IR 05000266/1985020

Insp Repts 50-266/85-20 & 50-301/85-19 on 851016-18,29-30 & 1119-21.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Inservice Insp Procedures,Work Activities,Nde, Personnel Certifications & Split Pin Replacement

ML20137H710
Person / Time
Site:	Point Beach
Issue date:	11/26/1985
From:	Danielson D, David Jones NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20137H681	List: IR 05000266/1985020 ML20137H676
References
50-266-85-20, 50-301-85-19, NUDOCS 8512020456
Download: ML20137H710 (5)

Text

~

.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMISSION

REGION III

-Report Nos. 50-266/85020(DRS); 50-301/85019(DRS)

Docket Nos. 50-266; 50-301 License Nos. DPR-24; DPR-27 Licensee: Wisconsin Electric Power Company 231 West Michigan Milwaukee, WI 53203 Facility Name: Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Inspection At: Point Beach Site, Two Creeks, WI Inspection Conducted: October 16-18, 29-30 and November 19-21, 1985 N -m Inspector: D . J5nes // 2/o 85 D6te '

Approved By: D.H.fl5 Daniel h

n,dhief // 4[C Materials and Processes Section Date Inspection Summary Inspection on October 16-18, 29-30 and November 19-21, 1985 (Report Nos. 50-266/85020(DRS); 50-301/85019(DRS))

Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced safety inspection to review inservice inspection (ISI) procedures, work activities, nondestructive examinations (NDE),

personnel certifications, and split pin replacement. The inspection involved a total of 41 inspector-hours onsite by one NRC inspecto Results: No violations or deviations were identifie %20gf)$ h [

G

.

.

DETAILS 1. Persons Contacted Wisconsin Electric Power Company (WEPCo)

• J. Zach, Manager PBNP

• J. Knorr, Regulatory Engineer

• J. Reisenbuechler, Superintendent, Engineering, Quality and Regulatory S. Pullins, ISI Coordinator K. Crowley, ISI Engineer G. Maxfield, Operations Superintendent

• F. Flentje, Administrative Specialist, EQRS Southwest Research Institute (SWRI)

L. McFarland, Supervisor NDE Field Services WestinghouseElectricCorporation(W1 B. Maurer, Eddy Current Coordinator F. Garofalo, Lead Analyst Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company R. Motquin, Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector The inspector also contacted and interviewed other licensee and contractor employee * Denotes those present at the exit intervie . Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Violation (266/84-01-01): Failure to establish adequate hydrostatic test program. The inspector reviewed the reply to the inspection report, dated May 2, 198 The licensee modified routine hydrostatic and pressure test procedures to eliminate references to a specific test gauge brand and established a controlling procedure (System and Component Hydrostatic / Pneumatic /

Inservice testing, 0I-65) with a form (Hydrostatic / Pneumatic / Inservice Test Data Sheet) for documenting required information for hydrostatic test gauges. Proper gauge use is assured through a quality coordinator review and approval of the test data sheet information. The Point Beach second 10 year interval " Hydrostatic and Pressure Testing Guidelines" was circulated to the appropriate personnel for review. This item is considered close #

-

.

.

3. Inservice Inspection Unit 2 General Information Westinghouse (W), Nuclear Service Division, performed the eddy current examination (ET) on the steam generator (SG) tubes and the ultrasonic examination (UT) on the guide tube support pins (split pins). Southwest Research Institute (SWRI) and WEPCo Quality Assurance Department performed the balance of the ISI in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1977 Edition, Summer 1979 Addenda.

i This is the third outage of the second ten year plan.

! Eddy current examination was performed on steam generators A and B l and the following tubes were plugged:

SG A Row Column Row Column 1 87 36 32 21 12 37 35 l 21 79 39 47 26 21 41 34 35 40 43 45 l

l SG B Row Column Row Column 2 2 10 45 4 59 10 46 5 72 11 2

'

5 73 11 43 6 46 11 46

6 47 11 47 6 75 11 48 7 27 12 41 7 30 12 47 7 45 13 54 7 46 16 4 7 47 18 40 8 26 18 48 8 46 19 68 8 47 20 55 8 92 21- 41 l

'

9 46 22 52 9 47 23 54 9 53 23 60

,

9 59 23 65

'

9 65 26 79 10 26 31 78

L

.

.

