IR 05000324/1990027

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Revised Insp Repts 50-324/90-27 & 50-325/90-27 on 900709-12. No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Electrical Sys Designs & Maint
ML20059B039
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/03/1990
From: Fillion P, Hunt M
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20058Q228 List:
References
50-324-90-27, 50-325-90-27, NUDOCS 9008270222
Download: ML20059B039 (1)


Text

-. . . . _ . .

., 'Q ] A ',

'

4 4 a ' UNITE 3 87AftS -

'

[m tteeg NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMl8810N

. y .

. R8080N ll i

l g 101 MARIETTA STR8ET.Na * ATLANTA.080RetA 30333 4,***** ENCLOSURE Report Hos.: 50-325/90-27 and 50-324/90-27

, Licensee: Carolina Power and Light Company P. O. Box 1551 Raleigh, NC 27602 Docket Hos.: 50-325 and 50-324 License Nos.: DPR-71 and DPR-62 Facility Name: Brunswick 1 and 2 Inspection Conducted: Jul 9-12 1990 Inspector N '

+ 7- 3 - 9 O P. Fillion '

Date Signed-

'

Approved b M. D. Hunt. Acting Chief

  1. aPA kV T-7-fD Date Signed P1 ant Systems-Section Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety SUMMARY Scope:

This routine, announced inspection was conducted in the areas of electrical systems design and maintenanc It.was a- follow-up to potential concerns identified in a previous inspection. The NRC inspector reviewed engineering reports, Licensee Event Reports, procurement documents, interviewed engineering personnel and operators, and inspected equipmen Results:

Six NRC identified issues covering a range of topics had been addressed by the licensee indicating good response to NRC initiative Timeliness was satisfactory. A major part of the-inspection was the review of engineering reports of various scopes and types. The brief . reports were authored by on-site engineers while the mijor comprehensive reports were prepared by consulting firms. These reports varied in quality, but from an overall balanced judgement viewpoint the engineering reports were of average qualit Plant areas inspected were in good condition, and a special effort had obviously been made to control corrosion in the service water pump hous In the areas inspected, violations or d tations were not identified,

~

cooB270222 900003 PDR ADOCK 05000324 O PDR

_ . . _ .-...m . . _ _ . . _ . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ _ . . . .

_ _._