|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20235B4531987-09-22022 September 1987 Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents Re Specified Dockets.Documents in App a Already Available in Pdr.Forwards App B Documents.App B Documents Also Available in Pdr. Documents for Listed Dockets Could Not Be Located ML20238D0201987-09-0909 September 1987 Forwards Breakdown of Analysis of Costs for Plant OL Application Reviews for 860622-1216,per 10CFR170.12(b). Invoice Will Be Sent Shortly ML20235B3621987-08-25025 August 1987 FOIA Request for Listed Documents for Specified Dockets ML20237K9961987-08-17017 August 1987 Responds to Requesting re-review of OL Fee Charges Under 10CFR170 as Billed on Invoices F1385 & F1386, ,for Review Period 840624-860621.Charges Billed Applicable to Plant Cases.Supportive Fee Info Encl ML20237L0261987-08-0707 August 1987 Ack Receipt of Invoices Re Plant for 840624-0721.Since All Licensing Activities Suspended in Jan 1984 & CP Surrendered on 850301,review of Charges & Issue of Credit Requested ML20235Q0291987-07-15015 July 1987 Advises That Cost Analyses for OL Application Reviews for 840624-860621 Completed.Breakdown of Review Costs by Program Ofc Encl.Util Will Receive Invoices for Listed Amounts ML20211P1311986-12-16016 December 1986 Advises That Encl Order Terminating CPPR-170 & CPPR-171 for Facility & Notice of Withdrawal of Application for OLs Have Been Forwarded to Ofc of Fr for Publication,Per Return of CPs by Util on 850301 ML20214R5961986-09-23023 September 1986 Responds to 860918 Request & Forwards Printout of Recent Filings in Facility Case.No Ruling Made by ASLB Since 860618 Ruling.Served on 860924 ML20214R6331986-09-22022 September 1986 Advises That Listed Individuals Served W/Author ML20214R6061986-09-18018 September 1986 Requests Confirmation Whether or Not Author on Mailing List & Whether Any Rulings Filed Since 860814.Response Requested ML20214R6381986-09-18018 September 1986 Requests Confirmation Whether or Not Author on Mailing List & Whether Any Rulings Filed Since 860814 ML20203E8271986-07-18018 July 1986 Informs That Recently Received Encl Ltrs Procedurally Insufficient.Requests That Provisions of Sections 2.701, 2.708,2.709 & 2.712 Re Filing & Svc of Documents Be Reviewed.Served on 860722 ML20199L0381986-07-0202 July 1986 Forwards Pleading in Response to Board Memorandum & Order Directing Briefs Be Served on 860602.Response Addresses Indiana Sassafras Audubon Soc & Save the Valley, Inc 860626 Motion ML20141A2171986-04-0101 April 1986 Informs That QA Program Being Revised Due to Cancellation of Const Activities & in Keeping W/Intention of Investment Recovery to Reflect Organizational Structure of Investment Recovery Program ML20138H5461985-12-0909 December 1985 Forwards Overview of Regional Ofc & Detailed Organizational Charts for Ofc Divs Due to Recent Organizational & Staff Changes.W/O Encl ML20137Z7951985-12-0404 December 1985 Forwards Matl to Support Removal of Unqualified Instrumentation from Diesel Generator Engine & Engine Skid. Devices Added to Equipment Q-list to Ensure That Qualification Maintained ML20138Q8301985-12-0303 December 1985 Further Response to FOIA Request for Records Re Voluntary or Required Redress of Sites Where Const Was Terminated, Including Crbr & Legal Analysis.Forwards App E Documents.App D & E Documents Available in Pdr.Photographs Also Available ML20133D1471985-10-0202 October 1985 Notifies That Util Rescinding ASME QA Program.Certificate of Authorization N-2456 & Code N Symbol Stamp Returned to ASME ML20135H7471985-09-17017 September 1985 Requests That Date of 850924 Originally Set for NRC Site Stabilization Survey of Const Site Be Rescheduled to Late Oct or Early Nov 1985 Due to Scheduling Conflicts ML20127P1861985-06-26026 June 1985 Forwards Insp Repts 50-546/85-01 & 50-547/85-01 on 850122-0614.No Violation Identified ML20133C7371985-06-14014 June 1985 Further Response to FOIA Request for Documents Re Site Redress Where Plant Const Begun,Including Clinch River Facility & NRC Legal Analysis Re Redress.Forwards App B Documents.App C Document Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemption 5) ML20134A8941985-06-10010 June 1985 Further Response to FOIA Request for Records Re Ford Amend Study.Records in App K Available in Pdr.Review for Addl Records Continuing ML20117P5131985-05-31031 May 1985 Ack Receipt of 850412 Response to Ltr Disputing Billed Amounts by NRC for OL Reviews.Requests That Due Date for Any Final Payment Be Extended for Reasonable Period of Time to Allow Issues to Be Resolved.Fee Paid ML20116N3691985-05-0101 May 1985 Forwards Response to 850402 Request for Addl Info Re Acreage Disturbed by Project & Emergency Offsite Facility Site Layup Actions.No Addl Permits or Approvals from Other Federal, State & Local Agencies Anticipated ML20100G3251985-04-0404 April 1985 Forwards SW Shields to HR Denton Re Surrendering CPPR-170 & CPPR-171 & Summarizing Util Plan to Stabilize Site & Motion to Terminate Proceeding ML20126J9081985-03-0606 March 1985 Further Response to FOIA Request That All Internal Memos to Div of Licensing from May-Nov 1984 Which Provided Draft SER, SER Sections & Questions or Requests for Addl Info Be Placed in Pdr.App C Documents Placed in PDR ML20102C2331985-03-0101 March 1985 Surrenders CPs CPPR-170 & CPPR-171.All const-related Activities on Site Halted.Site Activities Conducted Per Author .Commitments Contained in Encl Site Stabilization Plan Will Govern Future Activities ML20102B7551985-02-25025 February 1985 Disputes Billing Amounts in NRC 850122 Summary Statement of Costs.Errors & Lack of Documentation Do Not Allow Acceptance of Billing Solely on Basis of NRC Internal Controls.Meeting Re Questioned Items & Extension of Due Date Requested ML20091S4501984-06-0101 June 1984 Responds to NRC Ltr Re Allegations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-546/84-01 & 50-547/84-01.Corrective Actions:Independent Engineering Consultants Evaluation of Concrete Const Showed Concrete Good to Excellent Quality ML20084P3501984-03-14014 March 1984 Requests Response to Encl W & V Smelser 840210 Inquiry Into NRC Attitude Toward Utils.Concerns Include Marble Hill & Bailly Cancellation,Withdrawal of Util Application for Zimmer & Denial of License for Byron Facility ML20086K1021984-01-20020 January 1984 Forwards Util 840116 Press Release Explaining Financial Reasons for Halting Facility Const.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080Q9121984-01-18018 January 1984 Notifies of Suspension of Const.Site Work Force Reduced to Less than 1,000.Action Taken Due to Inability to Finance Project.Nrc Should Issue Draft SER as Is,So Benchmark Exists for Licensing Review Process ML20079N4611984-01-11011 January 1984 Responds to NRC Re IE Insp Repts 50-546/83-20 & 50-547/83-21.Const Suspended.Insp Repts & Notice of Violation Will Be Placed W/Util Records of Nonconforming Conditions to Be Addressed When Const Resumed ML20083E2891983-12-22022 December 1983 Informs That Applicant Will Require Time to Consider & Determine Response to Special Task Force of Governor of in Recommendation That Const of Facilities Be Canceled.Aslb Should Defer Further Action.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20083E0501983-12-21021 December 1983 Forwards Revised Affidavit Requesting That Matl Transmitted to NRC in Response to Question 470.7 of NRC Environ Rept - OL Stage Be Withheld Per 10CFR2.790.Revised Affidavit Submitted in Response to NRC 831125 Request ML20083H6691983-12-14014 December 1983 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-546/83-19 & 50-547/83-20.Corrective Actions:Sys Developed to Identify Matls Requiring Periodic Maint & Storage Procedures Revised to Identify Sys ML20082R6411983-12-0808 December 1983 Forwards Pp 11 Omitted from 831130 Response to Sassafras Audubon Soc & Valley Watch,Inc Contentions ML20082M9481983-12-0202 December 1983 Forwards Amend 30 to FSAR & Suppl 4 to Environ Rept - OL Stage (Filed in PDR Category C).Affidavit of Distribution Encl ML20082M8251983-11-30030 November 1983 Requests Extension Until 840301 for Response to Byron Integrated Design Insp Rept ML20082D2131983-11-14014 November 1983 Responds to IE Bulletin 83-06,Nonconforming Matls Supplied by Tube-Line Corp.... Requests Submittal Extension Until 840331 to Respond to Permit Adequate Review & Evaluation of Vendor Info ML20081K6081983-11-0707 November 1983 Forwards,For Review,Util Response to Generic Ltr 82-33 Re Reg Guide 1.97 Planned Improvement Rept on Instrumentation for light-water-cooled Power Plants to Assess Plant Environs Following Accident ML20086A8591983-11-0101 November 1983 Forwards Addl Copies of Sassafras Audubon/Valley Watch 831022 Joint Suppl.Svc List Requested.W/O Encl ML20078P1541983-10-28028 October 1983 Corrects Ref on Page 10,Line 2,of 831021 Joint Suppl to Sassafras Audubon Soc & Valley Watch Petitions for Intervention in OL Hearing.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20085L3131983-10-11011 October 1983 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-546/83-15 & 50-547/83-15.Corrective Actions: Directive Will Be Issued to Pullman Const Industries Emphasizing Resposibility for Reporting Nonconformances ML20080N2841983-09-30030 September 1983 Forwards Status of Outstanding Third Quarter 1983 Commitments in Amends to Fsar.Description of Containment Hydrogen Monitoriing Sys Will Be Submitted During First Quarter 1984 ML20080J0201983-09-23023 September 1983 Forwards Changes to Safeguards Vol & Responses to NRC Requests for Addl Info,Included in Amend 28 to OL Application.Changes Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML20080J0531983-09-21021 September 1983 Forwards Responses to 830824 Requests for Addl Info Re Fsar. Requests Which Pertain to Byron FSAR Not Addressed.Responses Will Be Included in Dec Amend ML20080G2731983-09-16016 September 1983 Discusses Feasibility & Benefits to Util of Eliminating Postulated Pipe Breaks in RCS Primary Loop from Structural Design Basis,Per NRC .Approx 200,000 Manhours of Installation Time Per Unit Will Be Saved ML20024F1781983-09-0202 September 1983 Requests Extension Until 840401 for Submittal of Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,to Incorporate Efforts Underway on Generic Requirements by Westinghouse Owners Group,Nuclear Util Task Action Committee (Nutac) ML20076D3371983-08-16016 August 1983 Forwards Response to IE Bulletin 83-05 Re Hayward Tyler Pump Co Failure to Effectively Implement QA Program.Pumps Not Commercially Accepted for Installation at Plant Site 1987-09-09
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20235B3621987-08-25025 August 1987 FOIA Request for Listed Documents for Specified Dockets ML20237L0261987-08-0707 August 1987 Ack Receipt of Invoices Re Plant for 840624-0721.Since All Licensing Activities Suspended in Jan 1984 & CP Surrendered on 850301,review of Charges & Issue of Credit Requested ML20214R6331986-09-22022 September 1986 Advises That Listed Individuals Served W/Author ML20214R6061986-09-18018 September 1986 Requests Confirmation Whether or Not Author on Mailing List & Whether Any Rulings Filed Since 860814.Response Requested ML20214R6381986-09-18018 September 1986 Requests Confirmation Whether or Not Author on Mailing List & Whether Any Rulings Filed Since 860814 ML20199L0381986-07-0202 July 1986 Forwards Pleading in Response to Board Memorandum & Order Directing Briefs Be Served on 860602.Response Addresses Indiana Sassafras Audubon Soc & Save the Valley, Inc 860626 Motion ML20141A2171986-04-0101 April 1986 Informs That QA Program Being Revised Due to Cancellation of Const Activities & in Keeping W/Intention of Investment Recovery to Reflect Organizational Structure of Investment Recovery Program ML20137Z7951985-12-0404 December 1985 Forwards Matl to Support Removal of Unqualified Instrumentation from Diesel Generator Engine & Engine Skid. Devices Added to Equipment Q-list to Ensure That Qualification Maintained ML20133D1471985-10-0202 October 1985 Notifies That Util Rescinding ASME QA Program.Certificate of Authorization N-2456 & Code N Symbol Stamp Returned to ASME ML20135H7471985-09-17017 September 1985 Requests That Date of 850924 Originally Set for NRC Site Stabilization Survey of Const Site Be Rescheduled to Late Oct or Early Nov 1985 Due to Scheduling Conflicts ML20117P5131985-05-31031 May 1985 Ack Receipt of 850412 Response to Ltr Disputing Billed Amounts by NRC for OL Reviews.Requests That Due Date for Any Final Payment Be Extended for Reasonable Period of Time to Allow Issues to Be Resolved.Fee Paid ML20116N3691985-05-0101 May 1985 Forwards Response to 850402 Request for Addl Info Re Acreage Disturbed by Project & Emergency Offsite Facility Site Layup Actions.No Addl Permits or Approvals from Other Federal, State & Local Agencies Anticipated ML20100G3251985-04-0404 April 1985 Forwards SW Shields to HR Denton Re Surrendering CPPR-170 & CPPR-171 & Summarizing Util Plan to Stabilize Site & Motion to Terminate Proceeding ML20102C2331985-03-0101 March 1985 Surrenders CPs CPPR-170 & CPPR-171.All const-related Activities on Site Halted.Site Activities Conducted Per Author .Commitments Contained in Encl Site Stabilization Plan Will Govern Future Activities ML20102B7551985-02-25025 February 1985 Disputes Billing Amounts in NRC 850122 Summary Statement of Costs.Errors & Lack of Documentation Do Not Allow Acceptance of Billing Solely on Basis of NRC Internal Controls.Meeting Re Questioned Items & Extension of Due Date Requested ML20091S4501984-06-0101 June 1984 Responds to NRC Ltr Re Allegations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-546/84-01 & 50-547/84-01.Corrective Actions:Independent Engineering Consultants Evaluation of Concrete Const Showed Concrete Good to Excellent Quality ML20084P3501984-03-14014 March 1984 Requests Response to Encl W & V Smelser 840210 Inquiry Into NRC Attitude Toward Utils.Concerns Include Marble Hill & Bailly Cancellation,Withdrawal of Util Application for Zimmer & Denial of License for Byron Facility ML20086K1021984-01-20020 January 1984 Forwards Util 840116 Press Release Explaining Financial Reasons for Halting Facility Const.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080Q9121984-01-18018 January 1984 Notifies of Suspension of Const.Site Work Force Reduced to Less than 1,000.Action Taken Due to Inability to Finance Project.Nrc Should Issue Draft SER as Is,So Benchmark Exists for Licensing Review Process ML20079N4611984-01-11011 January 1984 Responds to NRC Re IE Insp Repts 50-546/83-20 & 50-547/83-21.Const Suspended.Insp Repts & Notice of Violation Will Be Placed W/Util Records of Nonconforming Conditions to Be Addressed When Const Resumed ML20083E2891983-12-22022 December 1983 Informs That Applicant Will Require Time to Consider & Determine Response to Special Task Force of Governor of in Recommendation That Const of Facilities Be Canceled.Aslb Should Defer Further Action.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20083E0501983-12-21021 December 1983 Forwards Revised Affidavit Requesting That Matl Transmitted to NRC in Response to Question 470.7 of NRC Environ Rept - OL Stage Be Withheld Per 10CFR2.790.Revised Affidavit Submitted in Response to NRC 831125 Request ML20083H6691983-12-14014 December 1983 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-546/83-19 & 50-547/83-20.Corrective Actions:Sys Developed to Identify Matls Requiring Periodic Maint & Storage Procedures Revised to Identify Sys ML20082R6411983-12-0808 December 1983 Forwards Pp 11 Omitted from 831130 Response to Sassafras Audubon Soc & Valley Watch,Inc Contentions ML20082M9481983-12-0202 December 1983 Forwards Amend 30 to FSAR & Suppl 4 to Environ Rept - OL Stage (Filed in PDR Category C).Affidavit of Distribution Encl ML20082M8251983-11-30030 November 1983 Requests Extension Until 840301 for Response to Byron Integrated Design Insp Rept ML20082D2131983-11-14014 November 1983 Responds to IE Bulletin 83-06,Nonconforming Matls Supplied by Tube-Line Corp.... Requests Submittal Extension Until 840331 to Respond to Permit Adequate Review & Evaluation of Vendor Info ML20081K6081983-11-0707 November 1983 Forwards,For Review,Util Response to Generic Ltr 82-33 Re Reg Guide 1.97 Planned Improvement Rept on Instrumentation for light-water-cooled Power Plants to Assess Plant Environs Following Accident ML20086A8591983-11-0101 November 1983 Forwards Addl Copies of Sassafras Audubon/Valley Watch 831022 Joint Suppl.Svc List Requested.W/O Encl ML20078P1541983-10-28028 October 1983 Corrects Ref on Page 10,Line 2,of 831021 Joint Suppl to Sassafras Audubon Soc & Valley Watch Petitions for Intervention in OL Hearing.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20085L3131983-10-11011 October 1983 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-546/83-15 & 50-547/83-15.Corrective Actions: Directive Will Be Issued to Pullman Const Industries Emphasizing Resposibility for Reporting Nonconformances ML20080N2841983-09-30030 September 1983 Forwards Status of Outstanding Third Quarter 1983 Commitments in Amends to Fsar.Description of Containment Hydrogen Monitoriing Sys Will Be Submitted During First Quarter 1984 ML20080J0201983-09-23023 September 1983 Forwards Changes to Safeguards Vol & Responses to NRC Requests for Addl Info,Included in Amend 28 to OL Application.Changes Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) ML20080J0531983-09-21021 September 1983 Forwards Responses to 830824 Requests for Addl Info Re Fsar. Requests Which Pertain to Byron FSAR Not Addressed.Responses Will Be Included in Dec Amend ML20080G2731983-09-16016 September 1983 Discusses Feasibility & Benefits to Util of Eliminating Postulated Pipe Breaks in RCS Primary Loop from Structural Design Basis,Per NRC .Approx 200,000 Manhours of Installation Time Per Unit Will Be Saved ML20024F1781983-09-0202 September 1983 Requests Extension Until 840401 for Submittal of Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,to Incorporate Efforts Underway on Generic Requirements by Westinghouse Owners Group,Nuclear Util Task Action Committee (Nutac) ML20076D3371983-08-16016 August 1983 Forwards Response to IE Bulletin 83-05 Re Hayward Tyler Pump Co Failure to Effectively Implement QA Program.Pumps Not Commercially Accepted for Installation at Plant Site ML20077J4941983-08-15015 August 1983 Informs of Change of Address.Related Correspondence ML20080B4641983-08-0101 August 1983 Forwards Nonproprietary Version of Independent Evaluation of Proposed Mods to Westinghouse D4,D5 & E Steam Generators. Mods Will Reduce Tube Vibration in Preheater Section & Do Not Result in Unreviewed Safety Question ML20024D0881983-07-29029 July 1983 Comments on Potential Impact of Plant on Aquatic Biota of Ohio River.Full Implementation of NRC Findings in Both Draft & Final EIS W/Complete Monitoring Program Recommended ML20077G7761983-07-27027 July 1983 Discusses Status of 830415 Commitments Re Suspension of Electrical Work Outlined in 830203 Confirmatory Action Ltr. Item I,Ii,Iii,Vi & VII Commitments Met.Surveillance Program for Backlog & Hanger Insp in Progress ML20077D1301983-07-25025 July 1983 Requests Correspondence Re Util Be Sent to Author Address ML20024D0221983-07-18018 July 1983 Forwards Proprietary Independent Evaluation of Proposed Mods to Westinghouse D4,D5 & DE Steam Generators. Rept Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) ML20076L4911983-07-15015 July 1983 Forwards Detailed Control Room Design Review Per Requirements of Generic Ltr 82-33, Suppl 1 to NUREG-0737 Requirements for Emergency Response Capability. Reg Guide 1.97 Implementation Rept Will Be Submitted by 831101 ML20076L3451983-07-14014 July 1983 Forwards Annual Financial Repts 1982 for Public Svc Co of Indiana,Inc & Wabash Valley Power Assoc,Inc ML20076M6691983-07-12012 July 1983 Comments on 830712 Public Meeting Re Environ Concerns for Application for Ols.Util Should Present Analyses of Environ Risks Associated W/More Severe Types of Very Low Probability Accidents in Environ Rept ML20077H4231983-07-0707 July 1983 Requests Withholding Proprietary Info in, Independent Evaluation of Proposed Mods to Westinghouse Model D4,D5 & E Steam Generators, Final Draft (Ref 10CFR2.790) ML20076L4181983-07-0606 July 1983 Informs That Completion Date for Item II of Re Cable Tray Hanger Insp Extended to 830805.Corrective Actions for Procedures & Nonconformances Created Delay ML20080J8841983-07-0505 July 1983 Requests Response to Concerns of Indiana Sassafras Audubon Soc Re safety-related Electrical Work at Site.Public Hearing Before ASLB Prior to Resumption of safety-related Electrical Const Requested ML20076L4951983-07-0101 July 1983 Requests Assignment of Inspector,Beginning 830707,to Verify Adequacy of Program for Improved Control Over Electrical Cable Tray Installation 1987-08-07
[Table view] Category:PUBLIC ENTITY/CITIZEN/ORGANIZATION/MEDIA TO NRC
MONTHYEARML20086A8591983-11-0101 November 1983 Forwards Addl Copies of Sassafras Audubon/Valley Watch 831022 Joint Suppl.Svc List Requested.W/O Encl ML20078P1541983-10-28028 October 1983 Corrects Ref on Page 10,Line 2,of 831021 Joint Suppl to Sassafras Audubon Soc & Valley Watch Petitions for Intervention in OL Hearing.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20077J4941983-08-15015 August 1983 Informs of Change of Address.Related Correspondence ML20077D1301983-07-25025 July 1983 Requests Correspondence Re Util Be Sent to Author Address ML20076M6691983-07-12012 July 1983 Comments on 830712 Public Meeting Re Environ Concerns for Application for Ols.Util Should Present Analyses of Environ Risks Associated W/More Severe Types of Very Low Probability Accidents in Environ Rept ML20028D2151983-01-12012 January 1983 Requests Info Re Requirements for Emergency Response Capability & Possible Impact on Plant,Per NUREG-0737,Suppl 1, Requirements for Emergency Response Capability. Schedules & Completion Dates Also Requested ML20064B8871982-12-18018 December 1982 Expresses Skepticism Re Applicant Const Schedule & Projected Costs & Performance of Westinghouse D-4 & D-5 Steam Generator Models.Nrc Caseload Forecast Panel Rept of 821201 Site Visit Requested ML20028F0331982-12-0909 December 1982 Forwards White Paper Xix, Our Marble Hill Problem, Proposing That Const of Facilities Be Halted,Since Plant Not Needed ML20054J1531982-06-21021 June 1982 Expresses Concern That Facilities Are Not Being Constructed W/Safety Design Features Warranted as Result of Reactor Operating Experience & Increased Knowledge of Unresolved Safety Issues ML20009B0831981-07-0202 July 1981 Forwards 810614 Resolution Opposing Facility Const ML20126K6631981-05-15015 May 1981 Responds to .Continued Receipt of NRC Correspondence to Util Requested.Considers Prospect of Speeding Up Licensing Process as Disturbing ML19344E4371980-07-0202 July 1980 Requests Transcript of 800325 Public Meeting Per 800406 Request & 800523 Ltr Promising Transcript Upon Issuance. Discusses Public Concerns & Suggestions Re Nuclear Issue & NRC ML19310A9401980-05-15015 May 1980 Responds to 800508 Inquiry Re Statement in 790901 Request for Hearing on Confirming Suspension of Const Re Heavy Faults.Forwards 790111 Indianapolis Star News Article in Which Statement Appeared.Requests Any Info on Subj ML19316A7881980-05-15015 May 1980 Expresses Concern Re Nuclear Waste Storage.Urges End to Const of Facility ML19323D1061980-05-0505 May 1980 Mailgrams from 23 Citizens Requesting That CP Should Not Be Issued Until FBI Investigation Results Are Known & Acted Upon.Urges That All Const Be Stopped Until Facility Is Inspected by Save the Valley Engineers ML19312E8201980-05-0505 May 1980 Opposes Facility Based on Inadequate Demand for Increased Electrical Generating Capacity & Public Safety Considerations.Util Motivated by tax-related Incentives. Preliminary Tax Incentive Rept Encl ML19323D2671980-05-0505 May 1980 Comments on NRC Attitude Re Facility Licensing:Urgent Need for Addl Generating Capacity Overstated.Public Health & Safety Threatened by Operation.Supporting Documentation Encl ML19323D1181980-04-30030 April 1980 Ltrs from Six Citizens & Associations Requesting That CP Not Be Issued Until FBI Investigation Results Are Known & Acted Upon.Urges That All Const Be Stopped Until Facility Is Inspected by Save the Valley Engineers ML19323D1711980-04-30030 April 1980 Submits Questions & Comments Presented at 800325 Public Meeting in Madison,In ML19323D1631980-04-0707 April 1980 Ack Receipt of NRC Notice of 800411 Meeting in Bethesda,Md Re Revised QA Program.Expresses Concerns Re safety-related Questions Not Answered at Madison,In Meeting ML19323F3461980-04-0202 April 1980 Requests That Outlined Questions & Comments Be Included in Record of 800325 Proceedings as Allowed by Us Court of Appeals ML19323B6341980-04-0202 April 1980 Requests That Submitted Questions & Comments Be Included in Record of 800325 Proceeding as Allowed by Us Court of Appeals ML19323B7871980-04-0202 April 1980 Discusses 800325 Meeting at Madison,Wi Re Stop Work Order at Facility.Nrc Was Unprepared or Unwilling to Press for Answers to Questions Raised by Citizens.Nrc Is Unworthy of Public Trust & Is Led By,Instead of Regulating Util ML19323D1801980-03-26026 March 1980 Compliments Handling of 800325 Meeting in Madison,In.F Hauck Comments Re Safety Matters Encl ML19323H9551980-03-26026 March 1980 Forwards Statement Which Was Not Completely Presented at 800325 Meeting Re Resumption of Const.Sassafras Audubon Written Statement Also Encl.W/O Sassafras Audubon Statement ML19323A0821980-03-0606 March 1980 Forwards Documentation of Util Over Capacity.Current Reserves Are Greater That 50% & Predictions for 1980 Show Reserves of 70%.No Urgency to Resume Const ML19309B0191980-03-0202 March 1980 Awaits Reply to 791210 Request for Hearing Re Order for Suspension of Const.Appeal Protested Regulation & Sys Which Can So Easily Dismiss Final Administrative Appeal W/O Reason or Explanation ML20126B4491980-02-21021 February 1980 Opposes Const of Plant on Grounds of Poor Workmanship, Inadequacy of Evacuation Plan & Exposure to Radiation ML19268C7921980-02-20020 February 1980 Requests Placement on Mailing List for Activities of Utils ML20126B4531980-02-11011 February 1980 Urges Commission Support of Proposal Requiring Areas Surrounding Nuclear Power Plants to File Evacuation Plan Before Issuance of Ol.Requests Stronger Regulations & Closer Insps Re Const Quality ML20126B4561980-02-0707 February 1980 Urges Provisions for Local Participation in Developing Evacuation Plans ML19296D0701980-02-0505 February 1980 Opposes Const of Facility Due to Unproven Evidence That Facility Could Be Operated Safely.Consideration of Petition Opposing Facility Is Underway ML19294B5731980-02-0202 February 1980 Opposes Const of Facility.Liabilities Outweigh Any Future Assets.Evacuation Plans Would Have to Include Residential Segment,Inmates of Prison,Alcoholic Treatment Ctr & Facility for Retarded ML19294B5771980-01-31031 January 1980 Supports Local Community Having Voice in Decision Re Const of Facility ML19296D0751980-01-31031 January 1980 Opposes Const of Facility Due to Environ Threat & Location of Water Supply ML19305E6211980-01-0505 January 1980 Notifies NRC That Three Issues Must Be Resolved Prior to Resumption of Safety Const.Fbi Investigation Should Be Completed,Independent Inquiry Should Be Launched & Util Should Renegotiate Fixed Price Contracts.Viewgraphs Encl ML19211A9491979-12-14014 December 1979 Forwards Appeal Re NRC Review of Director'S Decision Under 10CFR2.206 ML19210D8771979-11-15015 November 1979 Requests Util Environ Rept ML19210B9181979-11-0707 November 1979 Requests Info Re Facility Concrete Problems,To Aid in Researching Concrete Problems at Limerick Facilities ML19254D7931979-10-24024 October 1979 Strongly Opposes Const Practices & Would Participate in Demonstration to Halt Restart of Const ML19208D5001979-09-24024 September 1979 Forwards Petition Calling for Revocation of Facility CP ML19309B9441979-09-16016 September 1979 Requests Establishment of Lpdr in Indianapolis,In. Believes That Lpdr Would Be Appreciated & well-used by Citizens of Indianapolis ML19211A1001979-09-0404 September 1979 Submits Addl Items to Be Considered in Review of 790629 Request for Suspension or Revocation of Cps.Requests Hearing ML20125B2281979-09-0404 September 1979 Requests Hearing on Behalf on Knob & Valley Audubon Society of Southern in Based on Info in Save the Valley Motion to Reopen Safety Issues ML19207C1861979-09-0303 September 1979 Requests That Const of Facility Be Stopped Permanently Due to Defective Workmanship & Matls ML20136B4181979-09-0101 September 1979 Forwards Request to Suspend & Revoke CP & to Reopen Safety Hearings ML20125B2251979-09-0101 September 1979 Requests Hearing on Behalf of Sassafras Audubon Society of Lawrence,Green,Monroe,Brown,Morgan & Owen Counties,In,Re 790815 Order Confirming Suspension of Const ML20136B5181979-08-30030 August 1979 Forwards Paddlewheel Alliance 790812 Petition Requesting Suspension & Revoking of CP Issued to PSC of in & to Reopen Safety Hearings ML19249A2661979-08-21021 August 1979 Requests Safety Hearings Be Reopened at Once,Cp Be Revoked & Congressional Investigation Initiated ML19242D4881979-07-10010 July 1979 Press Release Re Series of Situations at Facility That Could Adversely Affect Health & Safety 1983-08-15
[Table view] |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:_ ___-____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
..
'
. <
.. .e , . vg The SASSAFRAS AUDUBON SOCIETY h j
*
'
i#[cQ of 1.AWRENCE . GREENE . MONROE . BROWN -
MORGAN & OWEN COUNTIES )
'
- '
..
INDIANA f .
-
g
~.
g April 7, 1983 .,-
/'l [Q -
,
pi N uA% ~
- 3) e, Q l KT -
'
-
9
,
-
1
,
'
, J ( h Mr. Victor Stello, Jr.
, .
g pg
~~ Y '
D.. rector, Office of Insp-ction and Inforce:ent U.S. Nuclear EcEulatory Coe=ission y Washington, D.C. 20555
#
Lear Mr. Stello:
Sassafras PSI, Audubon April 11, 1980 received notico today of the forthco=ing meeting of the NEC vith for Marble Hil.1. in Bethesda, Ma:jland, on PSI ts P.svised Quality Assurance Progran YouMadieon, at an not listed In* nas a participant in the meeting, but since you c; mired the meeting on this subject, and will be involved in the recoc:enia. tion to tre Cc _ issionero as to whether safety-related constmetion should rect =m at Marble Hill, vc thought it best to addmsa our continuir.g concerns to you.
None of the major questions SAS seeks answers to concer.ing Marble Hill (see State ent presented to you at Madison, Indiana on March at Madison. 25, 1980) were ansvend at the meeting With 2ege.nl Question I, "Can Marble Hill be repaired sufficient 1v?", se hope that the NP.C will support an independent asness:nent of the quality of constn::ti.
and the degree to which it can be satisfactorily repaired, which has been sought by Save-the-Valley.
The question of whether PSI will be required to have N Certification, not just an "interic latter": prior to resu=ption of construction at Marble Hill, was made mo:e confuswg at the coeting on March 25, Madison, Indiana by the co=ments of Mr. S.V.
Shields, Vice-President, Elactric Systems, PSI.
all recponsibility for Marble EC'? Does PSI still intend to assu::e over-vill not PSI have to be certified? If the ASME Code is law in the State of Indian of the Subcom=ittee Hearings on Constmetion Problets at Me bin Hill:Nutech's assess Rdeer Re rula-ter r Co : .ission 0*.ersitht, November 27 and 28,1979, states that it is extre:ely in-portant that all systems and co=ponents in that plant be built in accordance with the ASME Code and be code stamped in order for PSI to qualify for insurance at Msicle F.ill.
This is not the tire to accept another promissory note from PSI.
Sassafras Audubon continues to be disturbed by the fact that substantial progress has been =ade in the construction of Marb2c FD' (even tho'.y;h not "ssfety-related") yet PSI does not. have a fully developed and functional Material Management Progrt.n. This seems i cxcusabic a2d a matter of =isplaced prioritics.
PSI, when questioned by the NRO at the March 25 meeting as to when PSI personnel would replace MAC personnel, replied that they expected it to take one to three years. As we co=nented on McMh 25th, this is far too indefinite considering thatsefety-related work of stoppage nuclear at pzseent.
experience.was brought on atscarcely MAC personnel least insee=a part the by serious ansg;;cesunderstaffir~%as trd xtent plannec. we l
s oos29 If
.
_. :
. .
'
l
.
l 1
,
PSI's analysis and conclusions regarding their fixed-price centracturt.1 agree-r.cnts did not addztss the substr.ntive problens associated with then in the pr.st ,
and as such are unacceptable. th assu:e that constructicn schedules and =r.tters !
which cause dehys in schedule vill be part of the April H Agenda on PSI's ,
Revised Ca/QC Progra=.
After the meetinE of PSI with the NRC on April 11th, we would appreciate a reply to our questions of March 25th and of this date, as well as a su==ary of the answers of PSI to the questions asked by the IE in CA Cuectier= Conmine the Merth Hill Docheted CA Prorra=.
The intr-ridinc concern of our Society continues to be the reed for Marble Hill?
The evidence ir.dicates it is not needed. To igncre this fact dien many aspects of Marbh FW 's conctruction is being questioned cannot be justified.
To s sincerely, l
e
- r. o A. -
s1 .
'
a, .
heute 1, Box 375 '
Nashville, InM == 47448 i
.
.
e
*
.
e 9
.
e
.
l l
.
l '
.. -____ - -__ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - . _ _ _ _ _ _ . -
'dao 80051Aoo06
'
* ~
- -
\
. . - -
.
Oh *
,
l DUPLICATE DOCUMENT
[ , Deborah H. McCarthy g
*
.
Entire document previously 208 Elm .
entered into system under: Eminence, Kentucky ,40019 O0314 CX306
'
ANo N o. of pages: (h April 2, 1980 Mr. James G. Keppler ,
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Director, Region 111 611 Ryan Plaza Drive -
Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76012
Dear Mr. Keppler,
I attended the meeting at Madison on March 25, 1980, regarding the issue of whether or not to lift the stop-work order at Marble Hill; I ask t.iat the following questions and comments be included in the record of that proceeding as allowed by the U.S.C.A.. (Mr. Stello stated there would be a transcript of the meeting, as required, although our local papers reported that the NRC had refused to make such a .
record.)
- 1. You (NRC re7 esentatives) statsd that you write the l
'
regulations (r.gscding qualifications for employment, inspection prot e'~ s, training requirements, etc.) for PSI; l so I ask who, spc ically, among you writes them and what training and qualifications Ispecifically) does that person (s) ;
have to do so? , .
- 2. It was noted by Mr. Keppler (I believe) that it has come to your attention that there are inconsistencies in some instances between your procedure manual and PSI's With regard to this problem (which procedure manuals.should be enough by itself to continue the stop-work order),
you merely asked PSI to explain. Did you consider that
,
singular question, and PSI's nonspecific reply, adequate investigation? Why did you not present examples of such inconsistencies and ask them, specifically, to explain the problem and how and when it arose and will be corrected?
How can you be at all certain they are following adequate
]t procedures when you know their manual does not conform to your manual? Why whould PSI be allowed to write its own j manuals; we know already that we cannot rely on them to police themselves.
' btL}f.- ,
APR 111980
' gocacao (, .
. . .
.
.. .
. .
. . .
. .
.
. .
. -
. .
. .
, 3. What has PSI done since the issuance of the stop-work order, other than write and rewrite procedures and move all
'
personnel on sight so that the long distance telephone need not be used? Tell me specifically what you heard them say they had done (other than those two things)? ? .
I *
'4. Isn't a company who would' enter into constructicn of an
ultra hazardous facility (i.e. , nuclear power plant) without
-
having such rules, regulations, procedures, training pro- '
' grams and trained personnel ALREADY VORKED OUT (to the nth degree), isn't such a company PER SE unqualified for a -
license to proceed?, .. .,
, : ',
,
. . . . .:
. . s , ., . . .
. .
,
. .
'
. ;.~
%: . .'.f_
'
5.. After .all, Mr. Stello, your inference (in talking about . ' r. -
. t r't ' quality ' control of subcontractors). was that the only way to. i .,' ' - .
' i .". ~ t . ..' ~ pro'ceed. if'one found shoddy wor'k, was to be rid of the C , .J
'
Y .."c-- . contractor who p,erformed the' shoddy work. Does this n'ot ;-
-
. ,
._ ,
-
,
'
' apply many times over to the issue of what should be r./ .
. required of the master mind of this , plant, PSI? . G;'1'- - -- .- '~
. .. ;. v . .. .- .V...- . :., . . -. r - - \
- 6. 'Aren't you' the NRCIgoing'~td r'equire production of some
,
of these contracts so you can verify whether or not.they do,
.
-
by virtue of,their' terms, include an ' incentive to complete the job as quickly as possible? Or, do you intend to merely accept PSI's self-3erving statements on this issue? e
,
'
..
.:: .. . . '. . 9 s.;.,..
. -
.c. ,
7 .~ .. r.~- :.- : w ..?.cWhy did ~you/'repre'se;ntativ,es of the NRC,, ?. allow PSI ;
.. .
'
. -
representatives.to drene on and on reading.page after page of printed material (which said little an pay, since two -
words out of every r sentance' vere PS1 doubletalk:- " quality .
assurance", " inspectors" or' " quality control managers")?
You gaveithe distinct imprassion., all.four,o.f you, while the -
PSI men were readin'g 'that yev were' bored; you all conversed motioned' to your colleague on the floor, -
.'.' _looke'd
. with each..otherat~at yo6r w c ,,
hes ~ 'ete'. ;'mee' ting? ;
so I ask each of you, had you -
N'W ,
".. .
-
read th'e' mate ' J it < .
' '
s y..x w. e..e +. . .' rial n. before~ the
, . . . - .. . , . . . . ., . . .
~a,,. a ,, ,~3w:
. -. .
.
.
.
-
Assuming.for..s..w;..s..
..
- th.
. . .
n.s. ,.~.4.e moment
. .- -
,,.
you were all p.w -r o p5'e r l y..~
. . .
'
ii . ' I.?" 'N . . .. . . .why'then did you*not insist that.the time be used to pose ~
'
.
"
-
"C. '
, .'questioni to the PSI ment Obviously, from the few exchanges
.
-
.- '
between Mr. Stello and Mr. Norris, you were not getting any
-
information that was helpful in making a decision; why if
. .you are a regulatory body, was that allowed?
-
.
' ,
. ..
'9. Weren't you curious as to why there are enough "non-conformances" that PSI is able to detail them and develop trends from them? Anyone who is familiar with statistics knows that it would take many "nonconformances" before any generalizations, or trends could be developed; should you not question why there are so many nonconformances if there is proper quality control assurance?
- 10. PS1 ndaitted that the quality control committee, one of the big changes they made, is basically a means of getting
.
. _. ~
'
N h 1 . Yl. ,
*;" . .
,
-
.
_ . -_ -__ - . . - - _. .
. . .
,
,
* -
. .
. , .
. . .
'
'
.
information about problems and progress to the various administrative people; it is not and cannot be a watchdog committee since it is composed of PSI people; so how is that
'
a "significant change" that has been made to correct the ' '
problems discovered in June? . .- .
.
, . .
- 11. This rule making process is the.only chance we citizens have to " participate" in the decision' as to whether or' not
'
to allow this company (who has shown bad faith through complete lack of planning and expertise) to proceed with>
-
building this public nuisance in our community; as Mr..,
Wendell Berry stated in his remarks.to you, you do not give the appearance of being in an . adversary. or watchdog' rela ~ ."
,
-
.
.
. tionship with PSI. .You cannot give me a valid reason as to .-
.
~.- why I don' t have the riiht . td a' lo' cal . referendum .'on the - .. .
'
..i r # will' issue of whether supply' energyto'to locate.this produce nuclekr' ultra tazardous materials' plant in . a ..(which
.
~
,pl. ant
'
'- -
hundreds of miles away) in my community; but yo'u can tell me ~
.
why you, by your lack of preparation, ' lack of hard questions to PSI and apologetic ma~nner towards.them, by your failure to require independent collaberation of issues, by your i initially derisive attitude towards the' citizens who came before you and by' your eintimidation'of those citizens, why you have made a charade of this one opportunity we as citi-zens have left to pr.ot,ect.ourselve.s.?
...y - ,. - .,. . . - , ..
- 12. What sort o'f' confidence.should we place.in any NRC
~
official who sits and tells us we'should " trust him" to protect our interest b'ecause he's the" man who believes proper planning and safety controls means " deciding what to do with the waste and cont'aminated materials (many of which
'
have a half life of tens,o'f thousands of years and. cannot
. conceivably be adequately conta1 ed) when the time comes"?
_
, . . A . N . . ,9.- ..
. .
-
.'
Do y'uo 1ntend to allow"c'onstruction'to proceed w'ithout
~
~
13.
requiring any independent d'~cumentation of changes;which are'.
~ '
~ -
o
,' in force at this date?.~. .and~ if you ah> intend to . require .1 p. . .
..~
C '- independent collaboration,' do'you not intend to allow the" ' - si
' ..7.M.. ' public 'to b'e privy to 'that'information?,,s/..f,. .; y_).M ?; : s. f. l[Ij9 .' ~ ~ $ ..
.
.. . _e
. .
_ . .: a : ...- f_.y, y.". .',y . .;;.Q .:g. c .c.g.4... y . &.-
.
. .,
.
,
- 14. Who specifically'. trained all tEese ne,w employees PSI
'
- 7. .
hired (and all ~the' old unqualified ones); how"were 'they . . .-
trained so quickly? How can.you think of letting work
.
. '., .
, proceed when it's obvious that the most PSI has done is to -
hire consultants to write. manuals for them (as opposed to
~
'
having completed adequate training of its employers)?-
-
; :, o , - ' .
- 15. You (being NRC represent'atives and Public Service Indiana representatives) said the meeting'was to be based on the " truth"; how can you make a tongue in check comment like that? Does your " truth" include the assertion that with all the nuclear power plants now in operation "we've only had one Three Mile Island"? After all, any well read person knows of many " accidents" and " shutdowns" - what is your
-,
.
.
-
3 . f-
. ,
'w.v'i.
*
- . *.". >..! '
-
. : -
- . .
.
_.
_
. . .
-
.
. . .
. *
, .
-
-
.
,
nomenclature those incidents? And is it your opinion that Three Mile Island is over? You said you would figure out what to do with the waste and contaminated structures "when the time comes"; well, what have you decided to do to. keep those pipes from disintegrating while you figure it out at
.
*
, : .
- 16. How can you state with any degree of certainty what .
dosage of radiation people took at Three Mile Island; isn't .
.'
it true that detectors were not in place until three days . , ,,
after the first announced leak? So the readings you toss . .'.
out are a measure of what was present on the date and in the , s i.
.
--
place the reading was taken, nothing more, isn.'t that true? . . ' . ' . '. _ ~
.. ; .. .
..
-
.. .
.. ., .>..~.:
'
. .. . < * *
. .,i r -
*.
'
O'.'
-
17 ',' As to notice of the' meetinp' ih, Madison', in wh'at' papers .' [c ' ...[ -
.
. '. s and on what days was noti *ce of the actual'date of the. meeting'. , . .
published? I saw a publication of notice that the'me'eting
*
? .- ,
e
- ' . would be on.one date; then it war. changed..to March 2.4, 1980. . ' -M I saw no proper notice that the mee' ting had' been changed
.
.
'
~" '
again to March 25, 1980'.~ *
.$
% *'
; ,,- ".g.,...'
.
' _. .
- 18. As I understand the, law, every proceeding is (shod 1d .
.
,
be) adversary in substance if it may result in an order in ,
.,
'
. .-
favor of one person as against another and the proceeding is. . '
none the less an adversary one simply because the primary purpose of the agency is to protect the public interest .
(U.S. v. Abilene & S.R. Company, 265 U.S. 274, 44 S.Ct. S65; in light of that, how can you (looking to the transcript of '
that March 25, 1980 meeting) justify your behavior? Your lack of questioning? Your failure to require independent verification? Your failure to take control of the situa-tion? Your willingness to let PSI proceed based on their *
!
, ,
own self serving promises? ~ , , .' l
. -
. , ..: . .
-{ ' ' '
- 20. What factors are' considered in choosing a cite for a ~
nuclear power plant? Is it mere happenstance that they are ( .
- ..
-
'
f'-
;
'often located in rural a'reas where the education level of %-
.
- '
a-
- .". the populace is low and where the opportunity.for'a ' ^ f .i '.
, $.
.
t[y ..f.
..a
'
'4'"# ;-
.
.~
. .
y
.,.] .paychech goes a long wa' l to win a ' person's loyalt$.'regularg...
, ,
.
.. j,
. -1. 1
), ; ';. l
. . . - ..
.
.
.
c
.
. . . c. . - .
. . . . ;
- 21. , If an emergency occurred, how long would you have to' .
'
; .
put into effect an evacuation plan? How can you pretend.to '..
'
'
i think ANY evacuation plan of a 10 mile /50 mile radius (as j you've indicated would be required) would work? '
<
i
- 21. Since you who attended the meeting on behalf of the NRC were not the ones who will make the ultimate decision here, !
did you not have an even higher duty to search out answers !
to these and other obvious questions? The members of th3 committee who make the decision will have nothing in front of them other than the material submitted by PS1 itself; the people of this country cannot remain calm as it becomes clear that thi.= is what you consider regulatory action.
'
. . 4
-
t .
'l.. * ' , ' - L ..- . ~ .:
, -
-.v v v
'
' * ^ ' - '- ' -" ~
I l
_ _ _ . - _ __
. . .
*
-
. . . .;
- .
. .
'
. - -
. . .
,
-
.
- 22. I understand that af ter I lef t you (Mr. Stello) agreed it might be a good idea to get some independent agent to inspect the " corrected" faults in the concrete; did it take a chance suggestion from a member of the public to make you think of that? And you are the watchdog for the pbblic? .
. *
- L , '; 1
- 23. Might I suggest 'that'the independent agent shbuld be allowed to test whereever he wants and not where directed by
-
' IS1? .
-
.
-1
., .
- 24. Have you made provisions for a complete security check of all employees and contractors working at Marble Hill? If 8 e not, on what basis do you justify the lack? An ill inclined
"
_e . contractor 'or wor'ker alone could perform shoddy workmanship
. n .'? ( ..; which, would 'have ~ grave consequences later. Terrorism is as
>
N., ..!'. , ' much a real threat as earthquakes and tornados; this plant
.
* * -
in particular 1might be more susceptable' to such an act
-
. considering who is to be the recipient of its power. Have you considered this'or.is this,another' problem you will deal with when the time comes?' s - 2- -
._
. .
.
..
Senator Townsend of Indiana has acknowledged that the Public Service ~ Commission in Indiana is a source of real problem to the people; i.e. , that it is interested in excess profits regardless of the effect on the people. Obviously, since
~
the power produced by Marble Hill is to be shipped out of the state, this plant is not for the people, but for the profits. Since you must know even more about this than 1, and yet you continue to rely on the " good faith" of those same individuals, it can only be said that you are indeed acting in collusion with the Commission members and PSI -
officials.
'
-
I want the record to reflect my feeling that NRC repre-
-
sentatives were generally unprepared for the March 25th
'
,,,- meeting..or, they were unwilling to press PSI for any hard
. .. . . . y c . ' facts or explanations. Further, Mr. Thornburg, Stello and .
- ~. . . ,,, . .Keppler' repeatedly checked their watches and commented about .
'l ."c N.t h the time.'. Mr:~ Stello,' while telling people they would have J
~ the opportunity'to ask all their questions, repeatedly
.*
?',~.
. .
s . badgered "How many 'more questions do you have" and "There is
-
a long line of people waiting" and he failed to control the floor for those who were asking questions; and, in more than
-
one instance, joined in the derisive attitude of the pro-Marble Hill people in the crowd (construction people, equipment
'
operators and engineers primarily).
This meeting did not serve the purpose of getting any hard data from PSI as to what specifically they have done,to correct their'heneous planning, construction, training, and quality control practices. NRC officials ontinue to fail to deal with many of the issues which are of concern to the citizens, i.e.,
,
.
.
l -
- ;
5
' - -
l - .
'
i .H .
; - ' .' .
.
" -
-
?..~ .- '%. > ; . .
.- ~; -
.
l
. _ - - _ _ _
/ - -- - - -- -
-
. . .
.
.
..
* . . . ;
o o *
. -
-
,
. . .
"
- 1. Wy should a company who ~went so far with no planning (and would have gone further) be alloiTed to proceed at all? - -
,
,
,.
.
- 2. Wat has PSI done to' change? ' '
.
.
- 3. Wat has been done to set up controls to"be certain everything is done perfectly (because anything less than perfect is not safe enough)?
- 4. Wat has the NRC done to exercise it's power and duty to assure public safety? . .
.. .; .
.
.
~. . . , .' . -
, . . . . .. .
.
5.- How can you think of building this plant when
~
. .
.
you admit that you'll have to figure out what to do
, . to keep us from being contaminated by waste, spills -
and/or shut downs ~, when the time "comes?. *-
* ' ' .V .
. -
+
_.
'.s . ,. .: _ ,.
- 6. _Since you obviously do thirik its okay to ' proceed without having the answers to those' ultimate questions, how can you p, ret.e,nd to, be any .sor.t. of watchdog agency?
.. . . .
t . .;.s
. n,
. . . r .- ..
.... ..
Sincerely, .
~'
~
,
,
J
' ' ' '
,
Deborah' H. McCarthy
. .,.
cc: Senator Walter D. Huddleston Senator Vendell H. Ford ,.
Senator John Berry , ; , . .
,
. ,. 1
.,... , , . 1 ,< .
. -.
. .,. . . ., .
.
.
. 3 .
-
.
. . , . . . v
., .
..
. , ; . : 2 ". :, n . >.. . . .- . .,
.
.-
. . --
.
,..y. .
.. ..
,
. .
.
.
1
,
...e s ; q :aw :.c v. ?., a. + t;, ' '
. - . .. .
. .... ..e ,.
.: . .
-. . . -- . ' . , . ;t.;r e
. . . . . .
.-
. ..: , . . . .. . . s ;. _ ,.u.,. ;
. s.... 7 .
u--... : .-
-
.. ..
.
,
.
, \
. . .. .. .
c
. .
. . .-
.
% * ,9,
. .:.
.g
..
~ ~ - .
.
** - ..
-
.
. .
- .
. .
.
.
-
. .
, .
.
. ,
...
.
. ,. .-
,* .
, .
..; -,
.
;a* . -r >
-
' >: - .
-
.
edP a
-
.
-
.
.
. .
'
. a. y
*
- - -
.
,
; :., _ g . .q . ' _ .L ' , _ ..,
*
', -
_,i' .:
,
- -.t
?
- ..;...
.
.
,'[;f,.**....:.?.;,;<.{..'~.,;.U:
<,..~<.,I : f , .-'; L; ; .. .
.
.: U. . :. ; .*:-. ,
,.
-
-.,;; . .
- - . - -
'
.
,
L1
. .}}