i I /

- - o r l

' l l r r c 6 i l 'o .

- r a - A O .e r t t a P R ( t i S o n c(

-

4 ni n e - C r 1r en i - n I O meS S 9.- ri n : i V R c-p f - ef i n l P_ t e y

-

c e r a s e o t a l i - r n 1, .. rD sC c o c cc h er r, i nt od r S- -. . ! i  ;

e E i oe t (

nlb

' r t . _ f & n nr c . 5 int u I c . -

- i n e . .

N t seeeii6 t er u! r o nA m d s 1 t

?

4_ E EEwst I

sd r vc S R .

.

.

I

y_ o5 nt C(

' p i

a

(

S

. _

J A

6' l r n e or a it '. r a i 1 A t r i

e I' . ua t

r

_

..

.

.

. r

.aE rES s

- t - ' - e *

- ! i h

!

'

_

.

T ai t

i-t t .

.

.

TRAINING RCCORD NAl_*M Al= ,6

_

ASSICM'.ENT: CUARD .

,

110URS Il0URS DUE CO?!PI.ETED DATE INSTRUCTOR REMARKS

.INING

.ic I. II & III (Audio Visual) 2 S'2.5 "l 8 Llobbs gj7, cntation 11e Relations

.fori & Crooning sin of Co mnd sic Dutics rett (Eccrgency/ Audio Visual) 1 I _(- 1 *i '16 kkoj hs gn Regior t s I l T '2. 5-7 8 [(obh5 53 7 5 R7 cords 2 1___ 'l-25-75 f(pId)S SA Duties 2 1 __9 I'l _~1 S l-j D $A .I 2 '2- . '? '2 '7 _'l3 [lebbs Sn l'R S I0

. _ _ _ _-~ _Z _ _ . _ _ _ . - _ - ..-- .-__.__..__ _ _ . . . _ . _ ___ =

OR-TRAI'!!NG ol A P l .in t ramtitration 20 __J o 6lll'F1 SfTSj CAS ur lite Alarn System __] O __ % O .DPCOnTor2.5,_SCA'{f tl 5AL .

6 Patrel Dutics 2 __._" h J . C S C O n T ..fsv 5 97 controI .s 5 _qN _ ._

..A_8? .0_1___/,_Pruoot._PAitwo't < ,n

-;a r, pienc Terkniques 2 1 .3 eIe Pa rit I n g*, - 1,_ __ _ ,, . F ,_ ,__ , . h.* _ d' . W N ,_ ._ 3 0 T . _ _

cranc Centrol 2 J

. . . _ . _ _ . . _ _ _ . ,

__._.'.

tor. & '.rndor'. 4 4 ..

4 _ _ _ . _ _., .

• ?;G

..cccy Proecelures __ __4 __._4 . .

.

4 " '. T .

.ttIication _t). ..[ _ _ _

S T-rb-Personnel / Vehicle 4 _,,_4 .

of itccords & lieports 4 dj- 6 '4 _Sl}.L of Cenmunicatton d}-

Te.___m,s,v c-s')

- __

. . ....

, , _ -. .... .. ,,....... . . . . . . .... ....__ . . ...

.

DURNS INTERNATIONAI. SECURITY SERVICC, IN .

NCAPGNS OUALIFICA"' ION RCCORD

_

[M9)DD0hb b SS8 OR BADC!: # _ _

ASS IG::: !;.:T_ CQ &iAp h

,_ ARMS OUAI.[FICATION FU:;DA."CNTALS AND TYPC RANGC sal'TY FIREARM l S If; :ATUiu. OF Cs;ICIF7/r(

s OUAIIPICATION COURSC TITLC l T A : C C O F I' ! C :'. R

IIOuRS d&$Y -

38 CAL . n SCOR ,/3b0 h MkI?T CodQSE* il00APk i 2 j mim- 4 g siOUa5 SCORC 3 nos Esmikir4T5d Udc%

T uOupS <;goir,og SCORC 2 00s pantyyjlacn> 4A//dM l

IlOU_RS SCORC -

t IIOU RS SCORI' l IlOUPS SCOllC llOUPS SCORC

_ _ _

llOU PS scold:

!!n "it,S SCOltC *

linURS SCORI:

IlOllRS SCORC

.

IlOURS SCORC llOURS S c o ltt:

i llOI:IIS SCORC l

_

llOUPS SCORE HOURS SCORC ANifblT b-D