ML20140G534

Package of Correspondence Re Harassment of QC Inspectors. Portions Deleted

ML20140G534
Person / Time
Site:	Waterford
Issue date:	05/02/1985
From:	AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
Shared Package
ML20140B839	List: IA-84-717, Discusses Allegation 4-83-A-86 ML20140B834 ML20140G471 ML20140G481 ML20140G486 ML20140G498 ML20140G517 ML20140G523 ML20140G528 ML20140G534 ML20140G540 ML20140G544 ML20140G550 ML20140G557 ML20140G563 ML20140G570 ML20140G576 ML20140G579 ML20140G584 ML20140G589 ML20140G593 ML20140G599
References
FOIA-84-717 NUDOCS 8507130245
Download: ML20140G534 (31)

Text

_

l t

~ Quality Assuranca Supervisor Waterford III Nuclear Flant P. O. BOX 782 Killona, 1.A 70066 RE: Rarassment of Quality Control Inspector On the above date, ]I was called for a heat number transfer onki

-On arrival, the craf t wasn't ready for Quality Control g"'-'

at L

.I was called for a fit-up inspection at same location. Notified L

]that there was a proble: with this package and had to check out the drawings.

Told foreman _that I was going to QC office to check our drawings out.

Cet a call fro C._ _ _ on radio to cone to QC basc.

Unen 1 got there he state 3 that. '% s t the Heck was I holding his job up for the last hour".

I was a t QC base I _.

Tne c.an started yelling at se concerning.this job.

I showed hi'c the pac age and told hin it was very vague and not enough information.

I'd back away free hit and Ralph Powers __ was trying to make end meet.

The siteg I ear (_

verbilly

.Y h

~ ~ ~

say, "he was Eoing to hang the son of a bitch" (ryself).

Tai's~has been going or for the last couple of weeks. Be would call us down, r:yself and Q C

!for inspecion and the vp Tne workers would 's'ay te us, '%'e told hie C_rkers voult pever be ready.

I

_ ve weren't ready".

Ee 's rushing the v:riert st.ich it. retujT. brings out bed veri..

Tnis is not the first tice I've had c prollen with{

-~~ C The can hac raised heck concerning wrong. T] Problems and.'Ghen you sh~ov bie the proble=, he still says we are~ 7 appare Pro:edura the fieli are woifilig to, yet he continues to tell his men, Don't worry about Q, Ec'11 take care of the:a when the time arises.

Every day the man I feel i

continues to harasse me while I'm doing my job.

I feel there should be something done know about this problec. Tne men has made cements to his l

fore =an concerning Procedure Reading List, not to worry about them, read,15 1 cinutes, sleep 15 minutes.

Foreman made this statement to bothf ~

"f and myself.

?

0507130245 850502 PDR FDIA PDR BER,NADEB4-717

. _ _. w' r

)

{,

CC**

E. MOT.EIS E0'n'AF.D, DITIOTOT. F20 ION IV 0171CI OT 1EETECTIO:: M.T. D?TOhCEMD:7 t.S. h*.'C' T.JJ. ILT ATOT*i C0t2:ISSION ~

M 011 EW.5 FLC.A DTJ\\*E, S?lT 1030 s

^

AT.'_IKOTO :, TDU.S 760j2

Pag? I cf 2 L..

E.

70:

FROM:

4:

RE: Alleged Harassment of a Quality Control Inspector RET-I

• E_R 2h.SNRCIEInformationNotice81-22,DatedJuly31, 1981 In response to your memo or the subject matter, I too am deeply concerned with this alleged incident of harassment.

This alleged incident was the subject of an impro=ptu meeting called b')

.z. -,. --.kx m - 2 Allegations, denials and agreement between both persons ensued. To reduce any further expansion of the problem I requested that I be allowed time to verify the documentation deficiency allegation. At this point both [

@ decided to immediately go to the field and check out the situation.

Today,[1 _

af ter ey visiting the Control Station in the field, to

~

verify the documentation problem.,Lreceived a tvpf_v;_i.t_ ten coonf_thr allegel c o:pl a:, nt o' harass =ent signed by U 3/

^

F-Soon thereafter I informed T

] that a meeting v ul oe convenec Tater in the day 'to ciscuss this all e g_e_d in c id e n t'.

The meeting convened at approxi=atel f 74r_ev_ office with V f

,and cTself in attendance.

P r~1 o r' t'e-

~

oeg:nt.:nf ol Ine meeting botn L,,

' were cognizant tne of the centents of the type written signed allegat:en.

-~:l *uct infe med ef th(.lleged ht assrs-- and tanded scid de:u en-on.

Afte:

a'.;egetec: plaint (-~ ~,7 denied all tc rea; and ce=ent exception. [,rtad int,the.tvas infermed by cyself that"I would be

~~

allegations without taking action in this matter today, but that I needed to listen to all other parties invclved and/or cited in the alleged harass:ent.

The meeting was ad-journeduntilf'

- ]

As you know I attended ygo r meeting on the subject allegation and listened to all parties present, f

ie[~

All parties involved confirmed and affirmed the statecents mace in t'he al'1h ation.

N L 3)

I&

P;ge 2 cf 2

__ ~

theb~~

eeting At approxicat

'the persons in attenda at at together with h t in my office. k*eighing

~

the allegation an confirming oral statements coupled w2th the oral affirca-tions ror the other parties involved, I took the action of reQvingf C fro: his present position, duties and involvement with{~

~

)

until urther notice.

To resolve this al' legation,through to a satisf actory conclusion 1 vish to teet with yourself sometime on C,, _.,'

7

- ~~

to review a schedule for the dictation of depositinn's 'oy all' _ parties invo17ed.

Attachment 7

cc:f

) (with attachment)

(with attachment) y (with attachment)

\\ (without attachment)

J (without attachment)

E. Morris Howard, Director Region IV Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Com=ission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive,, Suite 1000 Arlington, TX 76012 (with attachment) l L

-. _ _.. b J l

--=

DATE-70:

FRT':

_ _.- m --

SUEJECT: V

,C IE 1hTOBHATION NOTICE 81-22 m

/

Ihe attached letter from FF":iJ "$67hM 9-9h[_'95%'_.

,] relates a The. Letter reports on an inciden't,that causes situation that cannot be tolerated.

me great concern.

role in the functioning of inspection personnc1 on Attitudes play a very important a Nuclear Power Plant Site, and if these people feel harassed or in any way threatened with jogsecurity or physical haru, it is their duty to report this to their supervisor. gletter reflects such an attitude.

I had a discussion withh teday on this letter, during which he re-affirmed his written statements, as well as stating that he still feels harassed.

le d refers to in his letter resulted in confirnation Interviews with the p fro: the: astowhatt,_) reported.

They all stated they would be villing to sign statements to this eTiect.

Any escalation of the type This situation ca not go unaddressed or unresolved.

j of ettitude thatdnow has, or the ste:ttude on the part of field supervision'Y toward the Ficid'QO Technicians vill reflect in the ability for(i ~

to centinue to implement an ef fective Ouality Assurance Program ic chis jobsite.

Resolution cust be Your attention te thic catter is necessary without dcicy.

retche t er.d apprepriate actions tckce bcstd en your inves tigstion of the in:ident.

1 l'

W*

! i,

(

\\ ;

l A AUG 16 P-*

cc:

l lt h!

E N orris Howard, Director Region IV h

Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Co-Assion 611 Rycn Ple:t Drive, Suite 1000 l

t.rlington, Tcsas 7601

/\\

l

_o 4

/ y,z t

1 i

Attention:

f f

L 1

Ja

.i

~~'

Dear Sir:

The recent incident involvin is regretful by any standard of measure.

C I, as theI

[ ~_ ]~_T _

. _ ' have spoken to p__

g-2 / prior to the incident and was imprbssed his positive and r e s.s.ive#a t t itud e.

With this in mind I expressed my concern to(

-a

)regardin

);ualifications, also prior to the incidenf. My concer6s were base'd 'on the following:

-) has not worked at a Nuclear Site prior to A-]WaterfordIII.

I, Q

B -[_.__

/resu=e does not indicate he has experience in i

Tne field of instrumentation.

1

)has not been exposed te the re:;uirements of safety C '{ lated installations.

l l

re intention tg act as a, judge or jury regarding It is not the validity of the allegations toward -

f

/

l It is4.

