GO2-83-366, Forwards WNP-2 Project Review of Completed Safety-Related Work, Fourteenth Progress Rept for Jan-Mar 1983,per Util 800717 Commitments in Response to Notice of Violation & Addl Info in Accordance w/10CFR50.54(f)

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards WNP-2 Project Review of Completed Safety-Related Work, Fourteenth Progress Rept for Jan-Mar 1983,per Util 800717 Commitments in Response to Notice of Violation & Addl Info in Accordance w/10CFR50.54(f)
ML20074A649
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 04/26/1983
From: Carlisle C
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To: Martin J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
References
GO2-83-366, NUDOCS 8305130245
Download: ML20074A649 (17)
v • d • e


Text

,

  • 1

~

Washington Public Power Supply System P.O. Box 968 3000 GeorgeWashington Way Richland, Washington 99352 ,(509)372-5000

"' l .,

b April 26, 1983 Docket Number 50-397 Responds to: N/A G02-83-366 Response required by: N/A Mr. J. D. Martin, Regional Administrator Nuclear Regulatory Cmmission, Region V 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596

Subject:

SUPPLY SYSTEM NUCLEAR PRCATELT 10. 2 IOURTEENTH PPOGRESS REPORT - 10CFR50.54(f)

Reference:

a) G02-80-153, N.O. Strand to USNBC, "WPPSS Nuclear Project No. 2 Docket No. 50-397, EA-80-20, Notice of Violation and Additional Infonnation -

10CFR50.54(f) ," dated July 17, 1980 This is the fourteenth Progress Report on the actions we have taken in regard to our cmmitments in Reference a) . This quarterly report covers the period of January through March 1983.

Sanple verification reinspections of work cunpleted prior to July,1980 by active site contractors have been empleted. All of the contractors except Bechtel have sutmitted final reports; only t.o remain to be approvel. Bechtel's work was far more extensive, and the reports are not yet emplete. The status of individual tasks is detailed in the attachments.

0305130245 830426 PDR ADOCK 05000 R

Mb,

J. D. Martin-April 26, 1983 Page 2 Please contact me if you have any questions on this matter.

. 1h6 Progra:n Director, WNP-2 CSC:RLK:eek Attachnents: 1. WNP-2 Project Review of Ccxupleted Safety-Related ibrk -

Progress Report IA. -Prepurchase and Inactive Contracts -

Status Report IB. Deficiency Doctanent Review -

Status Report cc: WS Chin, BPA - Richland JA Forrest, B&R - Richland PE Grady, BPA - VNP-2 JB Knotts, Jr., Debevoise & Thman, Shoreham Bldg.

120017th St. NW. , Washington, DC 20036 ND Lewis, EFSEC, WS PYll, Olympia, NA 98504 TA Margelsdorf, Bechtel - WNP-2

-A Toth, NRC - Resident Inspector, WNP-2 JJ Verderber, B&R, 185 Crossway Park Dr., Woodbury, NY 11797 i

e - w-,,, -- - . , , _

' ' ATI%CHMENT 1 Paga 1 of 6 FUJRIEENDI PROGRESS REPORT WNP-2 PIO7ECT REVIDi OF COMPLE'IED SAFETY-RELATED WORK A. INTRODUCTION This rcport covers activities of the Supply Systan's Quality veri-fication Program (QVP) durirs the nonths of January, February and March, 1983. Reinspection of hardware installed in the plant by active site contractors and selected for reverification is acrnplete, and the results of these reinspections are being evaluated. As the review of prepurchase and inactive (PP&IA) contract records approached ccznpletion, problens were identified indicating a possible need for verification reinspection of work installed by closed site contracts. Investigation and reinspections have been initiated. Several contract reports coverirs the contractors' activities have been crznpleted, others are in progress.

B. GHERAL INFOR% TION

1. An audit of the Quality Verification Progran was performed by the Supply Systan's Corporate Quality Assurance organization in January. This audit covered activities defined as amunitments to the NBC as a result of the 10CFR50.54(f)-response letter arx1 subsequent modifications. Four quality finding reports (no significant deficiencies) resulted frczn the audit. The QVP office responded to then with the appropriate adjustments to procedure, as follows:-.

e RCSW-ll, RCSW Progran Manual Administration This internal office procedure was revised to include the requirenent that internal QVP office procedures coverirs quality-affecting activities be reviewed ard approved by the Project QA Manager, o RCSW-12, Documentation Control This internal office p.ucedure was revised to clarify certain requirenents (update) arri to secure approval by the Project QA Manager.

e OVI-07, Active Site Contracts Evaluation & Selection For Reinspection This-QVP instruction was revised to clarify its exclusive purpose of recordirg decisions not to reinspect certain active site contracts.

ATISCHMENT 1 Paga 2 of 6

2. An NBC inspection team of five senior personnel perfonned a review of CVP activities durim the week of February 13. The team's review covered all elsnents of the QVP regardig our response actions to the original 10CFR50.54(f) request and sub-sequent ammituts. 'Ihe results of the team's review, eleven issues on which further information was required to confirm satisfactory action by the Supply Systen, were %=M at a meetig with Region V personnel on March 17. Of the eleven issues identified, we had provided additional clarification for seven and cmmitted to additional action for four. The additional action consists of:

o Identifying Changes in Ctmmitments The Supply Systen will revise its ommitment smmary document (dated July,1982, sent to you in the Eleventh Progress Report, G02-8?-544, dated 8/09/82) to record in general terms, the methods by which 50.54(f)-response-letter ommitments hah been addressed, identifying any changes made in the original ammitments.

e Strengthenirg Review of PP&IA Contracts The Supply System will initiate a special review of PP&IA contracts to determine what plant omponents have special importance or are unique and deserve special attention.

The review will include a " boiling down" of critical c mpo-nents which should be reviewed or reinspected, regardless of other indicators to the contrary, an accountig of pre-vious coverage by other programs, aM a review of perti-nent procedures, specific to the selected ccruponents. If not satisfactorily addressed, these special itens will be reinspected for specific attributes determined to be rele-vant to the special nature of the c mponents.

3. Durirs this reporting period, the staff levels have been in-creased in the QVP office by one and the Bechtel Reverification Group (BRG) by three. BRG has added two technical writers aM another engineer. The QVP office replaced an analyst lost through attrition in the last report period. Also, the Bechtel hane office assigned a part-time statistician to assist BRG in analyzing and reporting trends of-reinspection results.
4. In addition to the QVP instruction revisions accouplished in response to the Corporate QA audit, two other procedures were revised during this report period:

e OVI-08, Reverification Inspection Team Concept This instruction was revisal to clarify the actions re-quired by team msnbers to justify and record the results of reinspections.

A'ITACHMENT 1

, Paga 3 of 6 e OVI-09, Special Structural Steel Reinspection Criteria This instruction now incorporates a revised engineerirg justification for the inspection criteria, and a minor revision to the criteria.

C. SYSTEMS CNPIETIN

1. The following is a brief report for each of the active site con-tractors' reverification activities:

o Contract 210A, Peter Kiewit Sons - Cmplete, reported earlier.

e Cbntract 213A, Pittshirg-DesMoines Steel - Cmplete, reported earlier, o Contract 215/230, WBG/Bechtel - Reinspection of all m ntract 215 hardware itms selected for reverification has ben cmpleted.

The followirs is a sumary of work durire this 2eport period:

Contairrnent Drywell Structural Steel - All reinspections of pipe whip supports ard structural steel were empleted in the previous report period. Reinspection of two beam-seat connections to the sacrificial shield wall structure re-vealed dimersional configurations that did not omply with the latest drawing. This original sample was increased to include two remaining beam seats of this type. Results of the latest inspection are being evaluatM by the Architect-Engineer (A/E) .

Startup Systes - Sample hardware reinspections were cmpleted in the previous report period. Thirty-five system reports have been written by the BRG and approved by Bechtel QA.

Reinspection results for the reainiry two systas will be evaluated and the reports cmpletM as four outstanding NCR's on these systes are addressed by the A/E.

QCIR Review - The QCIR (Bechtel's QC Inspection Report) review, initiated in the last report period for the purpose of addressire a concern about one engineer's performance in this program, has been empletd. Although a few of the QCIR's were converted to NCR's for administrative purposes, no evidence of technical inadequacy has been identified.

Contract Reverification Report - Preparation of the overall contract report for 215 is approximately 75% ocruplete.

The parts reaining to be empleted are those sections dealirs with cxxnpilation and evaluation of the reinspec-tion results.

e Contract 216, The Waldinger Corporation - Cmplete, reported earlier. An addendum to the reverification report was pre-pard to clarify a few areas in the text. This addendum will be issud in the next report period.

, , , - - - - a n g -n _-,.. -- m c -n- - - -1..n

ATDGETF 1 Raga 4 of 6

1. (Continual) e Contract 217, Sentry - Cmplete, reported earlier.

Sme areas of weakness in the final report, identified by the NBC Resident Inspector, have been addressed and renedied by incorporatire an addendun into the report.

'Ihe addendun was pr@ared, reviewed, ard approved during this report period, and published at the beginning of April.

e Contract 218, Fischbach/Iord (F/L) - The dcaft of the final report for this contract has been under review and iteration by the QVP office and BRG. The BRG has prepared the Bechtel Sumary for the report, covering Bechtel and Supply Systan activities in verifying electrical mnstruction work. Re-view and approval of the contract 218 report are expected to be emplete in the next report period.

e Contracts 219/234, O.B. Cannon - Cmplete, reported earlier.

