ML19320A431: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:: | {{#Wiki_filter:: | ||
, 8005050 D 6 . | , 8005050 D 6 . | ||
: 1. Non-Routine, Non-Radiological Environmental Report No. 50-313/75-3 | : 1. Non-Routine, Non-Radiological Environmental Report No. 50-313/75-3 | ||
: 2. Report Date: 1/21/75 3. Occurrence Date: 1/17/75 | : 2. Report Date: 1/21/75 3. Occurrence Date: 1/17/75 | ||
Line 29: | Line 24: | ||
. 5. Identification of Occurrence: Fish kill on intake screens exceeding 3000 pounds based on 24-hour. sample period. | . 5. Identification of Occurrence: Fish kill on intake screens exceeding 3000 pounds based on 24-hour. sample period. | ||
: 6. Conditions Prior to Occurrence: | : 6. Conditions Prior to Occurrence: | ||
Steady-State Power X Reactor Power ~2500 MWth | Steady-State Power X Reactor Power ~2500 MWth Ilot Standby _ | ||
Net. Output 830 MWe Cold Shutdown Percent of Full Power 98 % | |||
Ilot Standby _ | |||
Net. Output 830 MWe | |||
Cold Shutdown Percent of Full Power 98 % | |||
Refueling Shutdown Routine Startup Operation Routine Shutdown ' | Refueling Shutdown Routine Startup Operation Routine Shutdown ' | ||
Operation | Operation Load Changes During Routine Power Operation ' | ||
Load Changes During Routine Power Operation ' | |||
Other (Specify) Four circulating water pumps were in operation. | Other (Specify) Four circulating water pumps were in operation. | ||
: 7. Description of Occurrence: - | : 7. Description of Occurrence: - | ||
, During routine fish impingement ponitoring 1/17/75 using procedure 1607.10, Monitoring Fish Impinged on ANO-1 Intake Screens, 6790 pounds of fish were collected during a 24-hour sample period beginning at 8:00 A.M. 1/16/75 and ending at 8:00 a.m. 1/17/75. A mixture of gizzard and threadfin shad made up 99.9% of the total weight of fish. Other fish made up 0.1% of the total weight. Threadfin shad made up 96% of the total number of shad. The intake water temperature at 8:00 a.m. 1/17/75 was 42*F and the ambient air temperature was 33*F. l (/ | , During routine fish impingement ponitoring 1/17/75 using procedure 1607.10, Monitoring Fish Impinged on ANO-1 Intake Screens, 6790 pounds of fish were collected during a 24-hour sample period beginning at 8:00 A.M. 1/16/75 and ending at 8:00 a.m. 1/17/75. A mixture of gizzard and threadfin shad made up 99.9% of the total weight of fish. Other fish made up 0.1% of the total weight. Threadfin shad made up 96% of the total number of shad. The intake water temperature at 8:00 a.m. 1/17/75 was 42*F and the ambient air temperature was 33*F. l (/ | ||
1 s | 1 s J | ||
J | |||
{w | {w | ||
< 'd l | < 'd l J | ||
J | |||
July 5, 1974 NSP-10, Rev. O Page 1 of 3 | July 5, 1974 NSP-10, Rev. O Page 1 of 3 | ||
i | i | ||
- Non-Routine, No -Radiological Environmental Report No.- 50-313/75-3 | - Non-Routine, No -Radiological Environmental Report No.- 50-313/75-3 | ||
: 8. Designation of Apparent Cruse of Occurrence: | : 8. Designation of Apparent Cruse of Occurrence: | ||
Design Procedure | Design Procedure Manufacture Unusual Service Condition Including Installation / Environmental Construction Component Failure Operator Other (Specify) X-The apparent cause was due to a natural die off of threadfin shad during the winter season,. | ||
Manufacture Unusual Service Condition Including Installation / Environmental Construction Component Failure Operator Other (Specify) X- | |||
