ML20129J520: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 14: Line 14:
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
| project = TAC:52793
| stage = Approval
}}
}}


Line 24: Line 26:


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
RANCHO SEC0 NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION - GENERIC LETTER 83-28 ITEM 1.1 POST TRIP REVIEW By letter dated April 15, 1985, we transmitted to you our Safety Evaluation Report (SER) on the results of our review of the information you provided for the Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station in response to Item 1.1 of Generic Letter 83-20 (Post Trip Review). In our letter, we noted that you had not submitted a systematic safety assessment program to assess unscheduled reactor trips (SER Section III E). We further noted that except for this, we found your Post-Trip Review Program and Procedures for Rancho Seco acceptable.
RANCHO SEC0 NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION - GENERIC LETTER 83-28 ITEM 1.1 POST TRIP REVIEW By {{letter dated|date=April 15, 1985|text=letter dated April 15, 1985}}, we transmitted to you our Safety Evaluation Report (SER) on the results of our review of the information you provided for the Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station in response to Item 1.1 of Generic Letter 83-20 (Post Trip Review). In our letter, we noted that you had not submitted a systematic safety assessment program to assess unscheduled reactor trips (SER Section III E). We further noted that except for this, we found your Post-Trip Review Program and Procedures for Rancho Seco acceptable.
By letter dated May 31, 1985, you provided the requested information. We have reviewed the information and found it acceptable. This completes our review of Item 1.1 of Generic Letter 83-28. Our re"ised SER is enclosed for your information.
By {{letter dated|date=May 31, 1985|text=letter dated May 31, 1985}}, you provided the requested information. We have reviewed the information and found it acceptable. This completes our review of Item 1.1 of Generic Letter 83-28. Our re"ised SER is enclosed for your information.
Sincerely,
Sincerely,
                                                         ' o.n a n.c 3. u. . > t Joun. slw=
                                                         ' o.n a n.c 3. u. . > t Joun. slw=

Latest revision as of 08:17, 10 August 2022

Forwards Revised SER on Systematic Safety Assessment Program to Assess Unscheduled Reactor Trips Per Generic Ltr 83-28, Item 1.1 Re post-trip Review.Program Acceptable.Review of Item 1.1 of Generic Ltr 83-28 Completed
ML20129J520
Person / Time
Site: Rancho Seco
Issue date: 07/03/1985
From: Stolz J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Reinaldo Rodriguez
SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
Shared Package
ML20129J522 List:
References
GL-83-28, TAC-52793, NUDOCS 8507230107
Download: ML20129J520 (2)


Text

- _ _ . _.

Jul. 0 3 1985 Docket No. 50-312 DISTRIBUTION Docket

  • File JPartlow NRC PDR ACRS-10 L PDR RIngram Mr. Ronald J. Rodriguez ORB #4 Rdg SMiner Assistant General Manager, Nuclear HThompson Gray File Sacramento Municipal Utility District 0 ELD EBrach 6201 S Street EJordan H0rnstein P. O. Box 15830 BGrimes Sacramento, California 95813

Dear Mr. Rodriguez:

SUBJECT:

RANCHO SEC0 NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION - GENERIC LETTER 83-28 ITEM 1.1 POST TRIP REVIEW By letter dated April 15, 1985, we transmitted to you our Safety Evaluation Report (SER) on the results of our review of the information you provided for the Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station in response to Item 1.1 of Generic Letter 83-20 (Post Trip Review). In our letter, we noted that you had not submitted a systematic safety assessment program to assess unscheduled reactor trips (SER Section III E). We further noted that except for this, we found your Post-Trip Review Program and Procedures for Rancho Seco acceptable.

By letter dated May 31, 1985, you provided the requested information. We have reviewed the information and found it acceptable. This completes our review of Item 1.1 of Generic Letter 83-28. Our re"ised SER is enclosed for your information.

Sincerely,

' o.n a n.c 3. u. . > t Joun. slw=

John F. Stolz, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #4 Division of Licensing

Enclosures:

As Stated cc w/ enclosures:

See next page ORB #4:Dl/7 :DL SMiner;fi/j z 7/J/85 7 85 -

8507230107 050703 DR ADOCK0500g2 L _ _ _ _ ._______________

Mr. R. J. Rodriguez Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Sacramento Municipal Utility District Station cc:

Mr. David S. Kaplan, Secretary Sacramento County and General Counsel Board of Supervisors Sacramento Municipal Utility 827 7th Street, Room 424 District Sacramento, California 95814

'6201 S Street P. O. Box 15830 Ms. Helen Hubbard Sacramento, California 95813 P. O. Box 63 Sunol, California 94586 Thomas Baxter, Esq.

Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 1800 M Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20036 Mr. Robert B. Borsum Babcock & Wilcox Nuclear Power Generation Division Suite 220, 7910 Woodmont Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Resident Inspector / Rancho Seco c/o U. S. N. R. C.

14410 Twin Cities Road -

Herald, California 95638 Regional Administrator, Region V U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Director Energy Facilities Siting Division

Energy Resources Conservation &

Development Consnission 1516 - 9th Street Sacramento, California 95814 Mr. Joseph 0. Ward, Chief Radiological Health Branch State Department of Health Services 714 P Street, Office Building #8 Sacramento, California 95814 Mr. Joseph Findaro California State Office 444 North Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 305 Washington, D.C. 20003

. _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ . - - _ . _ _ _ _ - - - . _ . - _ __