In the Technical Audit Associates (TAA) review of the final reports of these contracts, a request was made to clarify that reinspection of coating work in the contaiment wetwell and drywell areas resulted in rejection and rework of a significant portion of prior work. Revisions to these re-ports are being prepared for this purpose.

e Contract 220, Johnson Controls, Inc. - The final reverifi-cation report for this contract had been ompleted and re-viewed by BRG at the time of the Corporate QA audit, dis-cussed in GENERAL Itsu 1. As a result of Supply Systen review, a number of additional Bechtel QC surveillance re-ports of the contractor's activities have been included in the final report. Review by the QVP office is still in progress.

2. In addition to the individual mntract reports mvering this element of the program, an overall Systens-Cmpletion Task Report is being prepared to sunnarize the reverification work accmplished for all active site contracts. Preparation of the first draft of this report has begun.

D. PREPUPCHASE AtO INACTIVE CONTRACIS

1. Document reviews on all prepurchase and inactive contracts have been empleted with one exception. One outstaniing purchase order  :

contract was identified in a recently-cmpleted review mnducted by the QVP office to assure that no eligible contracts (QC-I/SC-I) were overlooked by QVP. This addition, contract 7426, has been entered in the status report (Attachment IA to this report) . The preparation of the overall task report of this element of the pro-gram has begun.

ATIACHMENT 1 Paga 5 of 6

2. During this report period, as a result of the PGA doctment review, the QVP identifial a need for reinspection of mntract 206 welded structural steel. The total population of this work was identified, randcm samples were selected, and reinspections are in progress. A re-review of pertinent dcv pnantation is being carried out at the same time to ascertain that the hardware and records match, and to identify the specific nature of discrepancies, if they should be encountered.

Contract 206 (Bovee-Crail) was the criginal contract responsible for general construction (concrete, structural steel, etc.) of the Reactor Buildirig and other b1ildirigs. One specific area of this con-tract was not satisfactorily addressed by other reviews in the pro-gran: structural steel installed by a specific subcontractor, which is the work being reinspected at this time.

Since contract 206 was terminated by default, we consider it necessary to investigate the possibility that follow-on construction of the same type could have similar problens as those discussed above. To assure that such follow-on construction is satisfactorily verified, we have initiated a review of mncrete and structural steel con-struction accmplished under other contracts after default of 206, wnich were to cmplete the original work scope of 206. The results of this review will be included with the information in our final reports. If a need for reinspection arises frm the review, it will be performed, as was the contract 206 inspection discussed above, in accordance with our Program procedures.

3. Reinspection of the diesel-generators by the Supply Systen Test and Startup organization (T&SU) has been completed and a report of their activities has been issued. The results show that the majority of deficiencies identified were of a minor nature with no significant trends apparent. The open deficiencies are being addressed by T&SU and/or Burns & Roe Engineering for resolution.

E. SPECIAL TASKS

1. Deficiency Document Review Progress continues on task reports documenting the reviews to verify the technical adequacy of site documents which dissaninated technical information to construction contractors. Individual reports are being prepared for eight such documents. Three reports have been prepared and are under review, thren are being prepared, and the document and procedure review is nearly complete on the remaining tm .

On our review of contractors' internal documentation, the document and procedure review has been cmpletal for nearly all active con-tracts and continues for inactive contracts. Preparation of re-ports of these activities and their results will follow.

ATIACHMENI' 1 Page 6 of 6 At this writing, the preliminary results of our Pi-@umu reviews of technical docuents indicate that 1) sme dmmnts received an indeperrient review for technical adequacy as a matter of procedure; these have been evaluated to meet the objectives of this Program, or 2) where this did not occur, an independent review was performed by this Progr m; no dispositions were identified to be technically inadequate.

The status of our reviews is sumarized in the charts emprising Attachment 1B to this report.

2. Personnel Qualifications The examination of personnel qualifications reviews conducted under the Restart Program continued during this period. The results of this examination, cmbined with similar information frcm reviews performed in the QVP, will be assessed to determine if further in-vestigation is warranted. An analysis of t!m Deficiency Docunent Review results for engineering personnel splayed by both the A/E and the construction contractors began during this period.
3. Receiving Inspections A prelaminary outlina for the final report of this task was prepared during this report period. In =Mition to information on repeat receiving inspections of contract 215 ASME materials performed by Bechtel, this report will include data generated when Bechtel assuned responsibility for the Supply System warehouses and per-formed another emplete receiving inspection on all ites. The examination of receiving inspection reviews perfonral during the Restart Progr e is continuing. As in the Personnel Qualifications Task, the results of this examination will be cmbined with similar information frm other reviews in this program for assessment to determine if further investigation is required.
4. Grout Evaluation Program Cmplete, reported earlier.

ATTAC> TENT 1A 4

FOURTEENTH FROGRESS REPORT SUPPLY SYSTD4 REVIEW OF PREPURCHAcf Af0 INACTIE CONTRACTS STATUS REPORT l i i I i l

.i l DESCRIPTION OF l STATUS OF OWER FINAL I l STATUS OF OWER EVALUATION l I

I CDNTRACTOR I CDNTRACTOR'S WORK l DOCLNENTATION REVIEW l RESULTS OF DOCLMENTATION REVIEW I ON NEED FOR REINSPECTION l l l (X COWLETE) i I (X CONPLETE) l I I I I I i l i I i 12808-2 General Electrict NSSS l 100 lNo Deficiencies i 100 l l l l l l

l l l l l 7 Science Systems l Seepage Control From :l l l l 1

l & Technology l Ponds Study l 100 INo Deficiencies l 100 l I I I I

I I I I

I 17 Pathway Bellows ,1 Refueling Bellows 1 100 INo Significant Deficiencies 100 I I l l l l

i i i i i i l 18 Farr Company l Standby Gas Treatment I l l l l :l & HEPA Filters l 100 INo Deficiencies l 100 I I I I I

I I I I  ;

4 lNo Significant Deficiencies 22A Joy Manufactur- 1: HVAC Fans 100 l 100 l .

, 1 ,

4 l ing i i l l l i l i I i j I i l i I I

. I 23 Byron Jackson l Standby Service Water l 100 lNo Deficiencies l 100 l l Pumps 1 ll l l l

l I I l

I i i l 4

l 24 tOICO Inc l. Shop Fabricated Tanks ll 100 lNo Deficiencies l 100 I I l l 1 I I j l 28 Buffalo Forge l HVAC Fans 100 lNo Significant Deficiencies 'l 100 l l I I I i i I i I I I I l 31A Whiting i Turbine Generator and i 100 IDeficiencies resolved, Rein- l 100 l l l Reactor Building Cranes!! llspection Completed L l l l I

l l 3200 Clayton 'i JIB Overhead Cranes 11 100 INo Significant Deficiencies 1 100 l

' l I l I I i l 35A Crane Co. !i Pumps & Motors l 100 INo Deficiencies 1 100 l l 1 l l l 1 I I I I l 36 Acme Concrete l ProdJction & Delivery l 100 lNo Sigr.ificant Deficiencies l 100 l l l of Concrete l l l l l l l l l l l

i

1 I ATTAC> TENT 1A FOURTEENTH PROGRESS REPORT SUPPLY SYSTD4 REVIEW OF PREFURCHASE AND INACTIVE CONTRACTS STATUS REPORT s i I I I I I I l DESCRIPTION OF l STATUS OF OWNER FINAL l l STATUS OF OWNER EVALUATION l l CDNTRACTOR I CDNTRACTOR'S WORK l DOCtNENTATION REVIEW l RESULTS OF DOCLMENTATION REVIEW l DN NEED FOR REINSPECTION l

, I ll l (X CO WLETE) l II (X COMPLETE) l l l  ! l l l l l 41A velan Valve l N1 clear Valves l 100 lNo Si pificant Deficiencies ll 100 I .

1 I l l l l I I I I 1 1 418 Anchor / Darling i Nuclear Valves l 100 INo Deficiencies l 100 1  ;

I I I I I i ,

I I I I I I ,

l 42A Fisher Controls l Control Valves 1 100 INo Deficiencies l 100 l j l l l l l l 1 I I I I l

I 42B Fisher Controls l Control Valves 1 100 INo Significant Deficiencies l 100 l
1 I I I I l
1 I I I I i 3

1 47A Westinghouse l Switchgear l 100 INo Deficiencies l 100 l

1 I I l l l I l

. l 48 Westinghouse u 480 Volt Substation 1 100 'No Deficiencies ll 100 I I I I I 4 I I I I l 49 I-T-E Imperial l Motor Control Centers L 100 INo Sirpificant Deficiencies Il 100 1 I I I I I

. I I I I I

, l 51A ESB Inc. 1 Batteries l 100 INo Deficiencies 1 100 I

, I l l i l l 1 I I I I l l 51B Power Conversion! Battery Chargers 100 INo Significant Deficiencies l 100 I

1 I I l l I .

I I l l 52 Solid State i Uninterruptible Power I 100 UNo Deficiencies l 100 l l Controls i Supply l l l l l l l l l 4

1 1 I I I l 53 Stewart , Diesel Generators i 100 100cumentation Deficiencies Being l 99 l l Stevenson i l lAddressed, Reinspection Completed l l I I I I I I I I I I i

1 55 Westinghouse l Containment Electrical ll 100 lNo Significant Deficiencies l 99 l l l Penetrations l l l l

1 1 I I I I l l 1 I I l I 57 Kinenetrics l Accelerometers l 100 [No Deficieties l 100 l l 1 l l l l L

-.7

.y.__, _

ATTAONENT 1A Page 3 of 5 F0lRTEENTH PROGIESS REPORT SUPPLY SYSTEM REVIEW OF PREPURCHASE APO INACTIVE CONTRACTS STATUS REPORT l l l l l l l STATUS OF OWER EVALUATION I i l DESCRIPTION OF l STATUS OF OWER FINAL l l l CONTRACTOR'S WORK l DOCLNENTATION REVIEW l RESULTS OF DOCLMENTATION REVIEW l DN NEED FOR REINSPECTION I CONTRACTOR I ll (X COMFLETE) I l l l (X CONPLETE) I 1 I I l

I l l I I I lNo Significant Deficiencies l 100 l SC Jelco l Instronent Racks 100 l l l l l l l l l l l 100 l l 59 CE l Instrument & Control l 100 lNo Deficiercles l l l l l l Boards 1 1 I l l l i i I I i lNo Significant Deficiencies l 100 l

! 60A Sentry Equip- l Sampling and Analysis l 100 l

I Systems l l l l ment Corp. I I

l 1 I I l 1 100 l l 62A Okonite i Electrical Cable 1 100 lNo Deficiencies l I I 1 I I l I I l l l . I INo significant Deficiencies l 100 l l 62B Raychem i Electrical Cable l 100 I

i l 1 I

1 I l

'l 1 100 l l 62C Rockbestos 1 Electrical Cable I 100 l Deficiencies Resolved ll l l l l I i I J l 100 I I l 67 H K Porter l Air Handling thits 100 lNo Deficiencies i l  !

I l l

'. I l I '

100 l l 68 BIF l Isolation valves l 100 INo Significant Deficiencies ,

I I 1 1 l l l l l l 100 INo Sig11ricant Deficiencies L 100 I l l 69 Velan l Check Valves l l l l l l I I 1 I HNo Deficiencies l 100 l l 71 Air Products & l Hydrogen Recombiner 1 100 l

l l l

1 Chemicals l i I I I I I l I I l l l 100 l j

l 73 Elgar l 15KVA Inverters 1 100 llNo Deficiencies l l l l I I I l l I I I l Pipe Whip Restraints l 100 (Deficiencies Identified and l 99 l l 90 Leckenby l l l l Corrected thru Action Plan l l l I I I i l l 1 i I l 100 l l 92A Ingersoll Rand l Sampling Probes l This is an Active Pre- lNo Deficiencies l l purchase Contract l l l l l l l l l l

-.- .- - - - . . _ . ~ _ -. - . _._ .. -.

ATTAD9ENT 1A Page 4 of 5 FOURTEENTH PROGRESS REPORT SUPPLY SYSTD4 REVIEW OF PRERIRCHASE APO INACTIW CONTRACTS ti?ATUS IEPORT 4

I I l

! I I I l l DESCRIPTION OF l STATUS OF OWPER FINAL l l STATUS OF OWER EVALUATION l RESULTS OF DOCUMENTATION REVIEW l ON NEED FOR REINSE CTION 'l i l CONTRACTOR I CONTRACTOR'S Wmk l DOCUMENTATION REVIEW l l l (X COMPLETE) l l (X COMPLETE) l l

i l l l

. I

! I I I l I .

928 Kaman Sciences l Radiation Nonitoring l This is an Active Pre- lNo Deficiencies l 99 l [

l l l l purchase Contract l- l l l I I l l i i l l I i

, I 93 GE Controls l Vacuum Breaker Valves 1 100 INo Deficiencies i 100 l I I i'

, I I I I L 1

94 8 F Shaw l MSRV Discharge l 100 INo Deficiencies l 100 l 4 1 l l- 1 i l

  • l I I r 1 l l 12409 Buehler Nuclear BWR High Density Spent , 100 INo Significant Deficiencies l 100 1 l Products l Fuel Racks l, l l l 4

l i I I I l j l l i I I I i

l 6426 Wright- 1 Interim Construction i 100 INo Significant Deficiencies l 95 l l Schuchart-Harbcrt L . ISpecial Scoping Review in Progressi l j i l i l I l i i i i i

l 6809 Bethlehem l Reinforcing Steel I 100 INo Sig11ficant Deficiencies . I 99 l 3 I I I I I

l I I I I i

i 6904 Welk Brothers l Annular Sleeves I 100 lNo Significant Deficiencies ll 100 l l l l l l 1 I I . I l

2 1 6905 Welk Brothers l Skimmer Surge Tank l 100 INo Significant Deficiencies l 99 l l l 1 l I I i I i 1

, l 6912 Pybus l Structural Steel l 100 INo Significant Deficiencies I 99 l l l I I I l I I I I I

l' l 6917 Texas Pipe i Pipe Spools l 100 INo Sicpificant Deficiencies ll 99 l I I I

l I i i

l 7012 Brand IndustrialI: Form Separation System 100 LNo Significant Deficiencies 1 99 l l

l ,

- I .

. l l 7426 Northwest Copperl Exhaust Duct l 95 lNo Significant Deficiencies l 10 l l I i

, I I I .I 1 1 l i I I I I I l l 205 Stewart Erikson l Reactor Building i_ 100 INo Significant Deficiencies l 100 l  !

I I Substrxture l I l i  :

. I l l i I l 1

ATTAONENT 1A Page 5 of 5 FOURTEENTH PROGRESS REPORT SUPPLY SYSTEM REVIEW OF PREPURCHASE Ato INACTIVE CONTRACTS STATUS REPORT l l l l l l l DESCRIPTION OF l STATUS Or OWER FINAL l l STATUS OF OWER EVALUATION l l

l DOCLNENTATION REVIEW l RESULTS OF DOCLNENTATION REVIEW l DN NEED FOR REINSPECTION l l QNTRACTOR l CONTRACTOR'S WORK l (% COMPLETE)  ! l (% COMR.ETE) l l l l l 1 I I l

I I I I I l 1 206 Bovee Crall 1 General Construction i 100  : Potential Deficiencies Reinspec- 1: 95 l l l tions of Strue. Stl. Recomended I l l

l l , I l

l 206A Peter Klewit l Architectural Const. l 100 (No Significant Deficiencies ll 95 l l l l lSpecial Scoping Review in Progressi l I I I I l l

l l l l l l l 207 PDM 'l Structural Steel l 100 lNo Sicpiricant Deficiencies l 100 l 1 1 I I I l l 1 1 I I l l 209 Rigging Int. I Rjgging of Reactor i 100 INo Deficiencies l 100 l l l Pressure Vessel II l l 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I l l 210 Peter Kiewit i Architectural Const. I 100 10 pen Documentation Deficiencies l 95 l l l l l Resolved, Special Scoping Review l l l l l lin Progress l l l I I I I I I I I I I i l 213 POM l Primary Containment 1 100 INo Significant Deficiencies l 100 l l i Vessel l i U l l 1 l l 1 I i l l 221 PTL l Testing Laboratory l 100 10 pen Deficiencies Being Resolved l 99 l l l l l thru Corrective Action Process l l l 1 I l I l l 225 McMillin Bros. I Make Up Water Ptaphouse" 100 lNo Significant Deficiencies 'l 100 l l l l l l l l l l l l l l 226 Sime l Reactor Building i 100 lNo Deficiencies l 100 l l l Excavation l l l l l I I l l l l l l l l 233 B F Shaw .. Spray Pond Alteration i 100 INo Deficiencies l 100 l l l l l l l l I I I I l l t Reactor Internals l l l l l 235 GEI & SE l Instrument Hodificationsl 100 lNo Significant Deficiencies l 99 l l I I l l l

F0lRTEENTH IROGRESS REFORT Attachment IB Page 1 of 4 DEFICIENCY 00CtDENT REVIEW St944ARY QC - I CONTRACTS l QJALITY CLASS-1 SEISMIC-I SITE DOCl#ENTATION SUBICT l l SITE WORK PERFORMED TO QVP REVIEW l l l l PCN l PED CWR ECN RCC CD NCR RFI l i l Contract)' Contractor lReviewlStatus+l Review IStatus+ Review Status + Review l Status + ReviewlStatus+ Review IStatus+ ReviewlStatus+ ReviewlStatus+l l 205* l Stewart-Erickson l Yes l 7 I E I 7 E 7 Yes l 7 I Yes I 7 Yes I 7 Yes l 11 Yes l 5 l

., 1 206* IBovee-Crall l Yes l 7 l E l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes I 11 l Yes l 4 l I l 206A* l Peter Klewit Sons' l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l E l 7 l Ves l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 11 l Yes l 6 l l'207* lPittsburgh-Des Moines l Yes ] 7 l Yes ! 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 11 l Yes l 3 i j l 209' lLampson Inc l Yes l 7 l D l 7 l Yes l 7 I Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l D l 7 i D l 7 l 2 l 210* l Peter Kiewit Sons' l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 11 l Yes ! 7 l i l 210A IPeter Kiewit Sons' l Yes l 7 l B l 7 l E l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l B l 7 l B l 7 l

! l 6426' IWright Schuchart Harbor l Yes l 7 l E l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 11 l Yes l 3 l l 213* lPittsburgh-Des Moines l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l E I 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 11 l Yes l 6 l l 213A* lPittsburgh-Des Moines l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l E I 7 l Yes l 7 l F l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 11 l Yes i 7 l l l 215 lWSH/Boecon/GERI l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l F l 7 l Yes l 7 l F l 7 l Ves l 7 l Yes l 11 l Yes l 11 l

I 216 lWaldinger l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l F l 7 l Wes l 7 l F l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 11 l Yes l 7 l l 217 l Sentry l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l F l 7 l T4 l 7 l F l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 11 l Yes l 7 l j l 218 lFischbach/ Lord l Yes l 7 l Yes Nl 7 l F l 7 l Yes l 7 l F l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 11 l Yes l 7 l j l 219 l0.B. Cannon l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l F l 7 l Yes l 7 l F l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 11 l Yes l 7 l j l 220 l Johnson Controls l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l F l 7 l Yes ! 7 l F l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 11 l Yes l 7 l i l 221' l Pacific Testing Labs l Yes l 7 l E l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 11 l A l - l l 1 221A l Pacific Testing Labs l Yes l 7 l D l 7 l E l 7 I Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l D l 7 l 'D l 7 l l 225' lMcMlllan Brothers l Yes l 7 l D l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 10 l Yes l 6 l 1 l 226 lSime Contruction Co. l Yes l 7 l E l 7 l E l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 3 l f l 233' l8F Shaw I Yes l 7 l Yes. l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 I Yes l 11 l Yes l 3 l i j l 234 10.B. Cannon l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l E l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 i Yes l 11 l Yes l 7 l j l 235 lGE IS&E l Yes l 7 l D l 7 l E l 7 l Yes I 7 l Yes l 7 l Yes l 7 l D l 7 l D l 7 l NOTES
LECEPO:
A - Review not commenced PCN - Project Change Notice 4 0 - No QC-I Work performed prior to 7/80 PED - Project Engineering Directive C - Special Review NCR - Nonconformance Report D - No QC-1 or QC-II/SC-1 Docunentation closed prior to 7/80 RFI - Request For Information E - Document not used for this contract ECN - Engineering Change Notice CWR - Contractor Waiver Request

~

F - Document reviewed under CAR 1475
  • - Denotes Inactive Contract RCC - Request for Contract Change

+ - Numbers indicate action in Flow Chart, Page 4 C.O. - Change Order

F0lRTEENTH PROGRESS REPORT Attachment IB Page 2 of 4 DEFICIENCY DOCtMENT REVIEW TASK NONCONFORMANCE REPrHT (NG)

REVIEW SlDEW l l I l l OISCREPANCIES I l l l l NO. OF NCR'S l l IDENTIFIED l CLARIFICATluN I l

CONTRACT l CLOSE0 PRIOR l l REQUIRING l FROVIDED - l CONTRACT l CONTRACTOR ACTIVITY l TO 7/80 I SAMPLE I 1 ARIFICATION l Nm CLEARED l RFMARKS 205* l Stew-Erikson Rx Bldg. Substructure l 31 1 4 l 0 l -

l 206* l Bovee-Crall l General Construction l 417 l 42 1 0 l -

l 206A* l Peter Kiewit Sons' l Arch. Construction l 387 l 39 l 4 l A l3 Clarifications Are Under Review By l l l l l l lThe Supply System Engineering 207* l Pittsburgh-Des l l l l l l l Moines Steel Co. I Structural Steel l 32 l 3 l 1 l 1 l 209' l Lampson Inc. l Rigging of Reactor Pressure l l l l l l l vessel i 2 l 0 1 -

l -

l 210' l Peter Kiewit Sons' l Arch. Construction i 41 l 5 1 0 l -

l 210A l Peter Klewit Sons' l Arch. Construction l B l B l -

l -

l 6426' l Wright Schuchart l l l l l l l Harbor i Interim General Construction l 113 l 11 1 0 l -

l 213' l Pittsburgh-Des I i l l l l l Moines Steel Co. l Primary Cont Vessel l 104 1 10 l 1 l 1 l 213A* l Pittsburgh-Des l l l l l l l Moines Steel Co. l Primary Cont Vessel Retrofit l 75 l 10 1 1 l 1 1 215 l WSH/Boecon/GORI l Mechanical Construction l 1016 l 126 l 11 l 11 1 216 1 Waldinger l HVAC, Plumbing l 420 1 49 l 15 l 15 l 217 l Sentry l Fire Protection l 3 l 1 1 0 l -

l 218 l Fischbach/ Lord l Electrical Construction 1 375 1 37 l 6 l 6 l 219 l 0.B. Cannon l Special Coatings i 13 l 2 1 0 l -

l 220 l Johnson Controls l Instrumentation l 27 l 3 1 0 l -

l 221* ' paalfic Testing Labl Testing l 6 l 1 1 0 l -

1 221A I Pacific Testing Lab] Testing l 8 l B l -

1 -

l 225' l McMillan Brothers l Makeup Water Pump House l 24 l 2 l 1 l 1 l 233' l BF Shaw l Spray Pond Alterations l 4 l 1 1 0 l -

l 234 1 0.8. Cannon l Wetwell Coating l 4 l 1 1 0 l .

I 235 l CE IS&E l I&C Board Modification l B l B l -

l -

l l 1 l l l l l l l ,

l 3094 l 347 l 40 l A I

  • Inactive Site Contract A: Review in progress, final data not available at this time.

0: No QC-1 NCR's closed prior to 7/80

-._ - . . - . . _ . . ._- . _ ~ . --

FOLRTEENTH PR0 MESS REPORT Attachment IB Page 3 of 4 DEFICIENCY DOClNENT REVIEW SlNMARY QC - 1 CONTRACTS l QJALITY CLASS-I SEISMIC-I 1. CONTRACTM 00'1NENTATION l l SITE WORK PERFORED StBICT TO QVP RFVIFW l l l l INTERNAL DOCLNENTS l l Contract 1 Contractor 1 00 l Review l Status +l DG l Review I Status +l

I 205* l Stewart-Erickson l Nm l Yes ICompletel None l - lCompletel l 206* l Bovee-Crail l IR l Yes l 3 l Nm l Yes l 3 l l 206A* l Peter Kiewit Sons' l IR l Yes 1 3 l None ! -

l -

l l 207* 1 Pittsburgh-Des Moines l l Yes l 3 l l Yes l 3 l l 209* I Lampson Inc l l D lCompletel l D lCompletel l 210* l Peter Kiewit Sons' l IR l Yes ]Completel None l - lCompletel I l 210A l Peter Kiewit Sons' l N/A l 8 lCompletel N/A l B lCompletel l 6426' l Wright Schuchart Harbor l l Yes 1 5 l l Yes l 5 l I 213' l Pittsburgh-Des Moines l CAR l Yes l 3 l ECAR l Yes 1 3 l i l 213A* l Pittsburgh-Des Moines l CAR l Yes [Completel ECAR l Yes lCompletel j l 215 l WSH/Boecon/GERI l IR l Yes ICompletel FG l C lCompletel i 216 1 Waldinger i DR l Yes l 9 l DR l Yes l 9 l l 217 i Sentry l IR l D l Complete l IR l D lCompletel i 218 l Fischbach/ Lord l IR l Yes lCompletel IR l Yes lCompletel

! l 219 l 0.B. Cannon l IR l Yes ICompletel None l - lCompletel l l 220 l Johnson Controls l ISR l Yes [Completel JRN l Yes lCompletel j l 221* l Pacific Testing Labs l l Yes lCompletel l Yes lCompletel j l 221A l Pacific Testing Labs l l D lCompletel l D lCompletel l 225' l McMillan Brothers l ICL l Yes l 5 i CAR l Yes 1 5 l

]

i l 226 l Sime Construction Company l l Yes l 3 l l Yes 1 3 1 1 233' l BF Shaw l l A l -

l l A l -

l l l 234 1 0.B. Cannon l IR l Yes ICompletel None ! - lCompletel

) l 235 1 T IS&E l CR 1 Yes l 6 1 None 1 -

l -

l i

NOTES: LETPO:

A - Review not commenced IR - Inspection Report B - No QC-1 Work performed prior to 7/80 CAR - Corrective Action Report 1 C - Special Review DR - Deficiency Report D - No QC-I or QC-II/SC-1 Docunentation closed prior to 7/80 ISR - Inspection Surveillance Report DO - Deficiency Docunent QR - Quality Report

  • DCD - Desigi Change Documen'. ECAR - Engineering Corrective Action Report
  • - Denotes Inactive Contract FCR - Field Change Request

+ - Numbers indicate action in Flow Chart, Page 4 JRN - Johnson Controls Field Request Notice j

1

ATTACilMENT 1B ,

Page 4 of 4 FOURTEENTil PROGRESS REPORT FIDW OIARP FOR REVIEW OF CONTRTIOR INTERNAL DOCUMENTATION 7

Write Report A

No 1 2 3 4 5 6 11 Coordinator -> Checklist -> Procedural N Iogbook N Sample Decision Write Interface Interview Review Revis Review to Report Sample Yes No V

10 Decision Document --) Review to Selection Increase Sample A

Yes

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=GO2-83-366,_Forwards_WNP-2_Project_Review_of_Completed_Safety-Related_Work,_Fourteenth_Progress_Rept_for_Jan-Mar_1983,per_Util_800717_Commitments_in_Response_to_Notice_of_Violation_%26_Addl_Info_in_Accordance_w/10CFR50.54(f)&oldid=3514175"