The three split pins identified as having indications in Report No. 50-266/84-19(DRS); 50-301/84-17(DRS) were replaced and 100%

ultrasonic examination was performed on the remainder. The UT noted an additional split pin with indications and it was replace No violations or deviations were identifie b. Program / Procedure Review The inspector revie'ed w the following program / procedures:

WEPCo, Visual Examination of Nuclear Power Plant Components, NDE-750, Revision 5 WEPCo, Magnetic Particle Examination Dry Powder Yoke Method, NDE-350, Revision 3 WEPCo, Visible Dye Penetrant Inspection of Weldments, NDE-451, Revision 3 WEPCo, Ultrasonic Thickness Measurement, NDE-102, Revision 0 W, Installation and Removal of Temporary Nozzle Covers, MRS 2.2.2, GEN-2, Revision 6 W, SM-10W Operating Procedure, MRS 2.4.2, GEN-30, Revision 0 W, Digital Multi-Frequency Eddy Current Inspection of Pre-Service and Inservice Heat Exchanger Tubing, MRS 2.4.2, GEN-28, Revision 0 W, Steam Generator Tubesheet Marking, MRS 2.2.2, GEN-12, Revision 1 W, Mechanical Plugging of Steam Generator Tubes, MRS 2.3.2, GEN-13, Revision 7 W, Mechanical Plugging Using the Limited Access Plug Installation Tool, SE-SG-83-010, Revision 1 W, Post-Activity Sign-off for Area Cleanliness, MRS 2.2.2, GEN-6, Revision 6 SWRI, Project Plan for the 1985 Inservice Examination of Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit 2, 85-WEP-PBH-2-1-0, Revision 0, October 1985 SWRI, Onsite NDE Records Control, S-FE-101-3 SWRI, Deviations to Nuclear Projects Operating Procedures, 1X-FE-101-3 SWRI, Weld Joint Identification Marking on Nuclear Power Plant Piping, 1X-FE-103-2 SWRI, Recording Indications During Ultrasonic Examinations of Pressure Vessel Welds, 1X-FE-118-1, Change 1 SWRI, Recording Data From Direct Visual, Liquid Penetrant, and Magnetic Particle Examination, 1X-FE-116-1 SWRI, Recording Indications From Ligaments, Bolting, Piping and Vessel Weld Examinations, 1X-FE-117-3 SWRI, Control of Nuclear Inspection Equipment and Materials, X111-AG-101-2 SWRI, Data Storage and Retrieval, XV11-AG-101-1, Change 2 SWRI, Dry Powder Magnetic Particle Examination, NDT-300-1/25 SWRI, Fluorescent Magnetic Particle Examination, NDT-300-2/37, Deviations 4, 5 SWRI, Manual Ultrasonic Examination of Pressure Vessel Welds, NDT-600-15/58, Deviation 3

. l

.

SWRI, Manual Ultrasonic Examination of Vessel-to-Nozzle Inner Radius Sections, NDT-600-11/40, Deviation 2 SWRI, Manual Ultrasonic Examination of Thin Wall Vessel Welds, NDT-600-26/6 SWRI, Manual Ultrasonic Examination of Ferritic Pressure Piping, NDT-600-41/7, Deviation 1 No violations or deviations were identifie Material and Equipment Certification The inspector reviewed the certification documents, relative to the following items:

(1) Ultrasonic instruments, transducers and couplant (2) Magnetic particle, materials and equipment (3) Eddy current equipment No violations or deviations were identifie NDE Personnel Certifications and Observations of Work Activities The inspector reviewed NDE personnel certifications in accordance with SNT-TC-1A, 1975/1980 Editio The inspector also observed the work and had discussions with personnel during the following examinations:

Ultrasonic examination of steam generator shell-to-head weld (SG-A-5) in accordance with SWRI Procedure NDT-600-15/58, Deviation 3, " Manual Ultrasonic Examination of Pressure Vessel Welds."

Eddy current examination of steam generator A, Column 72 - Row 3 and Column 71 - Row 4, steam generator B, Column 19 - Rows 19-22, 25-26 and 33-35, in accordance with Westinghouse Procedure MRS 2.4.2, GEN-28, Revision 0, " Digital Multi-Frequency Eddy Current Inspection of Pre-Service and Inservice Heat Exchanger Tubing."

No violations or deviations were identifie . Exit Interview The NRC inspector met with the licensee representatives (denoted in Paragraph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on November 21, 198 The inspector summarized the purpose and findings of the inspectio The licensee representatives acknowledged this information. The inspector also discussed the likely informational content of the inspection report with regard to documents or processes reviewed during the inspection. The licensee representatives did not identify any such j

documents / processes as proprietary.

i l

i

5

_ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -