IR 05000324/1998013

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-324/98-13 & 50-325/98-13 on 981026-30 (Ref 10CFR73.21).No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Plant Support
ML20196D491
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/24/1998
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20196D488 List:
References
50-324-98-13, 50-325-98-13, NUDOCS 9812020257
Download: ML20196D491 (2)


Text

.. . ._ = - .. - - - - ..

!

l

-

,

SAFEGUARcd INFORMATiGN i

.

I l

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION 11 Docket Nos.: 50-325,50-324 i

License Nos.: DPR-71, DPR-62 Report No.: 50-325/98-13,50-324/98-13

Licensee: Carolina Power & Light Company Facility: Brunswick Nuclear Plant, Units 1 & 2 Location: Carolina Power & Light Company Brunswick Nuclear Plant P.O. Box 10429 Southport, NC 28461 Dates: October 26-30,1998 Inspecto David H. Thompson l Safeguards inspector i

Approved by: George A. Belisle, Chief, i SpecialInspection Branch, Division of Reactor Safety L

!

!

!

.

i p. .. -

MW

! "

gg g,Le 9812O20257 981124 PDR ADOCK 05000324 G PDR ; ,

. . _ _ _ _ __ - - - . . __, . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

,

!

s I

N RC ' ? s t ~ .3 u . .. ,,

.

, , , ,

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 & 2 l NRC Inspection Report 50-325/98-13, and 50-324/98-13 l I

This safeguards inspection included aspects of licensee plant support. The report covers a i five day period of an announced inspection by a regional safeguard specialist. The specific areas evaluated were in the Physical Security Program for Power Reactor Plant Support i

.

The licensee conducted security and safeguards activities in a manner that protected l public health and safety and that this portion of the program, as implemented, met the licensee's commitments and NRC requirements. (Section S1).

.

The licensee's security facilities and equipment were determined to be well maintained and reliable. The excellent engineering and instrumentation and control personnel support were the major contributing factor to continued operability of the detection and assessment equipment. (Section S2).

.

The Security Force Members adeq%te'y demonstrated that they had the requisite knowledge necessary to effective!/ implement the duties and responsibilities associated with their day-to-day and contingency response positions. The licensee's actions to implement NRC Information Notice 98-35, " Threat Assessments and Consideration of Heightened Physical Protection Measures," dated September 4,1998, were reviewed and considered adequate. (Section S4).

.

SAFEGUARDS INFCGM ggggg; y & C C ?k % =**

_-