The apparent cause was due to a natural die off of threadfin shad during the winter season,. | |||
: 9. . Analysis of Occurrence: | : 9. . Analysis of Occurrence: | ||
The only noticeable Environmental Impact was the removal of the above mentioned fish from the lake, The fish that were collected were dis-posed of through land fill operation. The fish that were not collected were disposed of through the trash disposal system. | The only noticeable Environmental Impact was the removal of the above mentioned fish from the lake, The fish that were collected were dis-posed of through land fill operation. The fish that were not collected were disposed of through the trash disposal system. | ||
s | s | ||
: 10. Corrective Action: , | : 10. Corrective Action: , | ||
Long term studies are in progress to determine the effects of plant operation of the aquatic ecosystems of the Dardanelle Reservoir. Data from this report and other data obtained is fed back into these studies to determine what changes might be made to the~ studies in order to ensure- that adequate data is obtained for evaluating plant impact. | Long term studies are in progress to determine the effects of plant operation of the aquatic ecosystems of the Dardanelle Reservoir. Data from this report and other data obtained is fed back into these studies to determine what changes might be made to the~ studies in order to ensure- that adequate data is obtained for evaluating plant impact. | ||
Review *by Arkansas Power G Light Company and its consultants of the results of these studies will determine what corrective action might be taken to reduce plant effects on the' Reservoir. | Review *by Arkansas Power G Light Company and its consultants of the results of these studies will determine what corrective action might be taken to reduce plant effects on the' Reservoir. | ||
i 1 | |||
i | |||
1 | |||
~ | ~ | ||
j l | j l | ||
Line 94: | Line 52: | ||
~ | ~ | ||
Page 2 of 3 ' | Page 2 of 3 ' | ||
s | s | ||
~ ~ 7 | ~ ~ 7 | ||
; '.- | ; '.- | ||
Non-Routine, Non-Radiological Environmental Report No. 50-313/75-3 | Non-Routine, Non-Radiological Environmental Report No. 50-313/75-3 | ||
: 11. Failure Data: | : 11. Failure Data: | ||
The circumstances of this report are similar to those reported in Non-Routine, Non-Radiological Environmental Report No. 50-313/74-1 through 50-313/74-11 and 50-313/75-1 and 50-313/75-2. | The circumstances of this report are similar to those reported in Non-Routine, Non-Radiological Environmental Report No. 50-313/74-1 through 50-313/74-11 and 50-313/75-1 and 50-313/75-2. | ||
: 12. Reviews and Approvals: | : 12. Reviews and Approvals: | ||
Reviewed and Approved by: Plant Safety Committee Yes (X) No ( ) | Reviewed and Approved by: Plant Safety Committee Yes (X) No ( ) | ||
Plant Superintendent Yes (X ) No ( ) | Plant Superintendent Yes (X ) No ( ) | ||
==Reference:== | ==Reference:== | ||
JWA-803 Date: 1/20/75 Reviewed by: J ). Date: /- 2 J.- 75 Licensing Supervisor Approved by:_ .eff////gc' /&e,-[ f Date: /- P.S /T ~ | JWA-803 Date: 1/20/75 Reviewed by: J ). Date: /- 2 J.- 75 Licensing Supervisor Approved by:_ .eff////gc' /&e,-[ f Date: /- P.S /T ~ | ||
/ ''Safet ~ Review Co .it ce | / ''Safet ~ Review Co .it ce | ||
* Approved by: 2 - 1 | |||
Approved by: 2 - 1 | |||
