ML20237G531

Informs of NRC Plans to Conduct Onsite Review of Plant Maint & Training Programs Beginning on 870929.Lists of Tasks for Accredited Programs Should Be Submitted by 870814.Types of Documentation That Should Be Made Available at Site Listed

ML20237G531
Person / Time
Site:	Rancho Seco
Issue date:	08/11/1987
From:	Kalman G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Andognini G SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
References
TAC-65896, NUDOCS 8708140113
Download: ML20237G531 (3)

Text

. , - _ . - . __ .____ -_ ___ ____ _ _ ___ -. __ . _ _ _ _ __

<..s. ,.

11 AUG 1987

' Docket No.: 50-312 DISTRIBUTION

• Docket; File a

~

Mr. J. Carl Andognini . .

NRC & Loc 51"PDRs Chief Executive Officer, Nuclear PD5 Plant File l Sacramento Municipal Utility District GHolahan 6201 S. Street JLee Post Office Box 15830 GKalman Sacramento, California 95852-1830 OGC-Bethesda

. EJordan

Dear Mr. Andognini:

JPartlow ACRS(10)

SUBJECT:

TRAINING PROGRAM REVIEW Beginning September 29, 1987, the NRC staff plans to conduct an onsite review of the Rancho Seco Training Programs. This review will include a post-accreditation evaluation. We expect to conclude the onsite review and conduct an exit briefing .on the afternoon of October 1,1987.

The staff will select tasks for review from the Rancho Seco accredited training program as well as from the maintenance training program. The task lists for the accredited programs should be submitted to the NRC project manager prior to the site visit. We will select tasks from the programs that we will review and inform you of our selection before the week of September 28 so that training material specific to these tasks will be readily available.

The task lists should be submitted by August 14, 1987. The review will focus on: (1) how the tasks were analyzed, (2) how training objectives were derived from the' task, (3) hcw training for the tasks was designed, developed, and implemented, (4) how trainees were observed and evaluated during training to determine their level of task mastery, and (5) how feedback on training, trainee evaluations, and on-the-job performance indicators are incorporated into revision and evaluation of the training programs.

The following is a general list of the types of documentation that should be I available at the site which we will use to answer questions about the d licensee's training programs:

Instructions / Procedures related to:

- Systematic methods used to analyze jobs, Training organization goals, objectives, and plans, Responsibilities / authority of training organization personnel, Methods of evaluating / selecting instructional materials, methods, )

and media, Methods for organizing / sequencing of training, Methods for keeping training programs current, Maintenance of training records, Selection of candidates for training and the granting of waivers / exemptions from training, ,

Evaluation of training programs, and 1 Training, qualification, and evaluation of instructors. l l

8700140113 070011 2 PDR ADDCK 0500 P

i

g -

aa .

Task lists for the job (s) being reviewed Documentation related to:

- Development / validation of task lists.

- Selection of tasks for formal training,

- Analysis of-on-the-job performance problems and industry events, j and Evaluation / audits of the training programs (s).

Roster / organization chart for the training organization Training schedule for the past 6 months and the next 6 months Final accreditation team report To assist the review-team, the person who coordinated the licensee's efforts >

toward accreditation should be available. In addition, any other cognizant training personnel involved with both the accredited programs and the maintenance program should be available to answer questions or clarify issues that are not readily apparent through document review. Trainees and job incumbents will be interviewed.

The purpose of this review is to provide an evaluation of the Rancho Seco training programs prior to restart as well as to monitor the effectiveness of the INP0 accreditation program. This type of review is consistent with the provisions of NRC's Policy Statement on training and qualifications of power plant personnel.

Original signed W George Kalman, Project Manager Project Directorate V Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects tkK DRSP/D:PDV DRS/fDV GK plan:cd GWKnighton 187 /If/87 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY i

- - -- -------- - _ -- _ --- - - - - - _ - A

Mr. G. Carl Andognini Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Chief Executive Officer, Nuclear Station Sacramento Municipal Utility District CC' Mr. David S. Kaplan, Secretary Mr. John Bartus and General' Counsel Ms. JoAnne Scott-Sacramento Municipal Utility Federal Energy Regulatory Commission District' 825 North Capitol Street, N. E.

6201 S Street Washington, D.C. 20426 P. O. Box 15830

-Sacramento, California 95813 Thomas A. Baxter, Esq.

Shaw,.Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 2300 N Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20037 Mr. John V. Vinguist Acting Manager, Nuclear Licensing Sacramento Municipal Utility District Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station 14440 Twin Cities Road Herald, California 95638-9799 Mr. Robert B..Borsum Babcock & Wilcox Nuclear Power Generation Division Suite 220, 7910 Woodmont Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Resident Inspector / Rancho Seco c/o'U. S. N. R. C.

14440 Twin Cities Road Herald, California 95638 Regional Administrator, Region V U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Mr.' Joseph 0. Ward, Chief Radiological Health Branch State Department of Health Services 714 P Street, Office Building #8 Sacramento, California 95814 i

Sacramento County Board of Supervisors  !

827 7th Street, Room 424 Sacramento, California 95814 Ms. Helen Hubbard P. O. Box 63 Sunol, California 94586 l

_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _