IR 05000313/1990037

Insp Repts 50-313/90-37 & 50-368/90-37 on 901015-19.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Verification of Isolation Component Exemptions

ML20062D568
Person / Time
Site:	Arkansas Nuclear
Issue date:	10/30/1990
From:	Kelley D, Seidle W, Singh A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20062D567	List: IR 05000313/1990037 ML20062D563
References
50-313-90-37, 50-368-90-37, NUDOCS 9011130364
Download: ML20062D568 (8)

Text

'

. '.

.

APPENDIX U.S. Nt' CLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

NRC Inspection Report: 50-313/90-37 Operating Licenses: DpR-51 50-368/90-37 NpF-6 Dockets: 50-313 50-368 Licensee: Entergy Operations, In P.O. Box 551 Little Rock, Arkansas 72203 facility Name: Arkansas t!uclear One (ANO), Units 1 and 2 Inspection At: ANO site. Russellville, Arkansas inspection Conducted: October 15-19, 1990 L

Inspectors: M/ '

l*!1 9O A. Singh, IYEptor Inspector, Test Programs Date Section, iTivision of Reactor Safety A , ./ Y /0 20 90 D. L. Kellt7, Reac".or In y ctor, Test Programs Vate /

Section, Division of Reactor Safety Accompanying personnel: H. C. Seidle, Chief Test Programs Section Division of Reactor Safety (October 18-19,1990)

Approved:  !. ~

M #/90 W. C. Seidle, Giief, Test Programs Section Date Division of Reactor Safety inspection Sunenary inspection Conducted October 15-19.1990(Report 50-313/90-37)

Areas inspected: Routine, announced inspection of the verification of isolation component exemptions (VOICE).

9011130364 901031 DR ADOCKOD00g3

. . .. . - -- _ _ . _ .

. ',

.

-2-i i

Results: Within *.he area inspecteo, no violations or deviations were identifie The inspectors cencluded that the licensee had a very well documented and controlled program for containment integrated leal rate testing (CILRT) and local leakratetesting(LLRT). In addition, the inspectors found no discrepancies  !

during the 100 percent visual inspection of accessible penetrations and isolating l components inside or outside the containment building. It was also noted that j the licensee had no exemptions to Appendix J, to 10 CFR Part 50 leak ratt testing requiraments. The inspectors also noted that in the plant are6s I inspected, they were clean and free of trash indicating a well implenented  !

housekeeping effor Inspection Conducted October 15-19.1990 (Report 50-300/90-37) ]

Area Inspected: Followup of a previously identified unresolved item (363/8714-U-06).

_Results: Within the area inspected the licensee made a coinnittent to provide additionalinformationregardingthIsunresolvedite ,

i l

<

I

.

.

'. ,

.

-3-

!

DETAILS PERSONS CONTACTED FNTERGY

• J. D. Vandergrift, Plant Manager, Unit 1

• 0. fisicaro, Manager, Licensing

• Lane, Manager, Engineering Programs and Standards ,

• Clark, licensing Specialist

• Lomax Superintendent, Engineering programs

• Pulling, Containment Leak Rate Testing Engineer, Engineering proprems

• Eubanks, Lead Engineer, Engineering prognms

• Rispoli, Superintendent, fire protection

' Campbell, Engineer, in Service Testing ,

• R. M. Cooper, Licensing

• D. E. James, Licensing Supervisor '

'G. Dobbs. Electrical Instrumentation / Control Engineering Supervisor

• D. Boyd, Licensing Specielist

• J. Taylor-Brown, Quality Control / Quality Engineering Manager j(R{

• C. Warren, Senior Resident inspector

• L. Smith, Resident Inspector The inspectors also interviewed other licensee employees during the inspectio .

• Denotes those attuiding the exit meeting conducted on October 19, 1990.

j FOLLOWUP Oil PREVIOUSLY IDENTiflED ITEM (92701)

(OPEN) Unresolved item (368/8714.U-06)

l resolution between the licensee and the Office This item remains of Nuclear open pending(NRR) concerning issues identified in Reactor Regulation NRC Inspection Report 50-313/87-14; 50-368/87-14, paragraphsB.cand10.b(1).

The issues involved the methods for the control of specific high/ low water pressure interface against inadvertent actuation by fire induced spurious signals. During this inspection, the licensee committed to respond to this l unresolved item in a timely manne . VERiflCATION OF CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY (61715)

The purposes of the inspection were to: visually identify all containment building penetrations and their associated isolating components; verify that the components were identified on current p&lDs or other drawings; determine which isolating components had been excluded from Appendix J to 10 CFR part 50

-

__ __ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

• *

. .

