ML20140G517

Requests Rept Re Status & Outcome of Investigation Re Structural Integrity of Foundation Basemat.Nrc Response to Motion to Reopen Due 840413.Rept Should Be Received Prior to 840413

ML20140G517
Person / Time
Site:	Waterford
Issue date:	02/28/1984
From:	Johnson W, Kohl C, Wilber H NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
To:	Hayes B NRC OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS (OI)
Shared Package
ML20140B839	List: IA-84-717, Discusses Allegation 4-83-A-86 ML20140G471 ML20140G481 ML20140G486 ML20140G498 ML20140G517 ML20140G523 ML20140G528 ML20140G534 ML20140G540 ML20140G544 ML20140G550 ML20140G557 ML20140G563 ML20140G570 ML20140G576 ML20140G579 ML20140G584 ML20140G589 ML20140G593 ML20140G599
References
FOIA-84-717 NUDOCS 8507130237
Download: ML20140G517 (3)

Text

/ ~ UNITED STATES 8 c NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

$ I ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPE AL PANEL g genn, VWASHINGTON. D.C. 20655 February 28, liq (((; 29 fl!11: 30 r

Ben B. Ila y e s , Director Office of Investigations U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Re: Docket No. 50-382, Louisiana Power

& Light Company (Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3)

Dear Mr. !!a ye s :

Several recent filings in the Waterford operating license proceeding have referred to an ongoing investigation by your office into allegations concerning this facility.

See, e.g., NRC Staff's Motion for Further Extension of Time (February 23, 1984) at 2. The allegations arise from a De cen.be r 10, 1983, article in Gambit (a New Orleans newspaper) and relate to the structural integrity of the foundation basemat. As you nay be aware, these allegations are the basis of a motion to reopen pending before us. In acccrdcr.ce with the Co.rission's August 5, 19E3, Policy Statement on Investigations and Adjudicatory Proceedings (48 Fed. Beg. 3f,258), we request that your office keep us (and the parties) informed as tc the status and outcone of the investigatien. The NEC staff's respor.sc tc the notion to reopen, which is to include the results of its own review of these allegations, is now due April 13, 19E4. We would thereforr ap preciate your report by that s anie tine.

F i r. re rc l y ,

Lu n Gd Christine N. Kohl, Chairman ii jfrl Ge' f m Dr. W. Reed Johnson

}4.nv e t$ h. ){ t -)

II ward A. Wilber 8507130237 850502 PDR

FDIA Administrative Judges

! BERNABE84-717 PDR Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board cc: Bruce Churchill, Esq.

Carole 11. Burstein, Esq.

Sherwin E. Turk, Esq.

I' J

. :-. -.; :q ,.. % ..

.m es.- .

b _' .

~

f) f - -

UNITE 35TATES

/

f NUCLEAR REGULATORY CUiIAMISSIO wasmucrow,0. c.aoses ff '* ..

).

MAR 121984 ETE .

I iRR IS8ti NAR 12 PH be I

!!"JE ti EnTET" '. - t.o pgu+ 0:: EAM#.Ri /

H[J sues W

Region IVJohn T. Collins, Regional Ad i ,

6 be '

m nistrator -

l k'd .

Harold R. DentonDirector Office of Nuclear, Reactor Reg, l gMr umber pg Richard C. DeYoung, Directo r u ation fv CSffice of Inspection & ent Enforcem William J. Dircks

g. ~

Executive Director for Operatio ns is COMANCHE PEAK ANDON WATERFORDCCM ORY ACTIONS

)ctice jor, f ca:. ~ t e remain a nu bc' acilities m er of issue the Conanche is nearing Peak and Water r2 cr te com;1ex and span more thanuefore

.-ell e ke its licensing dec lved  ::-tination/

c' e sch integration of one The issues remaining for these these Office.is

.e c  : *::

edule to satisfy hearing sues andandlice toNRC assure issuesIn ord gass" ee~+::: : .s.:c manage all necessary nsing decision needs, actions leacing t ge the: e'#crts Iwit? .

the leadof NRR, responsibility IE, and Ris activity., for Division thDarrell o prompt Eisenhut, Directo of Licensing, NPD e nd CELD.

He will iv2_ .. f Prior to any of the affected Oegion IV, and will coorcinate vity :- . :de.c. be ,concurred inspections) or NRR naking deci i s in by

)senty .

s ons on these plants,ffices undertaking Eise. hut in the management cated se of thesin the process of ass

\ph;se of this program will be the ide activities. nior manager to lv;d "cr each plant prior to heari su;s have been identified a Prong and lic' ensing decisionsentification of. .

. be c:,eveloped and implemented. gram Plan for resolution of f .

each

!n,tha and thewerk scheduleneeded, for completion.the identification of the resp

$ ora be similar to the effort undert k In principle, this ef iablo Canyon except that thisa'eff en regarding the alle

%spection, hearing, and allegation ort should encompass issuesall .gation fY

.*.* ' 4;;%=r,f,t*. . .,e.;5. C. ..x.l.( s'

~: : ^ ?:% * ;'T

, . . . . . , - ='?.. {'r-L .. k' A6.^N....TM:?.- < -

'N - .

e..+ 4, . s. > r

.. e a ...

c. . ..

+. ~ . , . - ,. :. . . . v -

.r . ;x - -

t .,

s. .

1 g ...

.4 .~ . '.' e

_ -s. .2-

. l

~

' g.~;. .

....S.%. .

. s

'.-*e/**

OVERAl.L MANAGEMENT 7 'F- . . COORDINATION (HRR) 1 01 Contact

. ,. .e . . .

ELD Contact

.c .

a. - .x. .y .

.~ ' .+.. . &

d'.[h-Overall Review of Review of Desian ~

Review of Construction Issues anc! Operation Issues QA Adequacy (CAT)

.. (t:RR) (Re9 IV) (IE) wg..-. .. .c ' .

y: -

-. . & ==*.-=. -

.

• _i.e.. .' ts.:.-

, .. .o

-*. .. .>2, M.*Y, T ~ - -

1. .

~Q R{* s .

o

,c. .a---+*

c g.. .;.s;w ;: . . .

[. . . . 'f .,=) .: .

.. L '.1 .

i

.n.

a,  %,1 * ;g6.' . . .

[ in - .:-a.v.:

? .- L .. ..u--r ,,t .- . *'.

$} .*'

'* b,L

( '.%..'.

.e l ,

l I

e e

e O h

. ..e

, . o