)~ r | )~ r | ||
. ' r*% Datc: / g3 7J nager of Nuclear Services ( } / | |||
. ' r*% Datc: / g3 7J | |||
nager of Nuclear Services ( } / | |||
Approved by* ///[,/g /m /' Date: /M5'I Director of Power Production Approved by: | Approved by* ///[,/g /m /' Date: /M5'I Director of Power Production Approved by: | ||
Date: /~Af''I Senior Vice President | Date: /~Af''I Senior Vice President l | ||
July 5, 1974 NSP-10, Rev. O Page 3 of 3 y | |||
l | l | ||
r~-~ | r~-~ | ||
_ AEC Dif,T HIL .lON FOR PART 50 DOCKET MATER . | _ AEC Dif,T HIL .lON FOR PART 50 DOCKET MATER . | ||
(TEMPOR ARY FORM) 843 CONTROL NO: | |||
(TEMPOR ARY FORM) 843 | |||
CONTROL NO: | |||
FILE: - | FILE: - | ||
FROM: Arkansas Power & Light DATE OF DOC DATE REC'D LTR TWX RPT OTHER Little Rock, Ark 72203 A.P. Pettit 1-23-75 1-25-75 X | FROM: Arkansas Power & Light DATE OF DOC DATE REC'D LTR TWX RPT OTHER Little Rock, Ark 72203 A.P. Pettit 1-23-75 1-25-75 X ORIG CC OTHER SENT AEC PDR m E.g. Case 1 signed | ||
ORIG CC OTHER SENT AEC PDR m E.g. Case 1 signed | |||
* SENT LOCAL PDR CLASS UNCLASS PROPINFO INPUT NO CYS REC'D DOCKET NO: | * SENT LOCAL PDR CLASS UNCLASS PROPINFO INPUT NO CYS REC'D DOCKET NO: | ||
XXX 40 50-313 DESCR: llON ENCLOSURES: | XXX 40 50-313 DESCR: llON ENCLOSURES: | ||
Line 153: | Line 88: | ||
W/ Copies W/ Copies W// Copies W/ Copies CLARK (L) STOLZ (L) DICKER (E) LEAR (L) | W/ Copies W/ Copies W// Copies W/ Copies CLARK (L) STOLZ (L) DICKER (E) LEAR (L) | ||
W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies PARR (L) VASSALLO IL) KNIGHTON (E) SPELS W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies . | W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies PARR (L) VASSALLO IL) KNIGHTON (E) SPELS W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies . | ||
KNIEL (L) PURPLE (L) /'YOUNGBLOOD (E) . | KNIEL (L) PURPLE (L) /'YOUNGBLOOD (E) . | ||
W/ Copies W/ Copies W/JCopies W/ Copies | W/ Copies W/ Copies W/JCopies W/ Copies INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION 6EG Fi13) TECH REVIEW /DENTON LIC ASST A/T IND YAtGFDR #'SCHROEDER GRIMES R. DIGGS (L) BRAITMAN OGC, ROOM P-506A MACCARY GAMMILL H. GEARIN (L) SALTZMAN VMUNTZlNG/ STAFF KNIGHT KASTNER E. GOULBOURNE (L) ABEL CASE PAWLICKl .rBALLARD GIAMBUSSO P. KREUTZER (E) | ||
INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION 6EG Fi13) TECH REVIEW /DENTON LIC ASST A/T IND YAtGFDR #'SCHROEDER GRIMES R. DIGGS (L) BRAITMAN OGC, ROOM P-506A MACCARY GAMMILL H. GEARIN (L) SALTZMAN VMUNTZlNG/ STAFF KNIGHT KASTNER E. GOULBOURNE (L) ABEL CASE PAWLICKl .rBALLARD GIAMBUSSO P. KREUTZER (E) | |||
SHAO SPANG LER J. LEE (L) PLANS i | SHAO SPANG LER J. LEE (L) PLANS i | ||
BOYD STELLO M. MAIGRET (L) MCDONALD MOORE (L) HOUSTON ENVIRO S. REED (E) CHAPMAN DEYOUNG (L) NOVAK v' MU LLER M. SERVICE (L) DUBE (Ltr) | BOYD STELLO M. MAIGRET (L) MCDONALD MOORE (L) HOUSTON ENVIRO S. REED (E) CHAPMAN DEYOUNG (L) NOVAK v' MU LLER M. SERVICE (L) DUBE (Ltr) |
Revision as of 05:13, 1 February 2020
ML19320A431 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Arkansas Nuclear |
Issue date: | 01/21/1975 |
From: | Cavanaugh W, Pettit A, Reuter D ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO. |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML19320A427 | List: |
References | |
NUDOCS 8005050436 | |
Download: ML19320A431 (4) | |
Text
, 8005050 D 6 .
