ML20202D316

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Omitted Page 42 to Insp Repts 50-324/97-13 & 50-325/97-13 Transmitted on 980123
ML20202D316
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/05/1998
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20202D284 List:
References
50-324-97-13, 50-325-97-13, NUDOCS 9802170044
Download: ML20202D316 (1)


See also: IR 05000324/1997013

Text

___ - _ - _

.

.

42

After discussions with the licensee. CR 97-04103 was issued to track the

failure to provide the results of fire door evaluations in the FHA.

This t/SAR discrepancy was identified by the inspector and is discussed

in Sec ion F2.4.

A review of the surveillance ins)ection and testing procedures for fire

doors was perfcrmed to confirm tlat the licensee specified fire door

clearance acce)tance criteria was in accordance with the guidance of

National Fire 3rotection Association (NFPA) 80. Standard for Fire Door <,

and Fire Windows. On December 10. 1997, the inspector observed ongoing

door replacement and repair activities for fire doors in the DG

buildirg.

No discrepancies were identified.

c.

Conclusions

The inspector concluded that fire door surveillance procedures and

acceptance criteria for verification of fire door clearances were in

accordance with NFPA guidance.

However, a UFSAR discrepancy associated

l

documentation of fire door and frame evaluations was identified.

F2.4 UFSAR Review

A recent discovery of.a licensee o>erating tLa facility in a manner

contrary to the UFSAR description -ighlighted the need for a special

focused review that compares plant practices procedures, and/or

parameters to the UFSAR des.' > iptions. While performing the inspections

discussed in this reoort

.e inspector reviewed the applicable portions

of the UFSAR that relatec *. the areas inspected.

The inspector

verified that the UFSAR wording was consistent with the observed plant

practices, procedures, and/or parameters.

The inspector reviewed UFSAR Section 9.5.1.4.3.4.b. Fire Doors as part

of the fire protection program review activities.

An int insistency was

noted in ; hat the licensee failed to document the results of evaluations

of fire doors and frames in the FHA. which is section 9.5.1.5 of the

UFSAR.

This issue is discussed in Section F2.3.

This item will be

identified as part of URI 50-325(324)/97-13-05. UFSAR Discrepancy Fire

Doors.

F3

Fire Protection Procedures and Documentation

F3.1 Fire Protection Procedures

a.

InSDeCtion SCoDe (64704)

The inspector evaluated the adequacy and implementation of the

licensee's Fire Protection Program described in the UFSAR and in Plant

Operating Manual Fire Protection Procedure OPLP-01. Revision 6. Fire

Protection Program Document.

In addition. a comparison was made of the

program to selected NRC Safety Evaluation Reports which ap3 roved the

station fire protection program.

The inspector reviewed t1e following

procedures for compliance with the NRC requirements and guidelines:

9802170044 900205

PDR

ADOCK 05000324

G

PDR

J

'

3