~~ intention to meet our responsibility by responding to any and all'occurYE~nces that threaten the integrity of the Quality i

Program.

L--_- --

,, )rt sponse to the incident of subjectgas concluded to be in the best interests of the project, the client,r L-

"/

]

Weare.confidentthatthereareareaswithinthe(&

organization

[

vhere{~~~

' valuable experience can be utilized while expanding his expertise in the Nuclear field.

has reviewed the situatior and is certain th_at the re-

/

'[' iisit 11 at io n'o f

i vill have a disrupting ef fect within the organization anc propagate EIIe already

~~

f TC &

b C"'

lisnotcontro11*

th dangerous perception thad Quality Prograr,or p id Ibrees. For thi's reason we fin

, unacceptable to thensc~,'ZE.'

~ If

/

Sincerely, t

's L

C b

'i:

i

'sf, l

l i

l l

I y-

.--,,w--

g 4

,(,,,,3,, 9 J,. ~Mi

~

Y 2:

7 t

q e

l

~.

, :s J

,/

~

f

\\

~

Mf m W

ll N?h 8

l S

l l

hl Y'74 f simi# s&l

,Y e s

1

)

)

%=

l i

lity Assurance Supervisor Waterford III Nuclear glant P. O. BOX 782 1111ons, IA 70066 RE: Earassment of Quality Control Inspector On the above date, ]'I was called for a heat number transfer on Dn arrival, the cra.f t wasn't ready for Quality Control

~at L

.I was called for a fit-up inspection at same lotation. Notified L-

]thattherewasaproble:withthis package and had to check out the drawings.

Told foreman _that I v_as. going to Q: office to check our drawings out.

Cet a call fro C

_ -d on radio to cene to QC base.

Enen I got there he stateE that, ' Vast the Heck vas I holding his job up for the last hour".

I was at QC base [~~

Tne nan started yelling at se concerning.this job.

I showed hi'c the pac age and told him it was very vague and not enough information.

I'd back away free hi cud Ralph Powers was trying to make end meet.

The site f '

~

.F lhear d verbilly say, "He was going to hang the son of a bitTh" (ryself).

Tri1Y has been going

~

~

or for the 1est couple of weeks.

Be would call us down, nyself and Q

}for inspecion and the yp ~ ~

ve weren't recdv".

He 's rushing

[

would say te us, "We told hin [rkers woult pever be ready.

Tne workers the verkers vMeh in rety.p brings out bcd work.

Inis is not the first tine I've had c problen with{

l Tne can hac raised bcck concerning

~

wrong. [i areWE1Eg ~ to, yet he continues te tell his men and.W en you shov hit the problec, be still says we are e

n the fiel

, Don't worry about QC, Ee'll take care of the:a when the time arises.

Every day the man, I feel continues to harasse me while I'm doing ey job.

I feel there should be something done know about this proble=.

Tne men has made cotzsents to his fore =en concerning Procedure Reading List, not to worry about them, read 15 minutes, sleep 15 minutes.

Foremanmadethisstatementtobothf

~ ~ ~

"f and cyself.

?

i il

\\

t I

l 7

-..s c.

/

I E. Y.0EEIS E:T/AED. DIFICTOE REGION IV 1

OTTICI 07 INETICTION /r ENTORCDC2'I U.S.1TJC!I!J. FJJ:"J.TOEY C0t2:ISS105 I.

[

611 EY/J: FLC.A DT.IVE, S"IT 1000 e

ATJ INOTon, TIX/.S 76012

Pcg2 1 of 2 v,

~

y L. -

TO:

FRO.M :

(

RE: Alleged Harassment of a Quality Control Inspector REF:

I GW..

1:

2)NSNRCIEInformationNotice61-22,DatedJuly31, 198)

In response to your memo or the subject matter, I too am deeply concerned with this alleged incident of harassment.

}hisallegedincidentvasthesubject of an impromptu' meeting calle_d b'y 2 n_n.,,

=r

- =-

,3 Allegations, denials and agreement between both persons ensued. To reduce any further expansion of the problem I requested that I be allowed time to verify the documentation deficiency allegation. At this point both I

@ decided to immediately go to the field and check out the situation. ~

Today, b - _ ' " '

'after ey visiting the Control Station in the field, to verify the cocumentation problem, Lreceived a tvpf yri_t_ ten conv of the alle_ge1 co= plaint o' harassment signed by E w

}l A

Soon thereafter I informed b

{

] that_ a meeting vill De convenec Tliiter in the dado discuss this alleg_e_d incident. The meeting convened at approxicatelyf Tir_cv_ office e

with V f

.aiid U self in attendance.

PrTo:~ t c' oeginninfol t'nT meeting both L

' were cognizant tne of the contents of the type v:itten signed allegation.

~:b l_

i ar ' info =ed cf the allt re d haras tre r ar.f handed said d::cr.er:

After readin( the s'.'.eted cc ;1aint C ' 7 denied all tc read and co=er: on.

allegations without exception.[~

tvas infor:ed by myself that"I would be taking action in this matter today, but that I needed to listen to all other partiesinvolvedand/]orcitedintheallegedharassment.

The meeting was ad-journedunti1{

As you know I atterded yp r meeting on the subject allegation and listened to i

_all parties present, ief

~

f All parties involved confirmed and affirmed the statements made in the al'1k ation.

[bM

~2 b./

4

P:ge 2 cf 2 y

___.mm At approxiczt

'the persons in attendagge at thell[..

beeting

~

together with

~'gh t in my office. Weighing the allegation an confirming oral statements coupled with the oral affirma-tions fro: the other parties ir.volved, I took the action of re

• vangf#

jll(("[' fro: his present position, duties and involvement with

}~ ~

)

until urther notice.

To resolve this al' legation,through to a satisf actory c,onclusion I wish to q3et with yourself sometime on C,_ _ _,'

~,,,,,,

to review a schedule for the dictation of depositT6ns'oy ffl parties involv'ed.

l Attachment 3

cc:: 1

) (with attachment)

(with attachment)

(with attachment) 2 '",

\\ (without attachment) j (without attachment)

E. P. orris Bovard, Director Region IV Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Com=ission 611 Ryan Plaza Drivef, Suite 1000 Arlington, TX 76012 (with attachment)

- ~.,.N m

DATE:

10:

TROM:

C~

SUBJECT:

U sC IE Ih7ORMATION NOTICE B1-22

~ Tc!EM %$

'[f4AY - _

)relatesa

/

E The attached letter fro = F@*#':

Ine Aester reports on an incideft,that causes situation that cannot be rolerated.

me great concern.

Attitudes play a very important role in the functioning of inspection personnel on a Nuclear Power Plant Site, and if these people feel harassed or in any way security or physical harm, it is their duty to report this to threatened with jo their supervisor, gletter reflects such an attitude.

I had a discussion withL today on this letter, during which he re-affirned his written statements, as well as stating that he still feels harassed.

le b refers to in his lefter resulted in confirmation Interviews with the p fror,the: as to what

-~ reported. They all stated they would be villing to sign statements to this effect.

Anv escalation of the type This situation cannet ge unaddressed or unresolved.

of ettitude thatDnow has, or the attitude on the part of field supervision.-

in the ability forff toward the Field QO Technicians will reflectan ef fective Quality Assurance Program 'a to continue to ir:plement Resolution cust be Yeur attentice tc this ratter is necessary without delay.

retthed a.i apprepriate actions tckca bcstd en your inves tigctier. ef the intident.

l I

W-

• t t

t

, ;I 1

l

\\ :

}A AUG 1 6 r--

cc:

i',

I !

EIMorris Howard, Director Region IV Office of Inspection and Enforcement i

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Co-A ssion 611 Rycn Fle:t Drive, Suite 2000 t.rlington, Tczas 76012

/

I

h,1 i

i Attention:

{

t i

t Je-

.+.

s

Dear Sir:

~ ~

The recent incident involvin is regretful by any standard of measure.

C

~ ~ ~ '

I as the have spoken to 3'.

prior to the incident and was impressed by his positive and

^

-as res,s.ive" attitude.

With this _in mind I expressed my concern to(

)regardin hualifications, also prior to the incidenf. My concerns were base'd bn the following:

A -] ___ _

has not worked at a Nuclear Site prior to Waterford III.

1, 4

B -f

/resu=e does not indicate he has experience in Tne field of instrumentation.

C-

')has not been exposed :: the re:;uirements of safety related iiista11ations.

' intention to,act as a judge or jury regarding I

It is not the validity of the allegations toward f

_ }

is f _,._ _

~~ ~

'fintention to meet our responsibility by responding Itto any and all occurYEIices that threaten the integrity of the Quality Progra=.

f __ _ _

Iesponsetotheincident of subjectgas concluded to be in the best 'in'terests of the project, the client,r L__

'/

Weare.confidentthatthereareareaswithinthe(,.

organization

' valuable experience can be utslized while expanding where {itise in the Nuclear field.

his expe

l has reviewed the situation and is certain that the re-

/

' 'n's't a n a t io n'o f' vill have i

a disrupting eflect within the organica::en anc propagate 1 e already

~

f 7C A

b lisnotcontro11in th "r dangerous perception tha -

Quality Program or _@ld fbrees. For thi's reason we find unacceptable to the-w.2 'Z2E '

f TJ

/

Sincerely, i

j i

6* Se '

y.

ai

• sj

,l., u '

-/

a' i

1 e

r-,

e r,

e

o

SUBJECT:

ALLEGED, HARASSMEKr, 07, A,QC. IRSPKC,T,0A,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

l I

I l

l i.

s' vill not be reassigned Ir. keep h with your reque (seeReference3),(u to the s

-V l

l kYOY 0

-7,

(>-)

m 2 7,4fa e 3 h

p as

<- qw /er-as'Ae&JaspA-s#z6 -

/~

$ /

+@E iiiiii EA

/*

)

> m.,~+ & 4,* v ' 6 ~

,u-fy s.

~ ~,,swo n -ca hs f&

W W&'//

d?

i;/.

. as u

l

-ee s,e. n = :

-7

~

.e.,

e-

,,,.ph, h 5_

l%h.Mi I

.... f~

L?

lX o

f PC. h.

l f.;l. 4 n

er brass

~>4 b

54,s wa~e a

v4 wRc 1

g;,

ln gj g Q'

- - r- '

~

s m..

'~

/

v

~.

MEMORANDUM Previous edttions usable

_i OF CALL MEMORANDUM OF CALL Previous editions usable TO' i C.

OV OA A

To:

s WERE VISITED BY-Q

[ yOti ' PE CALLED By.

b C vce wEcE Ct LLEC E*-

I YOc V.ERE VISITED EY-

'b

)

0F(

l

]Pt.EAS HONE >

FTS Ov0N PLE ASE PHONE >

FTS AUTOVON O WiLL CAtt AGAiN O is waiting To sco vou a

wtSHES AN APPOINTMENT b WILL CALL AGAIN h RETURNED YOUR CALL IS WAITING TO SEE YOU MESSAGE RETURNED YOUR CALL WISHES AN APPOINTMENT M ESSAGE y

2 7 ggy 3

Ng

• T

/.

W [Y ggcgivto ev I#E

DATE

)1

/

Ow"

=

//l44 c

=

/

T sML

?

RLClev00By DATL

/

63 110 NSN 7540-00 634-401E QAND ARD F p C e L,s. G.7.C.1992 3r t.529.*219 FPMR (41 CFR) 103-11.6

-e N(UON _.fWQC0@QQ@ Q@QC3 GD 60300. 0033

4

.!~

O Q

. g...

b Ls

-?.h'...

<(

s s

' 'I

)

_Ndh.,.,

~

~~

I D

l

'. www.

j v

x....

7 hab a 3

tl'

= _.

d&

wldW 6

-xd, du,/$

dT @ X m s-edigdhh

% (* ~ 6 y-b4 %d

'd C

/

j w (Q car,cq w 4

> Ce dJJi d: i dd hw toe.rc 1

3

• . s%,,.

kQC( -** $ k U % Q g, 4y

(%

/g i

& an n n 4 va! w w he e : v;::

~-

t WA*GMs.,. w

.2

v.. : s:.",,

Io r(vfy. [gQ

u. 5 j

T6 sude I e J.1 0 8 l

ier c3 nen; todc/

1:,

6as

-e L

),\\i\\ -

g6 bE m Vs bV k

" ". e!

ud..ddd h &<d a

w,&

..he u

(zg y uuws we-q Q

.D*MM

l

' OM v....

<h k.o al tu e, 4,.s m, <

O

'I da jla z( - ~ ~ ~

9 e

n

, x5 ucqo s

[s (V <k6

,O o

- w r s

-,A ucw,

~c

'O 4

i-c.k.

M t4.,1 v - %.

hE k,4,) dwatt[

(t

&C N(f @ CM 0

- +

.s -

a, a a e

toc TM DCC ' < [ d tko slg a d /c !ca.an LL i t o m't us v m,6. vcA'r tu.

't ?

h

~

y

.i web

..y c o ~,c k hwc) l w

o r

L

% ~

L'd t,

i g[cs w meu,by' b A

O wave d 4 p*

t 1

- dw cLs 'd

%, <,d,4 nn ny 9

y e

4,

t.

. p,.

=r

,.N78 Llb -

l

()

b r'

if.,

^

UNITED STATES f

i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

(

W ASHINGTON. D.C. 20656 0FFICE OF

/

INVESTIGATIONS g( /

'E T l

s E

u-

=

m

~

%. f.

LJ/

&npk(.ug (

A' D

s a

9 M

{.'h e.w g

• ru.:

.e.

-. y r_ Q @' y d $

_. e N

e W

a e'

~. y

-e 9*

• %s.-,.;,,. -

~. ?.?

M,;,.

c wq3.

~~

xE4 b &.- w w

O rm h, UNITED STATES z

[

p ts i 14 s

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

%{

WASHINGTON. Dr 20555 (Q Q OFFICE OF DNVESTIGATIONS e

1 0

~

m g, y _Q Sv sp.

m s-

~

c NEC z

u W $

)u'edsud %

N youx-L y.

i.

m..t

~

+. me*

• J s

f y'

g M

f>

• • t *~ lJCL u Q)9 vg z

'y M

3..

7

' M'.

--. 4 y=

Nh$^&'

. _x _-. s.wmr-m

-r s'..

?'

A

+.

-v".

M.-

.,- _.,. =..--

^

r

' A h..

%5 ~

,

~;-,,,

O r '*

c

-N..xx$

_s__-rue -- _ _.

g.

g

• k

"( 4.

b E' #M__

C%

['

p 19 6 4 mt z.

mt yJ #t.

CA

< h..u-

'C W

y W

cdt

1. 1J.7 hra b %

m,

u.

e~

"i.

a

~., m.....

_ ~ - u ;-

M c_-,

• * ^ ir - - _, 6, k

M

~

k k fr+: hz

')( s...e,arte_d -

e 1-a - -.m o.E0_ ctM

'h A pvc k;t

- T~ w c_a.u. -tc.0_Q 3%

1. ~ x.

r-

-k,

}

.p M (u n 3- ~

~~

e M*.k

• J

^ ' '

g f

a.Nnp,%>e 3D%

e?

cLu ch.L$c vA q

cu] w,4uj

./

/

.c

)M e,/

//

tA_O. b

- ~ - - - - -

- -. _ C "I k G4]

~

y

<c,: k d k c.p w o'4 g h m wvcsv q Y

re.>u Q h w t s. >

u zwsd -tet.Q w %

.7 es. c ci

+3 n

9 YM j 'ud St "N

" '1

..a e s

'+(% Y

\\

f v-o cc. w s M'.- 3 N G 'l C.

e

bc.

h w<

%d.

c D

+uo buwg Tum @u.

gb.0 h.

Co

- n J

"I,4 s wSW 69 e

Q VA.4 %M dCAC

$O TOOI ob h

W j

R 9"'

p es 4

fu d ew vg

_%~

mm g

.c %

Qth

% 3<

I S.... - a j. =

u_Q. J...... g 0

4.

-1

.r w4 hp at bsLu dw hu at u

+dc 3Gi_L w (.M m 9 b s,

er

>- ax_)

w.=

{33Y2 l

(? '

[ ac n w,,

bs kuc

~

~

F e-

~

ha uc w ds t L

=

7

".as

?3e

. g.:

4A

'9

.a-i 6*

L.

}-11-b Me c.

3

.{Ni[E

^'

(

~

e a.c @

7 tkcsc Q

as a-u.

< + n

" /S % %/ qi3[

n/qu ogs t$

kc-

'Sm ewysP-PN l ' ' T _. '\\ 1.)

'I y

l d

,n,.

c-r.

. --nus hw

,r' WH Q

y'

% ~:

J,

~

~*4

\\

'5W Q b Y~

L~

"e Y

M.'

yLLL Ab 1

WN U

h wqd Mu 9 % tr sd 621 d m 2 h-m da+ km W

j gp

~

.i b

/,s f.--

V y,.

m

8 9

g 9

9 9

..; - ~

w. -

,.u-n

.. a

- -y

.f

' ~ ~ ~

'N *

. w"

~

b

/s h C

ws 4

4 cea.u-tEGA y w.

w a:-

wakl y 20 lu dy 3 5% M

-r D

ya... -

1 5;. ?

W-

-. - ~

k,qs SCT cdqth-- tobed u co.d b k

) cm hw - dcd L. 4m

-~~

~.

k S

I 3..

I i

e

--[-

~'

w O

r-n47 l

)

, a',,,K

, 3...., 9.. -

)(

q cet=.--.

.., y;'

• TM4 TInul,

.i31,

/

wp Q

') =&d

~%

r % %...

wew r<w 4,J

.P w cf-r a%c $ cl, t,o (C-s I

%s &s xqfv $ gk %*

cc 9

s~

\\

~....

(e t

k

g..

e 6

e e

q-2t43 dd9-h W{3bc b be.ck u(IR g+ S, y

p w

.=

(,xd m,g%

4 a

%su

)

%% Qw Em b

Ih45{C %@Q

=

3

-)

4 m

S 4 ct-

< V\\A@v "N

nEs l

f mbd ((

d<b.v. 5 MCf25

\\.

~ ~ ~ - --

)

~

-2 cedWi4 Ch-

\\

d ci.. 9x5(<'..

Ts FDes cf W

) 3 kas vesua,g

\\- t 0

p f

q ) k'[ d l

g

~7 g h Q..

.k 9

\\,

V g v itt.

3-e

\\

k (w

[

f

O O

W o

e te

,.m _q A W. 9

, u-ay

<. m s

m hf M,,9 fcq 4

su_

de')

U dh. @ gt geba"*

aad

• "(,fe

/ge p

q s

ea J%

439 c#

s d

(sc

.Y M

d 7) p.

'-gue

,,eu{ )

)

'^

ego

}

s 4?

f

.f 33t jo.#(""h a

4 v!c(c

\\

h W9 s (o' yc -

7 o

,dW {

d4 g (,

a\\t

l c.

~

l 7 -h 1]

haq.w'20;9gE 5'

d

/

LQ c

/

a4g-

, k. '.

w ga E6%c

"(

m u

'(

s C

h Q

N SE

- (

W h

h b

M N

j

>m 1

t cLA

• Oc c

$a di i

Qg e

i

- p c

$ (> ul q

[

1

y_

m e

1\\

/

% 5i o gG N

.g '

M d

y:

w-p y

k a"

?..q"j j

f

~

W js hs

~

b' t

5e > Lc,

%e

/

W *Aaff l$

rd e

1 y'y v

) (N a[D a.(s fa C 1

u Qk.

\\

3

1. p qu e

d (Ud

-4f

/

66

( I.2 e

Y 9

f.-

2

>V W y

w q

s

-M f

N

..s A

Allegation No.

ALLEGATION REVIEW ALLEGATION IN REGARD TO HARASSMENT OF QUALITY CONTROL

SUBJECT:

INSPECTOR DOCKET NO.

Waterford 3 (DN: 50-382)

.L...____-.--...-.

ALLEGER NAME:

1 ADDRESS:

1

- - ~...

TELE. NO:

Mo PNoiar

• POSITION / TITLE:

~

DETAILS:

C c ' ' ;' ' ' ' ' k DJ 'J C 'J k r t riv rr e c wG oc trL C m

u-3w

'~

^

id 2 15 N07 LL) O L rc *rJ C I~' E A ~'*=C*'

'h

~-

O g

.a ris i:

P A'v i-h r. J E.

Action Assigned To:

Disposition:

Y

-