ML20153C054

Notice of Nonconformance from Insp on 851209-13

ML20153C054
Person / Time
Issue date:	02/14/1986
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To:
Shared Package
ML20153C015	List: ML20153C010 ML20153C030 ML20153C054 ML20153C071
References
REF-QA-99901037 99901037-85-01, 99901037-85-1, NUDOCS 8602180242
Download: ML20153C054 (3)

Text

T Li .

t j

APPENDIX B I-Zetec, Inc.

l Docket No. 99901037/85-01 NOTICE OF NONCONFORMANCE Based on the results of an NRC inspection conducted on December 9-13, 1985,

- it appears _that certain of your activities were not conducted in accordance with NRC requirements.

Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 states: " Activities affecting

. quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be

. accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings. Instructions, procedures, or drawings shall include appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been satisfactorily accomplished."

-Nonconformances with these requirements are as follows:

1. Section 2.4.3 of Zetec's Quality Assurance Manual (QAM) No. Z-QA dated January 1985 states, "The Quality Assurance Manager will review purchase orders with QA requirements to assure Zetec compliance."

Contrary to the above, there was no documented evidence that the QA Manager reviewed two purchase orders (PO) containing QA requirements. The P0s were from Westinghouse (No. MM-2?051-M-XX dated June 3, 1985) and Rochester Gas & Electric (No. N-EG-45426 dated September 5, 1984). (85-01-03)

2. Section 4.4.2.4 of the QAM states, in part, " Quality requirements shall be specified on the purchase order. Attachments...must be indicated on the main page of the purchase order."

Section 4.4.2.5 of the QAM states, in part, "... purchase orders shall be reviewed by the Quality Assurance Manager prior to purchase."

Contrary to the above, a review of 17 P0s for major components revealed the following (85-01-04):

(a) PO No. EL 13185 to Gould for stripchart recorders and P0 No.

EL 92485 to Allen Engineering for camera systems did not contain QA requirements, and there was no documented evidence of a QA Manager review.

8602180242 860214 PDR GA999 EECZETEC 99901037 PDR E-.---_-_-___._

(b) Fifteen P0s did not reference the "QA Requirements" attachment.

The P0s were to Hewlett-Packard (30485, 82185, and 102485);

Allen Engineering (61485); Koyo International of America (71185); American Music (51685); Standard Power (82884-B);

Tektronix (91785, 92884, 102585, and 111585); and Advanced Digital Information (21185, 32185, 32585, and 51685).

3. Section 18.4.1B of the QAM requires that field service audits be accomplished for field inspections and the results reported on Form Z-QA 4.

Contrary to the above, there was no documented evidence that a field service audit was performed on field inspection No. 840324 at the Yankee Rowe nuclear facility in April and May 1984. (85-01-05)

4. Section 7.4.3.3 of the QAM states, " Inspected components shall be tagged ' ACCEPTED' upon receipt approval."

Contrary to the above, during an inspection of the manufacturing facility, it was noted in a holding area that 29 containers with camera systems from Allen Engineering and four containers with graphics printers from Hewlett Packard were not appropriately tagged following receipt inspection approval. (85-01-06)

5. Section 7.6.2 of the QAM states, in part, " Suppliers of Major Components...shall be on an ' Approved Supplier' list."

Contrary to the above, a review of P0s for major components indicated that three items were purchased from suppliers who were not on the Approved Supplier List dated January 25, 1985.

The suppliers were American Music - tape recorders (P0 51685),

AllenEngineering-TVcameras(P0s61485and92485),andKoyo International of America - video monitors (P0 71185). (85-01-07)

6. Section 8.4.3.1 of the QAM requires that all blanks on the " Burn-in tag" be filled in, and if a blank is not applicable, "N/A" shall be written in the blank.

Contrary to the above, it was noted that Burn-in tags for four items (i.e., MIZ-12 remote / amp and power supply, OMB II, and SM4) on Rochester Gas & Electric P0 N-E6-45426 did not have "N/A" identified in not applicable blanks. (85-01-08)

. 7. Section 18.6.1 of the QAM states, in part, " Personnel performing audits shall be appropriately trained...."

Contrary to the above, there was no documented evidence to show that the individual who audited XTEX on an annual basis from 1980 thru 1984 was trained or qualified to be an auditor. (85-01-09)

__ 2

8. Section 2.3.3.1 of the QAM states, in part, " Certification of non-destructive testing personnel is. based on...SNT-TC-1A...."

Section 9.6.1 of SNT-TC-1A states, in part, "The qualification records of the certified individuals shall be maintained and... include the fo110 wing:...(4) statement indicating satisfactory completion of training in accordance with the employer's written procedure...."

Section 7.4.1 of Zetec Procedure No. Z-QA 101 " Personnel Qualification and Certification Procedure" Revision 6 states, in part, "The personnel records of the certified individuals should include, as a minimum, the following:.. 4. Statement indicating satisfactory completion of training in accordance with the Zetec, Inc. ' written procedure...."

Contrary to the above, a review of the qualification records of 32 NDE 4 personnel revealed that the qualification records did not contain a statement indicating satisfactory completion of training in accordance with Procedure No. Z-QA 101. (85-01-10)

9. Section 4.4 of Zetec Procedure No. Z-QA 101 states, in 'part, "The examination shall be administered...on an annual basis. Examination results shall be kept on file for the period of certification."

Contrary to the above, there was no record of an eye examination for inspector Nissley for the period of December 26, 1980 to February 5, 1981 during which time the inspector was on a job at the Millstnne ~

nuclear facility. (85-01-11)'

10. Section 17.4.1 of the QAM states, in part, "All equipment certification records...will be retained for seven years."

Contrary to the above, there was no record of a calibration certificate (Form No. Z-QA 8A) for instrument FM 22-4 (S/N 016) which had been calibrated for Power Inspection in February 1984. (85-01-12) 11~. Section 2.3.1.1 of the QAM states, in part, "The Quality Assurance Program Plan is based on the applicable requirements of... ANSI N45.2...."

Section 13 of ANSI N45.2-1977 requires that measuring and test equipment be calibrated at prescribed intervals against certified equipment traceable to the National Bureau of Standards.

Section 3.0 of Procedure No SSP-TCS "Non-Ferromagnetic Tubing Eddy Current Calibration Standard Fabrication and Certification Procedure,"

Revision 3 states, in part, " Equipment used to measure the various dimensions shall be.. 5. Gauge Blocks - 1" (#810135), .950" (#770198),

and .900" (#800145)...."

Contrary to the above, there was no documented evidence to show that the three gage blocks (S/Ns 810135, 770198, and 800145) in the Specialty Shop were ever calibrated against certified equipment traceable to the National Bureau of Standards. (85-01-13)