- 1. Non-Routine, Non-Radiological Environmental Report No. 50-313/75-3
- 2. Report Date: 1/21/75 3. Occurrence Date: 1/17/75
. 5. Identification of Occurrence: Fish kill on intake screens exceeding 3000 pounds based on 24-hour. sample period.
- 6. Conditions Prior to Occurrence:
Steady-State Power X Reactor Power ~2500 MWth Ilot Standby _
Net. Output 830 MWe Cold Shutdown Percent of Full Power 98 %
Refueling Shutdown Routine Startup Operation Routine Shutdown '
Operation Load Changes During Routine Power Operation '
Other (Specify) Four circulating water pumps were in operation.
- 7. Description of Occurrence: -
, During routine fish impingement ponitoring 1/17/75 using procedure 1607.10, Monitoring Fish Impinged on ANO-1 Intake Screens, 6790 pounds of fish were collected during a 24-hour sample period beginning at 8:00 A.M. 1/16/75 and ending at 8:00 a.m. 1/17/75. A mixture of gizzard and threadfin shad made up 99.9% of the total weight of fish. Other fish made up 0.1% of the total weight. Threadfin shad made up 96% of the total number of shad. The intake water temperature at 8:00 a.m. 1/17/75 was 42*F and the ambient air temperature was 33*F. l (/
1 s J
{w
< 'd l J
July 5, 1974 NSP-10, Rev. O Page 1 of 3
i
- Non-Routine, No -Radiological Environmental Report No.- 50-313/75-3
- 8. Designation of Apparent Cruse of Occurrence:
Design Procedure Manufacture Unusual Service Condition Including Installation / Environmental Construction Component Failure Operator Other (Specify) X-The apparent cause was due to a natural die off of threadfin shad during the winter season,.
- 9. . Analysis of Occurrence:
The only noticeable Environmental Impact was the removal of the above mentioned fish from the lake, The fish that were collected were dis-posed of through land fill operation. The fish that were not collected were disposed of through the trash disposal system.
s
- 10. Corrective Action: ,
Long term studies are in progress to determine the effects of plant operation of the aquatic ecosystems of the Dardanelle Reservoir. Data from this report and other data obtained is fed back into these studies to determine what changes might be made to the~ studies in order to ensure- that adequate data is obtained for evaluating plant impact.
Review *by Arkansas Power G Light Company and its consultants of the results of these studies will determine what corrective action might be taken to reduce plant effects on the' Reservoir.
i 1
~
j l
July 5, 1974 NSP-lb, Rev. O 1
~
Page 2 of 3 '
s
~ ~ 7
- '.-
Non-Routine, Non-Radiological Environmental Report No. 50-313/75-3
- 11. Failure Data:
The circumstances of this report are similar to those reported in Non-Routine, Non-Radiological Environmental Report No. 50-313/74-1 through 50-313/74-11 and 50-313/75-1 and 50-313/75-2.
- 12. Reviews and Approvals:
Reviewed and Approved by: Plant Safety Committee Yes (X) No ( )
Plant Superintendent Yes (X ) No ( )
Reference:
JWA-803 Date: 1/20/75 Reviewed by: J ). Date: /- 2 J.- 75 Licensing Supervisor Approved by:_ .eff////gc' /&e,-[ f Date: /- P.S /T ~
/ Safet ~ Review Co .it ce
- Approved by: 2 - 1
)~ r
. ' r*% Datc: / g3 7J nager of Nuclear Services ( } /
Approved by* ///[,/g /m /' Date: /M5'I Director of Power Production Approved by:
Date: /~AfI Senior Vice President l
July 5, 1974 NSP-10, Rev. O Page 3 of 3 y
l
r~-~
_ AEC Dif,T HIL .lON FOR PART 50 DOCKET MATER .
(TEMPOR ARY FORM) 843 CONTROL NO:
FILE: -
FROM: Arkansas Power & Light DATE OF DOC DATE REC'D LTR TWX RPT OTHER Little Rock, Ark 72203 A.P. Pettit 1-23-75 1-25-75 X ORIG CC OTHER SENT AEC PDR m E.g. Case 1 signed
XXX 40 50-313 DESCR: llON ENCLOSURES:
Ltr tre..s the following..... notarized 1-23-75
...... Environnental Abnormal Occurrence No. 50-313/
75-3.....concerning fish inningement in excess 6f the environ tech specs.....
(40 cys enc 1 rec'd)
PLANT NAME: Arkansas Nuclear One - #1 FOR ACTION /INFORMATION 1-27-75 JB BUTLER (L) SCHWENCER (L)#ZlEMANN (L) REGAN (E)
W/ Copies W/ Copies W// Copies W/ Copies CLARK (L) STOLZ (L) DICKER (E) LEAR (L)
W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies PARR (L) VASSALLO IL) KNIGHTON (E) SPELS W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies .
KNIEL (L) PURPLE (L) /'YOUNGBLOOD (E) .
W/ Copies W/ Copies W/JCopies W/ Copies INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION 6EG Fi13) TECH REVIEW /DENTON LIC ASST A/T IND YAtGFDR #'SCHROEDER GRIMES R. DIGGS (L) BRAITMAN OGC, ROOM P-506A MACCARY GAMMILL H. GEARIN (L) SALTZMAN VMUNTZlNG/ STAFF KNIGHT KASTNER E. GOULBOURNE (L) ABEL CASE PAWLICKl .rBALLARD GIAMBUSSO P. KREUTZER (E)
SHAO SPANG LER J. LEE (L) PLANS i
BOYD STELLO M. MAIGRET (L) MCDONALD MOORE (L) HOUSTON ENVIRO S. REED (E) CHAPMAN DEYOUNG (L) NOVAK v' MU LLER M. SERVICE (L) DUBE (Ltr)
SKOVHOLT (L) ROSS DICKER S. SHEPPARD (L) E. COUPE
/GOLLER (L) (Ltr) IPPOLITO KNIGHTON M. SLATER (E) PETERSON P. CO L LINS TEDESCO YOUNGBLOOD H. SMITH (L)
DENISE D. THOMPSON (7)
LONG REGAN S. TEETS (L) KLECKER p41EG OPR LAINAS / PROJECT LDR G. WILLI AMS (E) EISENHUT FILE & REGION (2 BENAROYA /W/ws//a (2) w'V. WILSON (L) WIGGINTON MORRIS VOLLMER HAR LESS STEELE yyYfm EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION fa ff_
- 1 - LOCAL PDRdfJe//p///s./ 8#* N.
- 1 -TIC (ABERNATHY)/(1k'0;.':0l - NATIONAL LABS dAA/4- )
1 - PD R-SAN /LA/NY
/1 - NSlC (BUCHANAN) v1 - W. PENNINGTON, Rm E-201 GT 1 - BROOKHAVEN NAT LAB 1 - ASLB 1 - CONSULTANTS 1 - G. U LRIKSON, ORN L 1 - Newton Anderson NEWMARK/BLUME/AGBABIAN 1 - ACRS HOLDING /SENT 1 - AGMED (RUTH GUSSMAN)
Hm B-127 GT 1 - R. D. MUELLER, Rm E-201 GT j