ML20024A064

Discusses Contentions I-33B,D,E,K & I-45 Re TMI Action Plan Items I.C.6,I.G.1,I.D.1,II.F.1,II.D.3 & II.B.2.Contentions Denied W/O Prejudice by ASLB 830516 Memorandum & Order,For Lack of Specificity

ML20024A064
Person / Time
Site:	Limerick
Issue date:	06/10/1983
From:	Dorsey J DORSEY, J.A., LIMERICK ECOLOGY ACTION, INC.
To:	Brenner L, Cole R, Morris P Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
TASK-1.C.6, TASK-1.D.1, TASK-1.G.1, TASK-2.B.2, TASK-2.D.3, TASK-2.F.1, TASK-TM NUDOCS 8306150362
Download: ML20024A064 (2)

Text

_- . -

.a ,..

JUDrrn - A. DORSEY KETED 00(.wt u

i.Aw orrecas 1815 WiLNUT ST SUITE 1632

'83 Jml13 p3:40 m a r u ari. ri. 1 1ov m u..n..

m:. Jg5[

. y~;-

June 10, 1983 Judge Lawrence Brenner Judge Richard F. Cole Atomic Safety and Licensing Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Board U.S. Nucle r Regulatory U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commission Washington, DC 20555 Washington, DC 20555 Judge Peter A. Morris Atomic Safety and Licensing .

Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission t Washington, DC 20555 In the Matter of Philadelphia Electric Company (Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2)

Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353 I

Gentlemen, j In its May 16, 1983 Membrandum and Order Confirming Schedules Established Ddring Prehearing Conference, the Board denied without prejudice contentions I-33B, D, E, K, and I-45, due to' lack of~ specificity and basis since the materials to which they l relate had been either just recently filed or still lacking.

i June 15 was set as the date for refiling based on new information.

I-33B. (TML Action Plan item # I.C.6) ,

oh eo No refiling necessary; contention satisfied.

@@ I-33D. (TMI Action Plan item # I.G.1) en O

N In its most recent submission, applicant points to

$$ its responses to SRAI-8 and Question 640.11, as

@@ sources of additional information in satisfaction of g< this TMI Action Plan item. Responses SRAI-8 and og 640'.11, however, were submitted as presently written n Ea.o in September of 1982; since that time, the staff 07 has expressed the same need for additional iriformation -

expressed by LEA (see the staff's March 11, 1983 report on the Development of the Draft Safety Evaluation Report for Limerick, in which it is stated that

. . . . .. h- *.$.. ' ' . S . . - . - - . . .

~

Brenner, page 2. l l

"[tlhe response to' item 640.11 needs to be expanded to )

more clearly describe additional testing and training discussed in the applicant's letter of March 6, 1981 to Robert L. Tedesco (NRR) , regarding NUREG-0737. Item I.G.l."

LEA will, if necessary, submit new contentions on this TMI Action Plan item when the req ~uired information is available. Since the NRC staff is pursuing this matter, it will likely not be necessary for LEA to do so.

~

I-33E. (TMI Action Plan itemi #s I.D.1, II.F.1, II.D. 3, and II.B. 2)

LEA has no additional cont'entions to file at this i time based upon the new information submitted by the applicant. When the control room design review itself is completed and available, LEA will submit contentions if necessary.

I-33K.

No refiling necessary; contention satisfied.

I-45.

No refiling necessary; contention satisfied.

cerely J ith A. Dorsey C nsel for Limerick Ecology Action xc: Service List

- , - . - . . . . - . . - . . . . . . . -. . . - . - - - - . - _ _ . - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . .