ML20024A064
| ML20024A064 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 06/10/1983 |
| From: | Dorsey J DORSEY, J.A., LIMERICK ECOLOGY ACTION, INC. |
| To: | Brenner L, Cole R, Morris P Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| TASK-1.C.6, TASK-1.D.1, TASK-1.G.1, TASK-2.B.2, TASK-2.D.3, TASK-2.F.1, TASK-TM NUDOCS 8306150362 | |
| Download: ML20024A064 (2) | |
Text
_-
.a JUDrrn - A. DORSEY KETED 00(.wt u
i.Aw orrecas 1815 WiLNUT ST SUITE 1632
'83 Jml13 p3:40 m a r u ari. ri. 1 1ov m u..n..
m:. Jg5[
. y~;-
June 10, 1983 Judge Lawrence Brenner Judge Richard F.
Cole Atomic Safety and Licensing Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Board U.S. Nucle r Regulatory U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commission Washington, DC 20555 Washington, DC 20555 Judge Peter A. Morris Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 t
In the Matter of Philadelphia Electric Company (Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2)
Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353 I
Gentlemen, j
In its May 16, 1983 Membrandum and Order Confirming Schedules Established Ddring Prehearing Conference, the Board denied without prejudice contentions I-33B, D, E, K, and I-45, due to' lack of~ specificity and basis since the materials to which they l
relate had been either just recently filed or still lacking.
June 15 was set as the date for refiling based on new information.
i I-33B. (TML Action Plan item # I.C.6) oh No refiling necessary; contention satisfied.
eo I-33D. (TMI Action Plan item # I.G.1) enO N
In its most recent submission, applicant points to its responses to SRAI-8 and Question 640.11, as sources of additional information in satisfaction of g<
this TMI Action Plan item.
Responses SRAI-8 and og 640'.11, however, were submitted as presently written n
Ea.o in September of 1982; since that time, the staff 07 has expressed the same need for additional iriformation -
expressed by LEA (see the staff's March 11, 1983 report on the Development of the Draft Safety Evaluation Report for Limerick, in which it is stated that
...... h-S
~
Brenner, page 2.
l
"[tlhe response to' item 640.11 needs to be expanded to
)
more clearly describe additional testing and training discussed in the applicant's letter of March 6, 1981 to Robert L. Tedesco (NRR), regarding NUREG-0737. Item I.G.l."
LEA will, if necessary, submit new contentions on this TMI Action Plan item when the req ~uired information is available.
Since the NRC staff is pursuing this matter, it will likely not be necessary for LEA to do so.
~
I-33E. (TMI Action Plan itemi #s I.D.1, II.F.1, II.D. 3, and II.B. 2)
LEA has no additional cont'entions to file at this i
time based upon the new information submitted by the applicant.
When the control room design review itself is completed and available, LEA will submit contentions if necessary.
I-33K.
No refiling necessary; contention satisfied.
I-45.
No refiling necessary; contention satisfied.
cerely J
ith A.
Dorsey C
nsel for Limerick Ecology Action xc: Service List
..