IR 05000266/1999014

Insp Repts 50-266/99-14 & 50-301/99-14 on 990726-30.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Access Authorization Program,Alarm Stations & Communications.Security Mgt Also Inspected

ML20211K534
Person / Time
Site:	Point Beach
Issue date:	08/31/1999
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20211K532	List: IR 05000266/1999014 ML20211K526
References
50-266-99-14, 50-301-99-14, NUDOCS 9909080015
Download: ML20211K534 (12)

Text

.

(

h a

! .

'

,

l l l

'

t l U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGIONlli .

!

l l Docket Nos: 50-266; 50-301 i License Nos: DPR-24; DPR-27 i

Report No: 50-266/99014(DRS); 50-301/99014(DRS)

!

Licensee: Wisconsin Electric Power Company i

Facility: Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 ( Location: 6610 Nuclear Road l Two Rivers, WI 54241 l

l l Dates: July 26-30,1999 '

inspector: J. Belanger, Senior Physical Security inspector Approved by: J. R. Creed, Safeguards Program Manager Division of Reactor Safety 9909080015 990031

{DR ADOCK 05000266 PDR

.

.

'

,

. l t  !

l

!

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 NRC Inspection Report 50-266/99014(DRS); 50 301/99014(DRS)

This routine inspection of the physical protection program included the access authorization program, alarm stations and communications, access controls for personnel, packages and !

vehicles; protected area detection and assessment aids, personnel search equipment and the vehicle barrier syste j

- Security management discovered through another nuclear utility that an individual previously granted unescorted access to the Point Beach had failed to advise the licensee of an alcohol related arrest while having unescorted access to the Point Beach

. _

,

Plant. Interviews by the licensee and the other nuclear utility resulted in the discovery

'

that this individual had a history of alcohol related arrests that were not reported to Point

Beach and other utilities prior to access to Point Beach. The licensee appropriately

- reviewed the information and denied access. (Section S1.1) 1

- Central and Secondary Alarm stations were equipped with the appropriate alarm, surveillance and communications capabilities. Inspector observations showed that the stations were continuously manned by operators and the central alarm station did not contain any operational activities that would interfere with the execution of the detection, j assessment and response functions. (Section S1.2)  ;

* The licensee has experienced delays in the computer replacement project but expect !

l that they will complete installation prior to the end of this year. The completion of this

installation is significant because the existing computer is not Y2K compliant.

!

(Section S1.3)

l

- Observation of protected area ingress search activities showed that the licensee had positive access controls in ensuring that only authorized personnel, material, and vehicles were granted access to the protected area. Searches were thorough and j l professionally conducted. Ingress search equipment such as metal detectors, x-ray i machines, and explosive detectors, were well maintained. (Section S1.4)

l

- Performance testing of selected protected area intrusion alarm zones showed that the

detection system was maintained in a functional and effective condition that would

'

detect attempted intrusions by an adversary. The testing performed by a member of the licensee's security staff was aggressive and professional. (Section S2.1)

• Field observation of the vehicle barrier system showed that the system was maintained in an effective condition in accordance with the description provided in the licensee's security plan. Periodic inspections of the system by the licensee identified minor maintenance issues which were promptly addressed by the plant maintenance staf (Section S2.2)

i

L

( .

L .

t l

f .- .

The security staffing level was adequate to meet security operational requirements i

! specified in the physical security plan. At the time of the previous inspection, excessive I overtime was required to meet these objectives. During the current inspection, it was identified that actions taken by management to increase the security staffing level have i- significantly reduced the overtime required such that it is no longer an issue with the l security force, and that the working environment of the security force had improve (Section S6.1)

I

l c

I i

! l

!

I i

~

.

l Report Details IV. Plant Support S1 Conduct of Security and Safeguards Activities S Access Authorization Proaram Insaadian Scoos (81700)

The inspector discussed key aspects of the access authorization (AA) program with the licensee and reviewed a sample documentation of full background investigations conducted,91-03 transfers from other nuclear utilities, and reinstatements. Additionally, the inspector reviewed the records of those individuals who were denied access or had

-

their access removed, and appeals, ' Observations and Findinas The inspector reviewed the access authorization files of ten randomly selected employee and contractor personnel who were granted unescorted access to the protected area. The files were well documented and no deficiencies were note Inspection results showed that the scope and depth of background investigations satisfied NRC regulatory requirements and provided an adequate level of background information on which to base a determination for access authorizatio A root cause evaluation (RCE)98-152 conducted by the licensee in response to a quality assurance audit finding had identified that the access authorization procedures did not contain adequate detail as to how the access review process was performed or tracked. At the time of the previous security inspection in January 1999, the licensee was tracking a long term corrective action to create and implement guidelines for the AA program. The inspector determined that the licensee had developed and implemented such guidelines. The inspector's review of these guidelines showed that they were

,

comprehensive and clea A review of the denial records indicated that a contract employee failed to report an alcohol related arrest that occurred while he had unescorted access at the Point Beach Plant in April 1999. The licensee became aware of the arrest after the employee left the Point Beach plant and was requesting unescorted access at another nuclear facilit Interviews of the individual by the Point Beach AA staff and the AA staff of the other nuclear facility disclosed that this employee had a history of alcohol related arrests while he maintained unescorted access at several NRC licensed facilities and did not report them in accordance with station procedures. Both nuclear utilities denied access to the individual on the basis of the alcohol problem without evidence of rehabilitation and the failure to report the arrests. This inspector determined that the denial was based on established criteria for denial specified in AA guideline Conclusions AA related records were accurate and complete. The AA program processes were adequately documented in recently developed guidelines. The licensee appropriately denied unescorted access to an individual who had exhibited an alcohol related problem

.. . . ..

.

.. .

.

. _ _ _

_____ __ -_ ___ ---

.

..

without evidence of rehabilitation and who had failed to report an arrest while maintaining unescorted access at the Point Beach Plan S1.2 Effectiveness of Alarm Station Operations Inspection Scope (81700)

The inspector eva?uated whether the central and secondary alarm stations were equipped with the alarm, surveillance and communications capabilities described in the approved security plan, and whether the a single act could remove the station's ability of detecting a threat and calling for assistance. The inspector also reviewed whether the central alarm station contained any operational activities that would interfere with the execution of the detection, assessment, and response function Observations and Findings The inspector determined through observation and interviews with alarm station operators that both alarm stations were independent and redundant and were provided with alarm monitoring and perimeter surveillance equipment described in the approved security plan. All security systems within the alarm stations were functional. Both

. stations were continuously manned by operators who communicated with security officers and who had the capability of communicating with the local law enforcement agency. Alarm station operators conducted their duties in a professional and dedicated manner. The inspector determined through observation and interviews with these operators that there were no assigned duties that would interfere with their primary responsibility to detect, assess, and respond to alarm Conclusions The alarm station capabilities to detect, assess, and respond to alarms met security plan commitments.- Alarm station operators were effective in the performance of their dutie S1.3 Delav in Security Comouter Replacement Project

- Inspection Scope (81700)

The inspector reviewed the status of the ongoing security computer replacement projec Interviews were conducted with the Emergency Response Manager and the Security Supervisor, b. ' Observations and Findinas >

The Security Supervisor (SS) advised that the security computer replacement project was approximately two months behind schedule but that their expectation was that the new computer would be installed prior to the end of 1999. The significance of installing the new computer prior to January 1, 2000, lies with the fact that the existing computer

is not Y2K compliant. The SS indicated that approximately five weeks of the delay was due to requirement for a review of the project by station engineering that was now required by station procedur _ . . . . . - -- - . .

-

. .- .

_

-

c

.

~

.

Subsequent to the completion of this inspection, the SS advised the inspector by l telephone that the five week delay for engineering analysis was eliminated and that the ;

current delay is approximately one month rather than two. The SS indicated that initiation of the installation would begin in late September and go through October 199 I Conclusions The current security computer replacement project was delayed by approximately one month but the licensee expects to install the system during September / October 199 This is significant because the current security computer is not Y2K complian S1.4 Protected Area Inaress Searches were Effective insoection Scope (81700)

The inspector evaluated personnel, vehicle, and package search activities to ensure that personnel, hand-carried items, packages and materials, and vehicles were adequately identified, authorized, and searched. Areas observed included the interior of the gatehouse, main and north vehicle search areas, and the north warehouse. The inspector observed personnel and hand-carried item searches in the gatehouse during periods of high traffic on three days of the inspection. The inspector observed one shipment of material transferred from the warehouse to the protected area. Two vehicle inspections at the main vehicle gate were observe Observations and Findinas 1 Ingress search equipment to include metal detectors, x-rays and explosive detectors were well maintained. Search equipment operators performed their duties in a i professional and thorough manner. The inspector observed that tests of the ingres , !

search equipment were conducted in accordance with established security procedure l All tests of the equipment were successfulin meeting established standards. No I discrepancies or weaknesses were note Conclusions Personnel, package, and vehicle searches were adequate. Ingress search equipment was maintained in an effective conditio S2 Status of Security Facilities and Equipment S Protected Area Detection System was Effective Insoection Scooe (81700)

The inspector evaluated the licensee's protected area intrusion alarm system for effectiveness. The inspector observed a member of the licensee's security organization perform the monthly performance testing in approximately twenty percent of the ;

protected area intrusion alarm zones which were selected by the inspecto I i

6 1

-

p

'.

l l

! _Qbservations and Findinas Attempted intrusions were aggressively conducted by a security officer at the request of the inspector at multiple locations in each of the six alarm zones selected. Potential exploitable vulnerabilities in the system were identified by the security operations supervisor or the inspector. All penetration attempts by crawling, Jump testing, and walking were successfully detected. Isolation zones were maintained clear of debris and vegetation that could cause nuisance alarms. All alarm hardware appeared to be maintained in good conditio Conclusions The licensee's intrusion alarm system, based on a sample review, was functional and effective in detecting attempted penetrations of the protected area perimete S2.2 Vehicle Barrier System was Maintained in Effective Conditiori Inspection Scooe (81700)

The inspector conducted a walk down of the licensee's vehicle barrier system to ensure that the system met security plan commitments and was adequately maintaine Observations and Findinas The inspector verified by observation that the as-built vehicle barrier system and components of tha system were consistent with the description in the approved security j plan. A review of records showed that periodic security surveillance were conducted in l accordance with site security procedures. Maintenanco and compensatory measures I were initiated to address identified problem Conclusions The licensee's vehicle control measures met regulatory requirements and was maintained in an effective condition. No deficiencies were identifie S6 Security Organization and Administration S Security Manaoement Successful in Reducina Security Force Overtime i Inspection Scope (81700)

During the previous security inspection conducted in January 1999, security l management expressed concern regarding continued excessive overtime in the security force and were pursuing efforts to increase and retain security staffing. The inspector interviewed the Emergency Response Manager and the Security Supervisor pertaining progress on this matter.

! Observations and Findinas Security management stated the increased security staffing achieved a significant reduction in the amount of overtime required to maintain security operations. In addition

gx

.

'

. i l

) to increasing staffing levels, the licensee was working with the security contractor to

'

improve security officer retention through the initial interview and selection process for new hire The inspector's interviews with approximately twelve members of the security force confirmed that the overtime was significantly reduced and that work attitudes and job performance improved. They indicated that overtime was infrequent and that it was usually voluntary. They also stated that they were able to take their days off as schedule ' Conclusions Security management was successful in achieving the staffing levels required to maintain security operations without the need for continued excessive overtime. Work attitudes and performance on the part of the security force improved as a resul X1 Exit Meeting Summary _

'

The inspector presented the inspection results to membens of licensee management on July 29, 1999. The licensee acknowledged the findings presented. The licensee did not identify any information discussed as proprietar I

i J

-

.

.

PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED Licensee C. Andrews, Orientations Specialist A. Cayla, Manager, Regulatory Services & Licensing M. Fencl, Security Specialist M. Findlay, Emergency Resources Manager F. Flentje, Senior Regulation and Compliance Specialist J. Gadzala, Licensing Manager V. Kaminskas, Maintenance Manager J. Knorr, Regulation and Compliance Manager B. Kopetsky, Security Specialist J. McCullum, Security Supervisor R. Mende, Plant Manager M. Reddemann, Site Vice President M. Sellman, Chief Nuclear Officer INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED I

IP 81700: ~ Physical Security Program For Power Reactors l

I

1 l

9 l

.

, . . . .

..

, i LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED l

Opened

)

None l

Closed None Discussed .

None

l l

l i

l

.

..

l l

l LIST OF ACRONYMS USED AA Access Authorization !

'

CFR Code of Federal Regulations DRS Division of Reactor Safety SS Security Supervisor RCE Root Cause Investigation l

l l

l

!

l

11

-

..

+

,

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED Point Beach Nuclear Plant Security System Tracking (Monthly reports for January through June <

1999)

Quality Verification Audit Report No. A-P-10 dated June 18,1999; Subject: Security and Fitness for Duty Programs t

.

t

,

l l

\

\

l 1 i 1

! l l

12