. .

(Appendix J) leak rate testing programs; deternene if the criteria for exemption

_

were met, as set f orth in Appendix J; and identify eny isolating components that had been given test waiver approval by NR The inspectors performed a 100 percent walkdown of the accessible areas, which involved 78 mechanical and 60 electrical containment building penetrations, and 153 isolating components associated with these penetrations. The inspectors were not able to walkdown two inaccessible penetrations and eight associated isolating

[~ components because these components were located in a high contamination are This inspection was performed inside and outside the containment building, and wherever possible, the inspectors traced associated system piping coming through an identified penetration back to its desigrtted containment buildino isolation components on either side of the containment building wall. All of the penetrations, isolating components, and associeted procedures are identified in the Attachment. The penetrations and associated components were appropriately labeled and tagged. The inspectors noted that the areas inspected were clean

& and free of trash indicating a well implemented and vigorous housekeeping effort. The inspectors compared P&lDs with Procedures 1305.018. " Local Leak Rate Testing," and 1304.023, " Local Leak Rate Testing - Type B." The review did not identify any discrepancies between the p&lDs and the procedure The inspectors also noted that the licensee had established a program to update the p&lDs regularl The licensee stated that they did not have any exemptions to Type A, B, or C

_

tests required by Appendix No violations or deviations were identified in this program are . CONTAINMLNT LOCAL LEAK RATE TESTING (61720)

The purpose of this inspection was to verify that primary containment local

-

leak rate tests, as required by ANO.1 Technical Specifications (TS), were

-

performed to ensure that leakage through testable containment building penetrations and isolation valves would not exceed the allowable leakage

=

specified. This review included records, procedures, and independent calculations associated with the local leak rate test (LLRT) Type C test During the inspection, the inspectors reviewed the primary containment building

-

LLRT Procedure 1305.018, idutified abrve. The procedure was complete and satisfactorily stated the acceptance criteria for each penetration and the

_

associatedcontainmentbuildingisoirtionvalve(CIV). Test procedure instructions were concise and provised for independent verification of test results and for system restoration. The inspectors reviewed records of LLRTs conducted during 1988. In conducting this review, the inspectors verified that

'

corrective actions were taken on excessive leakage components and that appropriate retests were conducted on penetrations and CIVs. The cumulative data for containment building testable penetrations and CIVs were reviewed to verify that the containment building local leak rate did not exceed the

_

acceptance criteria. The LLRT results were well within the acceptance criteria as required by the Technical Specificatico ;

__ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _

• *

. ,

.

5-The inspectors also noted that the use of "N/A" (not applicable) was not prevalent in the data packages, and in several instances, a clear explanation was given in those cases where "N/A" was used. The inspectors concluded that the licensee had a strong program in the area of LLR During this inspection, the inspectors also observed a local leak rate test being performed en Valve No. CY4603 in the gaseous redwaste system. The individuals performing the test were knowledgeable and performed the test in a professional manner. The inspectors also noted that the licensee did not have any formal training program for the individuals who performed the LLRT. In response, a licensee representetive stated that they were aware of the inspectors'

observation and, as a part of their ongoing program, planned to provide formal training regarding this matter to the LLRT personnel. The inspectors had no further question No violation 6 or deviations were identified in this program are . EXIT MEElijjGG An exit meetitg was held on October 19, 1990, with personnel identified in paragraph 1 of this report. At the exit meeting, the inspectors summarized the scope and find *.ngs of the inspection. The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the information provided to, or reviewed by, the inspectors

_ _ _ . . . .

'. ,

AIIAClitiENT 00NTAINMENT PENETRATIONS.INDEX AND DRAWINGS Penetratior Na , System Tyne Test P&lD No.

P1 Main Steam A M-2006 P2 Main Steam A M-206 Pd Main Feedwater A H-206 P4 Main Feedwater A M-206 P5 RB Spray A M-236 P6 Spare A C-108. C-110 P7A Pzr Sample C M-237, 230 P7B Quench Tk Sample C M-237, 230

P8 HPI A M-230, 231

P9 RCP Seal Water C M-231 P10 SO Sample C H-237, 200 P11 Gaseous Radwaste C M-215 P12 GFT Sample C M-236 P13 HPI A M-230, 231 P14 Letdown C M-231 P15 HPI A M-230 P16 RCP Seal Water A M-230, 231 P17 EFW A M-204, 200 P18 Spare A C-108. C-110 P19 Fuel Cooling C M-235 P20 Spare A C-108. C-110 P21 Service Water C M-210 P22 Service Water C .M-210 P23 RD Spray A M-236 P24A Hydrogen Sampling C M-261, 237 P24B Hydrogen Sampling C H-261

, P25 APM C M-261, 237 P26 LPI A M-230, 232 (' .

, P27 Decay Heat A M-232

'

P28 Spare A C-108 C-110 P29 Spare A C-108. C-110 P30 Spare A C-108 C-110 P31 CFT Fill & N2 C M-236, 230 P32 CFT Fill & N2 C M-236, 230 P33 Par. Spray C M-230, 231, 232 P34 Makeup & HPI A H-230, 231 P35 Spare A C-108, C-110 P36 LPI A M-230, 232 P37 Spare A C-108. C-110 P38 Spare A C-108. C-110 P39 Condensate C M-230 P40 Firewater C M-219 P41 Ni supply C M-233, 230 P42 Plant Heating C M-220 P43 Breathing Air C M-218 P44 Spare A C-108, C-110 i

_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ __________._______._______________.__.___.________________m_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .

i

'.- .

.  :

!

_

~2~ \

!-  !

P45 Spare C M-234 i L' P46 Instrument Air C M-220 CRD Cooling

'

P47 B M-236 P48 Plant Heating A C-108 C-110 P49 ILRT Connection C H-222 m P50 Spare C M-234 !

.

"

P51 Chill Water C M-261

'

,

PS2 RCP Cooling C M-261 t P53A Hydrogen Sampling C H-234 ,

"

P53B Hydrogen Sampling C H-210 "

,

P54 ICW A C-1-8, C-110 P55 Service Water A C-108, 0-110

~ P56 Spare C M-206 P57 Spare C M-222 P58 S. G. Blowdown C M-234 P59 Chill Water A C-108, C-110 i P60 ICW' C- H-234 i P61 Spare C M-210 P62 ICW C M-206

, P63 Service Water A M-204 P64 SG Blowdown A,C M-232, 237 P65- EFW A,0 H-232, 237 P66 Containment Sump C M-313 P67 Containment Sump A M-214 i P68- R. B. sump Drain C M-230 i P69 RCS Drain C H-261 P70 Quench Tank Drain C M-261 V-1 Containment Purge B C-108 C-110 *

'

V-2 Containment Purge B C-108, C-110 C-1 Equipment Hatch B C-108, C-110

' C-2 Escape Hatch- B C-108, C-110 C-3 Fuel Transfer A C-121~

C-4: Personnel-. Hatch A C-121 '

0-5 ' Dome Vent Pipe B C-108, C-110'

C-6 Dome. Vent Pipe .

A C-108, C-110 i E- Electrical Penetration B C-108, 0-110 t E-2- * Electrical Penetration B C-108, C-110 >

E-3, E-14 Electrical. Penetration A C-108. C-110 E-21~ -Electrical Penetration B C-108, C-110 E-22 * Electrical Penetration A .0-108. C-110'

E-23-29' Electrical Penetration' B C-108, C-110

.E-30-32 * Electrical-Penetration A C-108, C-110- -

-

,

E-33-36 Electrical Penetration B C-108, 0-110'

E-41-45 * Electrical Penetration A C-108, C-110 E-50-55 Electrical Penetration' B C-108, C-110 E-57-63 Electrical ~ Penetration B C-108, C-110 E-56 1* Electrical Penetration A C-108 C-110 E-64-65- * Electrical Penetration A C-108. C-110 l E-06-67 Electrical Penetration B C-108, 0-110- ;

,

.E-68-74 * Electrical Penetration A C-108, C-110

,

• These electrical penetrations are capped.

l:

'. -

i

y

,1.,,

,

.' o _

.- , ,

t ', .,

i

.. P ,,p

I I

'

PROCEDURES I

t

,

' PmoaAEe N Title Date

.

'1305.018, Revision-2 Local Leak Rate Testing 10/01/90 ;

. .

. t-1304.020, Revision 5 Reactor Building Accese and Ventilation Leak 08/28/89 j Rate Testit .

I

1304.023,' Revision 11 local Leak Rate Testing Electrical 07/19/89 j

. 1092.030. Revision 0 Integrated Leak Rate Test 07/12/88 l I

1092.196, Revision 0 Unit 1 Primary Containment Leak Rate Running 10/06/90- i Total-  !

,

'

?

g .

,

,

,

h i  !

$

i

b r f

, >

!

'

' ~

% , ,

s <  !

7 a

'

!.

n

~I

'!

'l y a fh .,

u-L

<.

,

v

.

>

k r b' ':